Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And as for it being a "narrow" ruling, that's belied by the dissenting opinion - the dissenting opinion clearly made the case that this could and would likely be a slippery slope leading to other forms of discrimination in business. The majority opinion is completely silent on that.

So, don't be surprised if MAGAs are indeed turned away from businesses. That slippery slope is real.

Didn't that already happen when the Little Red Hen diner turned away Sarah Huckabee for no better reason that she was a Trump appointee?
I don't even think the employees invoked "religious principle" as a reason. They just didn't like her politics.

As a Christian who was raised as a Catholic, the conservative policies of turning their backs on refugees, the sick, the poor and the elderly is a CLEAR violation of my religious principles and goes against EVERYTHING that Christ taught in the four Gospels, as it also goes against all of the teachings of St. Francis and many other major figures of the Church. It is my religious conviction that unless and until Republicans change their ways and embrace Christ, we as Christians cannot serve them.

Fellow Catholic here. They hate us. They write here on this forum over and over that they hate us. I'm not saying that you should hate them, but recognize that you're voting for people who literally hate everything you stand for, and are seeking to undermine a Catholic way of life in nearly all aspects.

Sorry but no. What we hate is when you think your religion should be reflected in the laws of our country. Believe whatever you want; keep religion out of politics. You don’t get to force other people to live according to your dogma, and when you do that people get pissed. Rightfully so.

This Supreme Court and imposing your religion on us is behind people now hating Catholics.

I had no opinion to favorable to the Catholic religion ten years ago; now? I will not be using any of your business services if you are Catholic or evangelical Christian. And I am Christian myself.

Please, as a Catholic, we are NOT all on board with this. You are right to reject the far-right conservative Catholics and Evangelicals who pervert the faith, but some of us are still on board with the true teachings of Christ, which included taking care of the sick, the poor, refugees and outcasts. Those are teachings that conservative Catholics and Evangelicals reject with their false ideology.

Then, sensible Catholics must speak up. Otherwise MAGA Catholics will define Catholicism for much of this country.

“Sensible” Catholics don’t offer anything you can’t get from CNN, the View and Disney plus they are far less entertaining. Why would anybody waste their time ?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And as for it being a "narrow" ruling, that's belied by the dissenting opinion - the dissenting opinion clearly made the case that this could and would likely be a slippery slope leading to other forms of discrimination in business. The majority opinion is completely silent on that.

So, don't be surprised if MAGAs are indeed turned away from businesses. That slippery slope is real.

Didn't that already happen when the Little Red Hen diner turned away Sarah Huckabee for no better reason that she was a Trump appointee?
I don't even think the employees invoked "religious principle" as a reason. They just didn't like her politics.

As a Christian who was raised as a Catholic, the conservative policies of turning their backs on refugees, the sick, the poor and the elderly is a CLEAR violation of my religious principles and goes against EVERYTHING that Christ taught in the four Gospels, as it also goes against all of the teachings of St. Francis and many other major figures of the Church. It is my religious conviction that unless and until Republicans change their ways and embrace Christ, we as Christians cannot serve them.

Fellow Catholic here. They hate us. They write here on this forum over and over that they hate us. I'm not saying that you should hate them, but recognize that you're voting for people who literally hate everything you stand for, and are seeking to undermine a Catholic way of life in nearly all aspects.

Sorry but no. What we hate is when you think your religion should be reflected in the laws of our country. Believe whatever you want; keep religion out of politics. You don’t get to force other people to live according to your dogma, and when you do that people get pissed. Rightfully so.

This Supreme Court and imposing your religion on us is behind people now hating Catholics.

I had no opinion to favorable to the Catholic religion ten years ago; now? I will not be using any of your business services if you are Catholic or evangelical Christian. And I am Christian myself.

Please, as a Catholic, we are NOT all on board with this. You are right to reject the far-right conservative Catholics and Evangelicals who pervert the faith, but some of us are still on board with the true teachings of Christ, which included taking care of the sick, the poor, refugees and outcasts. Those are teachings that conservative Catholics and Evangelicals reject with their false ideology.

Then, sensible Catholics must speak up. Otherwise MAGA Catholics will define Catholicism for much of this country.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And as for it being a "narrow" ruling, that's belied by the dissenting opinion - the dissenting opinion clearly made the case that this could and would likely be a slippery slope leading to other forms of discrimination in business. The majority opinion is completely silent on that.

So, don't be surprised if MAGAs are indeed turned away from businesses. That slippery slope is real.

Didn't that already happen when the Little Red Hen diner turned away Sarah Huckabee for no better reason that she was a Trump appointee?
I don't even think the employees invoked "religious principle" as a reason. They just didn't like her politics.

As a Christian who was raised as a Catholic, the conservative policies of turning their backs on refugees, the sick, the poor and the elderly is a CLEAR violation of my religious principles and goes against EVERYTHING that Christ taught in the four Gospels, as it also goes against all of the teachings of St. Francis and many other major figures of the Church. It is my religious conviction that unless and until Republicans change their ways and embrace Christ, we as Christians cannot serve them.

