Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks that Imgur link is doctored?

Yes. You are the only one. Please tell what exactly you think is doctored?

I don't doubt the photo exists, but I think someone who is claiming to be a neighbor and close friend took a photo she found of them at a restaurant and created a fake instagram post. Who took this photo? For all we know, it could have been taken months ago by Christine when they were all out to dinner. Look at it closely, they don't look like they're being touchy feely, they are just taking a photo together. Yes, she's wearing an extremely revealing shirt, but hey, she's Brazilian, that's how they dress. Prove it's real by posting the rest of the pictures that you have.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the PP suggesting the picture could be old and AP made it seem like it was recent.

It is not. I have more pictures of them and one from this month. It was shared by someone who had access to her “close” friends stories on Instagram. They were living and behaving like a couple. I knew CB, went to her place a handful of times, walked their dog a couple of times, and met/saw Brendan once. I didn’t have a good impression about him.

Christine on the other hand was one of the kindest souls out there. A great mom, nurse, host mom, and friend. Amazing human being. I would be completely SHOCKED if she had Joe Ryan over for a sexual encounter, because I do not believe she would do that as the caring mother I know she was.

PROVE IT. Post the rest. I think someone faked that photo that you've been posting over and over again. People here and on reddit keep saying "it's all over her social media" but there has only been one image linked. If you want us to believe you, then you need to post the rest immediately. We're not giving you time to create more fake photos. Post the rest of them right now.

What is fake about the photo?

Anonymous wrote:For the PP suggesting the picture could be old and AP made it seem like it was recent.

It is not. I have more pictures of them and one from this month. It was shared by someone who had access to her “close” friends stories on Instagram. They were living and behaving like a couple. I knew CB, went to her place a handful of times, walked their dog a couple of times, and met/saw Brendan once. I didn’t have a good impression about him.

Christine on the other hand was one of the kindest souls out there. A great mom, nurse, host mom, and friend. Amazing human being. I would be completely SHOCKED if she had Joe Ryan over for a sexual encounter, because I do not believe she would do that as the caring mother I know she was.

PROVE IT. Post the rest. I think someone faked that photo that you've been posting over and over again. People here and on reddit keep saying "it's all over her social media" but there has only been one image linked. If you want us to believe you, then you need to post the rest immediately. We're not giving you time to create more fake photos. Post the rest of them right now.

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who thinks that Imgur link is doctored?

Yes. You are the only one. Please tell what exactly you think is doctored?

Anonymous wrote:

Question for the BB stans, the ones who rush to aggressively defend his earning potential and "good name," like you were 12 and he was Taylor Swift - do you do this for others too? Prison pen pals and the like? Or just him? And if just him, why him? Genuinely curious.

I'd ask if a single one of you is a guy but we all know the answer to that one.

I have not interpreted any posts on here as supporting BB or aggressively defending him. Suggesting that BB deserves the same benefits - innocent until proven guilty - as literally every other person is supporting the basic premise of the justice system that benefits all of us. Let the police and prosecutors do their jobs. No one posting on this thread has access to all of the information that they do and they definitely know things they are not releasing yet to the public, so those who have already decided BB is guilty are the ones that look arrogant. If the police were as certain as posters here, he would have already been charged. Presumably, investigators are doing their jobs and collecting enough evidence to move forward against someone - maybe BB - shortly.

I’m curious why you are so positive he killed his wife? How are you so definitively ruling out the au pair as the wife’s killer? BB may be guilty of some morally questionable behavior, but does that mean he is also a murderer? Hopefully, police work will answer that question. I don’t think a bunch of DCUM posters will.

You think it makes sense for him to have a relationship with the woman who killed his wife? If not, what is the other logical conclusion?

Anonymous wrote:

Question for the BB stans, the ones who rush to aggressively defend his earning potential and "good name," like you were 12 and he was Taylor Swift - do you do this for others too? Prison pen pals and the like? Or just him? And if just him, why him? Genuinely curious.

I'd ask if a single one of you is a guy but we all know the answer to that one.

