Anonymous wrote:Cynthia Erivo’s GG nails

Anonymous wrote:Does Ariana Grande have some sort of medical issue? Her movements and expressions are so jerky and unnatural. It’s really distracting to see her bopping around as someone else is talking.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ariana Grande in vintage Givenchy Haute Couture

Dress itself is lovely. It is from the Haute Couture S/S 1966 collection by Hubert de Givenchy.

In a release about the look, an archivist at Givenchy shared, "The dress is pale yellow silk with a hand-beaded bodice ... from the epic Givenchy Haute Couture/Audrey Hepburn era ... cne of the most important unions between a designer and muse."

Thanks for the background -- my first thought was Hepburn and now I see why.

I think the gloves were wrong and that the color doesn't work, especially with her hair that shade of blonde. I think if she'd gone platinum it would have worked better, though unfortunately she still would have been screwed over by that pale pink and yellow rose backdrop. She looks better in the room (though the dress itself is less striking while seated).

Couldn’t find Audrey in that dress - only a similar one

I wish we could see if against the green background. Against the yellow she just disappears into the background.

The color story still doesn't work for me -- she looks sick here. Agree with the PP who said her skin tone is too warm for this yellow and it's made worse by the auburn tones in her hair. This is not a warm yellow so it clashes.

Like her. I’m part Italian and yellow is a hard color for us. Someone like Nicole Kidman can rock it because she had no yellow tones in her skin.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ariana Grande in vintage Givenchy Haute Couture

Dress itself is lovely. It is from the Haute Couture S/S 1966 collection by Hubert de Givenchy.

In a release about the look, an archivist at Givenchy shared, "The dress is pale yellow silk with a hand-beaded bodice ... from the epic Givenchy Haute Couture/Audrey Hepburn era ... cne of the most important unions between a designer and muse."

Did Hepburn wea the dress? She had dark hair and more blue toned skin. Grande has more yellow toned Mediterranean skin plus the light reddish hair makes it all extremely washed out and sallow looking. A softer, fuller look on her hair might have helped balance it out a little. It’s a beautiful dress but wrong for her and badly styled here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ariana Grande in vintage Givenchy Haute Couture

Dress itself is lovely. It is from the Haute Couture S/S 1966 collection by Hubert de Givenchy.

In a release about the look, an archivist at Givenchy shared, "The dress is pale yellow silk with a hand-beaded bodice ... from the epic Givenchy Haute Couture/Audrey Hepburn era ... cne of the most important unions between a designer and muse."

Thanks for the background -- my first thought was Hepburn and now I see why.

I think the gloves were wrong and that the color doesn't work, especially with her hair that shade of blonde. I think if she'd gone platinum it would have worked better, though unfortunately she still would have been screwed over by that pale pink and yellow rose backdrop. She looks better in the room (though the dress itself is less striking while seated).

Couldn’t find Audrey in that dress - only a similar one

I wish we could see if against the green background. Against the yellow she just disappears into the background.

The color story still doesn't work for me -- she looks sick here. Agree with the PP who said her skin tone is too warm for this yellow and it's made worse by the auburn tones in her hair. This is not a warm yellow so it clashes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jodie Foster in Dior

Do not like. It overwhelms her.

Jodie just won her fifth globe so she can get away with it.

I actually like it - bit weird and looks cross between a nuns habit and an armless dress Michelle Obama might wear.

But she would look silly in a more conventional red carpet gown.

She has had a ton of memorable, flawless, and not conventional red carpet looks. I don't think this is one of them. It's not terrible. I just don't really like it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ariana Grande in vintage Givenchy Haute Couture

Dress itself is lovely. It is from the Haute Couture S/S 1966 collection by Hubert de Givenchy.

In a release about the look, an archivist at Givenchy shared, "The dress is pale yellow silk with a hand-beaded bodice ... from the epic Givenchy Haute Couture/Audrey Hepburn era ... cne of the most important unions between a designer and muse."

Thanks for the background -- my first thought was Hepburn and now I see why.

I think the gloves were wrong and that the color doesn't work, especially with her hair that shade of blonde. I think if she'd gone platinum it would have worked better, though unfortunately she still would have been screwed over by that pale pink and yellow rose backdrop. She looks better in the room (though the dress itself is less striking while seated).

Couldn’t find Audrey in that dress - only a similar one

I wish we could see if against the green background. Against the yellow she just disappears into the background.

The color story still doesn't work for me -- she looks sick here. Agree with the PP who said her skin tone is too warm for this yellow and it's made worse by the auburn tones in her hair. This is not a warm yellow so it clashes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ariana Grande in vintage Givenchy Haute Couture

Dress itself is lovely. It is from the Haute Couture S/S 1966 collection by Hubert de Givenchy.

