Anonymous
04/14/2024 16:25
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Donnie Two Scoops is in panic mode over the moronic decision that happened in Arizona. He knows it’s bad news.
Kind of a wild take you have there. He just reinforced the idea that states' rights exists.
No, he backed away from one of his dumbest brags yet.
And I looooooove that you’re willing to sign away women’s citizenship like it’s nothing.
Citizenship? Do tell.
What do you call it when a person has no bodily autonomy and no legal rights to make decisions for their own body and future? I’d call that second class citizenship. Or straight up slavery. It’s what Republicans want.
You call it what you want.
There's a point where it's about infanticide, not bodily autonomy. Do you have two brains, two hearts, four eyes, etc? Comes a point where your views on killing the innocent are unacceptable.
Okay, so where is the point where it is a reasonable decision to have an abortion -- or do you believe in a total ban on abortion?
First trimester, but my "reasonableness" doesn't matter. Everyone has an opinion, so let states work it out with their constituents. I'm against federalizing every f'n issue. Washington DC does not have all the answers.
So premature rupture of membranes in second trimester, 17 weeks, nonviable to deliver, just wait for sepsis to set in and deliver the fetus after it does naturally? Hope the woman survives septic shock, but because it's past the first trimester, no other options?
I am the previous poster. Exceptions for the life of the mother, rape, incest, etc.
But you're not going to be doing partial-birth abortions because you changed your mind/couldn't make up your mind in the later parts of the pregnancy.
Or you sleep around and have had 17 abortions to your name. That s*** ain't happening. I'm reasonable, but you want to make a business out of encouraging abortions and selling stem cells for $$$, no.
If you're in an area where there are more abortions than live births, that s*** has got to stop. You understand my wavelength now. I'm talking about abuse of the system. Things like clinics pushing abortions to make money. Much like medicare fraud.
Things like Planned Parentthood shifting funds and using fungibility clauses to whack the tax payer for funding when the law clearly states you shall not. Lawfare against the Hyde Amendment. MONETIZING the industry for disgusting evil ends.
And not just the fiscal angle, but also pushing abortions as a right to the point you have to announce you had one just to be cool. It's not cool. Making statements like "I regret not getting pregnant just so I could have an abortion" are counterproductive, but it's reality.
I'm not unreasonable, but there are two sides to every argument.
DP. Why? What makes a first or second or third abortion fine but 17 is too many? Clearly the woman is lousy at birth control and doesn't want to be a mother. After 12 or 16 abortions, then you think she should have a baby rather than another abortion?
Curious to hear your reasoning. That woman seems to me to be an excellent candidate for abortion. Even for abortion 18 if it comes up.
Anonymous
04/14/2024 16:22
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Donnie Two Scoops is in panic mode over the moronic decision that happened in Arizona. He knows it’s bad news.
Kind of a wild take you have there. He just reinforced the idea that states' rights exists.
No, he backed away from one of his dumbest brags yet.
And I looooooove that you’re willing to sign away women’s citizenship like it’s nothing.
Citizenship? Do tell.
What do you call it when a person has no bodily autonomy and no legal rights to make decisions for their own body and future? I’d call that second class citizenship. Or straight up slavery. It’s what Republicans want.
You call it what you want.
There's a point where it's about infanticide, not bodily autonomy. Do you have two brains, two hearts, four eyes, etc? Comes a point where your views on killing the innocent are unacceptable.
Okay, so where is the point where it is a reasonable decision to have an abortion -- or do you believe in a total ban on abortion?
First trimester, but my "reasonableness" doesn't matter. Everyone has an opinion, so let states work it out with their constituents. I'm against federalizing every f'n issue. Washington DC does not have all the answers.
So premature rupture of membranes in second trimester, 17 weeks, nonviable to deliver, just wait for sepsis to set in and deliver the fetus after it does naturally? Hope the woman survives septic shock, but because it's past the first trimester, no other options?
I am the previous poster. Exceptions for the life of the mother, rape, incest, etc.
