Anonymous wrote:What about the two minutes that he was walking around and using his phone after she had driven away? He turned on and the turned off his phone using the lock button two minutes after she had left.

Anonymous wrote:The minute, I heard that the cop stayed in his house while the person dying on his front lawn and refused to go outside to help. I knew they were guilty.

I have a household of law-enforcement officers and believe me, dude is guilty AF

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, court tv lady-I think there’s reasonable doubt. No one I know in mass thinks the case is strong enough and most are shocked and annoyed they retried.

I'm not "court tv lady," I'm a GULC JD with decades of experience in our criminal justice system and several hundred DUIs under my belt as both a defender and a prosecutor.

And you must not know many people in Mass who have actual brains in their heads, or the ones you know are all cult susceptible non-critical thinkers.

you must be a terrible attorney to believe such lies. GULS should take your degree back.

You have no investment into this case. I am local. My parents live in Canton. Everyone in town knows she didn’t do it and is getting railroaded while I pay for it as a taxpayer.

Every ALL CAPS comment you make can be rebutted.

MSP is garbage as is Canton PD. Look at the Birchmore case.

Anonymous wrote:Anyways, courts adjourned for the day. I thought McCabe did well.

Did you miss the DEFENDER part of my post?

I was in the criminal justice clinic at Georgetown, one of the best such programs in the country. I also clerked at the PDS in DC, one of the best public defender organizations in the country. I have a much stronger predilection toward the defense position which is what made me an excellent prosecutor. I know what reasonable doubt is and I know what magical thinking, UNreasonable doubt and shadows of doubt look like. I'd be the first to criticize if I saw any evidence whatsoever of nefarious activity on the part of the po-po in this case; it's not there. Calling a disgusting murdered a c*** on your private phone in text messages to friends/family doesn't make you a dirty cop.

An audit of the Canton PD was done by 5 Stones intelligence, an outfit that has multi-million contracts with the USA government across multiple agencies. No wrongdoing, no corruption. Some of their practices need to be updated to best practices, but nothing was done in this investigation to undermine the evidence that was collected. There was ZERO probable cause to investigate the home or the guests therein.

An audit of sorts was done by the FBI/DOJ of the Massachusetts State Police and all parties involved in this case and there was ZERO evidence found of a third party culprit or a police coverup. If you think differently, you don't know the relationships between local and federal law enforcement in Massachusetts. If there had been anything nefarious found, heads would be rolling.

Karen Read is an odious human being who is guilty of manslaughtering and murdering John O'Keefe. What she's done since she killed him is the proof of what a disgusting c*** she is at her core, she has a disordered personality and no moral compass whatsoever.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She did it. If the people in the house killed him, which they did not, then they got pretty damn lucky that she broke her tail light and was the one to find him the next morning. Because without that they would have had no way to pin this on her.

She called her mom that night in the middle of the night 3 times she knew what she did.

Lots of women call their moms multiple times a day or night. Whatever!

“She felt she struck something,” William Read said in the Boston 25 segment. “She said, ‘Dad, I think I struck something. … I remember … backing up and hitting something.’

ok....

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, court tv lady-I think there’s reasonable doubt. No one I know in mass thinks the case is strong enough and most are shocked and annoyed they retried.

I'm not "court tv lady," I'm a GULC JD with decades of experience in our criminal justice system and several hundred DUIs under my belt as both a defender and a prosecutor.

And you must not know many people in Mass who have actual brains in their heads, or the ones you know are all cult susceptible non-critical thinkers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, court tv lady-I think there’s reasonable doubt. No one I know in mass thinks the case is strong enough and most are shocked and annoyed they retried.

I'm not "court tv lady," I'm a GULC JD with decades of experience in our criminal justice system and several hundred DUIs under my belt as both a defender and a prosecutor.

And you must not know many people in Mass who have actual brains in their heads, or the ones you know are all cult susceptible non-critical thinkers.

Yes, and former prosecutors are of course famously representative of the average juror!

Did you miss the DEFENDER part of my post?

I was in the criminal justice clinic at Georgetown, one of the best such programs in the country. I also clerked at the PDS in DC, one of the best public defender organizations in the country. I have a much stronger predilection toward the defense position which is what made me an excellent prosecutor. I know what reasonable doubt is and I know what magical thinking, UNreasonable doubt and shadows of doubt look like. I'd be the first to criticize if I saw any evidence whatsoever of nefarious activity on the part of the po-po in this case; it's not there. Calling a disgusting murdered a c*** on your private phone in text messages to friends/family doesn't make you a dirty cop.

An audit of the Canton PD was done by 5 Stones intelligence, an outfit that has multi-million contracts with the USA government across multiple agencies. No wrongdoing, no corruption. Some of their practices need to be updated to best practices, but nothing was done in this investigation to undermine the evidence that was collected. There was ZERO probable cause to investigate the home or the guests therein.

An audit of sorts was done by the FBI/DOJ of the Massachusetts State Police and all parties involved in this case and there was ZERO evidence found of a third party culprit or a police coverup. If you think differently, you don't know the relationships between local and federal law enforcement in Massachusetts. If there had been anything nefarious found, heads would be rolling.

Karen Read is an odious human being who is guilty of manslaughtering and murdering John O'Keefe. What she's done since she killed him is the proof of what a disgusting c*** she is at her core, she has a disordered personality and no moral compass whatsoever.

You are way too invested in a random case, are you always this crazy?

+1 you probably want to keep an eye on your blood pressure, former prosecutor/defender/alum of the prestigious criminal justice clinic at Georgetown.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, court tv lady-I think there’s reasonable doubt. No one I know in mass thinks the case is strong enough and most are shocked and annoyed they retried.

I'm not "court tv lady," I'm a GULC JD with decades of experience in our criminal justice system and several hundred DUIs under my belt as both a defender and a prosecutor.

And you must not know many people in Mass who have actual brains in their heads, or the ones you know are all cult susceptible non-critical thinkers.

Yes, and former prosecutors are of course famously representative of the average juror!

Did you miss the DEFENDER part of my post?

I was in the criminal justice clinic at Georgetown, one of the best such programs in the country. I also clerked at the PDS in DC, one of the best public defender organizations in the country. I have a much stronger predilection toward the defense position which is what made me an excellent prosecutor. I know what reasonable doubt is and I know what magical thinking, UNreasonable doubt and shadows of doubt look like. I'd be the first to criticize if I saw any evidence whatsoever of nefarious activity on the part of the po-po in this case; it's not there. Calling a disgusting murdered a c*** on your private phone in text messages to friends/family doesn't make you a dirty cop.

An audit of the Canton PD was done by 5 Stones intelligence, an outfit that has multi-million contracts with the USA government across multiple agencies. No wrongdoing, no corruption. Some of their practices need to be updated to best practices, but nothing was done in this investigation to undermine the evidence that was collected. There was ZERO probable cause to investigate the home or the guests therein.

An audit of sorts was done by the FBI/DOJ of the Massachusetts State Police and all parties involved in this case and there was ZERO evidence found of a third party culprit or a police coverup. If you think differently, you don't know the relationships between local and federal law enforcement in Massachusetts. If there had been anything nefarious found, heads would be rolling.

Karen Read is an odious human being who is guilty of manslaughtering and murdering John O'Keefe. What she's done since she killed him is the proof of what a disgusting c*** she is at her core, she has a disordered personality and no moral compass whatsoever.

You are way too invested in a random case, are you always this crazy?