Anonymous wrote:DS who was on both AOS and AET waitlist , got an offer from AOS today .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://vimeo.com/446846141
Found this linked from a news story.

That video holds no maximum quota. Read the preso again. Man, no wonder why your kid didn't get in.

https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/loudoun/Board.nsf/files/BS9PUK66501E/$file/Academies%20of%20Loudoun%20Admission%20081120.pdf

If they cannot fill the expected quota by census, they will go county-wide to determine the next admission. Also, this is almost 5 years old at this point and has changed. Teacher recommendations matter, as do real grades. They specifically denote in this 2020-2021 policy that they *don't* just because of COVID.

It also doesn't say a minimum quota, though presumably they admit 2% of a total of 7500 8th graders, so 75% of that would be 1.5%.
You are correct that maximum quota is not listed there, though the slides are not what I remember. I remember Willard's 31, but also 10 for AOS and 11 for AET for another school, which was the maximum quota, but that is not in that meeting. Everything else I remember is in this meeting. I didn't notice at the time but there appears to be a quota for low-income as well.

I really don't think you know what the word quota means. There's no minimum. There's no maximum. There's no brown, poor, or green quota system.

They align the census data towards the application data and try to make those values be congruent with the student population. "Changing" the criteria in 2021 to more even amounts per middle school had almost no effect on the racial disparity in the academies.

In 2020, the 23% asian population in LCPS represented 82% of the AoS accepted offers. The very next year it resulted in 60% of the AoS accepted offers - and AET stayed the exact same - with that same 23%.

The only reason people think that there might be a quota is because there have been so many attempts to limit certain populations generally. So that's where their mind goes.

The way to address this isn't to say "you're nuts, nothing going on here, move along" The way to address this is to say "while there are certainly plenty of attempts to limit some groups, that is not what is going on here, lets go fight the racists together"

Check the links above. There is a minimum quota per school. The school board speaking, this looks like there intent was to reduce Asian numbers. Unlike with TJ, prep was mentioned. One school boiard member objected to the idea these kids only got in because of prep.

Check the links again, no quota. The intent was to reduce the amount of kids coming from just three schools, which accounted for 82% of accepted admissions to AoS.

The actual data represents a 20% drop in Asian acceptance to AoS in 2022 (from 82 to ~60) and a 0% drop in Asian acceptance to AET in 2022. Whites didn't benefit here - that 20% drop went to Hispanic, African American, and 2 or more races.

Funding a public school with 82% Asian kids from three middle schools sounds like a horrible use of tax dollars.

Wait. Why is it a horrible use of tax dollars to fund a school that is predominantly asian? I mean there are definitely schools that are predominantly white. And schools that are predominantly black. And schools that are predominantly hispanic. Why are predominantly asian schools bad?

Because it's selective and only resources one small area of the county. even with the admission per middle school the makeup of AOS is still the same, only AET has changed.

So it's a horrible use of tax dollars because members of one race disproportionately meet the standards of a selective criteria?
Is there some special form of racism in that part of the state that makes it easier for asian kids to meet the selective criteria and prevents white kids and black kids and hispanic kids from also meeting the standards of that selective criteria?

Uhh, yeah. That's why all these parents are up in arms about it not being a solely test-based admission process. Go read the mission statement.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://vimeo.com/446846141
Found this linked from a news story.

That video holds no maximum quota. Read the preso again. Man, no wonder why your kid didn't get in.

https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/loudoun/Board.nsf/files/BS9PUK66501E/$file/Academies%20of%20Loudoun%20Admission%20081120.pdf

If they cannot fill the expected quota by census, they will go county-wide to determine the next admission. Also, this is almost 5 years old at this point and has changed. Teacher recommendations matter, as do real grades. They specifically denote in this 2020-2021 policy that they *don't* just because of COVID.

It also doesn't say a minimum quota, though presumably they admit 2% of a total of 7500 8th graders, so 75% of that would be 1.5%.
You are correct that maximum quota is not listed there, though the slides are not what I remember. I remember Willard's 31, but also 10 for AOS and 11 for AET for another school, which was the maximum quota, but that is not in that meeting. Everything else I remember is in this meeting. I didn't notice at the time but there appears to be a quota for low-income as well.

I really don't think you know what the word quota means. There's no minimum. There's no maximum. There's no brown, poor, or green quota system.