Fellow Catholic here. They hate us. They write here on this forum over and over that they hate us. I'm not saying that you should hate them, but recognize that you're voting for people who literally hate everything you stand for, and are seeking to undermine a Catholic way of life in nearly all aspects.

Sorry but no. What we hate is when you think your religion should be reflected in the laws of our country. Believe whatever you want; keep religion out of politics. You don’t get to force other people to live according to your dogma, and when you do that people get pissed. Rightfully so.

This Supreme Court and imposing your religion on us is behind people now hating Catholics.

I had no opinion to favorable to the Catholic religion ten years ago; now? I will not be using any of your business services if you are Catholic or evangelical Christian. And I am Christian myself.

Please, as a Catholic, we are NOT all on board with this. You are right to reject the far-right conservative Catholics and Evangelicals who pervert the faith, but some of us are still on board with the true teachings of Christ, which included taking care of the sick, the poor, refugees and outcasts. Those are teachings that conservative Catholics and Evangelicals reject with their false ideology.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And as for it being a "narrow" ruling, that's belied by the dissenting opinion - the dissenting opinion clearly made the case that this could and would likely be a slippery slope leading to other forms of discrimination in business. The majority opinion is completely silent on that.

So, don't be surprised if MAGAs are indeed turned away from businesses. That slippery slope is real.

Didn't that already happen when the Little Red Hen diner turned away Sarah Huckabee for no better reason that she was a Trump appointee?
I don't even think the employees invoked "religious principle" as a reason. They just didn't like her politics.

As a Christian who was raised as a Catholic, the conservative policies of turning their backs on refugees, the sick, the poor and the elderly is a CLEAR violation of my religious principles and goes against EVERYTHING that Christ taught in the four Gospels, as it also goes against all of the teachings of St. Francis and many other major figures of the Church. It is my religious conviction that unless and until Republicans change their ways and embrace Christ, we as Christians cannot serve them.

Fellow Catholic here. They hate us. They write here on this forum over and over that they hate us. I'm not saying that you should hate them, but recognize that you're voting for people who literally hate everything you stand for, and are seeking to undermine a Catholic way of life in nearly all aspects.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And as for it being a "narrow" ruling, that's belied by the dissenting opinion - the dissenting opinion clearly made the case that this could and would likely be a slippery slope leading to other forms of discrimination in business. The majority opinion is completely silent on that.

So, don't be surprised if MAGAs are indeed turned away from businesses. That slippery slope is real.

If a business decides to shun half the people in this country, that is on them. It won't end well.
Look at what happened to Bud Light when they essentially mocked their customer base.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The 'wise latina' continues to dissent longer than normal. Surprised?

She is the definition of an activist judge. Look at her record, she is the most extreme of all the Supremes, but never gets called out because she is the "good kind" of activist judge.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me.

But if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give-a-drink to him. For doing this, you will heap coals of fire upon his head

So the Bible says basically for your bakery to make the penis cake and not impede that customers journey to Hell.

Yes. Also, love thy neighbor. The people protesting helping others are not real Christians, they just think they are.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me.

But if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give-a-drink to him. For doing this, you will heap coals of fire upon his head

So the Bible says basically for your bakery to make the penis cake and not impede that customers journey to Hell.

Yes. Also, love thy neighbor. The people protesting helping others are not real Christians, they just think they are.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me.

But if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give-a-drink to him. For doing this, you will heap coals of fire upon his head

So the Bible says basically for your bakery to make the penis cake and not impede that customers journey to Hell.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me.

But if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give-a-drink to him. For doing this, you will heap coals of fire upon his head

So the Bible says basically for your bakery to make the penis cake and not impede that customers journey to Hell.

Anonymous wrote:
Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me.

But if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give-a-drink to him. For doing this, you will heap coals of fire upon his head

Anonymous wrote:Discrimination because of political beliefs is legal.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And as for it being a "narrow" ruling, that's belied by the dissenting opinion - the dissenting opinion clearly made the case that this could and would likely be a slippery slope leading to other forms of discrimination in business. The majority opinion is completely silent on that.

So, don't be surprised if MAGAs are indeed turned away from businesses. That slippery slope is real.

Didn't that already happen when the Little Red Hen diner turned away Sarah Huckabee for no better reason that she was a Trump appointee?
I don't even think the employees invoked "religious principle" as a reason. They just didn't like her politics.

She was not turned away simply for being a Trump appointee. She was turned away for defending the indefensible, namely a desire to ban gays in the military and the separation of children at the border from their traveling companions, which forced minors to advocate for themselves at their amnesty hearings even though they were too young to do so. (You might also remember that there was no protocol to keep track of the children, so they were essentially “lost” in the system and not all of them have been reunited with their families.) Huckabee Sanders was turned away for being the spokesperson for this cruelty.

? Same thing. She was turned awya for her political views . End of.

Her political views go against my personal religious views. And, those of many other Americans.

Nonsense. No one voiced any "religious" objection. They just din't like her political affiliation. As far as I know this is perfectly legal.

No many religious people think she has turned her back on Christ.