Anonymous
06/26/2023 14:14
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous
Anonymous
06/25/2023 08:50
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:For all the people who continue about the "Russia hoax"...here is the thing, in 2016, several different three letter agencies of our government picked up chatter about Russian infiltration of the Trump campaign. they picked up chatter about money and tactics used by the Russians similar to tactics used in Turkey, with Brexit etc. So, when the spy agencies doing their work, pick up such chatter, what are the supposed to do? If you don't want to be rolled up in spy chatter, don;t consort with foreign nationals who our government can legally monitor. the fact is, we have great international law enforcement officials and operatives. The problem is when the criminals weaponize their messages to make them out to be the bad guys. This is exactly what Trumpworld has done.
Absolutely. Trump supporters are idiots.
Anonymous
06/25/2023 08:06
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
For all the people who continue about the "Russia hoax"...here is the thing, in 2016, several different three letter agencies of our government picked up chatter about Russian infiltration of the Trump campaign. they picked up chatter about money and tactics used by the Russians similar to tactics used in Turkey, with Brexit etc. So, when the spy agencies doing their work, pick up such chatter, what are the supposed to do? If you don't want to be rolled up in spy chatter, don;t consort with foreign nationals who our government can legally monitor. the fact is, we have great international law enforcement officials and operatives. The problem is when the criminals weaponize their messages to make them out to be the bad guys. This is exactly what Trumpworld has done.
Anonymous
06/23/2023 19:30
Subject: Re:Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:
Two fake electors, a Trump campaign official, and a partridge in a pear tree.
“Michael Roman, a top official in former President Donald J. Trump’s 2020 campaign, is in discussions with the office of the special counsel Jack Smith that could soon lead to Mr. Roman voluntarily answering questions about a plan to create slates of pro-Trump electors in key swing states that were won by Joseph R. Biden Jr., according to a person familiar with the matter.
If Mr. Roman ends up giving the interview — known as a proffer — to prosecutors working for Mr. Smith, it would be the first known instance of cooperation by someone with direct knowledge of the so-called fake elector plan. That plan has long been at the center of Mr. Smith’s investigation into Mr. Trump’s wide-ranging efforts to overturn the 2020 election.”
No, but it was my understanding that Mr. Donald Trump was above board on this? /s
Anonymous
06/23/2023 19:26
Subject: Re:Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Two fake electors, a Trump campaign official, and a partridge in a pear tree.
“Michael Roman, a top official in former President Donald J. Trump’s 2020 campaign, is in discussions with the office of the special counsel Jack Smith that could soon lead to Mr. Roman voluntarily answering questions about a plan to create slates of pro-Trump electors in key swing states that were won by Joseph R. Biden Jr., according to a person familiar with the matter.
If Mr. Roman ends up giving the interview — known as a proffer — to prosecutors working for Mr. Smith, it would be the first known instance of cooperation by someone with direct knowledge of the so-called fake elector plan. That plan has long been at the center of Mr. Smith’s investigation into Mr. Trump’s wide-ranging efforts to overturn the 2020 election.”
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
06/17/2023 22:14
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tom Fitton....isn't a lawyer, LOL.
Judicial Watch has a team of them.
Reinforcing this:
https://www.judicialwatch.org/about/#legal
They weren’t giving Trump legal advice. Fitton was.
Fitton IS judicial watch. It's like 40 people all working for him.
He’s still not a lawyer and shouldn’t play one on Twitter or around Trump.
Well, he is and I hope he continues.
Are you actively hoping for Trump's incarceration?
Fitton's cause is suing for release of government information. His interest in this case is not Trump's well-being. He would love nothing more than to have laws protecting classified information to be weakened. And this means he files a large numbers of challenges in court. Some he wins, some he loses. He does not lose a minute's sleep over his losses.
So Fitton's like hell yeah brother, don't give an inch! Fight this thing to the end. But Fitton's got no skin in the game. He'll just move onto the next thing. Trump on the other hand could go to jail.
DP - I am actively hoping the government's evidence supports the indictment beyond a reasonable doubt so that Trump is convicted by a jury of his peers/fellow citizens.
Much of that is based on my deep seated belief that we give our elected and appointed officials (especially at the high levels of federal government) far too much deference in relation to how an average citizen would be treated. And that's across party lines for me.
I come at this from the point of view that ordinary citizens are treated too harshly by the law in many situations. But acting as Trump has done, with intent to keep documents he knew he was unauthorized to keep, showing them to unauthorized users and possibly risking agents' lives and undermining our national security... that deserves a punishment he will smart under. And I think that means prison time.
The Law and Order people always think they are exempt from enforcement.
Anonymous
06/17/2023 20:28
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tom Fitton....isn't a lawyer, LOL.
Judicial Watch has a team of them.
Reinforcing this:
https://www.judicialwatch.org/about/#legal
They weren’t giving Trump legal advice. Fitton was.