But you're not going to be doing partial-birth abortions because you changed your mind/couldn't make up your mind in the later parts of the pregnancy.
Or you sleep around and have had 17 abortions to your name. That s*** ain't happening. I'm reasonable, but you want to make a business out of encouraging abortions and selling stem cells for $$$, no.
If you're in an area where there are more abortions than live births, that s*** has got to stop. You understand my wavelength now. I'm talking about abuse of the system. Things like clinics pushing abortions to make money. Much like medicare fraud.
Things like Planned Parentthood shifting funds and using fungibility clauses to whack the tax payer for funding when the law clearly states you shall not. Lawfare against the Hyde Amendment. MONETIZING the industry for disgusting evil ends.
And not just the fiscal angle, but also pushing abortions as a right to the point you have to announce you had one just to be cool. It's not cool. Making statements like "I regret not getting pregnant just so I could have an abortion" are counterproductive, but it's reality.
I'm not unreasonable, but there are two sides to every argument.
What you describe is first trimester behavior. Haven't partial birth abortions been banned for a long time?
Anonymous
04/14/2024 16:16
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Donnie Two Scoops is in panic mode over the moronic decision that happened in Arizona. He knows it’s bad news.
Kind of a wild take you have there. He just reinforced the idea that states' rights exists.
No, he backed away from one of his dumbest brags yet.
And I looooooove that you’re willing to sign away women’s citizenship like it’s nothing.
Citizenship? Do tell.
What do you call it when a person has no bodily autonomy and no legal rights to make decisions for their own body and future? I’d call that second class citizenship. Or straight up slavery. It’s what Republicans want.
You call it what you want.
There's a point where it's about infanticide, not bodily autonomy. Do you have two brains, two hearts, four eyes, etc? Comes a point where your views on killing the innocent are unacceptable.
Okay, so where is the point where it is a reasonable decision to have an abortion -- or do you believe in a total ban on abortion?
First trimester, but my "reasonableness" doesn't matter. Everyone has an opinion, so let states work it out with their constituents. I'm against federalizing every f'n issue. Washington DC does not have all the answers.
So premature rupture of membranes in second trimester, 17 weeks, nonviable to deliver, just wait for sepsis to set in and deliver the fetus after it does naturally? Hope the woman survives septic shock, but because it's past the first trimester, no other options?
I am the previous poster. Exceptions for the life of the mother, rape, incest, etc.
But you're not going to be doing partial-birth abortions because you changed your mind/couldn't make up your mind in the later parts of the pregnancy.
Or you sleep around and have had 17 abortions to your name. That s*** ain't happening. I'm reasonable, but you want to make a business out of encouraging abortions and selling stem cells for $$$, no.
If you're in an area where there are more abortions than live births, that s*** has got to stop. You understand my wavelength now. I'm talking about abuse of the system. Things like clinics pushing abortions to make money. Much like medicare fraud.
Things like Planned Parentthood shifting funds and using fungibility clauses to whack the tax payer for funding when the law clearly states you shall not. Lawfare against the Hyde Amendment. MONETIZING the industry for disgusting evil ends.
And not just the fiscal angle, but also pushing abortions as a right to the point you have to announce you had one just to be cool. It's not cool. Making statements like "I regret not getting pregnant just so I could have an abortion" are counterproductive, but it's reality.
I'm not unreasonable, but there are two sides to every argument.
Anonymous
04/14/2024 16:05
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:We're going to see more and more headlines like this in red states now:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/georgia-father-sentenced-50-years-prison-poisoning-newborns-breastmilk-rcna147708
In Georgia, father poisons his babies pumped breastmilk with antifreeze, so he won't have to pay child support.
Is Georgia a red state?
Anonymous
04/14/2024 15:50
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Donnie Two Scoops is in panic mode over the moronic decision that happened in Arizona. He knows it’s bad news.
Kind of a wild take you have there. He just reinforced the idea that states' rights exists.
No, he backed away from one of his dumbest brags yet.
And I looooooove that you’re willing to sign away women’s citizenship like it’s nothing.
