Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m just saying that on that first day of the murder I posted on the closed thread that it’s weird when families only post their kid on their Christmas card and so many people said that was BS and that they were a loving family… but Sometimes when it smells like BS, it is BS!

Oh man, we only put our kids on our xmas card (they're cuter than DH and I)!

Honestly, most of the cards we receive are just the kids and not the parents....

Agree. Who wants to see adults on a Christmas card? Kids change from year to year- it’s fun to see how they’ve grown, especially if you don’t live close by. And yes, most kids are tons cuter than their parents.

It's definitely a sign of an unhappy family in SOME cases. Another sign was his FB page that had photo of him and his dog...no family. Before you say maybe they didn't want that public- Christine's profiles are all public and have pics of their child.

You are really reaching here, to the point of sounding ridiculous. Lots of people only put their kids on their Christmas cards- in some cultures, it would be considered vain to send out a picture of yourself, but kids are okay because they’re growing and changing every year. A lot of people see Christmas as being about and for children, so their Christmas cards keep the focus on children, not grown adults.

There are lots of reasons to think something was very, very wrong with this guy and his relationship with his wife(and the human race in general with the way he was able to use an innocent man to try to hide his actions), but putting a picture of a child on a Christmas card is not one of them. Please.

+1. Would also say most families I know only put the kids on the Christmas card. Heck sometimes the grandparents put only the grandkids on the Christmas card. I would say those who post photos of their entire family on a Christmas card are more atypical than typical.

That is not my experience at all! Usually the people that don’t include themselves are upset they gained weight or don’t like pictures of themselves.

My experience has been that people who include themselves with their kids on a card are people who are really stuck on themselves. The kind who would be judgmental about other people gaining weight.

Most of the cards I get with pictures are just the kids.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really curious what their family dynamic was prior to the incident. It didn't seem like BB and JM were trying to hide their romance even before the murder...

Wonder what they told Christine re: the trip to NY in January, shortly before the killings?

She knew he had cheated for years with many people, it likely was a sad, lonely marriage.

The cover for the trips was that they brought the daughter along too. Juliana was able to say she was going along to experience a new city and take care of her. Brendan would often visit friends during the day. Once the daughter would go to sleep they’d continue the affair at night

Anonymous wrote:One of the most chilling details from the last WaPo article: BB did not ask paramedics about his wife, as they were trying to save her life. He only asked if JR had a pulse.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really curious what their family dynamic was prior to the incident. It didn't seem like BB and JM were trying to hide their romance even before the murder...

Wonder what they told Christine re: the trip to NY in January, shortly before the killings?

She knew he had cheated for years with many people, it likely was a sad, lonely marriage.

Anonymous wrote:Really curious what their family dynamic was prior to the incident. It didn't seem like BB and JM were trying to hide their romance even before the murder...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m just saying that on that first day of the murder I posted on the closed thread that it’s weird when families only post their kid on their Christmas card and so many people said that was BS and that they were a loving family… but Sometimes when it smells like BS, it is BS!

Oh man, we only put our kids on our xmas card (they're cuter than DH and I)!

Honestly, most of the cards we receive are just the kids and not the parents....

Agree. Who wants to see adults on a Christmas card? Kids change from year to year- it’s fun to see how they’ve grown, especially if you don’t live close by. And yes, most kids are tons cuter than their parents.

It's definitely a sign of an unhappy family in SOME cases. Another sign was his FB page that had photo of him and his dog...no family. Before you say maybe they didn't want that public- Christine's profiles are all public and have pics of their child.

You are really reaching here, to the point of sounding ridiculous. Lots of people only put their kids on their Christmas cards- in some cultures, it would be considered vain to send out a picture of yourself, but kids are okay because they’re growing and changing every year. A lot of people see Christmas as being about and for children, so their Christmas cards keep the focus on children, not grown adults.

There are lots of reasons to think something was very, very wrong with this guy and his relationship with his wife(and the human race in general with the way he was able to use an innocent man to try to hide his actions), but putting a picture of a child on a Christmas card is not one of them. Please.

+1. Would also say most families I know only put the kids on the Christmas card. Heck sometimes the grandparents put only the grandkids on the Christmas card. I would say those who post photos of their entire family on a Christmas card are more atypical than typical.

That is not my experience at all! Usually the people that don’t include themselves are upset they gained weight or don’t like pictures of themselves.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m just saying that on that first day of the murder I posted on the closed thread that it’s weird when families only post their kid on their Christmas card and so many people said that was BS and that they were a loving family… but Sometimes when it smells like BS, it is BS!

Oh man, we only put our kids on our xmas card (they're cuter than DH and I)!

Honestly, most of the cards we receive are just the kids and not the parents....

Agree. Who wants to see adults on a Christmas card? Kids change from year to year- it’s fun to see how they’ve grown, especially if you don’t live close by. And yes, most kids are tons cuter than their parents.

