Apparently former history professor Newt Gingrich is incapable of learning from history.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The irony of these strikes on Iran is that Iran needs a nuclear bomb in order to prevent the bombing of their country. Iran has always said they did not want uranium for nukes, they should reconsider and do a Pakistan.

Because Iran would only ever use nuclear weapons in self-defense, and never to advance its clearly stated goal of annihilating Israel, the Great Satan, and other Western countries which fail to accept its vision of Islam uber alles, because infidels deserve only death in their worldview? Right, great idea.

And Israel would never advance its clearly stated goal of annihilating Gaza, the Great Amalek, and other countries (Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, etc etc) which fail to accept its vision of Zionism because anti-Zionist deserve only death in their worldview? Right, great idea

More fabricated nonsense, with no basis in reality. Israel has zero expansionist ambitions, beyond those well justified as needful to provide border buffers from entities which attacked first. It has been that way since 1948. Attack Israel, lose territory. Stay put and behave yourself, and Israel leaves you alone. Iran, on the other hand, funds and encourages Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis and others, as proxies for terror they pretend to deny stimulating, letting their Muslim "brethren" take the heat for them. Those days are finally over.

How can one reconcile your false claims regarding Israel’s expansive intentions in light of the actual statements made by its government officials?

What such statements? Asserting they exist doesn't make them happen. Hamas anbd Iran, on the other hand, have been clear forever about their ambitions towards Israel.

Elud Olmert was on Ezra Klein’s podcast and said Israel has sent archeologists into Lebanon to find “proof” that the ancient Israelis lived there too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The irony of these strikes on Iran is that Iran needs a nuclear bomb in order to prevent the bombing of their country. Iran has always said they did not want uranium for nukes, they should reconsider and do a Pakistan.

Because Iran would only ever use nuclear weapons in self-defense, and never to advance its clearly stated goal of annihilating Israel, the Great Satan, and other Western countries which fail to accept its vision of Islam uber alles, because infidels deserve only death in their worldview? Right, great idea.

And Israel would never advance its clearly stated goal of annihilating Gaza, the Great Amalek, and other countries (Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, etc etc) which fail to accept its vision of Zionism because anti-Zionist deserve only death in their worldview? Right, great idea

More fabricated nonsense, with no basis in reality. Israel has zero expansionist ambitions, beyond those well justified as needful to provide border buffers from entities which attacked first. It has been that way since 1948. Attack Israel, lose territory. Stay put and behave yourself, and Israel leaves you alone. Iran, on the other hand, funds and encourages Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis and others, as proxies for terror they pretend to deny stimulating, letting their Muslim "brethren" take the heat for them. Those days are finally over.

How can one reconcile your false claims regarding Israel’s expansive intentions in light of the actual statements made by its government officials?

They'll pretend that illegal settlements don't exist, or that Israel never annexed the territories of other sovereign nations, or Zionize aka gaslight you into believing that Israel never wanted to ethnically cleanse and genocide Gaza to occupy and settle it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The irony of these strikes on Iran is that Iran needs a nuclear bomb in order to prevent the bombing of their country. Iran has always said they did not want uranium for nukes, they should reconsider and do a Pakistan.

Because Iran would only ever use nuclear weapons in self-defense, and never to advance its clearly stated goal of annihilating Israel, the Great Satan, and other Western countries which fail to accept its vision of Islam uber alles, because infidels deserve only death in their worldview? Right, great idea.

And Israel would never advance its clearly stated goal of annihilating Gaza, the Great Amalek, and other countries (Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, etc etc) which fail to accept its vision of Zionism because anti-Zionist deserve only death in their worldview? Right, great idea

More fabricated nonsense, with no basis in reality. Israel has zero expansionist ambitions, beyond those well justified as needful to provide border buffers from entities which attacked first. It has been that way since 1948. Attack Israel, lose territory. Stay put and behave yourself, and Israel leaves you alone. Iran, on the other hand, funds and encourages Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis and others, as proxies for terror they pretend to deny stimulating, letting their Muslim "brethren" take the heat for them. Those days are finally over.

How can one reconcile your false claims regarding Israel’s expansive intentions in light of the actual statements made by its government officials?

What such statements? Asserting they exist doesn't make them happen. Hamas anbd Iran, on the other hand, have been clear forever about their ambitions towards Israel.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The irony of these strikes on Iran is that Iran needs a nuclear bomb in order to prevent the bombing of their country. Iran has always said they did not want uranium for nukes, they should reconsider and do a Pakistan.

Because Iran would only ever use nuclear weapons in self-defense, and never to advance its clearly stated goal of annihilating Israel, the Great Satan, and other Western countries which fail to accept its vision of Islam uber alles, because infidels deserve only death in their worldview? Right, great idea.