They align the census data towards the application data and try to make those values be congruent with the student population. "Changing" the criteria in 2021 to more even amounts per middle school had almost no effect on the racial disparity in the academies.

In 2020, the 23% asian population in LCPS represented 82% of the AoS accepted offers. The very next year it resulted in 60% of the AoS accepted offers - and AET stayed the exact same - with that same 23%.

The only reason people think that there might be a quota is because there have been so many attempts to limit certain populations generally. So that's where their mind goes.

The way to address this isn't to say "you're nuts, nothing going on here, move along" The way to address this is to say "while there are certainly plenty of attempts to limit some groups, that is not what is going on here, lets go fight the racists together"

Check the links above. There is a minimum quota per school. The school board speaking, this looks like there intent was to reduce Asian numbers. Unlike with TJ, prep was mentioned. One school boiard member objected to the idea these kids only got in because of prep.

Check the links again, no quota. The intent was to reduce the amount of kids coming from just three schools, which accounted for 82% of accepted admissions to AoS.

The actual data represents a 20% drop in Asian acceptance to AoS in 2022 (from 82 to ~60) and a 0% drop in Asian acceptance to AET in 2022. Whites didn't benefit here - that 20% drop went to Hispanic, African American, and 2 or more races.

Funding a public school with 82% Asian kids from three middle schools sounds like a horrible use of tax dollars.

Wait. Why is it a horrible use of tax dollars to fund a school that is predominantly asian? I mean there are definitely schools that are predominantly white. And schools that are predominantly black. And schools that are predominantly hispanic. Why are predominantly asian schools bad?

Because it's selective and only resources one small area of the county. even with the admission per middle school the makeup of AOS is still the same, only AET has changed.

So it's a horrible use of tax dollars because members of one race disproportionately meet the standards of a selective criteria?
Is there some special form of racism in that part of the state that makes it easier for asian kids to meet the selective criteria and prevents white kids and black kids and hispanic kids from also meeting the standards of that selective criteria?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://vimeo.com/446846141
Found this linked from a news story.

That video holds no maximum quota. Read the preso again. Man, no wonder why your kid didn't get in.

https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/loudoun/Board.nsf/files/BS9PUK66501E/$file/Academies%20of%20Loudoun%20Admission%20081120.pdf

If they cannot fill the expected quota by census, they will go county-wide to determine the next admission. Also, this is almost 5 years old at this point and has changed. Teacher recommendations matter, as do real grades. They specifically denote in this 2020-2021 policy that they *don't* just because of COVID.

It also doesn't say a minimum quota, though presumably they admit 2% of a total of 7500 8th graders, so 75% of that would be 1.5%.
You are correct that maximum quota is not listed there, though the slides are not what I remember. I remember Willard's 31, but also 10 for AOS and 11 for AET for another school, which was the maximum quota, but that is not in that meeting. Everything else I remember is in this meeting. I didn't notice at the time but there appears to be a quota for low-income as well.

I really don't think you know what the word quota means. There's no minimum. There's no maximum. There's no brown, poor, or green quota system.

They align the census data towards the application data and try to make those values be congruent with the student population. "Changing" the criteria in 2021 to more even amounts per middle school had almost no effect on the racial disparity in the academies.

In 2020, the 23% asian population in LCPS represented 82% of the AoS accepted offers. The very next year it resulted in 60% of the AoS accepted offers - and AET stayed the exact same - with that same 23%.

The only reason people think that there might be a quota is because there have been so many attempts to limit certain populations generally. So that's where their mind goes.

The way to address this isn't to say "you're nuts, nothing going on here, move along" The way to address this is to say "while there are certainly plenty of attempts to limit some groups, that is not what is going on here, lets go fight the racists together"

Check the links above. There is a minimum quota per school. The school board speaking, this looks like there intent was to reduce Asian numbers. Unlike with TJ, prep was mentioned. One school boiard member objected to the idea these kids only got in because of prep.

Check the links again, no quota. The intent was to reduce the amount of kids coming from just three schools, which accounted for 82% of accepted admissions to AoS.

The actual data represents a 20% drop in Asian acceptance to AoS in 2022 (from 82 to ~60) and a 0% drop in Asian acceptance to AET in 2022. Whites didn't benefit here - that 20% drop went to Hispanic, African American, and 2 or more races.

Funding a public school with 82% Asian kids from three middle schools sounds like a horrible use of tax dollars.

