Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why can't we see the entire "Birthday Book"?

There is a link to the entire document on the House Oversight Committee website.

In the index to the book, https://drive.google.com/drive/mobile/folders/1ZSVpXEhI7gKI0zatJdYe6QhKJ5pjUo4b

What are the names of the two Friend contributors that are blacked out?

One comes alphabetically between Black and Brunel. The other comes between Rosovsky and Wexner.

PP here -- Ha, I'm slow! Obviously the second blackout is Trump.

Actually, Trump's name is listed there right before Rosovsky, out of alphabetical order. So it's somebody else.

Oh right! On what grounds does someone other than victims merit redaction?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why can't we see the entire "Birthday Book"?

There is a link to the entire document on the House Oversight Committee website.

In the index to the book, https://drive.google.com/drive/mobile/folders/1ZSVpXEhI7gKI0zatJdYe6QhKJ5pjUo4b

What are the names of the two Friend contributors that are blacked out?

One comes alphabetically between Black and Brunel. The other comes between Rosovsky and Wexner.

PP here -- Ha, I'm slow! Obviously the second blackout is Trump.

Actually, Trump's name is listed there right before Rosovsky, out of alphabetical order. So it's somebody else.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BREAKING: House Democrats obtain Jeffrey Epstein's 50th birthday book.

Stay tuned. We will soon learn if Trump's letter to Epstein is real.

-aaronparnas

This is strange. It doesn’t feel like a bombshell and before I say this is fake, was he known to draw and make these weird cards?

What's the alternative? That in 2003 someone decided to take a page in Jeffrey Epstein's birthday card as from Trump in case Trump, who had never expressed political ambitions (and may even have been a Democrat at the time) happened to lead a conservative movement and become president some day? I mean, come on people. Anyone claiming this was faked just sounds unhinged. You can argue that it doesn't mean anything. But fake? Please.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why can't we see the entire "Birthday Book"?

There is a link to the entire document on the House Oversight Committee website.

In the index to the book, https://drive.google.com/drive/mobile/folders/1ZSVpXEhI7gKI0zatJdYe6QhKJ5pjUo4b

What are the names of the two Friend contributors that are blacked out?

One comes alphabetically between Black and Brunel. The other comes between Rosovsky and Wexner.

PP here -- Ha, I'm slow! Obviously the second blackout is Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why can't we see the entire "Birthday Book"?

There is a link to the entire document on the House Oversight Committee website.

In the index to the book, https://drive.google.com/drive/mobile/folders/1ZSVpXEhI7gKI0zatJdYe6QhKJ5pjUo4b

What are the names of the two Friend contributors that are blacked out?

One comes alphabetically between Black and Brunel. The other comes between Rosovsky and Wexner.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His “no comment” at this point makes him seem guilty.

With this logic, what does it suggest for Trump? Aggressive defensiveness including his claims of lies and falsehoods and a $10 million lawsuit?

Billion. He sued Rupert Murdoch, Dow Jones, the Wall Street Journal, and the two bylined reporters personally for $10 billion.

They’re still trying to call it fake. It’s deranged.

It's desperate.

Maybe this is why he’s been fortifying DC.

Anonymous wrote:Why can't we see the entire "Birthday Book"?

There is a link to the entire document on the House Oversight Committee website.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His “no comment” at this point makes him seem guilty.

With this logic, what does it suggest for Trump? Aggressive defensiveness including his claims of lies and falsehoods and a $10 million lawsuit?

Billion. He sued Rupert Murdoch, Dow Jones, the Wall Street Journal, and the two bylined reporters personally for $10 billion.

They’re still trying to call it fake. It’s deranged.

It's desperate.

Anonymous wrote:

That plane has Epstein's id #, and the building is Mar-a-Lago

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His “no comment” at this point makes him seem guilty.

With this logic, what does it suggest for Trump? Aggressive defensiveness including his claims of lies and falsehoods and a $10 million lawsuit?

Billion. He sued Rupert Murdoch, Dow Jones, the Wall Street Journal, and the two bylined reporters personally for $10 billion.

They’re still trying to call it fake. It’s deranged.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

How disgusting. To have powerful men drooling over young girls groveling at their feet.

Our society is so so messed up.

That picture?

The building in the background?

It’s Mar a Lago.

Yikes! Is it really Mar a Lago? Did Trump own it yet?

Yes. Per Wikipedia Trump bought it in 1985, then converted to his private "club" in 1995.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Maxwell testimony is a joke at this point. She put this disgusting book together. Bill Clinton should man up instead of just responding “no comment” on his own entry in the birthday book.

+1000 the comment is very alarming as is all this trips down there to visit him over the years.

Supposedly, Clinton, while on the LOLITA Express, disappeared with a very young girl to a private area of the plane and his Secret Service agent was told to stay behind. Bring it all out into the open.

I'm more concerned about the sitting POTUS than a has been. But, all these pervs should be nailed to the wall.

- Clinton and Trump hater.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

^ Julie K. Brown is the Miami Herald reporter we have to thank for all of the Epstein/sex trafficking reporting coming to light, by the way.

She should win a Pulitzer for her reporting, but I'm sure Trump will make some awful comment about that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

How disgusting. To have powerful men drooling over young girls groveling at their feet.

Our society is so so messed up.

That picture?

The building in the background?

It’s Mar a Lago.

Yikes! Is it really Mar a Lago? Did Trump own it yet?

Anonymous wrote:His “no comment” at this point makes him seem guilty.

With this logic, what does it suggest for Trump? Aggressive defensiveness including his claims of lies and falsehoods and a $10 million lawsuit?