Anonymous wrote:At 2:08 in the DC News Now vid where one exhibit is shown it states that both bodies were repositioned in the room so Christine was not killed in a guest room, etc.

People need to stop bickering over details provided by JPM's lawyer, it's ALL lies. The pages about people's own holiday cards are narcissistic but the pages going on and on about trips to the zoo in Feb were pointless, it was part of the ruse, not anything that ever was happening. JPM waited down the street for JR to arrive. She did not forget lunches. Everything about their story is a lie.

I still don't see the part about CB being held down, guess that was by JPM? if the forensics on that are solid then her charges should be increased. What dumbasses, there was no way the evidence supported JR being the killer, not done a single person. Sounds like both engaged in killing each victim.

RIP Christine, RIP Joe.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I found it by looking at the news report on DC News Now. During the reporting they showed a couple of pages from the prosecution document on the video. You have to watch close and stop the action. I have no idea why the document has not been made available to the general public. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNzLcN56oaU

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There has been considerable speculation in these pages; there is nothing wrong with that as long as it is made clear when it is nothing more than that. What is unfortunate is the speculation and arguments over things that are clear from the court records. For example, there was endless back and forth about "no signs of a struggle" as well as how this might show Christine was drugged. But here is what prosecutor's set forth in court papers:

"Autopsy findings on Christine’s body are consistent with her arms being pinned down while she was stabbed once through the left side of her neck. An immobilized Christine instinctively and defensively could only turn her head away from this blow but this exposed the right side of her neck where she was then stabbed repeatedly, five more times."

While that is not proof at this point, it does establish what the prosecution intends to show about the stabbing.

My biggest concern is that the case may not be the slam-dunk that many here are suggesting. If Magalhaes does not flip, in each separate case the prosecution will have to demonstrate that a particular act was either performed by a specific defendant or that it was part of a conspiracy between the two. Defense lawyers for each could claim that the other one was responsible. From what we have previously heard from her lawyer, that at least seemed to be the direction they were going. Hopefully, the lengthy, painstaking efforts of police and prosecutors have build an air-tight case but we cannot really say at this point.

What is your source for the above, PP? I have not seen these details in media accounts.

Anonymous wrote:There has been considerable speculation in these pages; there is nothing wrong with that as long as it is made clear when it is nothing more than that. What is unfortunate is the speculation and arguments over things that are clear from the court records. For example, there was endless back and forth about "no signs of a struggle" as well as how this might show Christine was drugged. But here is what prosecutor's set forth in court papers:

"Autopsy findings on Christine’s body are consistent with her arms being pinned down while she was stabbed once through the left side of her neck. An immobilized Christine instinctively and defensively could only turn her head away from this blow but this exposed the right side of her neck where she was then stabbed repeatedly, five more times."

While that is not proof at this point, it does establish what the prosecution intends to show about the stabbing.

My biggest concern is that the case may not be the slam-dunk that many here are suggesting. If Magalhaes does not flip, in each separate case the prosecution will have to demonstrate that a particular act was either performed by a specific defendant or that it was part of a conspiracy between the two. Defense lawyers for each could claim that the other one was responsible. From what we have previously heard from her lawyer, that at least seemed to be the direction they were going. Hopefully, the lengthy, painstaking efforts of police and prosecutors have build an air-tight case but we cannot really say at this point.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I found it by looking at the news report on DC News Now. During the reporting they showed a couple of pages from the prosecution document on the video. You have to watch close and stop the action. I have no idea why the document has not been made available to the general public. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNzLcN56oaU

That they are! The part about Juliana waiting a few houses down in the cul-de-sac for the ring camera notification of Joe’s arrival is rather damning. Stupid girl. Brendan just needed a fall gal and looks like you took the bait.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I found it by looking at the news report on DC News Now. During the reporting they showed a couple of pages from the prosecution document on the video. You have to watch close and stop the action. I have no idea why the document has not been made available to the general public. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNzLcN56oaU

Anonymous wrote:I found it by looking at the news report on DC News Now. During the reporting they showed a couple of pages from the prosecution document on the video. You have to watch close and stop the action. I have no idea why the document has not been made available to the general public. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNzLcN56oaU

Anonymous wrote:There has been considerable speculation in these pages; there is nothing wrong with that as long as it is made clear when it is nothing more than that. What is unfortunate is the speculation and arguments over things that are clear from the court records. For example, there was endless back and forth about "no signs of a struggle" as well as how this might show Christine was drugged. But here is what prosecutor's set forth in court papers:

"Autopsy findings on Christine’s body are consistent with her arms being pinned down while she was stabbed once through the left side of her neck. An immobilized Christine instinctively and defensively could only turn her head away from this blow but this exposed the right side of her neck where she was then stabbed repeatedly, five more times."

While that is not proof at this point, it does establish what the prosecution intends to show about the stabbing.

My biggest concern is that the case may not be the slam-dunk that many here are suggesting. If Magalhaes does not flip, in each separate case the prosecution will have to demonstrate that a particular act was either performed by a specific defendant or that it was part of a conspiracy between the two. Defense lawyers for each could claim that the other one was responsible. From what we have previously heard from her lawyer, that at least seemed to be the direction they were going. Hopefully, the lengthy, painstaking efforts of police and prosecutors have build an air-tight case but we cannot really say at this point.