Wait. Why is it a horrible use of tax dollars to fund a school that is predominantly asian? I mean there are definitely schools that are predominantly white. And schools that are predominantly black. And schools that are predominantly hispanic. Why are predominantly asian schools bad?

Because it's selective and only resources one small area of the county. even with the admission per middle school the makeup of AOS is still the same, only AET has changed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://vimeo.com/446846141
Found this linked from a news story.

That video holds no maximum quota. Read the preso again. Man, no wonder why your kid didn't get in.

https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/loudoun/Board.nsf/files/BS9PUK66501E/$file/Academies%20of%20Loudoun%20Admission%20081120.pdf

If they cannot fill the expected quota by census, they will go county-wide to determine the next admission. Also, this is almost 5 years old at this point and has changed. Teacher recommendations matter, as do real grades. They specifically denote in this 2020-2021 policy that they *don't* just because of COVID.

It also doesn't say a minimum quota, though presumably they admit 2% of a total of 7500 8th graders, so 75% of that would be 1.5%.
You are correct that maximum quota is not listed there, though the slides are not what I remember. I remember Willard's 31, but also 10 for AOS and 11 for AET for another school, which was the maximum quota, but that is not in that meeting. Everything else I remember is in this meeting. I didn't notice at the time but there appears to be a quota for low-income as well.

I really don't think you know what the word quota means. There's no minimum. There's no maximum. There's no brown, poor, or green quota system.

They align the census data towards the application data and try to make those values be congruent with the student population. "Changing" the criteria in 2021 to more even amounts per middle school had almost no effect on the racial disparity in the academies.

In 2020, the 23% asian population in LCPS represented 82% of the AoS accepted offers. The very next year it resulted in 60% of the AoS accepted offers - and AET stayed the exact same - with that same 23%.

The only reason people think that there might be a quota is because there have been so many attempts to limit certain populations generally. So that's where their mind goes.

The way to address this isn't to say "you're nuts, nothing going on here, move along" The way to address this is to say "while there are certainly plenty of attempts to limit some groups, that is not what is going on here, lets go fight the racists together"

Check the links above. There is a minimum quota per school. The school board speaking, this looks like there intent was to reduce Asian numbers. Unlike with TJ, prep was mentioned. One school boiard member objected to the idea these kids only got in because of prep.

Check the links again, no quota. The intent was to reduce the amount of kids coming from just three schools, which accounted for 82% of accepted admissions to AoS.

The actual data represents a 20% drop in Asian acceptance to AoS in 2022 (from 82 to ~60) and a 0% drop in Asian acceptance to AET in 2022. Whites didn't benefit here - that 20% drop went to Hispanic, African American, and 2 or more races.

Funding a public school with 82% Asian kids from three middle schools sounds like a horrible use of tax dollars.

Wait. Why is it a horrible use of tax dollars to fund a school that is predominantly asian? I mean there are definitely schools that are predominantly white. And schools that are predominantly black. And schools that are predominantly hispanic. Why are predominantly asian schools bad?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://vimeo.com/446846141
Found this linked from a news story.

That video holds no maximum quota. Read the preso again. Man, no wonder why your kid didn't get in.

https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/loudoun/Board.nsf/files/BS9PUK66501E/$file/Academies%20of%20Loudoun%20Admission%20081120.pdf

If they cannot fill the expected quota by census, they will go county-wide to determine the next admission. Also, this is almost 5 years old at this point and has changed. Teacher recommendations matter, as do real grades. They specifically denote in this 2020-2021 policy that they *don't* just because of COVID.

It also doesn't say a minimum quota, though presumably they admit 2% of a total of 7500 8th graders, so 75% of that would be 1.5%.
You are correct that maximum quota is not listed there, though the slides are not what I remember. I remember Willard's 31, but also 10 for AOS and 11 for AET for another school, which was the maximum quota, but that is not in that meeting. Everything else I remember is in this meeting. I didn't notice at the time but there appears to be a quota for low-income as well.

I really don't think you know what the word quota means. There's no minimum. There's no maximum. There's no brown, poor, or green quota system.

They align the census data towards the application data and try to make those values be congruent with the student population. "Changing" the criteria in 2021 to more even amounts per middle school had almost no effect on the racial disparity in the academies.