And Israel would never advance its clearly stated goal of annihilating Gaza, the Great Amalek, and other countries (Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, etc etc) which fail to accept its vision of Zionism because anti-Zionist deserve only death in their worldview? Right, great idea

More fabricated nonsense, with no basis in reality. Israel has zero expansionist ambitions, beyond those well justified as needful to provide border buffers from entities which attacked first. It has been that way since 1948. Attack Israel, lose territory. Stay put and behave yourself, and Israel leaves you alone. Iran, on the other hand, funds and encourages Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis and others, as proxies for terror they pretend to deny stimulating, letting their Muslim "brethren" take the heat for them. Those days are finally over.

How can one reconcile your false claims regarding Israel’s expansive intentions in light of the actual statements made by its government officials?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The irony of these strikes on Iran is that Iran needs a nuclear bomb in order to prevent the bombing of their country. Iran has always said they did not want uranium for nukes, they should reconsider and do a Pakistan.

Because Iran would only ever use nuclear weapons in self-defense, and never to advance its clearly stated goal of annihilating Israel, the Great Satan, and other Western countries which fail to accept its vision of Islam uber alles, because infidels deserve only death in their worldview? Right, great idea.

And Israel would never advance its clearly stated goal of annihilating Gaza, the Great Amalek, and other countries (Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, etc etc) which fail to accept its vision of Zionism because anti-Zionist deserve only death in their worldview? Right, great idea

More fabricated nonsense, with no basis in reality. Israel has zero expansionist ambitions, beyond those well justified as needful to provide border buffers from entities which attacked first. It has been that way since 1948. Attack Israel, lose territory. Stay put and behave yourself, and Israel leaves you alone. Iran, on the other hand, funds and encourages Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis and others, as proxies for terror they pretend to deny stimulating, letting their Muslim "brethren" take the heat for them. Those days are finally over.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The irony of these strikes on Iran is that Iran needs a nuclear bomb in order to prevent the bombing of their country. Iran has always said they did not want uranium for nukes, they should reconsider and do a Pakistan.

Because Iran would only ever use nuclear weapons in self-defense, and never to advance its clearly stated goal of annihilating Israel, the Great Satan, and other Western countries which fail to accept its vision of Islam uber alles, because infidels deserve only death in their worldview? Right, great idea.

And Israel would never advance its clearly stated goal of annihilating Gaza, the Great Amalek, and other countries (Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, etc etc) which fail to accept its vision of Zionism because anti-Zionist deserve only death in their worldview? Right, great idea

Anonymous wrote:The irony of these strikes on Iran is that Iran needs a nuclear bomb in order to prevent the bombing of their country. Iran has always said they did not want uranium for nukes, they should reconsider and do a Pakistan.

Because Iran would only ever use nuclear weapons in self-defense, and never to advance its clearly stated goal of annihilating Israel, the Great Satan, and other Western countries which fail to accept its vision of Islam uber alles, because infidels deserve only death in their worldview? Right, great idea.

Anonymous wrote:The irony of these strikes on Iran is that Iran needs a nuclear bomb in order to prevent the bombing of their country. Iran has always said they did not want uranium for nukes, they should reconsider and do a Pakistan.

Well they've been accused of Israel of almost having nuclear weapons for more than 40 years. At his point, might as well get them.

The irony of these strikes on Iran is that Iran needs a nuclear bomb in order to prevent the bombing of their country. Iran has always said they did not want uranium for nukes, they should reconsider and do a Pakistan.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Netenyahu fled to Greece during Iranian strikes!

What an fing coward!

https://trt.global/world/article/26bf219546c4

What obvious nonsense. You should be ashamed to propagate such patent untruths, but if it helps your anti-Israel, antisemitic, and pro-Hamas agenda, it is understandable.

Greek American here. I just scanned some online Greek news and all the stories said it was the Israeli ambassador to Greece, not Netanyahu. I don’t know if that’s true or not, but that’s what I’m reading. Here is one quote:

“According to information, the Israeli government plane, Wings of Zion, which transported the Israeli ambassador to Greece, is currently in Athens.

According to information from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, because the Tel Aviv airport has been closed due to the crisis, the Israeli ambassador to Greece was transported on a special flight from Tel Aviv where he was in Athens on the government plane, which was not carrying any other passengers.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

A highly credible source, a Twitter account run by a Muslim in Australia, notorious for publishing incorrect information. https://www.newstatesman.com/science-tech/2020/03/spectator-index-news-sources-who-behind

There are multiple news stories about Israel requesting the US to join the campaign. Including Barack Ravid from Axios who has a lot of insider Israeli sources.

https://www.axios.com/2025/06/14/israel-iran-war-us-nuclear-program-trump

Anonymous wrote:

A highly credible source, a Twitter account run by a Muslim in Australia, notorious for publishing incorrect information. https://www.newstatesman.com/science-tech/2020/03/spectator-index-news-sources-who-behind