I cannot comprehend why these people would risk everything to lie for trump.

I realize this pales in comparison, but she also interrupted the judge who called on her to explain. He started by saying "Am I correct..." and she interrupted and said "No, you're not." Can you fathom acting that way in a court of law, to a judge?? It just shows the utter contempt these imbeciles have for the rule of law.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't Bondi's law license now on the line since she claimed she'd reviewed and ratified everything that Halligan did?

Wouldn't the Florida bar have to disbar her? We know that won't happen.l

Then... Disbar her in every other state where she has a license along with any Florida bar members that are covering for her.

State bars have reciprocal discipline. The Virginia Bar has jurisdiction over actions committed in Virginia. Under agreements Florida is supposed to apply penalties imposed by Virginia as well.

The 4th Circuit can revoke her ability to practice before the courts of the circuit. That would "shot circuit" Halligan's ability to serve as USA in the Eastern District.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't Bondi's law license now on the line since she claimed she'd reviewed and ratified everything that Halligan did?

Wouldn't the Florida bar have to disbar her? We know that won't happen.l

Then... Disbar her in every other state where she has a license along with any Florida bar members that are covering for her.

State bars have reciprocal discipline. The Virginia Bar has jurisdiction over actions committed in Virginia. Under agreements Florida is supposed to apply penalties imposed by Virginia as well.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't Bondi's law license now on the line since she claimed she'd reviewed and ratified everything that Halligan did?

Wouldn't the Florida bar have to disbar her? We know that won't happen.l

Then... Disbar her in every other state where she has a license along with any Florida bar members that are covering for her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to add to today's chronicle of DoJ cockups.

IANAL but I imagine that a judge wouldn’t care about that if the judge really wanted to see that memo.

The DoJ attorney also said he didn't know about any memo and the told the judge he was under orders not to talk about the memo he supposedly knew nothing about. Which again can get that attorney personally in trouble. You don't lie to the judge.

Anonymous wrote:Just to add to today's chronicle of DoJ cockups.

IANAL but I imagine that a judge wouldn’t care about that if the judge really wanted to see that memo.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't Bondi's law license now on the line since she claimed she'd reviewed and ratified everything that Halligan did?

Depends, did she sign anything or make any direct statements to the court?

It's on the last page of this filing. https://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000019a-84d6-d49b-af9f-b4f6dac00000

Ooo yeah, she might be in trouble.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't Bondi's law license now on the line since she claimed she'd reviewed and ratified everything that Halligan did?

Depends, did she sign anything or make any direct statements to the court?

It's on the last page of this filing. https://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000019a-84d6-d49b-af9f-b4f6dac00000

Anonymous wrote:Isn't Bondi's law license now on the line since she claimed she'd reviewed and ratified everything that Halligan did?

Wouldn't the Florida bar have to disbar her? We know that won't happen.l

Anonymous wrote:Isn't Bondi's law license now on the line since she claimed she'd reviewed and ratified everything that Halligan did?

Depends, did she sign anything or make any direct statements to the court?

Isn't Bondi's law license now on the line since she claimed she'd reviewed and ratified everything that Halligan did?

The irony of the DOJ committing extremely blatant perjury whole attempting to prosecute Comey for a very convoluted perjury argument sure is something.

Anonymous wrote:This will be over by the end of the week.

Then disbarment proceedings against Halligan and the rest of the Trump Team Vengeance can begin.

Hey guys, is it a good idea to put a partisan hack insurance lawyer in charge of a felony prosecution?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"NEWS: During a hearing in federal court in VA, prosecutors confirmed that the operative indictment in the case against James Comey was never shown to or voted on by the entire grand jury before it was presented in open court."

https://bsky.app/profile/annabower.bsky.social/post/3m5yoqty6k22w

This is just nuts. They gave the judge a friggin' fake indictment!

Isn’t that illegal? Don’t lawyers have certain rules they have to follow in court? This sounds like a free for all.

This would be known as a fraud on the court. We found someone lying, and it's Lindsay Halligan!

This is all part of Bannon's plan. He has called for the equivalent of the Star Chamber: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Chamber