Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Warnock, Kelly or Beshear

Warnock and Kelly don’t pass the hot test, but beshear is ok looking he might have a chance. Gavin Newsome passes the hot test and has the best chance of winning.

?????

The relatively Good looking candidates are more likely to win. Lots of research this topic and the more attractive political candidates have better odds. Warnock and Kelly are less attractive than Vance. Gavin Newsome is more handsome so his odds of winning are better.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Warnock, Kelly or Beshear

Warnock and Kelly don’t pass the hot test, but beshear is ok looking he might have a chance. Gavin Newsome passes the hot test and has the best chance of winning.

?????

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Warnock, Kelly or Beshear

Warnock and Kelly don’t pass the hot test, but beshear is ok looking he might have a chance. Gavin Newsome passes the hot test and has the best chance of winning.

Anonymous wrote:Warnock, Kelly or Beshear

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone knowledgable about Illinois weigh in on Pritzger?

I've been in the "Illinois is an economic disaster" camp, and basically ruled out Pritzger because of that baggage. But I tuned into r/Illinois (which does skew young and left) and they seem to really like him. In particular, the consensus is that the Illinois pension liability issue exploded under previous governors, and Pritzger has been working diligently to whittle it down (although it remains a long term problem).

So, is there a counter-narrative to the "Illinois disaster" narrative that supports Pritzger?

Pritzker is a very competent governor. He's quick on his feet. He's empathetic. He's good on a stage. His biggest problem is that he was a born a billionaire. And once people start digging into the Hyatt Hotels fortune and where Pritzker invests his billions and how he avoids taxes, people will see that he is completely unrelatable. It does not help that his cousin, Thomas Pritzker, is closely linked to Epstein and just resigned as Executive Chairman of Hyatt. Plus, it is clear that a lot of progressives won't for anyone Jewish. So I don't think Gov Pritzker is viable at this moment in time. There is zero demand for yet another billionaire with any kind of links to Epstein, indirect or otherwise.

His state is in shambles. Is he competent?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It has to be Gavin Newsom. Straight from central casting.

As a Californian, this is an astonishing idea. Have you seen what he has done to us.

He was elected Gov twice by landslides. So, someone in CA must like him, even if you don’t.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AOC needs time to learn. I'm not sure who to blame. AOC or her staff.She ws completely unprepared for Muncih. Venezuela gaff, word salad, ridiculing Rubio on the cowboys originating in Spain. They were called vaqueros, who are cow herders, which mortared in Mexico then US as cowboys. With Hispanic heritage, that makes it even. worse.

Both Newsom and AOC are a mess. So much baggage. Wes Moore caught lying. (and I liked him!) Gov Pete and too soft. We need something just shy of middle age who is dynamic like Bill Clinton and Obama.

I think Newsom could have won who CA is a mess.Pritzker is a mess. 2 badly run states with huge problems. Chris Murphy is holier than though with zero personality. Andy Bershear (Sp) is boring.

I wouldn't risk a woman at this point. Maybe for VP. But I think AOC as VP would be like Vance. Not viable as president. I think Pelosi gave her advice. Learn, get some chops, then be the new generation.

But who would have guessed Mamadai would win NYC. Though he is good looking and personably, and his opponents were hard Nos. Perfect storm for him to get elected.

Most off the radar sane people have little interest in turning their lives upside down to run for president.

58% of democrats say the D party has gone too far to the left. - CNN

(A) the 2 most popular federal programs are Social Security and Medicare. These are left wing socialist programs (B) A lot of the frustrations that allowed Trump to win focused on affordability which left wing policies address and centralist policies do not.

While granted the perception of left wins/social programs as an idea are not popular, the actual left wing / social programs are.

Identity politics are a tool used by Centralist / Moderate Dems to keep things status quo for the establishment in terms of economic policies.

