Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously timed for the return of the House:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/us/politics/trump-epstein-emails.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20251112&instance_id=166274&nl=breaking-news®i_id=130978122&segment_id=210450&user_id=fcb1b8a728d5f78d42df74f0dbc09f85


EPSTEIN ALLEGED IN E-MAILS THAT TRUMP KNEW OF HIS CONDUCT

In a message obtained by Congress, the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein's victims.

It's pretty clear this leak was timed for the House reconvening after being off 59 days. Johnson is swearing in Adelita Grijalva, who will become the 218th signature on the discharge petition to release the Epstein files.

The fact that more information hasn't be released or leaked sooner and faster the past few years makes it obvious there is an effort by very powerful people to keep as much info sealed for as long as possible. As far as Trump's involvement is concerned; it's very likely he at least knew of Epstein's disgusting and criminal wrongdoings at the time they were happening and it's certainly plausible he participated in the wrongdoings. Best case for Trump, which really isn't a best anything, is that he is one of many powerful politicians seeking to provide cover for ultra-wealthy political donors who have ties to those implicated in the files.

Trump joked that Epstein liked them young.

Joked about it.

Even though he had a daughter.

Trump has two daughters though he only lusts after Ivanka.

You don’t remember the TV interview shortly after Tiffany’s birth when he talked about her legs being very nice and speculated on how good her breasts would be once she got old enough to have some???

Marla was sitting next to him and she smiled one of those mortified smiles - no surprise that marriage didn’t last, Marla the raised in America wife didn’t have the stomach for his disgusting lack of character.

Yes, the man sexualized his newborn infant daughter.

To be honest Marla's character was wanting.

I mean, you’re not wrong in that I can’t imagine how any woman would want to marry this ugly pompous gasbag creep, but he had a lot of money and many women are drawn to the payday.

But she had enough character to leave him in fairly short order and to stay well away from his orbit ever since, she doesn’t glom on to his creepy life like Ivana did for so many years.

Right, but let's not get drawn into the very minor character flaws of Trump's wives. The real elephant in the room, the abysmal character flaw, is Trump's. This is what we're discussing here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does "Police Chief etc. I'm 75% there" mean?

Exectly. Where is "there" -- what goal were they working toward?

Sarah Longwell figured this out on her show today. It means Epstein and Maxwell had been wondering who sold them out. Epstein finally figured out it was Trump so he emailed Maxwell to tell her. Trump was the dog that didn’t bark bc when the police chief was dragging everyone, Trump seemed immune annd was not mentioned/questioned even though he was at Epstein’s house for hours with underage girls. “I’m 75% there” means he’s 75% sure or 75% to figuring out the whole thing.

Could be, and that’s just further proof that he raped children. He’s sell anyone out to save himself.

Though, these made up narratives to try to sell Trump as a non child rapists are getting pretty entertaining.

Was he also secretly saving them from the basement of a pizza shop lmao

You drop phrases like "raped children" so easily. I wish you had the courage not to be anonymous when you say such things.

So he can send his army of violent criminals out to kidnap us too?

It is quite interesting to note though that you don’t see too many people defending him in public anymore, isn’t it perhaps it’s because they all know what he really is and don’t want to be associated with him? It works two ways you know.

Wait, what? You're calling him a child rapist because of immigration enforcement?

There is going to come a day where all these comments will be unmasked and communities will splinter.

I can’t wait to find out who is behind the posts supporting Trump at this point.

OMG!! This this this!

I’ve always assumed the Heritage Foundation has a room full of interns posting for free all day. And Russia, China, and Israel.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously timed for the return of the House:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/us/politics/trump-epstein-emails.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20251112&instance_id=166274&nl=breaking-news®i_id=130978122&segment_id=210450&user_id=fcb1b8a728d5f78d42df74f0dbc09f85


EPSTEIN ALLEGED IN E-MAILS THAT TRUMP KNEW OF HIS CONDUCT

In a message obtained by Congress, the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein's victims.

It's pretty clear this leak was timed for the House reconvening after being off 59 days. Johnson is swearing in Adelita Grijalva, who will become the 218th signature on the discharge petition to release the Epstein files.

The fact that more information hasn't be released or leaked sooner and faster the past few years makes it obvious there is an effort by very powerful people to keep as much info sealed for as long as possible. As far as Trump's involvement is concerned; it's very likely he at least knew of Epstein's disgusting and criminal wrongdoings at the time they were happening and it's certainly plausible he participated in the wrongdoings. Best case for Trump, which really isn't a best anything, is that he is one of many powerful politicians seeking to provide cover for ultra-wealthy political donors who have ties to those implicated in the files.

Trump joked that Epstein liked them young.

Joked about it.