Citizenship? Do tell.
What do you call it when a person has no bodily autonomy and no legal rights to make decisions for their own body and future? I’d call that second class citizenship. Or straight up slavery. It’s what Republicans want.
You call it what you want.
There's a point where it's about infanticide, not bodily autonomy. Do you have two brains, two hearts, four eyes, etc? Comes a point where your views on killing the innocent are unacceptable.
Okay, so where is the point where it is a reasonable decision to have an abortion -- or do you believe in a total ban on abortion?
First trimester, but my "reasonableness" doesn't matter. Everyone has an opinion, so let states work it out with their constituents. I'm against federalizing every f'n issue. Washington DC does not have all the answers.
So premature rupture of membranes in second trimester, 17 weeks, nonviable to deliver, just wait for sepsis to set in and deliver the fetus after it does naturally? Hope the woman survives septic shock, but because it's past the first trimester, no other options?
Per PP, that sounds like a reasonable outcome. It's obviously the woman's fault for generating a non-viable pregnancy that didn't manifest itself as such in the first trimester. As such, she must pay with her life.
Anonymous
04/14/2024 15:46
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
("after it dies naturally inside her")
Anonymous
04/14/2024 15:45
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Donnie Two Scoops is in panic mode over the moronic decision that happened in Arizona. He knows it’s bad news.
Kind of a wild take you have there. He just reinforced the idea that states' rights exists.
No, he backed away from one of his dumbest brags yet.
And I looooooove that you’re willing to sign away women’s citizenship like it’s nothing.
Citizenship? Do tell.
What do you call it when a person has no bodily autonomy and no legal rights to make decisions for their own body and future? I’d call that second class citizenship. Or straight up slavery. It’s what Republicans want.
You call it what you want.
There's a point where it's about infanticide, not bodily autonomy. Do you have two brains, two hearts, four eyes, etc? Comes a point where your views on killing the innocent are unacceptable.
Okay, so where is the point where it is a reasonable decision to have an abortion -- or do you believe in a total ban on abortion?
First trimester, but my "reasonableness" doesn't matter. Everyone has an opinion, so let states work it out with their constituents. I'm against federalizing every f'n issue. Washington DC does not have all the answers.
So premature rupture of membranes in second trimester, 17 weeks, nonviable to deliver, just wait for sepsis to set in and deliver the fetus after it does naturally? Hope the woman survives septic shock, but because it's past the first trimester, no other options?
Anonymous
04/14/2024 12:58
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Donnie Two Scoops is in panic mode over the moronic decision that happened in Arizona. He knows it’s bad news.
Kind of a wild take you have there. He just reinforced the idea that states' rights exists.
No, he backed away from one of his dumbest brags yet.
And I looooooove that you’re willing to sign away women’s citizenship like it’s nothing.
Citizenship? Do tell.
What do you call it when a person has no bodily autonomy and no legal rights to make decisions for their own body and future? I’d call that second class citizenship. Or straight up slavery. It’s what Republicans want.
You call it what you want.
There's a point where it's about infanticide, not bodily autonomy. Do you have two brains, two hearts, four eyes, etc? Comes a point where your views on killing the innocent are unacceptable.
Okay, so where is the point where it is a reasonable decision to have an abortion -- or do you believe in a total ban on abortion?
First trimester, but my "reasonableness" doesn't matter. Everyone has an opinion, so let states work it out with their constituents. I'm against federalizing every f'n issue. Washington DC does not have all the answers.
Your right. Your opinion doesn’t matter. And your are totally misrepresenting the SCOTUS ruling. They didn’t “send it back to states” the said this needs to be legislated. That means state OR federal legislation.
AND I would wager that you’d be super duper fine if MAGA GOP were to enact a federal ban.
Anonymous
04/14/2024 12:36
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Donnie Two Scoops is in panic mode over the moronic decision that happened in Arizona. He knows it’s bad news.
Kind of a wild take you have there. He just reinforced the idea that states' rights exists.
No, he backed away from one of his dumbest brags yet.
