Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's consider for a moment if Republicans had been caught hiring a bunch of antifa-type protestors to attend and act up at a McAuliffe rally.
Imagine, for a moment, how the media would handle THAT story. Now, consider how they are handling THIS story.

Precisely this. Not to mention the posters who have their noses out of joint because their stupid candidate did something stupid. All they can do is splutter and invoke Trump - as usual. I'm so embarrassed for anyone who supports McAuliffe.

We’re all cringing with secondhand embarrassment for Youngkin voters, so it all works out.

I am a Democrat who voted for Youngkin. You are the reason why I walking away from my party.

Comments from an anonymous person on a mommy website made you vote for Youngkin?

Why are Democrats so obtuse? People LIKE YOU are the reason the PP (and many others) are walking away from Democrats. But, you knew that.

Someone asked about reputable pollsters.

I follow quite a few.

Check out Frank Luntz. He’s nationally known pollster. He said yesterday, based on historical data, 80% prediction for Youngkin. I about fell out of my chair.

You can see a video of the comment on his Twitter (he posted it yesterday afternoon). He can explain his reasoning/analysis better than I can explain it here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m voting for Youngkin because I’m a teacher and see first hand what is happening in public schools in the area. We need drastic changes. Many teachers in my school will be voting for him.

As for the topic of school choice, I’m all for it. Public schools need some competition. Currently they are running wild and no longer care about academics.

A lot of teachers in your school will lose their jobs when Youngkin puts vouchers in place and people flock to private schools.

DP. A lot of teachers will voluntarily resign from public schools and happily go work in charters. From Youngkin's website:

Restore Excellence In Education
Virginia’s students have fallen behind because of extended school closings, lower school standards, and political agendas. Glenn will empower parents and restore excellence and commonsense in education by:

• Keeping Schools Open Safely Five Days a Week
• Restoring High Expectations & Getting Every Student College or Career Ready
• Ridding Political Agendas from the Classroom by Banning Critical Race Theory
• Rebuilding Crumbling Schools, Raising Teacher Pay, & Investing in Special Education Programs
• Creating at least 20 New Innovation Charter Schools across the K-12 Spectrum to Provide Choice

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am still trying to get my head around Terry's campaign being blamed for a stunt orchestrated by republicans.

A) The stunt has been connected to Democrat operatives. Fact.

B) The stunt was set to make his rival look extremely bad and McAuliffe's poll numbers were sliding. Fact.

C) Public campaign oversight has shown that McAuliffe paid the Lincoln group during this campaign. Fact.

D) Several of the stunt instigators have been allegedly connected to the Democrat Party of Virginia.

E) National media, heavily left-leaning, refuse to investigate or identify the names or positions of the instigators even with clear pictures from multiple angles. Fact.

All roads lead to Terry.

It is being investigated right now. Stay tuned to the news.

Anonymous wrote:I’m voting for Youngkin because I’m a teacher and see first hand what is happening in public schools in the area. We need drastic changes. Many teachers in my school will be voting for him.

As for the topic of school choice, I’m all for it. Public schools need some competition. Currently they are running wild and no longer care about academics.

Absolutely agree.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You have to laugh at how democrats purport to support POC, but the moment some one dares think for themselves - Winsome Sears - bye. Such hypocrisy.

What are you talking about? Winsome Sears is a Republican - Democrats aren’t supporting her because of her policy positions, not her race.

Also, she’s running against another POC, so by your standards no one could vote for either candidates without turning their backs on a POC.

Wait, that's not the position Democrats have taken in the past! Anyone who didn't vote for HRC was a "misogynist" - remember?? Anyone who criticizes ANY female Democrat is a "misogynist". Never mind that we all stated we didn't agree with her policy positions. Democrats have made it plain: if you don't support a woman, you're a misogynist. If you don't support a POC, you're a racist. These are YOUR standards - except when they're not, of course.
DP

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am still trying to get my head around Terry's campaign being blamed for a stunt orchestrated by republicans.

A) The stunt has been connected to Democrat operatives. Fact.

B) The stunt was set to make his rival look extremely bad and McAuliffe's poll numbers were sliding. Fact.

C) Public campaign oversight has shown that McAuliffe paid the Lincoln group during this campaign. Fact.

D) Several of the stunt instigators have been allegedly connected to the Democrat Party of Virginia.

E) National media, heavily left-leaning, refuse to investigate or identify the names or positions of the instigators even with clear pictures from multiple angles. Fact.

All roads lead to Terry.

They are absolutely terrified of being accused later of having delivered the election to Youngkin, but realistically that is something that McAuliffe’s team is doing, not the media.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's consider for a moment if Republicans had been caught hiring a bunch of antifa-type protestors to attend and act up at a McAuliffe rally.
Imagine, for a moment, how the media would handle THAT story. Now, consider how they are handling THIS story.