Fitton IS judicial watch. It's like 40 people all working for him.
He’s still not a lawyer and shouldn’t play one on Twitter or around Trump.
Well, he is and I hope he continues.
Are you actively hoping for Trump's incarceration?
Fitton's cause is suing for release of government information. His interest in this case is not Trump's well-being. He would love nothing more than to have laws protecting classified information to be weakened. And this means he files a large numbers of challenges in court. Some he wins, some he loses. He does not lose a minute's sleep over his losses.
So Fitton's like hell yeah brother, don't give an inch! Fight this thing to the end. But Fitton's got no skin in the game. He'll just move onto the next thing. Trump on the other hand could go to jail.
DP - I am actively hoping the government's evidence supports the indictment beyond a reasonable doubt so that Trump is convicted by a jury of his peers/fellow citizens.
Much of that is based on my deep seated belief that we give our elected and appointed officials (especially at the high levels of federal government) far too much deference in relation to how an average citizen would be treated. And that's across party lines for me.
I come at this from the point of view that ordinary citizens are treated too harshly by the law in many situations. But acting as Trump has done, with intent to keep documents he knew he was unauthorized to keep, showing them to unauthorized users and possibly risking agents' lives and undermining our national security... that deserves a punishment he will smart under. And I think that means prison time.
Anonymous
06/17/2023 12:38
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tom Fitton....isn't a lawyer, LOL.
Judicial Watch has a team of them.
Reinforcing this:
https://www.judicialwatch.org/about/#legal
They weren’t giving Trump legal advice. Fitton was.
Fitton IS judicial watch. It's like 40 people all working for him.
He’s still not a lawyer and shouldn’t play one on Twitter or around Trump.
Well, he is and I hope he continues.
Are you actively hoping for Trump's incarceration?
Fitton's cause is suing for release of government information. His interest in this case is not Trump's well-being. He would love nothing more than to have laws protecting classified information to be weakened. And this means he files a large numbers of challenges in court. Some he wins, some he loses. He does not lose a minute's sleep over his losses.
So Fitton's like hell yeah brother, don't give an inch! Fight this thing to the end. But Fitton's got no skin in the game. He'll just move onto the next thing. Trump on the other hand could go to jail.
DP - I am actively hoping the government's evidence supports the indictment beyond a reasonable doubt so that Trump is convicted by a jury of his peers/fellow citizens.
Much of that is based on my deep seated belief that we give our elected and appointed officials (especially at the high levels of federal government) far too much deference in relation to how an average citizen would be treated. And that's across party lines for me.
Anonymous
06/17/2023 10:22
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tom Fitton....isn't a lawyer, LOL.
Judicial Watch has a team of them.
Reinforcing this:
https://www.judicialwatch.org/about/#legal
They weren’t giving Trump legal advice. Fitton was.
Fitton IS judicial watch. It's like 40 people all working for him.
He’s still not a lawyer and shouldn’t play one on Twitter or around Trump.
Well, he is and I hope he continues.
Are you actively hoping for Trump's incarceration?
Fitton's cause is suing for release of government information. His interest in this case is not Trump's well-being. He would love nothing more than to have laws protecting classified information to be weakened. And this means he files a large numbers of challenges in court. Some he wins, some he loses. He does not lose a minute's sleep over his losses.
So Fitton's like hell yeah brother, don't give an inch! Fight this thing to the end. But Fitton's got no skin in the game. He'll just move onto the next thing. Trump on the other hand could go to jail.
Oh trust me, Fitton has skin in the game. He has an extremely close relationship with Trump.
Anonymous
06/17/2023 09:18
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tom Fitton....isn't a lawyer, LOL.
Judicial Watch has a team of them.
Reinforcing this:
https://www.judicialwatch.org/about/#legal
They weren’t giving Trump legal advice. Fitton was.
Fitton IS judicial watch. It's like 40 people all working for him.
He’s still not a lawyer and shouldn’t play one on Twitter or around Trump.
Well, he is and I hope he continues.
Are you actively hoping for Trump's incarceration?
Fitton's cause is suing for release of government information. His interest in this case is not Trump's well-being. He would love nothing more than to have laws protecting classified information to be weakened. And this means he files a large numbers of challenges in court. Some he wins, some he loses. He does not lose a minute's sleep over his losses.
So Fitton's like hell yeah brother, don't give an inch! Fight this thing to the end. But Fitton's got no skin in the game. He'll just move onto the next thing. Trump on the other hand could go to jail.
Anonymous
06/16/2023 19:05
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tom Fitton....isn't a lawyer, LOL.
Judicial Watch has a team of them.
Reinforcing this:
https://www.judicialwatch.org/about/#legal
They weren’t giving Trump legal advice. Fitton was.
Fitton IS judicial watch. It's like 40 people all working for him.
He’s still not a lawyer and shouldn’t play one on Twitter or around Trump.
Well, he is and I hope he continues.