And I looooooove that you’re willing to sign away women’s citizenship like it’s nothing.
Citizenship? Do tell.
What do you call it when a person has no bodily autonomy and no legal rights to make decisions for their own body and future? I’d call that second class citizenship. Or straight up slavery. It’s what Republicans want.
You call it what you want.
There's a point where it's about infanticide, not bodily autonomy. Do you have two brains, two hearts, four eyes, etc? Comes a point where your views on killing the innocent are unacceptable.
Okay, so where is the point where it is a reasonable decision to have an abortion -- or do you believe in a total ban on abortion?
First trimester, but my "reasonableness" doesn't matter. Everyone has an opinion, so let states work it out with their constituents. I'm against federalizing every f'n issue. Washington DC does not have all the answers.
What if a fetus is developing without an organ or an organ outside of its body? Give it a chance to see if it shakes it off?
Anonymous
04/14/2024 12:21
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Donnie Two Scoops is in panic mode over the moronic decision that happened in Arizona. He knows it’s bad news.
Kind of a wild take you have there. He just reinforced the idea that states' rights exists.
No, he backed away from one of his dumbest brags yet.
And I looooooove that you’re willing to sign away women’s citizenship like it’s nothing.
Citizenship? Do tell.
What do you call it when a person has no bodily autonomy and no legal rights to make decisions for their own body and future? I’d call that second class citizenship. Or straight up slavery. It’s what Republicans want.
You call it what you want.
There's a point where it's about infanticide, not bodily autonomy. Do you have two brains, two hearts, four eyes, etc? Comes a point where your views on killing the innocent are unacceptable.
Okay, so where is the point where it is a reasonable decision to have an abortion -- or do you believe in a total ban on abortion?
First trimester, but my "reasonableness" doesn't matter. Everyone has an opinion, so let states work it out with their constituents. I'm against federalizing every f'n issue. Washington DC does not have all the answers.
We are doing this now and women's rights are being trampled. How about "let doctors work it out with their patients?"
Is there anything forced birthers have said or done that shows that they care? Women and girls are dying due to total bans and they don’t care. “States’ rights” they say, as if it’s acceptable for women to be right-less half citizens. Statistically speaking future criminals are being born in the thousands; they don’t care. “Personal responsibility” they say, as if abortion isn’t taking responsibility, as if their party isn’t going after birth control. Who cares if a woman is going to give birth to a child who will die and her fertility will be destroyed. “God’s will,” they say, as if the entire medical industry isn’t based on disrupting “God’s will” with appendectomies and Viagra and cancer treatment.
I think we can all quit pretending that forced birthers are sensible, moderate people. They’ve shown they’re not and that not a one of their arguments has any sense behind it whatsoever.
Anonymous
04/14/2024 11:24
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
We're going to see more and more headlines like this in red states now:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/georgia-father-sentenced-50-years-prison-poisoning-newborns-breastmilk-rcna147708
In Georgia, father poisons his babies pumped breastmilk with antifreeze, so he won't have to pay child support.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/georgia-father-sentenced-50-years-prison-poisoning-newborns-breastmilk-rcna147708
In Georgia, father poisons his babies pumped breastmilk with antifreeze, so he won't have to pay child support.
Anonymous
04/14/2024 11:19
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Donnie Two Scoops is in panic mode over the moronic decision that happened in Arizona. He knows it’s bad news.
Kind of a wild take you have there. He just reinforced the idea that states' rights exists.
No, he backed away from one of his dumbest brags yet.
And I looooooove that you’re willing to sign away women’s citizenship like it’s nothing.
Citizenship? Do tell.
What do you call it when a person has no bodily autonomy and no legal rights to make decisions for their own body and future? I’d call that second class citizenship. Or straight up slavery. It’s what Republicans want.
You call it what you want.
There's a point where it's about infanticide, not bodily autonomy. Do you have two brains, two hearts, four eyes, etc? Comes a point where your views on killing the innocent are unacceptable.