In a release about the look, an archivist at Givenchy shared, "The dress is pale yellow silk with a hand-beaded bodice ... from the epic Givenchy Haute Couture/Audrey Hepburn era ... cne of the most important unions between a designer and muse."

Anonymous wrote:The people posting on this thread have the blandest, most boring, most basic tastes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jodie Foster in Dior

Do not like. It overwhelms her.

Jodie just won her fifth globe so she can get away with it.

I actually like it - bit weird and looks cross between a nuns habit and an armless dress Michelle Obama might wear.

But she would look silly in a more conventional red carpet gown.

She has had a ton of memorable, flawless, and not conventional red carpet looks. I don't think this is one of them. It's not terrible. I just don't really like it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ariana Grande in vintage Givenchy Haute Couture

Dress itself is lovely. It is from the Haute Couture S/S 1966 collection by Hubert de Givenchy.

In a release about the look, an archivist at Givenchy shared, "The dress is pale yellow silk with a hand-beaded bodice ... from the epic Givenchy Haute Couture/Audrey Hepburn era ... cne of the most important unions between a designer and muse."

Thanks for the background -- my first thought was Hepburn and now I see why.

I think the gloves were wrong and that the color doesn't work, especially with her hair that shade of blonde. I think if she'd gone platinum it would have worked better, though unfortunately she still would have been screwed over by that pale pink and yellow rose backdrop. She looks better in the room (though the dress itself is less striking while seated).

Couldn’t find Audrey in that dress - only a similar one

I wish we could see if against the green background. Against the yellow she just disappears into the background.

I still hate it but it might be okay with a necklace that is a couple inches longer, darker hair, lose the gloves and add a tennis bracelet, soft waves of hair and maybe lose the fake eye lashes. The hair does look better from the side but it just isn’t working from the front.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm starting to get sick of Wicked.

Such a self-important cast. The movie and its message are not THAT deep and life-changing.

Welcome. You aren't the only hater.

It's sad because I LOVED the Wicked musical when I was a young teen. My grandparents surprised me and took me to see it on Broadway, and I listened to the songs for months!

I enjoyed the movie but am kind of sick of it now.

PP here and loved the book and think the stage musical was wonderful. I think the movie is a gross money grab (I loathe when they split a story into multiple movies like this -- just tell a damn story in one movie) and while I think Erivo and Grande are terrific vocal talents, I don't like their interpretation of these roles and have found their press tour excruciating. Erivo in particular has really turned me off forever. Like zero self-awareness. Even by Hollywood standards. They need to stop. I'm glad this is kind of their swan song because the Oscars don't have a Musical or box office category so they won't be featured as heavily for the rest of awards season (though they will be at everything, ugh).

Erivo is so off-putting. Wasn't she the one complaining that someone made fan art of the movie that mimicked the original musical poster (and thus didn't show her face)?

They are all so far up each other's A$$, including Goldbum and Michelle Yeoh (who was not very good in this film at all).

Yes, she took it as a racist insult because she was either not familiar with the original (iconic) marketing for the musical, or she was aware of it and is just so self-involved that it never occurred to her that the fan had positive intentions.

Yes, the whole cast and directing/producing team has the vibe of a group of high schoolers who think their spring production of Grease is the most important thing that has ever happened and show up to class in character and break into song in the cafeteria. Like are they aware everyone else in the room also makes movies (or tv)? And that a lot of those movies are actually more "important" from the perspective of telling a story people haven't already seen? So irritating.

I also think it's weird how hard that movie has been marketed to little kids. My 1st grader has been begging to see it but I know it will be too intense for her, having seen the stage musical (and been to movies with her before). I would take a 10 yr old to it no problem but they've aggressively marketed it to like toddlers and preschoolers for some reason. I don't get it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ariana Grande in vintage Givenchy Haute Couture

Dress itself is lovely. It is from the Haute Couture S/S 1966 collection by Hubert de Givenchy.

In a release about the look, an archivist at Givenchy shared, "The dress is pale yellow silk with a hand-beaded bodice ... from the epic Givenchy Haute Couture/Audrey Hepburn era ... cne of the most important unions between a designer and muse."

Thanks for the background -- my first thought was Hepburn and now I see why.

I think the gloves were wrong and that the color doesn't work, especially with her hair that shade of blonde. I think if she'd gone platinum it would have worked better, though unfortunately she still would have been screwed over by that pale pink and yellow rose backdrop. She looks better in the room (though the dress itself is less striking while seated).

Couldn’t find Audrey in that dress - only a similar one

I wish we could see if against the green background. Against the yellow she just disappears into the background.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jodie Foster in Dior

Do not like. It overwhelms her.

Jodie just won her fifth globe so she can get away with it.

I actually like it - bit weird and looks cross between a nuns habit and an armless dress Michelle Obama might wear.

But she would look silly in a more conventional red carpet gown.