Anonymous wrote:This is what the NY taxpayers are funding. Money going to people who entered our country illegally.
And, it won't be long before federal money heads their way, so we are all footing the bill for these people.

Amid a continued influx of migrants to New York City, Mayor Eric Adams has directed every city agency to cut city-funded spending, Adams announced Saturday.

Adams said the cuts will not include layoffs.

"The simple truth is that longtime New Yorkers and asylum seekers will feel these potential cuts, and they will hurt," Adams said.

In a video announcement, the mayor called the influx of migrants arriving in the city "a crisis that will cost our city $12 billion over three fiscal years."

He blamed the federal and state government for causing the city to make this decision.

"These tough decisions are a direct result of inaction in Washington and Albany," Adams said.

City agencies will be asked to submit a plan showing how they can cut costs by 5% for the upcoming November budget update, by another 5% in January's preliminary budget and by a final 5% in April's executive budget, according to the mayor.

A simpler solution would be to just send them all home. But Democrats would rather put illegal immigrants ahead of our own citizens. Disgraceful.

To analyze how large influxes of immigrant workers, in this case, construction workers, impact the market, the Los Angeles Times studied the Southern California building trade. The Times wrote that over a few decades, construction workers went from being majority union, and majority U.S.-born, to majority immigrant. In the article conclusion, journalist Natalie Kitroeff wrote, “Nonunion shops made aggressive inroads into home building with workers who had less experience.

The result: Today slightly more than 1 in 10 construction workers are in a union, compared with 4 in 10 in the 1970s….an influx of immigrants who would work for less made it easier for builders to quickly shift to a nonunion labor force…”

In a relatively short time, immigration played a leading role in eliminating solid, blue-collar United Brotherhood of Carpenters jobs that paid middle-class wages, offered health care, paid vacations and pensions.

Anonymous wrote:Just democrat hypocrisy at its finest. Sanctuary city is wonderful as long as it's not in my backyard.

and saying that they need to go after employers, yet we HAVE A SYSTEM THAT WORKS!

and they refuse to mandate e-verify

Title 42 is a good start, but here are bills that have been introduced in both chambers that would EFFECTIVELY END THE BORDER CRISIS.
☀Rep. Andy Biggs' (R-Ari.) H.R.1901 and Sen. Mike Lee's (R-Utah) S.884 introduced bills to address asylum fraud.
☀Rep. Ken Calvert (R-Cal.) and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) have introduced mandatory E-Verify bills into the House (H.R.78) and Senate (S.71) respectively.

Where are democrats? Why do they refuse to mandate E-Verify ?

A 2016 study confirmed what many have known for years: The E-Verify system is remarkably effective at deterring illegal immigration.

Researchers Pia M. Orrenius and Madeline Zavodny found that "having an E-Verify law reduces the number of less-educated prime-age immigrants from Mexico and Central America — immigrants who are likely to be unauthorized — living in a state." They studied the direct effect that the adoption of E-Verify has on the illegal alien population. They focused on Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Utah — all states that adopted E-Verify policies.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40176-016-0053-3

This is what the NY taxpayers are funding. Money going to people who entered our country illegally.
And, it won't be long before federal money heads their way, so we are all footing the bill for these people.

Amid a continued influx of migrants to New York City, Mayor Eric Adams has directed every city agency to cut city-funded spending, Adams announced Saturday.

Adams said the cuts will not include layoffs.

"The simple truth is that longtime New Yorkers and asylum seekers will feel these potential cuts, and they will hurt," Adams said.

In a video announcement, the mayor called the influx of migrants arriving in the city "a crisis that will cost our city $12 billion over three fiscal years."

He blamed the federal and state government for causing the city to make this decision.

"These tough decisions are a direct result of inaction in Washington and Albany," Adams said.

City agencies will be asked to submit a plan showing how they can cut costs by 5% for the upcoming November budget update, by another 5% in January's preliminary budget and by a final 5% in April's executive budget, according to the mayor.