Even though he had a daughter.

Trump has two daughters though he only lusts after Ivanka.

You don’t remember the TV interview shortly after Tiffany’s birth when he talked about her legs being very nice and speculated on how good her breasts would be once she got old enough to have some???

Marla was sitting next to him and she smiled one of those mortified smiles - no surprise that marriage didn’t last, Marla the raised in America wife didn’t have the stomach for his disgusting lack of character.

Yes, the man sexualized his newborn infant daughter.

To be honest Marla's character was wanting.

I mean, you’re not wrong in that I can’t imagine how any woman would want to marry this ugly pompous gasbag creep, but he had a lot of money and many women are drawn to the payday.

But she had enough character to leave him in fairly short order and to stay well away from his orbit ever since, she doesn’t glom on to his creepy life like Ivana did for so many years.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously timed for the return of the House:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/us/politics/trump-epstein-emails.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20251112&instance_id=166274&nl=breaking-news®i_id=130978122&segment_id=210450&user_id=fcb1b8a728d5f78d42df74f0dbc09f85


EPSTEIN ALLEGED IN E-MAILS THAT TRUMP KNEW OF HIS CONDUCT

In a message obtained by Congress, the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein's victims.

It's pretty clear this leak was timed for the House reconvening after being off 59 days. Johnson is swearing in Adelita Grijalva, who will become the 218th signature on the discharge petition to release the Epstein files.

The fact that more information hasn't be released or leaked sooner and faster the past few years makes it obvious there is an effort by very powerful people to keep as much info sealed for as long as possible. As far as Trump's involvement is concerned; it's very likely he at least knew of Epstein's disgusting and criminal wrongdoings at the time they were happening and it's certainly plausible he participated in the wrongdoings. Best case for Trump, which really isn't a best anything, is that he is one of many powerful politicians seeking to provide cover for ultra-wealthy political donors who have ties to those implicated in the files.

Trump joked that Epstein liked them young.

Joked about it.

Even though he had a daughter.

Trump has two daughters though he only lusts after Ivanka.

You don’t remember the TV interview shortly after Tiffany’s birth when he talked about her legs being very nice and speculated on how good her breasts would be once she got old enough to have some???

Marla was sitting next to him and she smiled one of those mortified smiles - no surprise that marriage didn’t last, Marla the raised in America wife didn’t have the stomach for his disgusting lack of character.

Yes, the man sexualized his newborn infant daughter.

To be honest Marla's character was wanting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously timed for the return of the House:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/us/politics/trump-epstein-emails.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20251112&instance_id=166274&nl=breaking-news®i_id=130978122&segment_id=210450&user_id=fcb1b8a728d5f78d42df74f0dbc09f85


EPSTEIN ALLEGED IN E-MAILS THAT TRUMP KNEW OF HIS CONDUCT

In a message obtained by Congress, the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein's victims.

It's pretty clear this leak was timed for the House reconvening after being off 59 days. Johnson is swearing in Adelita Grijalva, who will become the 218th signature on the discharge petition to release the Epstein files.

The fact that more information hasn't be released or leaked sooner and faster the past few years makes it obvious there is an effort by very powerful people to keep as much info sealed for as long as possible. As far as Trump's involvement is concerned; it's very likely he at least knew of Epstein's disgusting and criminal wrongdoings at the time they were happening and it's certainly plausible he participated in the wrongdoings. Best case for Trump, which really isn't a best anything, is that he is one of many powerful politicians seeking to provide cover for ultra-wealthy political donors who have ties to those implicated in the files.

Trump joked that Epstein liked them young.

Joked about it.

Even though he had a daughter.

Trump has two daughters though he only lusts after Ivanka.

You don’t remember the TV interview shortly after Tiffany’s birth when he talked about her legs being very nice and speculated on how good her breasts would be once she got old enough to have some???

Marla was sitting next to him and she smiled one of those mortified smiles - no surprise that marriage didn’t last, Marla the raised in America wife didn’t have the stomach for his disgusting lack of character.

Yes, the man sexualized his newborn infant daughter.

To be honest Marla's character was wanting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did Democrats object to releasing the Epstein files today?
Tim Burchett asked for unanimous consent, and Democrats blocked it.
Was this a Trojan horse in the unanimous consent rules?

They didn't. His spin to the media is a lie, of course. You can watch what really happened on CSPAN. His request could not be entertianed because the Republican Speaker Pro Tempore said Burchett had not followed the rules and because he did not have the consent of Republican Mike Johnson, who is on record opposing Burchett's attempt.

My guess is that he tried this because it would have allowed the no votes to hide.

