Anonymous wrote:ou can't bring a case based on aesthetics, nor can you assert a right to sunlight. It would never get anywhere close to a jury.
How about drainage issues?
Anonymous wrote:
Nuisance could be more cars on the street parked as well. We have a neighbor who couldn't get his truck out of the driveway because another neighbor kept his car parked in exactly the wrong spot on the street. These streets are not that wide. County was called on that one.
ou can't bring a case based on aesthetics, nor can you assert a right to sunlight. It would never get anywhere close to a jury.
How about drainage issues?
ou can't bring a case based on aesthetics, nor can you assert a right to sunlight. It would never get anywhere close to a jury.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The neighbors need to get together and litigate.
Litigation has been discussed amongst neighbors. Cost is definitely a factor.
I think at this moment, everyone is hoping the work stoppage leads to the structure needing to be torn down.
Costs like having to pay legal fees for the defendant when they ultimately prevail...
That's not the way it works.
The legal theory would be one of private nuisance. The neighbors might prevail in front of a jury; it's difficult to imagine most people having any sympathy for the defendant in this case, and plenty for the plaintiffs.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
The neighbors need to get together and litigate.
Litigation has been discussed amongst neighbors. Cost is definitely a factor.
I think at this moment, everyone is hoping the work stoppage leads to the structure needing to be torn down.
Costs like having to pay legal fees for the defendant when they ultimately prevail...
That's not the way it works.
The legal theory would be one of private nuisance. The neighbors might prevail in front of a jury; it's difficult to imagine most people having any sympathy for the defendant in this case, and plenty for the plaintiffs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The neighbors need to get together and litigate.
Litigation has been discussed amongst neighbors. Cost is definitely a factor.
I think at this moment, everyone is hoping the work stoppage leads to the structure needing to be torn down.
Costs like having to pay legal fees for the defendant when they ultimately prevail...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The neighbors need to get together and litigate.
Litigation has been discussed amongst neighbors. Cost is definitely a factor.
I think at this moment, everyone is hoping the work stoppage leads to the structure needing to be torn down.
Anonymous wrote:
The neighbors need to get together and litigate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The neighbors need to get together and litigate.
On what basis?
Anonymous wrote:
The neighbors need to get together and litigate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As far as I can tell, the complaints here seem more emotional and psychological than substantive. Not everything has to be pleasant to your eyes.
It seems like this addition is unpleasant in many people's eyes (based on comments here). If I were the neighbor I would appeal my tax assessment because no way would I pay 10K in taxes (or close to that) to live next to that. Their house value is most definitely impacted and it's the fault of the county. The assessed value is no longer valid on their house.
Doing a formal or rigorous study on the impact of an ugly house on the property values of neighboring homes would be difficult, due to the subjectivity. But there other things that can give us an idea. Consider dilapidated houses. Those have about a 5% impact on the value of neighboring homes.
Anonymous wrote:As far as I can tell, the complaints here seem more emotional and psychological than substantive. Not everything has to be pleasant to your eyes.
It seems like this addition is unpleasant in many people's eyes (based on comments here). If I were the neighbor I would appeal my tax assessment because no way would I pay 10K in taxes (or close to that) to live next to that. Their house value is most definitely impacted and it's the fault of the county. The assessed value is no longer valid on their house.