Public schools can't ask parents for ID as to legal or not. We can ask nothing. Can only enroll them and provide any services needed. I think that's true everywhere in US.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s a ton of unoccupied commercial real estate in NYC. The city should just seize the properties through imminent domain and create housing for new arrivals. It really is that easy.

Did you mean to say pay the owners fair market price for real estate they bought and pay taxes?

Fair market prices? LOL.
How about give them a pittance, like when Trump was able to get the government to use eminent domain to seize real estate so that he could build his casino in Atlantic City. That's the MAGA way.

Yes, i think people deserve to be paid a fair market price. (Please try to converse without bringing up Trump and MAGA. )

TOUGH SHIT! WE WILL KEEP BRINGING UP TRUMP AND MAGA EVERY SINGLE DAY UNTIL THE DAY HE IS NO LONGER IN POLITICS.
Total FAIL on your part. Get used to it. If you don't like it, complain to Republicans, not us.

Hope you're okay. Nonetheless, I happen to think eminent domain is unfair.

I'm fine, but obviously you aren't, since you voted for a guy who thinks eminent domain seizure is great and he made millions off of it.

What??? No one said that.

It's hilarious to watch people on the right clutch pearls say "moi?" and try to thread the needle around the Trump elephant in the room, thinking they have some kind of plausible deniability, when they don't.

What does Trump have to do with this. Trump is not the president. Joe Biden is. Eric Adams is the mayor. No one else. Concentrate on you.

People like Trump are exactly the problem. How many illegals are working at Trump Resorts?

You want to stop illegal migration? Arrest the Trumps and all the other wealthy people hiring undocumented workers. No work. No pay. No migrants.

No wall is going to keep people out. But if you arrest the people hiring undocumented workers and give them lengthy prison sentences, the problem is solved.

The Republican response to that solution, of course, is crickets.

Weird then that the only states that require E-verify for government and all or most private employers are red (depending on how you count Arizona).

+1 to E verify but need to add enforcement

Hilarious that CA and Illinois both FORBID E-Verify! Unreal, actually.

Is it possible that they use another system?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s a ton of unoccupied commercial real estate in NYC. The city should just seize the properties through imminent domain and create housing for new arrivals. It really is that easy.

Did you mean to say pay the owners fair market price for real estate they bought and pay taxes?

Fair market prices? LOL.
How about give them a pittance, like when Trump was able to get the government to use eminent domain to seize real estate so that he could build his casino in Atlantic City. That's the MAGA way.

Yes, i think people deserve to be paid a fair market price. (Please try to converse without bringing up Trump and MAGA. )

TOUGH SHIT! WE WILL KEEP BRINGING UP TRUMP AND MAGA EVERY SINGLE DAY UNTIL THE DAY HE IS NO LONGER IN POLITICS.
Total FAIL on your part. Get used to it. If you don't like it, complain to Republicans, not us.

Hope you're okay. Nonetheless, I happen to think eminent domain is unfair.

I'm fine, but obviously you aren't, since you voted for a guy who thinks eminent domain seizure is great and he made millions off of it.

What??? No one said that.

It's hilarious to watch people on the right clutch pearls say "moi?" and try to thread the needle around the Trump elephant in the room, thinking they have some kind of plausible deniability, when they don't.

What does Trump have to do with this. Trump is not the president. Joe Biden is. Eric Adams is the mayor. No one else. Concentrate on you.

People like Trump are exactly the problem. How many illegals are working at Trump Resorts?

You want to stop illegal migration? Arrest the Trumps and all the other wealthy people hiring undocumented workers. No work. No pay. No migrants.

No wall is going to keep people out. But if you arrest the people hiring undocumented workers and give them lengthy prison sentences, the problem is solved.

The Republican response to that solution, of course, is crickets.

Exactly

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s a ton of unoccupied commercial real estate in NYC. The city should just seize the properties through imminent domain and create housing for new arrivals. It really is that easy.