It's definitely a sign of an unhappy family in SOME cases. Another sign was his FB page that had photo of him and his dog...no family. Before you say maybe they didn't want that public- Christine's profiles are all public and have pics of their child.

You are really reaching here, to the point of sounding ridiculous. Lots of people only put their kids on their Christmas cards- in some cultures, it would be considered vain to send out a picture of yourself, but kids are okay because they’re growing and changing every year. A lot of people see Christmas as being about and for children, so their Christmas cards keep the focus on children, not grown adults.

There are lots of reasons to think something was very, very wrong with this guy and his relationship with his wife(and the human race in general with the way he was able to use an innocent man to try to hide his actions), but putting a picture of a child on a Christmas card is not one of them. Please.

How about not putting anyone on a Christmas card, as that's not what Christmas is about. So silly. This was not even a thing until the last 20 years or so.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now we know why JM hasn’t pled. With these facts and planning, the prosecutor will want real jail time. She is a threat to society. At some point they will need to decide how much they need her or whether the other evidence is enough. The goal should be nailing BB.

I believe they have enough physical evidence to find them both guilty. It is not and either or question right now. The prosecution has already stated they will go forward with JM’s trial next month. They are not currently offering her a deal and they will not unless she were to give testimony that damns BBs case, and even if they offer her a deal it wont be time served, she still physically did a progressively fatal shot ending Joe’s life along with BB. They both are guilty and they both will pay for what they have done, no jury alive won’t clearly see their guilt.

Anonymous wrote:Now we know why JM hasn’t pled. With these facts and planning, the prosecutor will want real jail time. She is a threat to society. At some point they will need to decide how much they need her or whether the other evidence is enough. The goal should be nailing BB.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the paramedics arrived, was the little girl still in the basement all by herself!?

Right??? I want to know this to, I cannot believe these disgusting people had the girl locked (I presume she was locked because otherwise wouldn't she have been curious about why they left her there for so long?) in the basement while they were dong this. It's the most horrific part of it all, IMO.

Killing 2 people in cold blood is pretty horrific too, imho.

What was any of it even for? Thrill kills? They were arrested and will go away for a very long time. They were already carrying on prior, trips together, etc. And then you've got TB, defo OLD ENOUGH TO KNOW BETTER, witness tampering while being recorded in FFX jail. Maybe all 3 are so dumb they thought the'd get away with it. Almost no one does. And that BB has been talking about doing this for years takes the cake. What a silver tongued devil he is.

Joe, Christine, little girl with no mom, Joe's mom, you all deserved so much better.

They have to be psychos. A divorce would be so much easier for them, and sparing all the innocents.

Not psychotic -- that means they have mentally broken with reality -- like a person who has schizophrenia or a person who is on LSD or something where they think a tree is talking to them. THAT is "psychotic."

They are surely narcissists --- they think their needs are the only important needs and the rest of the world is subservient to them. Non-psychotic people do really, really bad things ALL THE TIME. EVERY MINUTE of EVERY DAY!

Psychotic people deserve our sympathy. They live tortured lives. These two (BB and JM) do NOT deserve our sympathy. THey know fully well what they were doing and didn't care. They figured they could outsmart everyone. It is a tragedy that the little girl will eventually know that she shares genes with someone SO conniving, callous, and deceptive. That alone would be hard to accept -- that you are directly related to someone SOOO hard-core cruel and cold.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m just saying that on that first day of the murder I posted on the closed thread that it’s weird when families only post their kid on their Christmas card and so many people said that was BS and that they were a loving family… but Sometimes when it smells like BS, it is BS!

Oh man, we only put our kids on our xmas card (they're cuter than DH and I)!

Honestly, most of the cards we receive are just the kids and not the parents....

Agree. Who wants to see adults on a Christmas card? Kids change from year to year- it’s fun to see how they’ve grown, especially if you don’t live close by. And yes, most kids are tons cuter than their parents.

It's definitely a sign of an unhappy family in SOME cases. Another sign was his FB page that had photo of him and his dog...no family. Before you say maybe they didn't want that public- Christine's profiles are all public and have pics of their child.

You are really reaching here, to the point of sounding ridiculous. Lots of people only put their kids on their Christmas cards- in some cultures, it would be considered vain to send out a picture of yourself, but kids are okay because they’re growing and changing every year. A lot of people see Christmas as being about and for children, so their Christmas cards keep the focus on children, not grown adults.

There are lots of reasons to think something was very, very wrong with this guy and his relationship with his wife(and the human race in general with the way he was able to use an innocent man to try to hide his actions), but putting a picture of a child on a Christmas card is not one of them. Please.

Anonymous wrote:Upcoming court dates?

Anonymous wrote:Really curious what their family dynamic was prior to the incident. It didn't seem like BB and JM were trying to hide their romance even before the murder...