Those who are going to vote NO to release must be on the record individually voting no to the release when they do the vote by normal procedures next week. Burkett tried to end run that and let the no voters try save face (which may mean he is actually a no vote himself).

And no one should be able to hide thier vote on this. The people have a right to know whether a congress person is complicit in tis coverup.

+1 Burchett is pissing on your leg and telling you it’s raining. He filed a House Resolution (H.Res.577) to release the Epstein files which would have required unanimous consent. He was trying to spare Republicans from having to record their vote on the House Bill under a discharge petition.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did Democrats object to releasing the Epstein files today?
Tim Burchett asked for unanimous consent, and Democrats blocked it.
Was this a Trojan horse in the unanimous consent rules?

They didn't. His spin to the media is a lie, of course. You can watch what really happened on CSPAN. His request could not be entertianed because the Republican Speaker Pro Tempore said Burchett had not followed the rules and because he did not have the consent of Republican Mike Johnson, who is on record opposing Burchett's attempt.

My guess is that he tried this because it would have allowed the no votes to hide.

Those who are going to vote NO to release must be on the record individually voting no to the release when they do the vote by normal procedures next week. Burkett tried to end run that and let the no voters try save face (which may mean he is actually a no vote himself).

And no one should be able to hide thier vote on this. The people have a right to know whether a congress person is complicit in tis coverup.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The NY Times ran hundreds of "but her emails" articles in 2016 and sat on Epstein's emails the entire time.

Why?

This, this, this.

Why do you think the New York Times had these emails?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obviously timed for the return of the House:

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/us/politics/trump-epstein-emails.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20251112&instance_id=166274&nl=breaking-news®i_id=130978122&segment_id=210450&user_id=fcb1b8a728d5f78d42df74f0dbc09f85


EPSTEIN ALLEGED IN E-MAILS THAT TRUMP KNEW OF HIS CONDUCT

In a message obtained by Congress, the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein's victims.

It's pretty clear this leak was timed for the House reconvening after being off 59 days. Johnson is swearing in Adelita Grijalva, who will become the 218th signature on the discharge petition to release the Epstein files.

The fact that more information hasn't be released or leaked sooner and faster the past few years makes it obvious there is an effort by very powerful people to keep as much info sealed for as long as possible. As far as Trump's involvement is concerned; it's very likely he at least knew of Epstein's disgusting and criminal wrongdoings at the time they were happening and it's certainly plausible he participated in the wrongdoings. Best case for Trump, which really isn't a best anything, is that he is one of many powerful politicians seeking to provide cover for ultra-wealthy political donors who have ties to those implicated in the files.

Trump joked that Epstein liked them young.

Joked about it.

Even though he had a daughter.

Trump has two daughters though he only lusts after Ivanka.

You don’t remember the TV interview shortly after Tiffany’s birth when he talked about her legs being very nice and speculated on how good her breasts would be once she got old enough to have some???

Marla was sitting next to him and she smiled one of those mortified smiles - no surprise that marriage didn’t last, Marla the raised in America wife didn’t have the stomach for his disgusting lack of character.

Yes, the man sexualized his newborn infant daughter.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tried to bring the discharge petition to the House floor today. Mike Johnson approved it. Hakeem Jeffries did not.

This is utter fiction.

Johnson is scheduling the vote for next week. I you are referring to Burchett;s efforts, that measure was improperly presented and was designed to give Republicans cover since their vote on a unanimous consent would be secret. Every vote on this needs to be public. Every legislator who votes against disclosure needs to be named and shamed.

Oh, it was improperly presented? Explain that in detail.

Anonymous wrote:I believe the victim Epstein referred to Trump spending hours with in his (Epstein’s) house is the Jane Doe who brought a federal lawsuit, twice, alleging that Trump raped her in Epstein’s NY home when she was 13 years old and an aspiring model.

This Jane Doe retracted her lawsuit citing credible threats against her by Trump supporters - but she’s still out there and I personally believe her, I believe she was raped for hours in Epstein’s house after he and/or Ghislaine arranged for her to be there and for Trump to then visit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The NY Times ran hundreds of "but her emails" articles in 2016 and sat on Epstein's emails the entire time.

Why?

This, this, this.

Why do you think the New York Times had these emails?

A lot of this was taking place in NYC over many years. That’s what real reporting is: tracking down sources and piecing together stories. For sure the NYT should have been on top of this and “asking questions” as they did about Hilary’s emails and Biden’s age.

A lot of this has been reported on already including by the Times. But you and the other PP are nuts if you think the Times could have subpoenaed all of Epstein’s emails.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can't help but wonder if there's some connection between Epstein, trump, John Casablancas and the teen pageants

I believe that’s already been documented.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/14/teen-models-powerful-men-when-donald-trump-hosted-look-of-the-year