Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you knew this was coming, right?
https://www.texastribune.org/2021/12/02/texas-ban-medical-abortion/
The cruelty is the point.
They’ll be after birth control next. They consider it abortive.
“Why can’t you use a condom?”
IVF will be up after that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the reason that carrying a child to term and then placing the baby up for adoption is mentally harmful, causes feelings of regret and sadness, vs aborting the baby and not having mental harm and feelings of regret and sadness?
If religious people use the state to violate your bodily integrity against your will for nine months, but really for all time given the fact that pregnancy and birth causes all kinds of changes in a woman’s body, do you think that that might cause mental harm?
<Rape trigger warning> For another example: rape hurts. Sex a woman wants usually does not. Rape is not necessarily any more violent than regular intercourse (though it can be), it’s the overwhelming of your rights as a person to say no, “I do not want this,” the violation of your body, every fiber of your brain screams against it (and frequently people’s body’s, too). This is the same thing. A thing undertaken with your consent is different than a thing undertaken against your consent. The state, even acting as a proxy for the religious feelings of forced birth misogynists, does not have the right to compel a citizen to use their body to grow a human against their will just like they can’t force us to donate a kidney, liver parts, marrow or even blood.
There was nothing about rape in either example. It was plainly about a teenage girl who had become pregnant and carried the baby to term and placed the baby for adoption vs aborted the baby.
Just 1% of women obtain an abortion because they became pregnant through rape, and less than 0.5% do so because of incest, according to the Guttmacher Institute.
PP is equating pro-birthers to rapists.
People who want to force women to do something they don’t want to do.
An apt comparison.
I am asking why once a woman is already pregnant it is considered more traumatic to carry the baby to term and adopt him or her into a family than aborting and ending the life of your own child. There was no rape in 99% of cases women seek abortion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the reason that carrying a child to term and then placing the baby up for adoption is mentally harmful, causes feelings of regret and sadness, vs aborting the baby and not having mental harm and feelings of regret and sadness?
If religious people use the state to violate your bodily integrity against your will for nine months, but really for all time given the fact that pregnancy and birth causes all kinds of changes in a woman’s body, do you think that that might cause mental harm?
<Rape trigger warning> For another example: rape hurts. Sex a woman wants usually does not. Rape is not necessarily any more violent than regular intercourse (though it can be), it’s the overwhelming of your rights as a person to say no, “I do not want this,” the violation of your body, every fiber of your brain screams against it (and frequently people’s body’s, too). This is the same thing. A thing undertaken with your consent is different than a thing undertaken against your consent. The state, even acting as a proxy for the religious feelings of forced birth misogynists, does not have the right to compel a citizen to use their body to grow a human against their will just like they can’t force us to donate a kidney, liver parts, marrow or even blood.
There was nothing about rape in either example. It was plainly about a teenage girl who had become pregnant and carried the baby to term and placed the baby for adoption vs aborted the baby.
Just 1% of women obtain an abortion because they became pregnant through rape, and less than 0.5% do so because of incest, according to the Guttmacher Institute.
PP is equating pro-birthers to rapists.
People who want to force women to do something they don’t want to do.
An apt comparison.
I am asking why once a woman is already pregnant it is considered more traumatic to carry the baby to term and adopt him or her into a family than aborting and ending the life of your own child. There was no rape in 99% of cases women seek abortion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you knew this was coming, right?
https://www.texastribune.org/2021/12/02/texas-ban-medical-abortion/
The cruelty is the point.
They’ll be after birth control next. They consider it abortive.
“Why can’t you use a condom?”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you knew this was coming, right?
https://www.texastribune.org/2021/12/02/texas-ban-medical-abortion/
The cruelty is the point.
They’ll be after birth control next. They consider it abortive.
“Why can’t you use a condom?”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you knew this was coming, right?
https://www.texastribune.org/2021/12/02/texas-ban-medical-abortion/
The cruelty is the point.
Anonymous wrote:If you don't believe in abortion, don't have one.
But leave others out of your beliefs. Their business is none of your business.
Is that so damn hard?
Anonymous wrote:So you knew this was coming, right?
https://www.texastribune.org/2021/12/02/texas-ban-medical-abortion/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the reason that carrying a child to term and then placing the baby up for adoption is mentally harmful, causes feelings of regret and sadness, vs aborting the baby and not having mental harm and feelings of regret and sadness?
Have you ever been pregnant? A pregnancy ending before 12 weeks is a minor procedure, and yes it may cause feelings of sadness for some women, but you can physically recover pretty quickly. A full-term pregnancy and childbirth alters the body and sometimes damages it extremely. Giving away a full-term infant can be devastating even if it's for the best.
Anonymous wrote:What is the reason that carrying a child to term and then placing the baby up for adoption is mentally harmful, causes feelings of regret and sadness, vs aborting the baby and not having mental harm and feelings of regret and sadness?
Anonymous wrote:The “moderate” and “reasonable” voices on here sound like either women in total and complete denial of what’s happening or like forced birthers who don’t like the fact that their disgusting politics are laid bare.
Anonymous wrote:Regarding “the left hasn’t won the abortion debate”
That is not true. 70% of Americans support Roe.
The left has absolutely won the debate.
And as for legislation being passed to solidify Roe, does anyone think those laws wouldn’t be struck down by this court?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the reason that carrying a child to term and then placing the baby up for adoption is mentally harmful, causes feelings of regret and sadness, vs aborting the baby and not having mental harm and feelings of regret and sadness?
If religious people use the state to violate your bodily integrity against your will for nine months, but really for all time given the fact that pregnancy and birth causes all kinds of changes in a woman’s body, do you think that that might cause mental harm?
<Rape trigger warning> For another example: rape hurts. Sex a woman wants usually does not. Rape is not necessarily any more violent than regular intercourse (though it can be), it’s the overwhelming of your rights as a person to say no, “I do not want this,” the violation of your body, every fiber of your brain screams against it (and frequently people’s body’s, too). This is the same thing. A thing undertaken with your consent is different than a thing undertaken against your consent. The state, even acting as a proxy for the religious feelings of forced birth misogynists, does not have the right to compel a citizen to use their body to grow a human against their will just like they can’t force us to donate a kidney, liver parts, marrow or even blood.
There was nothing about rape in either example. It was plainly about a teenage girl who had become pregnant and carried the baby to term and placed the baby for adoption vs aborted the baby.
Just 1% of women obtain an abortion because they became pregnant through rape, and less than 0.5% do so because of incest, according to the Guttmacher Institute.
PP is equating pro-birthers to rapists.
People who want to force women to do something they don’t want to do.
An apt comparison.
I am asking why once a woman is already pregnant it is considered more traumatic to carry the baby to term and adopt him or her into a family than aborting and ending the life of your own child. There was no rape in 99% of cases women seek abortion.