Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The SCI and other highly classified documents should have never been taken out of the SCIF in DC in the first place, so that crime is in DC.
What criminal statute do you think that violates?
That has been cited in this thread several times.
No, it hasn’t. Because an authorized person taking a classified document out of a SCIF is not a crime. If it were, we’d be sending security officers to jail all day for doing their jobs.
Er, security officers don't take classified (TS) documents out of SCIFs. I take it you don't know anyone with clearance?
How do you think classified docs get moved from one place to another?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The SCI and other highly classified documents should have never been taken out of the SCIF in DC in the first place, so that crime is in DC.
What criminal statute do you think that violates?
That has been cited in this thread several times.
No, it hasn’t. Because an authorized person taking a classified document out of a SCIF is not a crime. If it were, we’d be sending security officers to jail all day for doing their jobs.
Martin admitted that beginning in the late 1990s and continuing through Aug. 31, 2016, he stole and retained U.S. government property from secure locations and computer systems, including documents in both hard copy and digital form relating to the national defense, that bore markings indicating that they were the property of the United States and contained highly classified information of the United States, including Top Secret/SCI information.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The SCI and other highly classified documents should have never been taken out of the SCIF in DC in the first place, so that crime is in DC.
What criminal statute do you think that violates?
That has been cited in this thread several times.
No, it hasn’t. Because an authorized person taking a classified document out of a SCIF is not a crime. If it were, we’d be sending security officers to jail all day for doing their jobs.
Er, security officers don't take classified (TS) documents out of SCIFs. I take it you don't know anyone with clearance?
How do you think classified docs get moved from one place to another?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The SCI and other highly classified documents should have never been taken out of the SCIF in DC in the first place, so that crime is in DC.
What criminal statute do you think that violates?
That has been cited in this thread several times.
No, it hasn’t. Because an authorized person taking a classified document out of a SCIF is not a crime. If it were, we’d be sending security officers to jail all day for doing their jobs.
The former president has no special rights when it comes to possession of classified documents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The SCI and other highly classified documents should have never been taken out of the SCIF in DC in the first place, so that crime is in DC.
What criminal statute do you think that violates?
That has been cited in this thread several times.
No, it hasn’t. Because an authorized person taking a classified document out of a SCIF is not a crime. If it were, we’d be sending security officers to jail all day for doing their jobs.
Er, security officers don't take classified (TS) documents out of SCIFs. I take it you don't know anyone with clearance?
Anonymous wrote:Marc Short was testifying before one of the DC grand juries today.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The SCI and other highly classified documents should have never been taken out of the SCIF in DC in the first place, so that crime is in DC.
What criminal statute do you think that violates?
That has been cited in this thread several times.
No, it hasn’t. Because an authorized person taking a classified document out of a SCIF is not a crime. If it were, we’d be sending security officers to jail all day for doing their jobs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The SCI and other highly classified documents should have never been taken out of the SCIF in DC in the first place, so that crime is in DC.
What criminal statute do you think that violates?
That has been cited in this thread several times.
No, it hasn’t. Because an authorized person taking a classified document out of a SCIF is not a crime. If it were, we’d be sending security officers to jail all day for doing their jobs.
The former president has no special rights when it comes to possession of classified documents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The SCI and other highly classified documents should have never been taken out of the SCIF in DC in the first place, so that crime is in DC.
What criminal statute do you think that violates?
That has been cited in this thread several times.
No, it hasn’t. Because an authorized person taking a classified document out of a SCIF is not a crime. If it were, we’d be sending security officers to jail all day for doing their jobs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The SCI and other highly classified documents should have never been taken out of the SCIF in DC in the first place, so that crime is in DC.
What criminal statute do you think that violates?
That has been cited in this thread several times.
Anonymous wrote:Can anyone tell me if trump can just keep kicking this can down the road indefinitely? This feels endless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The SCI and other highly classified documents should have never been taken out of the SCIF in DC in the first place, so that crime is in DC.
What criminal statute do you think that violates?