Did you mean to say pay the owners fair market price for real estate they bought and pay taxes?

Fair market prices? LOL.
How about give them a pittance, like when Trump was able to get the government to use eminent domain to seize real estate so that he could build his casino in Atlantic City. That's the MAGA way.

Yes, i think people deserve to be paid a fair market price. (Please try to converse without bringing up Trump and MAGA. )

TOUGH SHIT! WE WILL KEEP BRINGING UP TRUMP AND MAGA EVERY SINGLE DAY UNTIL THE DAY HE IS NO LONGER IN POLITICS.
Total FAIL on your part. Get used to it. If you don't like it, complain to Republicans, not us.

Hope you're okay. Nonetheless, I happen to think eminent domain is unfair.

I'm fine, but obviously you aren't, since you voted for a guy who thinks eminent domain seizure is great and he made millions off of it.

What??? No one said that.

It's hilarious to watch people on the right clutch pearls say "moi?" and try to thread the needle around the Trump elephant in the room, thinking they have some kind of plausible deniability, when they don't.

What does Trump have to do with this. Trump is not the president. Joe Biden is. Eric Adams is the mayor. No one else. Concentrate on you.

People like Trump are exactly the problem. How many illegals are working at Trump Resorts?

You want to stop illegal migration? Arrest the Trumps and all the other wealthy people hiring undocumented workers. No work. No pay. No migrants.

No wall is going to keep people out. But if you arrest the people hiring undocumented workers and give them lengthy prison sentences, the problem is solved.

The Republican response to that solution, of course, is crickets.

Weird then that the only states that require E-verify for government and all or most private employers are red (depending on how you count Arizona).

+1 to E verify but need to add enforcement

Hilarious that CA and Illinois both FORBID E-Verify! Unreal, actually.

Oh, and NY of course.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s a ton of unoccupied commercial real estate in NYC. The city should just seize the properties through imminent domain and create housing for new arrivals. It really is that easy.

Did you mean to say pay the owners fair market price for real estate they bought and pay taxes?

Fair market prices? LOL.
How about give them a pittance, like when Trump was able to get the government to use eminent domain to seize real estate so that he could build his casino in Atlantic City. That's the MAGA way.

Yes, i think people deserve to be paid a fair market price. (Please try to converse without bringing up Trump and MAGA. )

TOUGH SHIT! WE WILL KEEP BRINGING UP TRUMP AND MAGA EVERY SINGLE DAY UNTIL THE DAY HE IS NO LONGER IN POLITICS.
Total FAIL on your part. Get used to it. If you don't like it, complain to Republicans, not us.

Hope you're okay. Nonetheless, I happen to think eminent domain is unfair.

I'm fine, but obviously you aren't, since you voted for a guy who thinks eminent domain seizure is great and he made millions off of it.

What??? No one said that.

It's hilarious to watch people on the right clutch pearls say "moi?" and try to thread the needle around the Trump elephant in the room, thinking they have some kind of plausible deniability, when they don't.

What does Trump have to do with this. Trump is not the president. Joe Biden is. Eric Adams is the mayor. No one else. Concentrate on you.

People like Trump are exactly the problem. How many illegals are working at Trump Resorts?

You want to stop illegal migration? Arrest the Trumps and all the other wealthy people hiring undocumented workers. No work. No pay. No migrants.

No wall is going to keep people out. But if you arrest the people hiring undocumented workers and give them lengthy prison sentences, the problem is solved.

The Republican response to that solution, of course, is crickets.

Perhaps you should focus on the DEMOCRATS' response to the border crisis, which is to refuse to secure the border in the first place. No one would be hiring illegal immigrants if they weren't in the country in the first place, genius. But nice deflection, whataboutism, and gaslighting. Bravo.
DP

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s a ton of unoccupied commercial real estate in NYC. The city should just seize the properties through imminent domain and create housing for new arrivals. It really is that easy.

Did you mean to say pay the owners fair market price for real estate they bought and pay taxes?