In 2020, the 23% asian population in LCPS represented 82% of the AoS accepted offers. The very next year it resulted in 60% of the AoS accepted offers - and AET stayed the exact same - with that same 23%.

The only reason people think that there might be a quota is because there have been so many attempts to limit certain populations generally. So that's where their mind goes.

The way to address this isn't to say "you're nuts, nothing going on here, move along" The way to address this is to say "while there are certainly plenty of attempts to limit some groups, that is not what is going on here, lets go fight the racists together"

Check the links above. There is a minimum quota per school. The school board speaking, this looks like there intent was to reduce Asian numbers. Unlike with TJ, prep was mentioned. One school boiard member objected to the idea these kids only got in because of prep.

Check the links again, no quota. The intent was to reduce the amount of kids coming from just three schools, which accounted for 82% of accepted admissions to AoS.

The actual data represents a 20% drop in Asian acceptance to AoS in 2022 (from 82 to ~60) and a 0% drop in Asian acceptance to AET in 2022. Whites didn't benefit here - that 20% drop went to Hispanic, African American, and 2 or more races.

Funding a public school with 82% Asian kids from three middle schools sounds like a horrible use of tax dollars.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://vimeo.com/446846141
Found this linked from a news story.

That video holds no maximum quota. Read the preso again. Man, no wonder why your kid didn't get in.

https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/loudoun/Board.nsf/files/BS9PUK66501E/$file/Academies%20of%20Loudoun%20Admission%20081120.pdf

If they cannot fill the expected quota by census, they will go county-wide to determine the next admission. Also, this is almost 5 years old at this point and has changed. Teacher recommendations matter, as do real grades. They specifically denote in this 2020-2021 policy that they *don't* just because of COVID.

It also doesn't say a minimum quota, though presumably they admit 2% of a total of 7500 8th graders, so 75% of that would be 1.5%.
You are correct that maximum quota is not listed there, though the slides are not what I remember. I remember Willard's 31, but also 10 for AOS and 11 for AET for another school, which was the maximum quota, but that is not in that meeting. Everything else I remember is in this meeting. I didn't notice at the time but there appears to be a quota for low-income as well.

I really don't think you know what the word quota means. There's no minimum. There's no maximum. There's no brown, poor, or green quota system.

They align the census data towards the application data and try to make those values be congruent with the student population. "Changing" the criteria in 2021 to more even amounts per middle school had almost no effect on the racial disparity in the academies.

In 2020, the 23% asian population in LCPS represented 82% of the AoS accepted offers. The very next year it resulted in 60% of the AoS accepted offers - and AET stayed the exact same - with that same 23%.

The only reason people think that there might be a quota is because there have been so many attempts to limit certain populations generally. So that's where their mind goes.

The way to address this isn't to say "you're nuts, nothing going on here, move along" The way to address this is to say "while there are certainly plenty of attempts to limit some groups, that is not what is going on here, lets go fight the racists together"

Check the links above. There is a minimum quota per school. The school board speaking, this looks like there intent was to reduce Asian numbers. Unlike with TJ, prep was mentioned. One school boiard member objected to the idea these kids only got in because of prep.

Check the links again, no quota. The intent was to reduce the amount of kids coming from just three schools, which accounted for 82% of accepted admissions to AoS.

The actual data represents a 20% drop in Asian acceptance to AoS in 2022 (from 82 to ~60) and a 0% drop in Asian acceptance to AET in 2022. Whites didn't benefit here - that 20% drop went to Hispanic, African American, and 2 or more races.

Funding a public school with 82% Asian kids from three middle schools sounds like a horrible use of tax dollars.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://vimeo.com/446846141
Found this linked from a news story.

That video holds no maximum quota. Read the preso again. Man, no wonder why your kid didn't get in.

https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/loudoun/Board.nsf/files/BS9PUK66501E/$file/Academies%20of%20Loudoun%20Admission%20081120.pdf

If they cannot fill the expected quota by census, they will go county-wide to determine the next admission. Also, this is almost 5 years old at this point and has changed. Teacher recommendations matter, as do real grades. They specifically denote in this 2020-2021 policy that they *don't* just because of COVID.

It also doesn't say a minimum quota, though presumably they admit 2% of a total of 7500 8th graders, so 75% of that would be 1.5%.
You are correct that maximum quota is not listed there, though the slides are not what I remember. I remember Willard's 31, but also 10 for AOS and 11 for AET for another school, which was the maximum quota, but that is not in that meeting. Everything else I remember is in this meeting. I didn't notice at the time but there appears to be a quota for low-income as well.

