Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do find it crazy that girls platforms try to dictate admission (seems both GA & ECNL) based on boys platforms.

They are different and should be treated that way.

Maybe I am wrong, but I just don't get WHY this is criteria.

MLSN and GA don't care if clubs also have ECNL.

ECNL won't let any of their teams be 2nd to MLSN or GA.

Multiple clubs have tried to have MLSN as their 1st team and ECNL has their second team. When this happens ECNL threatens to take or does take girls ECNL away.

You misunderstood her question. And for heavens sake stop being in denial. It’s 2025 and the age of avoiding reality is over. All good ECNL girl players are moving to GA next season or those who got a spot. My DD is on ECNL team and our top 6 players all left. She’s hating it now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do find it crazy that girls platforms try to dictate admission (seems both GA & ECNL) based on boys platforms.

They are different and should be treated that way.

Maybe I am wrong, but I just don't get WHY this is criteria.

MLSN and GA don't care if clubs also have ECNL.

ECNL won't let any of their teams be 2nd to MLSN or GA.

Multiple clubs have tried to have MLSN as their 1st team and ECNL has their second team. When this happens ECNL threatens to take or does take girls ECNL away.

Anonymous wrote:yeah, trash clubs

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:4 teams thats two weekends in NC, no different than MA conference in ECNL. Biggest difference is that at least in ECNL you are travelling to play CSA. CSA is the only team worth playing in NC on the girls side.

I'm sure you realize what a ridiculous statement this is. NC has a population of 11 million people and growing, with many excellent young female soccer players almost all of which do not play for CSA.

What metric quantifies this statement?

if you don't play for CSA, you are not good.

i'm a bankruptcy attorney. i sent the GA my card

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:4 teams thats two weekends in NC, no different than MA conference in ECNL. Biggest difference is that at least in ECNL you are travelling to play CSA. CSA is the only team worth playing in NC on the girls side.

I'm sure you realize what a ridiculous statement this is. NC has a population of 11 million people and growing, with many excellent young female soccer players almost all of which do not play for CSA.

Poster was going for the hyberbole, but they have a point. Looking at Soccer Rankings, CISC will be the cream of the crop as they are coming from ECNL. The rest (Triangle, Wake, CDA) are on par or below the RL teams in NC.

CISC lost a ton of players when they left ECNL. Next couple seasons will be up for grabs as all these new GA clubs fight for the same player pool. Most likely 1 GA club emerges as the clear leader and gets most of the non-ECNL top players. Same will happen in VA with maybe 1 or 2 clubs collecting most of the players.

happens everywhere. kids fight for Tier 1 ECNL team, those who don't make it look for Tier 2 level gA team

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:4 teams thats two weekends in NC, no different than MA conference in ECNL. Biggest difference is that at least in ECNL you are travelling to play CSA. CSA is the only team worth playing in NC on the girls side.

I'm sure you realize what a ridiculous statement this is. NC has a population of 11 million people and growing, with many excellent young female soccer players almost all of which do not play for CSA.

Poster was going for the hyberbole, but they have a point. Looking at Soccer Rankings, CISC will be the cream of the crop as they are coming from ECNL. The rest (Triangle, Wake, CDA) are on par or below the RL teams in NC.

CISC lost a ton of players when they left ECNL. Next couple seasons will be up for grabs as all these new GA clubs fight for the same player pool. Most likely 1 GA club emerges as the clear leader and gets most of the non-ECNL top players. Same will happen in VA with maybe 1 or 2 clubs collecting most of the players.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:4 teams thats two weekends in NC, no different than MA conference in ECNL. Biggest difference is that at least in ECNL you are travelling to play CSA. CSA is the only team worth playing in NC on the girls side.

I'm sure you realize what a ridiculous statement this is. NC has a population of 11 million people and growing, with many excellent young female soccer players almost all of which do not play for CSA.

What metric quantifies this statement?

if you don't play for CSA, you are not good.

Anonymous wrote:CISC did a surprisingly good job maintaining girl players after the unannounced switcheroo to GA. Next year is a whole different story with the age change switch to SY…septQ4 cisc players will flood CSA and try to get on teams that they couldn’t make in the BY system.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:4 teams thats two weekends in NC, no different than MA conference in ECNL. Biggest difference is that at least in ECNL you are travelling to play CSA. CSA is the only team worth playing in NC on the girls side.

I'm sure you realize what a ridiculous statement this is. NC has a population of 11 million people and growing, with many excellent young female soccer players almost all of which do not play for CSA.

Poster was going for the hyberbole, but they have a point. Looking at Soccer Rankings, CISC will be the cream of the crop as they are coming from ECNL. The rest (Triangle, Wake, CDA) are on par or below the RL teams in NC.