Fair market prices? LOL.
How about give them a pittance, like when Trump was able to get the government to use eminent domain to seize real estate so that he could build his casino in Atlantic City. That's the MAGA way.

Yes, i think people deserve to be paid a fair market price. (Please try to converse without bringing up Trump and MAGA. )

TOUGH SHIT! WE WILL KEEP BRINGING UP TRUMP AND MAGA EVERY SINGLE DAY UNTIL THE DAY HE IS NO LONGER IN POLITICS.
Total FAIL on your part. Get used to it. If you don't like it, complain to Republicans, not us.

Hope you're okay. Nonetheless, I happen to think eminent domain is unfair.

I'm fine, but obviously you aren't, since you voted for a guy who thinks eminent domain seizure is great and he made millions off of it.

What??? No one said that.

It's hilarious to watch people on the right clutch pearls say "moi?" and try to thread the needle around the Trump elephant in the room, thinking they have some kind of plausible deniability, when they don't.

What does Trump have to do with this. Trump is not the president. Joe Biden is. Eric Adams is the mayor. No one else. Concentrate on you.

People like Trump are exactly the problem. How many illegals are working at Trump Resorts?

You want to stop illegal migration? Arrest the Trumps and all the other wealthy people hiring undocumented workers. No work. No pay. No migrants.

No wall is going to keep people out. But if you arrest the people hiring undocumented workers and give them lengthy prison sentences, the problem is solved.

The Republican response to that solution, of course, is crickets.

Weird then that the only states that require E-verify for government and all or most private employers are red (depending on how you count Arizona).

+1 to E verify but need to add enforcement

Hilarious that CA and Illinois both FORBID E-Verify! Unreal, actually.

Guess the migrants can live with all the deranged homeless people in their tent cities defecting on the streets and their open market drug bazaars.

Just democrat hypocrisy at its finest. Sanctuary city is wonderful as long as it's not in my backyard.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s a ton of unoccupied commercial real estate in NYC. The city should just seize the properties through imminent domain and create housing for new arrivals. It really is that easy.

Did you mean to say pay the owners fair market price for real estate they bought and pay taxes?

Fair market prices? LOL.
How about give them a pittance, like when Trump was able to get the government to use eminent domain to seize real estate so that he could build his casino in Atlantic City. That's the MAGA way.

Yes, i think people deserve to be paid a fair market price. (Please try to converse without bringing up Trump and MAGA. )

TOUGH SHIT! WE WILL KEEP BRINGING UP TRUMP AND MAGA EVERY SINGLE DAY UNTIL THE DAY HE IS NO LONGER IN POLITICS.
Total FAIL on your part. Get used to it. If you don't like it, complain to Republicans, not us.

Hope you're okay. Nonetheless, I happen to think eminent domain is unfair.

I'm fine, but obviously you aren't, since you voted for a guy who thinks eminent domain seizure is great and he made millions off of it.

What??? No one said that.

It's hilarious to watch people on the right clutch pearls say "moi?" and try to thread the needle around the Trump elephant in the room, thinking they have some kind of plausible deniability, when they don't.

What does Trump have to do with this. Trump is not the president. Joe Biden is. Eric Adams is the mayor. No one else. Concentrate on you.

People like Trump are exactly the problem. How many illegals are working at Trump Resorts?

You want to stop illegal migration? Arrest the Trumps and all the other wealthy people hiring undocumented workers. No work. No pay. No migrants.

No wall is going to keep people out. But if you arrest the people hiring undocumented workers and give them lengthy prison sentences, the problem is solved.

The Republican response to that solution, of course, is crickets.