Okay, so where is the point where it is a reasonable decision to have an abortion -- or do you believe in a total ban on abortion?
First trimester, but my "reasonableness" doesn't matter. Everyone has an opinion, so let states work it out with their constituents. I'm against federalizing every f'n issue. Washington DC does not have all the answers.
We are doing this now and women's rights are being trampled. How about "let doctors work it out with their patients?"
Anonymous
04/14/2024 11:17
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Donnie Two Scoops is in panic mode over the moronic decision that happened in Arizona. He knows it’s bad news.
Kind of a wild take you have there. He just reinforced the idea that states' rights exists.
No, he backed away from one of his dumbest brags yet.
And I looooooove that you’re willing to sign away women’s citizenship like it’s nothing.
Citizenship? Do tell.
What do you call it when a person has no bodily autonomy and no legal rights to make decisions for their own body and future? I’d call that second class citizenship. Or straight up slavery. It’s what Republicans want.
You call it what you want.
There's a point where it's about infanticide, not bodily autonomy. Do you have two brains, two hearts, four eyes, etc? Comes a point where your views on killing the innocent are unacceptable.
Okay, so where is the point where it is a reasonable decision to have an abortion -- or do you believe in a total ban on abortion?
First trimester, but my "reasonableness" doesn't matter. Everyone has an opinion, so let states work it out with their constituents. I'm against federalizing every f'n issue. Washington DC does not have all the answers.
So in the 6th month, if there is an anormality, the mother should just carry it to term, risking her life or her ability to have another child in the future?
Anonymous
04/14/2024 11:15
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Donnie Two Scoops is in panic mode over the moronic decision that happened in Arizona. He knows it’s bad news.
Kind of a wild take you have there. He just reinforced the idea that states' rights exists.
Saying states should decide only highlights what a cluster F this is especially if you live in a state which has such restrictions on reproductive health.
Reproductive health? Is that what you call it when you're aborting a living thing in a late term abortion? Ok
Do you understand why late term abortions happen? Are you purposely ignorant?
You tell us
Got it, purposely ignorant.
It’s the only way they can continue to hold the abhorrent views they hold. Anyone who literally wants to believe that women are happily choosing abortion for healthy third trimester pregnancies is a moron beneath attention. We have provided so many links of so many stories, as well as the stats - that less than 1% of all abortions happen after 21 weeks. They do not care because they hate women. They focus obsessively on what does not happen rather than admit that they want all abortion and birth control banned because they think women belong to men and how dare she try to abort a man’s baby.
Don’t forget, they also find it completely acceptable for children to carry out pregnancies that result from rape and incest.
That AZ law has NO exceptions for rape or incest, no matter the age of the victim.
Why would they have age limits? Their contempt for women means that that little girl, victim of rape, is going to grow up to be a woman. In their mindset, a man gets to decide what he wants to do with a woman’s body and they’re not going to stop him.
This. Whether a girl is 11 and raped, or a woman is 30 and has a life threatening medical issue and other kids, it makes no difference to republicans in these states at this point.
Anonymous
04/14/2024 10:52
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Donnie Two Scoops is in panic mode over the moronic decision that happened in Arizona. He knows it’s bad news.
Kind of a wild take you have there. He just reinforced the idea that states' rights exists.
No, he backed away from one of his dumbest brags yet.
And I looooooove that you’re willing to sign away women’s citizenship like it’s nothing.
Citizenship? Do tell.
What do you call it when a person has no bodily autonomy and no legal rights to make decisions for their own body and future? I’d call that second class citizenship. Or straight up slavery. It’s what Republicans want.
You call it what you want.
There's a point where it's about infanticide, not bodily autonomy. Do you have two brains, two hearts, four eyes, etc? Comes a point where your views on killing the innocent are unacceptable.
Okay, so where is the point where it is a reasonable decision to have an abortion -- or do you believe in a total ban on abortion?
First trimester, but my "reasonableness" doesn't matter. Everyone has an opinion, so let states work it out with their constituents. I'm against federalizing every f'n issue. Washington DC does not have all the answers.