I have not interpreted any posts on here as supporting BB or aggressively defending him. Suggesting that BB deserves the same benefits - innocent until proven guilty - as literally every other person is supporting the basic premise of the justice system that benefits all of us. Let the police and prosecutors do their jobs. No one posting on this thread has access to all of the information that they do and they definitely know things they are not releasing yet to the public, so those who have already decided BB is guilty are the ones that look arrogant. If the police were as certain as posters here, he would have already been charged. Presumably, investigators are doing their jobs and collecting enough evidence to move forward against someone - maybe BB - shortly.

I’m curious why you are so positive he killed his wife? How are you so definitively ruling out the au pair as the wife’s killer? BB may be guilty of some morally questionable behavior, but does that mean he is also a murderer? Hopefully, police work will answer that question. I don’t think a bunch of DCUM posters will.

Not sure if he stabbed his wife, or the Au pair did, or JR did. But here’s why I think he was part of the plan to murder her:

It’s usually the husband (but not always!)

He lied on the 911 call when there is no logical explanation for it. Like if I saw my Au pair shoot an intruder, there’s no way I’m gonna tell the police it was me. Wtf.

He didn’t act in a “normal” way after his wife’s death. Now, we all know people do unusual things when they are in despair or grief. But this goes beyond that. (1) he kept living in the house his wife (mother of his child) was murdered in. I don’t care what the housing market is doing, there’s no way I’d make my kids live in a house their father was murdered in. (2). He kept the Au pair. He knew from the instant that they called 911 that she shot JR. So at best she’s unhinged. Yet he keeps her on as his child’s caregiver? Wtf. (3). Most grieving husbands would be out there trying to get justice for their wife. In contrast, BB lawyered up and isn’t cooperating with the police.

So yeah, I think he’s guilty. In a court of law, he will be tried and it will be the prosecution’s burden to prove he’s guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. And even if they can’t, that doesn’t mean he’s innocent. It only means the prosecutor didn’t meet his / her burden.

But this isn’t a court of law. We aren’t sentencing him. We are allowed to form our own opinions on his guilt.

Question for the BB stans, the ones who rush to aggressively defend his earning potential and "good name," like you were 12 and he was Taylor Swift - do you do this for others too? Prison pen pals and the like? Or just him? And if just him, why him? Genuinely curious.

I'd ask if a single one of you is a guy but we all know the answer to that one.

I have not interpreted any posts on here as supporting BB or aggressively defending him. Suggesting that BB deserves the same benefits - innocent until proven guilty - as literally every other person is supporting the basic premise of the justice system that benefits all of us. Let the police and prosecutors do their jobs. No one posting on this thread has access to all of the information that they do and they definitely know things they are not releasing yet to the public, so those who have already decided BB is guilty are the ones that look arrogant. If the police were as certain as posters here, he would have already been charged. Presumably, investigators are doing their jobs and collecting enough evidence to move forward against someone - maybe BB - shortly.

I’m curious why you are so positive he killed his wife? How are you so definitively ruling out the au pair as the wife’s killer? BB may be guilty of some morally questionable behavior, but does that mean he is also a murderer? Hopefully, police work will answer that question. I don’t think a bunch of DCUM posters will.

Am I the only one who thinks that Imgur link is doctored?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do we know where the au pair has been living since February? Has she been continuing her work in the home with the husband?

With the husband… who she is dating.

And the child. Let us not forget that.

For the PP suggesting the picture could be old and AP made it seem like it was recent.

It is not. I have more pictures of them and one from this month. It was shared by someone who had access to her “close” friends stories on Instagram. They were living and behaving like a couple. I knew CB, went to her place a handful of times, walked their dog a couple of times, and met/saw Brendan once. I didn’t have a good impression about him.

Christine on the other hand was one of the kindest souls out there. A great mom, nurse, host mom, and friend. Amazing human being. I would be completely SHOCKED if she had Joe Ryan over for a sexual encounter, because I do not believe she would do that as the caring mother I know she was.

Anonymous wrote:Do we know where the au pair has been living since February? Has she been continuing her work in the home with the husband?

With the husband… who she is dating.

I really hope the au pair’s lawyer talks some sense into her and convinces her to tell the authorities every single incriminating fact about BB. I notice she is being held without bond, which isolates her from BB’s influence. Unless she has a lawyer provided by BB, which would be bad.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would a grieving, uninvolved in the murders husband refuse to cooperate with LE, especially being LE himself?

