Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He is signing an executive order today. No doubt Democrats will sue in an attempt to protect the illegal alien squatters. They use the citizenship of their anchor babies to access welfare, food stamps, health care and a whole host of public benefits. Trump needs to take this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to restore integrity to our citizenship process.
No. This is a distraction. Trump can’t change the Constitution with an EO.
Trump should focus on grocery prices.
Something else he has zero control over. What ever happened to “free markets”? We are capitalists until we aren’t, I guess.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He is signing an executive order today. No doubt Democrats will sue in an attempt to protect the illegal alien squatters. They use the citizenship of their anchor babies to access welfare, food stamps, health care and a whole host of public benefits. Trump needs to take this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to restore integrity to our citizenship process.
Because he and SCOTUS get to decide what Amendment is legal? So one day we'll get rid of the 2nd Amendment the same way?
They interpret the constitution. This is a perfect case for them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He is signing an executive order today. No doubt Democrats will sue in an attempt to protect the illegal alien squatters. They use the citizenship of their anchor babies to access welfare, food stamps, health care and a whole host of public benefits. Trump needs to take this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to restore integrity to our citizenship process.
No. This is a distraction. Trump can’t change the Constitution with an EO.
Trump should focus on grocery prices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He is signing an executive order today. No doubt Democrats will sue in an attempt to protect the illegal alien squatters. They use the citizenship of their anchor babies to access welfare, food stamps, health care and a whole host of public benefits. Trump needs to take this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to restore integrity to our citizenship process.
Because he and SCOTUS get to decide what Amendment is legal? So one day we'll get rid of the 2nd Amendment the same way?
Anonymous wrote:Because it’s in the Constitution?? EO doesn’t override the constitution but ok.
Anonymous wrote:He is signing an executive order today. No doubt Democrats will sue in an attempt to protect the illegal alien squatters. They use the citizenship of their anchor babies to access welfare, food stamps, health care and a whole host of public benefits. Trump needs to take this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to restore integrity to our citizenship process.
Anonymous wrote:He is signing an executive order today. No doubt Democrats will sue in an attempt to protect the illegal alien squatters. They use the citizenship of their anchor babies to access welfare, food stamps, health care and a whole host of public benefits. Trump needs to take this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to restore integrity to our citizenship process.
Anonymous wrote:He is signing an executive order today. No doubt Democrats will sue in an attempt to protect the illegal alien squatters. They use the citizenship of their anchor babies to access welfare, food stamps, health care and a whole host of public benefits. Trump needs to take this case all the way to the Supreme Court in order to restore integrity to our citizenship process.
Anonymous wrote:U.S. Constitution
"...and subject to the jurisdiction thereof..."
/thread
Anonymous wrote:
Well, he's signing the executive order today.
What will happen?
Anonymous wrote:When virtually every other sane first world country doesn't have it? For starters, Spain, the UK, Germany, Switzerland, Italy, France, Greece, Australia, Japan, Singapore, China, Colombia, nor the Czech Republic and any of the many other countries liberals say they're going to move to do not have birth right citizenship. What Trump is proposing isn't extreme at all, so why is there resistance to enacting common sense reform? It's also funny too, because as these elections showed, many coming over the border who eventually establish themselves aren't even Democratic voters either, so the Dems may actually seriously want to rethink they're immigration and citizenship policies before they blindly stand up for making it extremely easy for letting in millions of super catholic people who are now showing to be socially conservative and supporters of traditional family values. There was a time when the 14th amendment served a purpose, but it is the year 2024. Birthright citizenship is now much more of a security liability than anything. Why shouldn't we end it when most of the countries liberals espouse and hold up as role models don't even have it?