Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m confused by what would even occur in a court case about this. Not being happy with an MCPS decision isn’t the same thing as the decision being illegal. Thinking that the decision isn’t fair because it lowers property centers isn’t the same thing as being illegal.
What about the decision making process was illegal according to the folks who have retained the lawyers?
They don't expect to win on the merits. They want to try to delay things long enough to convince MCPS that it is easier to give in. It is easier to implement policies that affect poor kids because their parents don't have money to throw at lawyers.
And the rest of us HATE the Wootton families already, for wasting money needed for things other than legal fees on this nonsense: you wanted a new school, you got a new school. It's just 3 miles down the road, so get over yourselves and stop wasting our tax dollars
Anonymous wrote:Why do any of you care? Serious question. Yall are on this thread continuously crashing out over something yall claim have zero merit, going as far as saying parents are pocketing donations. How about just not caring and living your own lives?
I don’t have a dog in the fight but I can see why some parents are upset, and they have every right to file a lawsuit. Good for them!
Just let this play out. Dont know why yall are so bothered all the time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Something was already filed last month.
And the org is registered.
Yawn. Please stop talking if you have no idea what you are talking about.
So you're saying they lost their status already?
https://onestop.md.gov/list_views/62f3e1797f7e3200016a3dab
What’s the name?
CEPA — Community and Education Policy Alliance
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Something was already filed last month.
And the org is registered.
Yawn. Please stop talking if you have no idea what you are talking about.
So you're saying they lost their status already?
https://onestop.md.gov/list_views/62f3e1797f7e3200016a3dab
What’s the name?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m confused by what would even occur in a court case about this. Not being happy with an MCPS decision isn’t the same thing as the decision being illegal. Thinking that the decision isn’t fair because it lowers property centers isn’t the same thing as being illegal.
What about the decision making process was illegal according to the folks who have retained the lawyers?
They don't expect to win on the merits. They want to try to delay things long enough to convince MCPS that it is easier to give in. It is easier to implement policies that affect poor kids because their parents don't have money to throw at lawyers.
And the rest of us HATE the Wootton families already, for wasting money needed for things other than legal fees on this nonsense: you wanted a new school, you got a new school. It's just 3 miles down the road, so get over yourselves and stop wasting our tax dollars
If you look at the save Wootton leadership it’s not even Wootton current to soon to be families.
No, it’s people concerned about their property values. That’s it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m confused by what would even occur in a court case about this. Not being happy with an MCPS decision isn’t the same thing as the decision being illegal. Thinking that the decision isn’t fair because it lowers property centers isn’t the same thing as being illegal.
What about the decision making process was illegal according to the folks who have retained the lawyers?
They don't expect to win on the merits. They want to try to delay things long enough to convince MCPS that it is easier to give in. It is easier to implement policies that affect poor kids because their parents don't have money to throw at lawyers.
And the rest of us HATE the Wootton families already, for wasting money needed for things other than legal fees on this nonsense: you wanted a new school, you got a new school. It's just 3 miles down the road, so get over yourselves and stop wasting our tax dollars
If you look at the save Wootton leadership it’s not even Wootton current to soon to be families.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m confused by what would even occur in a court case about this. Not being happy with an MCPS decision isn’t the same thing as the decision being illegal. Thinking that the decision isn’t fair because it lowers property centers isn’t the same thing as being illegal.
What about the decision making process was illegal according to the folks who have retained the lawyers?
They don't expect to win on the merits. They want to try to delay things long enough to convince MCPS that it is easier to give in. It is easier to implement policies that affect poor kids because their parents don't have money to throw at lawyers.
And the rest of us HATE the Wootton families already, for wasting money needed for things other than legal fees on this nonsense: you wanted a new school, you got a new school. It's just 3 miles down the road, so get over yourselves and stop wasting our tax dollars
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m confused by what would even occur in a court case about this. Not being happy with an MCPS decision isn’t the same thing as the decision being illegal. Thinking that the decision isn’t fair because it lowers property centers isn’t the same thing as being illegal.
What about the decision making process was illegal according to the folks who have retained the lawyers?
They don't expect to win on the merits. They want to try to delay things long enough to convince MCPS that it is easier to give in. It is easier to implement policies that affect poor kids because their parents don't have money to throw at lawyers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Something was already filed last month.
And the org is registered.
Yawn. Please stop talking if you have no idea what you are talking about.
So you're saying they lost their status already?
https://onestop.md.gov/list_views/62f3e1797f7e3200016a3dab
Anonymous wrote:I’m confused by what would even occur in a court case about this. Not being happy with an MCPS decision isn’t the same thing as the decision being illegal. Thinking that the decision isn’t fair because it lowers property centers isn’t the same thing as being illegal.
What about the decision making process was illegal according to the folks who have retained the lawyers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Insane that some people seem to literally think MCPS and its PR team would waste their time on this forum. The board and Taylor are living rent free in your paranoid little heads.
Actually, MCPS does post on DCUM.
Whatever you say.Anonymous wrote:Something was already filed last month.
And the org is registered.
Yawn. Please stop talking if you have no idea what you are talking about.
Anonymous wrote:Insane that some people seem to literally think MCPS and its PR team would waste their time on this forum. The board and Taylor are living rent free in your paranoid little heads.