We know that LE has charged Juliana with shooting Joe and LE believes Joe and Christine were both victims. If Brendan is not guilty and he believed that Juliana had also attacked and killed his wife Christine with a knife, as the only other possibility, wouldn't he speak to LE rather than take Juliana out to dinner? The "horrific" violent murder of your wife and the mom of your little child in your nice home would be a boner killer for most, no?

Why would he lie and say he shot Joe? Forensics proved otherwise. Why lie to the police, esp with own LE career on the line? How many explanations are there for that?

She's not that hot. Dime a dozen.

From who did Juliana get a gun? If it was his FBI service revolver why wasn't it with him when he went to work? They had a gun safe and a small child. Did he give it to her?

He doesn't look all that grief stricken, maybe that's a clue? They both look pretty pleased with themselves tbh.

https://imgur.com/kfobZhj

I agree with all of this, but we don’t know exactly when that picture was taken. She can post it whenever she wants framing it as current. It could have been months before the murders.

BB turned 38 the day before the murder. His birthday is February 23 1985.

Yes, she posted the picture when he was 38, but that doesn’t mean they took it when he was 38… The woman could be totally deranged.

Well she obviously didn’t commit the murders alone. If BB was innocent, do you really think he would keep her on as his child’s nanny?!?

I agree he is not acting like a spouse who lost the mother of his child. I'm just pointing out that this crazy AP could have been lying on her socials.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would a grieving, uninvolved in the murders husband refuse to cooperate with LE, especially being LE himself?

We know that LE has charged Juliana with shooting Joe and LE believes Joe and Christine were both victims. If Brendan is not guilty and he believed that Juliana had also attacked and killed his wife Christine with a knife, as the only other possibility, wouldn't he speak to LE rather than take Juliana out to dinner? The "horrific" violent murder of your wife and the mom of your little child in your nice home would be a boner killer for most, no?

Why would he lie and say he shot Joe? Forensics proved otherwise. Why lie to the police, esp with own LE career on the line? How many explanations are there for that?

She's not that hot. Dime a dozen.

From who did Juliana get a gun? If it was his FBI service revolver why wasn't it with him when he went to work? They had a gun safe and a small child. Did he give it to her?

He doesn't look all that grief stricken, maybe that's a clue? They both look pretty pleased with themselves tbh.

https://imgur.com/kfobZhj

I agree with all of this, but we don’t know exactly when that picture was taken. She can post it whenever she wants framing it as current. It could have been months before the murders.

BB turned 38 the day before the murder. His birthday is February 23 1985.

Yes, she posted the picture when he was 38, but that doesn’t mean they took it when he was 38… The woman could be totally deranged.

Well she obviously didn’t commit the murders alone. If BB was innocent, do you really think he would keep her on as his child’s nanny?!?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would a grieving, uninvolved in the murders husband refuse to cooperate with LE, especially being LE himself?

We know that LE has charged Juliana with shooting Joe and LE believes Joe and Christine were both victims. If Brendan is not guilty and he believed that Juliana had also attacked and killed his wife Christine with a knife, as the only other possibility, wouldn't he speak to LE rather than take Juliana out to dinner? The "horrific" violent murder of your wife and the mom of your little child in your nice home would be a boner killer for most, no?

Why would he lie and say he shot Joe? Forensics proved otherwise. Why lie to the police, esp with own LE career on the line? How many explanations are there for that?

She's not that hot. Dime a dozen.

From who did Juliana get a gun? If it was his FBI service revolver why wasn't it with him when he went to work? They had a gun safe and a small child. Did he give it to her?

He doesn't look all that grief stricken, maybe that's a clue? They both look pretty pleased with themselves tbh.

https://imgur.com/kfobZhj

I agree with all of this, but we don’t know exactly when that picture was taken. She can post it whenever she wants framing it as current. It could have been months before the murders.

BB turned 38 the day before the murder. His birthday is February 23 1985.

Yes, she posted the picture when he was 38, but that doesn’t mean they took it when he was 38… The woman could be totally deranged.