I really don't think you know what the word quota means. There's no minimum. There's no maximum. There's no brown, poor, or green quota system.

They align the census data towards the application data and try to make those values be congruent with the student population. "Changing" the criteria in 2021 to more even amounts per middle school had almost no effect on the racial disparity in the academies.

In 2020, the 23% asian population in LCPS represented 82% of the AoS accepted offers. The very next year it resulted in 60% of the AoS accepted offers - and AET stayed the exact same - with that same 23%.

The only reason people think that there might be a quota is because there have been so many attempts to limit certain populations generally. So that's where their mind goes.

The way to address this isn't to say "you're nuts, nothing going on here, move along" The way to address this is to say "while there are certainly plenty of attempts to limit some groups, that is not what is going on here, lets go fight the racists together"

Check the links above. There is a minimum quota per school. The school board speaking, this looks like there intent was to reduce Asian numbers. Unlike with TJ, prep was mentioned. One school boiard member objected to the idea these kids only got in because of prep.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://vimeo.com/446846141
Found this linked from a news story.

That video holds no maximum quota. Read the preso again. Man, no wonder why your kid didn't get in.

https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/loudoun/Board.nsf/files/BS9PUK66501E/$file/Academies%20of%20Loudoun%20Admission%20081120.pdf

If they cannot fill the expected quota by census, they will go county-wide to determine the next admission. Also, this is almost 5 years old at this point and has changed. Teacher recommendations matter, as do real grades. They specifically denote in this 2020-2021 policy that they *don't* just because of COVID.

It also doesn't say a minimum quota, though presumably they admit 2% of a total of 7500 8th graders, so 75% of that would be 1.5%.
You are correct that maximum quota is not listed there, though the slides are not what I remember. I remember Willard's 31, but also 10 for AOS and 11 for AET for another school, which was the maximum quota, but that is not in that meeting. Everything else I remember is in this meeting. I didn't notice at the time but there appears to be a quota for low-income as well.

I really don't think you know what the word quota means. There's no minimum. There's no maximum. There's no brown, poor, or green quota system.

They align the census data towards the application data and try to make those values be congruent with the student population. "Changing" the criteria in 2021 to more even amounts per middle school had almost no effect on the racial disparity in the academies.

In 2020, the 23% asian population in LCPS represented 82% of the AoS accepted offers. The very next year it resulted in 60% of the AoS accepted offers - and AET stayed the exact same - with that same 23%.

The only reason people think that there might be a quota is because there have been so many attempts to limit certain populations generally. So that's where their mind goes.

The way to address this isn't to say "you're nuts, nothing going on here, move along" The way to address this is to say "while there are certainly plenty of attempts to limit some groups, that is not what is going on here, lets go fight the racists together"

Check the links above. There is a minimum quota per school. The school board speaking, this looks like there intent was to reduce Asian numbers. Unlike with TJ, prep was mentioned. One school boiard member objected to the idea these kids only got in because of prep.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://vimeo.com/446846141
Found this linked from a news story.

That video holds no maximum quota. Read the preso again. Man, no wonder why your kid didn't get in.

https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/loudoun/Board.nsf/files/BS9PUK66501E/$file/Academies%20of%20Loudoun%20Admission%20081120.pdf

If they cannot fill the expected quota by census, they will go county-wide to determine the next admission. Also, this is almost 5 years old at this point and has changed. Teacher recommendations matter, as do real grades. They specifically denote in this 2020-2021 policy that they *don't* just because of COVID.

It also doesn't say a minimum quota, though presumably they admit 2% of a total of 7500 8th graders, so 75% of that would be 1.5%.
You are correct that maximum quota is not listed there, though the slides are not what I remember. I remember Willard's 31, but also 10 for AOS and 11 for AET for another school, which was the maximum quota, but that is not in that meeting. Everything else I remember is in this meeting. I didn't notice at the time but there appears to be a quota for low-income as well.

I really don't think you know what the word quota means. There's no minimum. There's no maximum. There's no brown, poor, or green quota system.

They align the census data towards the application data and try to make those values be congruent with the student population. "Changing" the criteria in 2021 to more even amounts per middle school had almost no effect on the racial disparity in the academies.

