Anonymous wrote:A Republican willing to take responsibility for a grave error. How rare!
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5778358-john-kennedy-iran-school-strike/
Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) on Tuesday said a strike on an all-girls school in Iran that killed around 175 people, which President Trump blamed on Tehran, was a mistake.
Airstrikes hit the Shajarah Tayyebeh elementary school in Minab in southern Iran on Feb. 28, when the U.S.-Israeli joint strikes began in the region. The military operation also attacked a nearby Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps naval base, according to an analysis from The Associated Press.
The research and satellite images showed that the strikes appeared to come from the U.S.
“I mean, we’re investigating, but I’m not going to hide behind that,” Kennedy said on “The Arena” with CNN’s Kasie Hunt. “I think that it was a terrible, terrible mistake.”
“The investigation may prove me wrong, I hope so,” he continued. “The kids are still dead. But I think it was a horrible, horrible mistake.”
The Louisiana Republican noted the strike likely “wasn’t intentional,” apologized for it and then called it “the sort of thing Russia does.”
“And when you make a mistake, you ought to admit it,” he added later. “Most people understand no one’s perfect, but I don’t think our men and women who are fighting for us did it intentionally. I’ll never believe that.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since the troll poster has requested more information from the WSJ, I'm happy to oblige with a gift link. There's a very clear satellite picture showing just how close the school is to the base. Anyone claiming that this school wasn't very much adjacent to the military base - and previously a part of it - is nutty.
The school is located on the edge of a compound linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, an elite branch of Iran’s armed forces, according to an analysis of images by The Wall Street Journal. There are indications the school building had previously been used as an IRGC headquarters, the official said.
The Journal analysis of satellite and open-source images shows the building was next to, and possibly part of, a compound linked to the IRGC. Farzin Nadimi, a senior fellow at the Washington Institute specializing in Iran’s military, said visual clues such as the size, number and arrangement of structures support the assessment that the site was a base, though there was little to suggest to him that it was an important one.
Google Maps identifies one building as a “cultural complex” of the IRGC, where young members play sports and train, Nadimi said. The compound also has a medical facility. A photograph pinned to the location on Google Maps shows a sign that says, “Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy Medical Command.”
https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/iran-us-school-strike-07d8ffac?st=o8z38t&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
Being "close to" a base is no excuse for bombing a school. No one would be saying "oh that's ok, it's understandable they killed my kid" if their kid was killed because they attended one of the 150 DoED schools co-located on a military base.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why did these parents send their girls to a school next to a military facility. So close it used to be part of the facility?
No one on this board does that. I guarantee.
Really? Why don't you send your name and what you'll pay with your guarantee since you're incorrect. There are 150+ Department of Defense schools co-located with military bases that thousands of American kids attend.
Don’t forget the base daycares and family housing located on our military bases that are nestled in or adjacent to civilian communities.
+1 This school had been fenced off from a military base since 2016. There is nothing in international law that justifies bombing kids during wars.
And there is nothing in the satellite imagery that would indicate this was a school. Sorry. You'll have to move on at some point.
New York Times reporting says otherwise. No one cares about your anonymous opinion, and no one is going to "move on" about a massive error that killed 150 kids.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/11/us/politics/iran-school-missile-strike.html
The top line finding of the internal military investigation mirrors a growing body of public evidence that clearly suggests U.S. responsibility.
Satellite imagery, social media posts and verified videos assembled by The Times visual investigation team indicate that the school was severely damaged by a precision strike that occurred around the same time as attacks on the naval base. A Times analysis showed that base was hit again within around two hours of the first strikes.
Anonymous wrote:Since the troll poster has requested more information from the WSJ, I'm happy to oblige with a gift link. There's a very clear satellite picture showing just how close the school is to the base. Anyone claiming that this school wasn't very much adjacent to the military base - and previously a part of it - is nutty.
The school is located on the edge of a compound linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, an elite branch of Iran’s armed forces, according to an analysis of images by The Wall Street Journal. There are indications the school building had previously been used as an IRGC headquarters, the official said.
The Journal analysis of satellite and open-source images shows the building was next to, and possibly part of, a compound linked to the IRGC. Farzin Nadimi, a senior fellow at the Washington Institute specializing in Iran’s military, said visual clues such as the size, number and arrangement of structures support the assessment that the site was a base, though there was little to suggest to him that it was an important one.
Google Maps identifies one building as a “cultural complex” of the IRGC, where young members play sports and train, Nadimi said. The compound also has a medical facility. A photograph pinned to the location on Google Maps shows a sign that says, “Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy Medical Command.”
https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/iran-us-school-strike-07d8ffac?st=o8z38t&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why did these parents send their girls to a school next to a military facility. So close it used to be part of the facility?
No one on this board does that. I guarantee.
Really? Why don't you send your name and what you'll pay with your guarantee since you're incorrect. There are 150+ Department of Defense schools co-located with military bases that thousands of American kids attend.