It's because of those exploding entitlement programs that yearly interest on the national debt is more than the yearly defense budget. Won't be long before king dollar is dethroned as the world's reserve currency and all the benefits of having the world's reserve currency evaporates.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AOC needs time to learn. I'm not sure who to blame. AOC or her staff.She ws completely unprepared for Muncih. Venezuela gaff, word salad, ridiculing Rubio on the cowboys originating in Spain. They were called vaqueros, who are cow herders, which mortared in Mexico then US as cowboys. With Hispanic heritage, that makes it even. worse.

Both Newsom and AOC are a mess. So much baggage. Wes Moore caught lying. (and I liked him!) Gov Pete and too soft. We need something just shy of middle age who is dynamic like Bill Clinton and Obama.

I think Newsom could have won who CA is a mess.Pritzker is a mess. 2 badly run states with huge problems. Chris Murphy is holier than though with zero personality. Andy Bershear (Sp) is boring.

I wouldn't risk a woman at this point. Maybe for VP. But I think AOC as VP would be like Vance. Not viable as president. I think Pelosi gave her advice. Learn, get some chops, then be the new generation.

But who would have guessed Mamadai would win NYC. Though he is good looking and personably, and his opponents were hard Nos. Perfect storm for him to get elected.

Most off the radar sane people have little interest in turning their lives upside down to run for president.

58% of democrats say the D party has gone too far to the left. - CNN

(A) the 2 most popular federal programs are Social Security and Medicare. These are left wing socialist programs (B) A lot of the frustrations that allowed Trump to win focused on affordability which left wing policies address and centralist policies do not.

While granted the perception of left wins/social programs as an idea are not popular, the actual left wing / social programs are.

Identity politics are a tool used by Centralist / Moderate Dems to keep things status quo for the establishment in terms of economic policies.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AOC needs time to learn. I'm not sure who to blame. AOC or her staff.She ws completely unprepared for Muncih. Venezuela gaff, word salad, ridiculing Rubio on the cowboys originating in Spain. They were called vaqueros, who are cow herders, which mortared in Mexico then US as cowboys. With Hispanic heritage, that makes it even. worse.

Both Newsom and AOC are a mess. So much baggage. Wes Moore caught lying. (and I liked him!) Gov Pete and too soft. We need something just shy of middle age who is dynamic like Bill Clinton and Obama.

I think Newsom could have won who CA is a mess.Pritzker is a mess. 2 badly run states with huge problems. Chris Murphy is holier than though with zero personality. Andy Bershear (Sp) is boring.

I wouldn't risk a woman at this point. Maybe for VP. But I think AOC as VP would be like Vance. Not viable as president. I think Pelosi gave her advice. Learn, get some chops, then be the new generation.

But who would have guessed Mamadai would win NYC. Though he is good looking and personably, and his opponents were hard Nos. Perfect storm for him to get elected.

Most off the radar sane people have little interest in turning their lives upside down to run for president.

58% of democrats say the D party has gone too far to the left. - CNN

(A) the 2 most popular federal programs are Social Security and Medicare. These are left wing socialist programs (B) A lot of the frustrations that allowed Trump to win focused on affordability which left wing policies address and centralist policies do not.

While granted the perception of left wins/social programs as an idea are not popular, the actual left wing / social programs are.

Identity politics are a tool used by Centralist / Moderate Dems to keep things status quo for the establishment in terms of economic policies.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AOC needs time to learn. I'm not sure who to blame. AOC or her staff.She ws completely unprepared for Muncih. Venezuela gaff, word salad, ridiculing Rubio on the cowboys originating in Spain. They were called vaqueros, who are cow herders, which mortared in Mexico then US as cowboys. With Hispanic heritage, that makes it even. worse.

Both Newsom and AOC are a mess. So much baggage. Wes Moore caught lying. (and I liked him!) Gov Pete and too soft. We need something just shy of middle age who is dynamic like Bill Clinton and Obama.

I think Newsom could have won who CA is a mess.Pritzker is a mess. 2 badly run states with huge problems. Chris Murphy is holier than though with zero personality. Andy Bershear (Sp) is boring.