In 2020, the 23% asian population in LCPS represented 82% of the AoS accepted offers. The very next year it resulted in 60% of the AoS accepted offers - and AET stayed the exact same - with that same 23%.

The only reason people think that there might be a quota is because there have been so many attempts to limit certain populations generally. So that's where their mind goes.

The way to address this isn't to say "you're nuts, nothing going on here, move along" The way to address this is to say "while there are certainly plenty of attempts to limit some groups, that is not what is going on here, lets go fight the racists together"

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://vimeo.com/446846141
Found this linked from a news story.

That video holds no maximum quota. Read the preso again. Man, no wonder why your kid didn't get in.

https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/loudoun/Board.nsf/files/BS9PUK66501E/$file/Academies%20of%20Loudoun%20Admission%20081120.pdf

If they cannot fill the expected quota by census, they will go county-wide to determine the next admission. Also, this is almost 5 years old at this point and has changed. Teacher recommendations matter, as do real grades. They specifically denote in this 2020-2021 policy that they *don't* just because of COVID.

It also doesn't say a minimum quota, though presumably they admit 2% of a total of 7500 8th graders, so 75% of that would be 1.5%.
You are correct that maximum quota is not listed there, though the slides are not what I remember. I remember Willard's 31, but also 10 for AOS and 11 for AET for another school, which was the maximum quota, but that is not in that meeting. Everything else I remember is in this meeting. I didn't notice at the time but there appears to be a quota for low-income as well.

I really don't think you know what the word quota means. There's no minimum. There's no maximum. There's no brown, poor, or green quota system.

They align the census data towards the application data and try to make those values be congruent with the student population. "Changing" the criteria in 2021 to more even amounts per middle school had almost no effect on the racial disparity in the academies.

In 2020, the 23% asian population in LCPS represented 82% of the AoS accepted offers. The very next year it resulted in 60% of the AoS accepted offers - and AET stayed the exact same - with that same 23%.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://vimeo.com/446846141
Found this linked from a news story.

That video holds no maximum quota. Read the preso again. Man, no wonder why your kid didn't get in.

https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/loudoun/Board.nsf/files/BS9PUK66501E/$file/Academies%20of%20Loudoun%20Admission%20081120.pdf

If they cannot fill the expected quota by census, they will go county-wide to determine the next admission. Also, this is almost 5 years old at this point and has changed. Teacher recommendations matter, as do real grades. They specifically denote in this 2020-2021 policy that they *don't* just because of COVID.

It also doesn't say a minimum quota, though presumably they admit 2% of a total of 7500 8th graders, so 75% of that would be 1.5%.
You are correct that maximum quota is not listed there, though the slides are not what I remember. I remember Willard's 31, but also 10 for AOS and 11 for AET for another school, which was the maximum quota, but that is not in that meeting. Everything else I remember is in this meeting. I didn't notice at the time but there appears to be a quota for low-income as well.

I really don't think you know what the word quota means. There's no minimum. There's no maximum. There's no brown, poor, or green quota system.

They align the census data towards the application data and try to make those values be congruent with the student population. "Changing" the criteria in 2021 to more even amounts per middle school had almost no effect on the racial disparity in the academies.

In 2020, the 23% asian population in LCPS represented 82% of the AoS accepted offers. The very next year it resulted in 60% of the AoS accepted offers - and AET stayed the exact same - with that same 23%.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://vimeo.com/446846141
Found this linked from a news story.

That video holds no maximum quota. Read the preso again. Man, no wonder why your kid didn't get in.

https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/loudoun/Board.nsf/files/BS9PUK66501E/$file/Academies%20of%20Loudoun%20Admission%20081120.pdf

If they cannot fill the expected quota by census, they will go county-wide to determine the next admission. Also, this is almost 5 years old at this point and has changed. Teacher recommendations matter, as do real grades. They specifically denote in this 2020-2021 policy that they *don't* just because of COVID.

It also doesn't say a minimum quota, though presumably they admit 2% of a total of 7500 8th graders, so 75% of that would be 1.5%.
You are correct that maximum quota is not listed there, though the slides are not what I remember. I remember Willard's 31, but also 10 for AOS and 11 for AET for another school, which was the maximum quota, but that is not in that meeting. Everything else I remember is in this meeting. I didn't notice at the time but there appears to be a quota for low-income as well.