Don’t forget the base daycares and family housing located on our military bases that are nestled in or adjacent to civilian communities.
+1 This school had been fenced off from a military base since 2016. There is nothing in international law that justifies bombing kids during wars.
And there is nothing in the satellite imagery that would indicate this was a school. Sorry. You'll have to move on at some point.
New York Times reporting says otherwise. No one cares about your anonymous opinion, and no one is going to "move on" about a massive error that killed 150 kids.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/11/us/politics/iran-school-missile-strike.html
The top line finding of the internal military investigation mirrors a growing body of public evidence that clearly suggests U.S. responsibility.
Satellite imagery, social media posts and verified videos assembled by The Times visual investigation team indicate that the school was severely damaged by a precision strike that occurred around the same time as attacks on the naval base. A Times analysis showed that base was hit again within around two hours of the first strikes.
+1 Even Republicans are admitting this is a massive f*** up.
GOP senator on Iran school strike: ‘A terrible, terrible mistake’
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5778358-john-kennedy-iran-school-strike/
Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) on Tuesday said a strike on an all-girls school in Iran that killed around 175 people, which President Trump blamed on Tehran, was a mistake.
Airstrikes hit the Shajarah Tayyebeh elementary school in Minab in southern Iran on Feb. 28, when the U.S.-Israeli joint strikes began in the region. The military operation also attacked a nearby Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps naval base, according to an analysis from The Associated Press.
The research and satellite images showed that the strikes appeared to come from the U.S.
“I mean, we’re investigating, but I’m not going to hide behind that,” Kennedy said on “The Arena” with CNN’s Kasie Hunt. “I think that it was a terrible, terrible mistake.”
“The investigation may prove me wrong, I hope so,” he continued. “The kids are still dead. But I think it was a horrible, horrible mistake.”
The Louisiana Republican noted the strike likely “wasn’t intentional,” apologized for it and then called it “the sort of thing Russia does.”
“And when you make a mistake, you ought to admit it,” he added later. “Most people understand no one’s perfect, but I don’t think our men and women who are fighting for us did it intentionally. I’ll never believe that.”
That's good that the Senator at least apologized. Unlike dementia Trump who said the Iranians shot Tomahawk missiles that they didn't have at themselves and then said he knew nothing about the incident.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why did these parents send their girls to a school next to a military facility. So close it used to be part of the facility?
No one on this board does that. I guarantee.
Really? Why don't you send your name and what you'll pay with your guarantee since you're incorrect. There are 150+ Department of Defense schools co-located with military bases that thousands of American kids attend.
Don’t forget the base daycares and family housing located on our military bases that are nestled in or adjacent to civilian communities.
+1 This school had been fenced off from a military base since 2016. There is nothing in international law that justifies bombing kids during wars.
And there is nothing in the satellite imagery that would indicate this was a school. Sorry. You'll have to move on at some point.
New York Times reporting says otherwise. No one cares about your anonymous opinion, and no one is going to "move on" about a massive error that killed 150 kids.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/11/us/politics/iran-school-missile-strike.html
The top line finding of the internal military investigation mirrors a growing body of public evidence that clearly suggests U.S. responsibility.
Satellite imagery, social media posts and verified videos assembled by The Times visual investigation team indicate that the school was severely damaged by a precision strike that occurred around the same time as attacks on the naval base. A Times analysis showed that base was hit again within around two hours of the first strikes.
GOP senator on Iran school strike: ‘A terrible, terrible mistake’
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5778358-john-kennedy-iran-school-strike/
Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) on Tuesday said a strike on an all-girls school in Iran that killed around 175 people, which President Trump blamed on Tehran, was a mistake.
Airstrikes hit the Shajarah Tayyebeh elementary school in Minab in southern Iran on Feb. 28, when the U.S.-Israeli joint strikes began in the region. The military operation also attacked a nearby Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps naval base, according to an analysis from The Associated Press.
The research and satellite images showed that the strikes appeared to come from the U.S.
“I mean, we’re investigating, but I’m not going to hide behind that,” Kennedy said on “The Arena” with CNN’s Kasie Hunt. “I think that it was a terrible, terrible mistake.”
“The investigation may prove me wrong, I hope so,” he continued. “The kids are still dead. But I think it was a horrible, horrible mistake.”
The Louisiana Republican noted the strike likely “wasn’t intentional,” apologized for it and then called it “the sort of thing Russia does.”
“And when you make a mistake, you ought to admit it,” he added later. “Most people understand no one’s perfect, but I don’t think our men and women who are fighting for us did it intentionally. I’ll never believe that.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why did these parents send their girls to a school next to a military facility. So close it used to be part of the facility?
No one on this board does that. I guarantee.
Really? Why don't you send your name and what you'll pay with your guarantee since you're incorrect. There are 150+ Department of Defense schools co-located with military bases that thousands of American kids attend.
Don’t forget the base daycares and family housing located on our military bases that are nestled in or adjacent to civilian communities.