Migrants are getting more free crap now than citizens. Please

Pre-Employment Inquiries and Citizenship

Most employers should not ask whether or not a job applicant is a United States citizen before making an offer of employment. The INA requires employers to verify the identity and employment eligibility of all employees hired after November 6, 1986, by completing the Employment Eligibility Verification (I-9) Form, and reviewing documents showing the employee's identity and employment authorization. Other state and federal laws require some employers to use E-Verify. Federal law prohibits employers from rejecting valid documents or insisting on additional documents beyond what is required for the Form I-9 or E-Verify processes, based on an employee's citizenship status or national origin. For example, an employer cannot require only those who the employer perceives as "foreign" to produce specific documents, such as Permanent Resident ("green") cards or Employment Authorization Documents. Employees are allowed to choose which documents to show for employment eligibility verification from the Form I-9 Lists of Acceptable Documents. Employers should accept any unexpired document from the Lists of Acceptable Documents so long as the document appears reasonably genuine on its face and relates to the employee.

Federal law also prohibits employers from conducting the Form I-9 and E-Verify processes before the employee has accepted an offer of employment. Applicants may be informed of these requirements in the pre-employment setting by adding the following statement on the employment application:

"In compliance with federal law, all persons hired will be required to verify identity and eligibility to work in the United States and to complete the required employment eligibility verification form upon hire."

E-Verify employers must use the system consistently and without regard to the citizenship, immigration status, or national origin of employees. They must also notify every employee who receives a Tentative Nonconfirmation (TNC) and should not make assumptions about employment authorization based on the TNC issuance. If an employee contests a TNC, employers cannot fire, suspend, modify a work schedule, delay job placement or otherwise take any adverse action against the employee just because the employee received a TNC.

As stated above, the INA prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of national origin by smaller employers (with four to 14 employees). The INA prohibits retaliation against individuals for asserting their rights under the INA, or for filing a charge or assisting in an investigation or proceeding under the INA. Discrimination charges under the INA are processed by the Immigrant and Employee Rights Section (IER) in the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division. For more information, contact IER at the numbers below (9:00 am-5:00 pm ET, Monday-Friday) or visit IER's website. Calls can be anonymous and in any language:

1-800-255-7688 (employees/applicants)
1-800-255-8155 (employers)
1-800-237-2515 and 202-616-5525 (TTY for employees/applicants and employers) www.justice.gov/ier

https://www.eeoc.gov/pre-employment-inquiries-and-citizenship

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s a ton of unoccupied commercial real estate in NYC. The city should just seize the properties through imminent domain and create housing for new arrivals. It really is that easy.

Did you mean to say pay the owners fair market price for real estate they bought and pay taxes?

Fair market prices? LOL.
How about give them a pittance, like when Trump was able to get the government to use eminent domain to seize real estate so that he could build his casino in Atlantic City. That's the MAGA way.

Yes, i think people deserve to be paid a fair market price. (Please try to converse without bringing up Trump and MAGA. )

TOUGH SHIT! WE WILL KEEP BRINGING UP TRUMP AND MAGA EVERY SINGLE DAY UNTIL THE DAY HE IS NO LONGER IN POLITICS.
Total FAIL on your part. Get used to it. If you don't like it, complain to Republicans, not us.

Hope you're okay. Nonetheless, I happen to think eminent domain is unfair.

I'm fine, but obviously you aren't, since you voted for a guy who thinks eminent domain seizure is great and he made millions off of it.

What??? No one said that.

It's hilarious to watch people on the right clutch pearls say "moi?" and try to thread the needle around the Trump elephant in the room, thinking they have some kind of plausible deniability, when they don't.

What does Trump have to do with this. Trump is not the president. Joe Biden is. Eric Adams is the mayor. No one else. Concentrate on you.

People like Trump are exactly the problem. How many illegals are working at Trump Resorts?

You want to stop illegal migration? Arrest the Trumps and all the other wealthy people hiring undocumented workers. No work. No pay. No migrants.

No wall is going to keep people out. But if you arrest the people hiring undocumented workers and give them lengthy prison sentences, the problem is solved.

The Republican response to that solution, of course, is crickets.

Weird then that the only states that require E-verify for government and all or most private employers are red (depending on how you count Arizona).

+1 to E verify but need to add enforcement