Anonymous
Post 07/29/2024 18:39     Subject: APS School Board Chair Drama

Yep. You don't even need Google for it. Just listen to them drone on at a SB meeting.
Anonymous
Post 07/28/2024 03:15     Subject: APS School Board Chair Drama

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I dunno. I pretty much hate Miranda/APE, but I've grown to hate Cristina and David more. Their showing at the last SB meeting was childish and petty.


They’ve been disappointing for sure but are still lightyears better than APE/MT.


Looks like they are getting the away for the day policy they won’t shut up about.


This is bad because…?


It's a good policy but APE/MT will take credit for it.

Well, people on here have been screaming that they are a lobbying group now so maybe they are behind it.


Finally, someone admits that APE is a lobbying group. They have their own interests in mind, not APS's. Maybe one day they'll show us their financials instead of a postcard.


Of course they are a lobbying group. They are great at gaslighting when people point that out. They haven’t thought this cell phone thing through at all and they sound unhinged.


You just need to google who the most vocal ones work for to know they are not in the interests of public education. They work for people who are all in to Project 2025.

They are lobbyists in real life too.


+1


+1
Anonymous
Post 07/26/2024 16:32     Subject: APS School Board Chair Drama

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I dunno. I pretty much hate Miranda/APE, but I've grown to hate Cristina and David more. Their showing at the last SB meeting was childish and petty.


They’ve been disappointing for sure but are still lightyears better than APE/MT.


Looks like they are getting the away for the day policy they won’t shut up about.


This is bad because…?


It's a good policy but APE/MT will take credit for it.

Well, people on here have been screaming that they are a lobbying group now so maybe they are behind it.


Finally, someone admits that APE is a lobbying group. They have their own interests in mind, not APS's. Maybe one day they'll show us their financials instead of a postcard.


Of course they are a lobbying group. They are great at gaslighting when people point that out. They haven’t thought this cell phone thing through at all and they sound unhinged.


You just need to google who the most vocal ones work for to know they are not in the interests of public education. They work for people who are all in to Project 2025.

They are lobbyists in real life too.


+1
Anonymous
Post 07/26/2024 15:11     Subject: APS School Board Chair Drama

haha looked it up. hadn't heard that term before.
Anonymous
Post 07/21/2024 17:04     Subject: APS School Board Chair Drama

Go Google them and stop with the sea lioning. (Look that up too).
Anonymous
Post 07/21/2024 16:15     Subject: APS School Board Chair Drama

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I dunno. I pretty much hate Miranda/APE, but I've grown to hate Cristina and David more. Their showing at the last SB meeting was childish and petty.


They’ve been disappointing for sure but are still lightyears better than APE/MT.


Looks like they are getting the away for the day policy they won’t shut up about.


This is bad because…?


It's a good policy but APE/MT will take credit for it.

Well, people on here have been screaming that they are a lobbying group now so maybe they are behind it.


Finally, someone admits that APE is a lobbying group. They have their own interests in mind, not APS's. Maybe one day they'll show us their financials instead of a postcard.


Of course they are a lobbying group. They are great at gaslighting when people point that out. They haven’t thought this cell phone thing through at all and they sound unhinged.


You just need to google who the most vocal ones work for to know they are not in the interests of public education. They work for people who are all in to Project 2025.

They are lobbyists in real life too.


Sources for this?