Precisely this. Not to mention the posters who have their noses out of joint because their stupid candidate did something stupid. All they can do is splutter and invoke Trump - as usual. I'm so embarrassed for anyone who supports McAuliffe.

We’re all cringing with secondhand embarrassment for Youngkin voters, so it all works out.

I am a Democrat who voted for Youngkin. You are the reason why I walking away from my party.

+1

I really disliked Trump and that made me get more active in local Democratic politics, but seeing how smug and insular (along with how hypocritical our local all-Democratic school board turns out to be) was a giant turn-off. Quit the party and don’t really have one now, but voted for Youngkin because having state and local government under one-party control has not been not working well.

Anonymous wrote:I am still trying to get my head around Terry's campaign being blamed for a stunt orchestrated by republicans.

A) The stunt has been connected to Democrat operatives. Fact.

B) The stunt was set to make his rival look extremely bad and McAuliffe's poll numbers were sliding. Fact.

C) Public campaign oversight has shown that McAuliffe paid the Lincoln group during this campaign. Fact.

D) Several of the stunt instigators have been allegedly connected to the Democrat Party of Virginia.

E) National media, heavily left-leaning, refuse to investigate or identify the names or positions of the instigators even with clear pictures from multiple angles. Fact.

All roads lead to Terry.

Anonymous wrote:You have to laugh at how democrats purport to support POC, but the moment some one dares think for themselves - Winsome Sears - bye. Such hypocrisy.

Yep.

CRT is not taught in virginia schools (or any schools for that matter) -so it is a really bad reflection that people are voting on a total lie.

I am still trying to get my head around Terry's campaign being blamed for a stunt orchestrated by republicans.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's consider for a moment if Republicans had been caught hiring a bunch of antifa-type protestors to attend and act up at a McAuliffe rally.
Imagine, for a moment, how the media would handle THAT story. Now, consider how they are handling THIS story.

Precisely this. Not to mention the posters who have their noses out of joint because their stupid candidate did something stupid. All they can do is splutter and invoke Trump - as usual. I'm so embarrassed for anyone who supports McAuliffe.

We’re all cringing with secondhand embarrassment for Youngkin voters, so it all works out.

I am a Democrat who voted for Youngkin. You are the reason why I walking away from my party.

+1

I'm not walking away from the party. I just can't stand McAuliffe or his platform. The local boards and counties (in my area at least) will still be run by Dems. Viva Youngkin!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It seems like the local Democratic pundits/pollsters (not the party hacks) are throwing in the towel on McAuliffe. He’s been passed by someone running a much smarter, more positive campaign, and since McAuliffe isn’t about anything but the hustle, that tells you something.

The biggest blunder was thinking that folks who’ve been dealing with lockdowns for 18 months really wanted to hear Debbie Downer dreck for months, aimed at someone whose novelty, cheery disposition, and inclusivity makes those comparisons particularly inapt.

I’ll go a step further and say I think the national D party is throwing in the towel on Terry. They can read the tea leaves too and it’s not worth the risk of the precarious position of the D slim lead in the House going into ‘22 to fall on a sword for him.

What does that mean? How would they fall on a sword for him if they were actually interested? Honest question.

Biden, Kamala, Obama et al expend political capital when they actively campaign for local candidates. They all came out to rallies for Terry, Terry loses and it’s a big negative reflection on them because they are pegged with a loser. Yes, they were all here last week in a last ditch attempt to save him, but watch them all to run like cockroaches when the lights come on as soon as he really starts to tank. Not to mention, watch the money. Youngkin has pulled in more in the last 2 weeks than Terry has, by a substantial margin. That’s a real sign the party big wigs are giving up and moving on to another race.

Thank you. A few questions - okay so maybe they've stopped fundraising for him? Its still a critical time to run ads on Election Day and the day before - so yeah that's huge. But I don't get the 'run like cockroaches'. They already came out for him as you said, would you be expecting all of them to be on the road in Virginia all Sunday and Monday as well? That's Terry's job. Or his surrogates job and although he's been bringing in national powerhouses, he really should have LOCAL surrogates who know the population and the county seats.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's consider for a moment if Republicans had been caught hiring a bunch of antifa-type protestors to attend and act up at a McAuliffe rally.
Imagine, for a moment, how the media would handle THAT story. Now, consider how they are handling THIS story.

Precisely this. Not to mention the posters who have their noses out of joint because their stupid candidate did something stupid. All they can do is splutter and invoke Trump - as usual. I'm so embarrassed for anyone who supports McAuliffe.

We’re all cringing with secondhand embarrassment for Youngkin voters, so it all works out.

I am a Democrat who voted for Youngkin. You are the reason why I walking away from my party.

+1