+1 This school had been fenced off from a military base since 2016. There is nothing in international law that justifies bombing kids during wars.
And there is nothing in the satellite imagery that would indicate this was a school. Sorry. You'll have to move on at some point.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/11/us/politics/iran-school-missile-strike.html
The top line finding of the internal military investigation mirrors a growing body of public evidence that clearly suggests U.S. responsibility.
Satellite imagery, social media posts and verified videos assembled by The Times visual investigation team indicate that the school was severely damaged by a precision strike that occurred around the same time as attacks on the naval base. A Times analysis showed that base was hit again within around two hours of the first strikes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why did these parents send their girls to a school next to a military facility. So close it used to be part of the facility?
No one on this board does that. I guarantee.
Really? Why don't you send your name and what you'll pay with your guarantee since you're incorrect. There are 150+ Department of Defense schools co-located with military bases that thousands of American kids attend.
Don’t forget the base daycares and family housing located on our military bases that are nestled in or adjacent to civilian communities.
+1 This school had been fenced off from a military base since 2016. There is nothing in international law that justifies bombing kids during wars.
Oh I'm so relieved to know that putting up a little chain link fence will stop missiles and blast debris in war time. /s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why did these parents send their girls to a school next to a military facility. So close it used to be part of the facility?
No one on this board does that. I guarantee.
Really? Why don't you send your name and what you'll pay with your guarantee since you're incorrect. There are 150+ Department of Defense schools co-located with military bases that thousands of American kids attend.
Don’t forget the base daycares and family housing located on our military bases that are nestled in or adjacent to civilian communities.
+1 This school had been fenced off from a military base since 2016. There is nothing in international law that justifies bombing kids during wars.
Oh I'm so relieved to know that putting up a little chain link fence will stop missiles and blast debris in war time. /s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why did these parents send their girls to a school next to a military facility. So close it used to be part of the facility?
No one on this board does that. I guarantee.
Really? Why don't you send your name and what you'll pay with your guarantee since you're incorrect. There are 150+ Department of Defense schools co-located with military bases that thousands of American kids attend.
Don’t forget the base daycares and family housing located on our military bases that are nestled in or adjacent to civilian communities.
+1 This school had been fenced off from a military base since 2016. There is nothing in international law that justifies bombing kids during wars.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd never heard of bellingcat.com until you posted pictures and lies from there. But a quick google shows that they've faced ample criticism for lies and political bias and close ties to Western security interests.
But you clearly want to believe a biased online aggregator rather than a legitimate news source. There's no arguing with those who are blind and will not see.
Consider yourself both under‑informed and misinformed. Bellingcat is not some fringe "online aggregator" - it’s a Netherlands‑based investigative organization whose work is widely cited by major newspapers, academic researchers, human‑rights bodies, and even courts. Independent media‑rating organizations like Media Bias/Fact Check, Ad Fontes Media, and FactCheck.org consistently rate Bellingcat as highly reliable, with a mild left‑of‑center bias, not as deceptive, partisan, or untrustworthy.
They specialize in open‑source intelligence (OSINT) and have broken major investigations into war crimes, chemical‑weapons attacks, covert operations, and state‑sponsored disinformation. Their methodology is transparent and replicable, which is exactly why their findings hold up under scrutiny.
As for the claim that they’ve been "caught lying": that accusation overwhelmingly comes from the governments and political actors whose covert activities Bellingcat exposed. A prime example is their work on the so‑called "separatist uprising" in Donbas. Bellingcat was instrumental in identifying the supposedly "local separatist" fighters as Russian active‑duty military personnel, including the network commanded by Igor Girkin (Strelkov) - an FSB commander who later openly admitted his role. Their investigations also helped document the movement of the Buk missile launcher used to shoot down MH17, which was later confirmed by multiple independent inquiries.
It’s not surprising that Russian state media and its online proxies have spent years trying to discredit Bellingcat with fabricated accusations. That’s what happens when an investigative outlet exposes operations that were never meant to see daylight.
So no, dismissing Bellingcat as "biased" or "lying" isn’t even a valid argument. It’s just repeating talking points from the very actors whose misconduct Bellingcat has documented with verifiable evidence. If anything you should start questioning the "aggregators" that you are getting your information from, because you clearly picked up some disinformation and propaganda there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why did these parents send their girls to a school next to a military facility. So close it used to be part of the facility?
No one on this board does that. I guarantee.
Really? Why don't you send your name and what you'll pay with your guarantee since you're incorrect. There are 150+ Department of Defense schools co-located with military bases that thousands of American kids attend.
Don’t forget the base daycares and family housing located on our military bases that are nestled in or adjacent to civilian communities.
+1 This school had been fenced off from a military base since 2016. There is nothing in international law that justifies bombing kids during wars.
Anonymous wrote:What's your source that the NY Times is using Iranian propaganda and that what you say is fact? Bellingcat.com is not a legitimate news source. Sorry that your education was so poor that you can't see that.