I wouldn't risk a woman at this point. Maybe for VP. But I think AOC as VP would be like Vance. Not viable as president. I think Pelosi gave her advice. Learn, get some chops, then be the new generation.

But who would have guessed Mamadai would win NYC. Though he is good looking and personably, and his opponents were hard Nos. Perfect storm for him to get elected.

Most off the radar sane people have little interest in turning their lives upside down to run for president.

58% of democrats say the D party has gone too far to the left. - CNN

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone knowledgable about Illinois weigh in on Pritzger?

I've been in the "Illinois is an economic disaster" camp, and basically ruled out Pritzger because of that baggage. But I tuned into r/Illinois (which does skew young and left) and they seem to really like him. In particular, the consensus is that the Illinois pension liability issue exploded under previous governors, and Pritzger has been working diligently to whittle it down (although it remains a long term problem).

So, is there a counter-narrative to the "Illinois disaster" narrative that supports Pritzger?

Pritzker is a very competent governor. He's quick on his feet. He's empathetic. He's good on a stage. His biggest problem is that he was a born a billionaire. And once people start digging into the Hyatt Hotels fortune and where Pritzker invests his billions and how he avoids taxes, people will see that he is completely unrelatable. It does not help that his cousin, Thomas Pritzker, is closely linked to Epstein and just resigned as Executive Chairman of Hyatt. Plus, it is clear that a lot of progressives won't for anyone Jewish. So I don't think Gov Pritzker is viable at this moment in time. There is zero demand for yet another billionaire with any kind of links to Epstein, indirect or otherwise.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone knowledgable about Illinois weigh in on Pritzger?

I've been in the "Illinois is an economic disaster" camp, and basically ruled out Pritzger because of that baggage. But I tuned into r/Illinois (which does skew young and left) and they seem to really like him. In particular, the consensus is that the Illinois pension liability issue exploded under previous governors, and Pritzger has been working diligently to whittle it down (although it remains a long term problem).

So, is there a counter-narrative to the "Illinois disaster" narrative that supports Pritzger?

Pritzker is a very competent governor. He's quick on his feet. He's empathetic. He's good on a stage. His biggest problem is that he was a born a billionaire. And once people start digging into the Hyatt Hotels fortune and where Pritzker invests his billions and how he avoids taxes, people will see that he is completely unrelatable. It does not help that his cousin, Thomas Pritzker, is closely linked to Epstein and just resigned as Executive Chairman of Hyatt. Plus, it is clear that a lot of progressives won't for anyone Jewish. So I don't think Gov Pritzker is viable at this moment in time. There is zero demand for yet another billionaire with any kind of links to Epstein, indirect or otherwise.

His state is in shambles. Is he competent?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone knowledgable about Illinois weigh in on Pritzger?

I've been in the "Illinois is an economic disaster" camp, and basically ruled out Pritzger because of that baggage. But I tuned into r/Illinois (which does skew young and left) and they seem to really like him. In particular, the consensus is that the Illinois pension liability issue exploded under previous governors, and Pritzger has been working diligently to whittle it down (although it remains a long term problem).

So, is there a counter-narrative to the "Illinois disaster" narrative that supports Pritzger?

Pritzker is a very competent governor. He's quick on his feet. He's empathetic. He's good on a stage. His biggest problem is that he was a born a billionaire. And once people start digging into the Hyatt Hotels fortune and where Pritzker invests his billions and how he avoids taxes, people will see that he is completely unrelatable. It does not help that his cousin, Thomas Pritzker, is closely linked to Epstein and just resigned as Executive Chairman of Hyatt. Plus, it is clear that a lot of progressives won't for anyone Jewish. So I don't think Gov Pritzker is viable at this moment in time. There is zero demand for yet another billionaire with any kind of links to Epstein, indirect or otherwise.

His state is in shambles. Is he competent?