Their words were silly and easily rebuttable, so it wasn’t what they said that was scary. What was scary was their demeanor and how angry and on edge most of the old white speakers were. You could just tell that much of their self-worth was wrapped up in the old name and how easily they would have fit in with the tiki torch crowd. Yuck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What the heck was wrong with Monique O’Grady. She seemed so angry.
Maybe listening to a dozen or so delusional old white people pretend Robert E. Lee was a saint rubbed her the wrong way.
There was not even close to a dozen delusional old white people who spoke tonight about Robert E Lee as a saint. Maybe, at the most one old man who was pretty obviously wacko and made no sense at all.
Only a slight exaggeration as to the age and tenor of the speakers. All but two were white, and quite a few of them were scary.
Scary??? Seriously???? No. Not one of them. If you are that easily scared by people who say something that you disagree with, maybe you’d better retreat to your safe space.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What the heck was wrong with Monique O’Grady. She seemed so angry.
Maybe listening to a dozen or so delusional old white people pretend Robert E. Lee was a saint rubbed her the wrong way.
There was not even close to a dozen delusional old white people who spoke tonight about Robert E Lee as a saint. Maybe, at the most one old man who was pretty obviously wacko and made no sense at all.
Only a slight exaggeration as to the age and tenor of the speakers. All but two were white, and quite a few of them were scary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What the heck was wrong with Monique O’Grady. She seemed so angry.
Maybe listening to a dozen or so delusional old white people pretend Robert E. Lee was a saint rubbed her the wrong way.
There was not even close to a dozen delusional old white people who spoke tonight about Robert E Lee as a saint. Maybe, at the most one old man who was pretty obviously wacko and made no sense at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What the heck was wrong with Monique O’Grady. She seemed so angry.
Maybe listening to a dozen or so delusional old white people pretend Robert E. Lee was a saint rubbed her the wrong way.
Anonymous wrote:What the heck was wrong with Monique O’Grady. She seemed so angry.
Anonymous wrote:It’s done. Washington-Loving High School.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Washington-Liberty is so much better than Loving. The Washington Loving Generals is stupidest name is I have ever heard of.
Agreed, Loving? make one wants to puke
My middle schoolers, future WL students, hate the 'loving' name. I do too. It sounds ridiculous for a HS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Washington-Liberty is so much better than Loving. The Washington Loving Generals is stupidest name is I have ever heard of.
Agreed, Loving? make one wants to puke
Anonymous wrote:This whole conversation comes down to three questions that the SB needs to answer.
1 - Would the newly proposed name be on the shortlist of candidate names, if we weren't trying to retrofit the "W-L" abbreviation?
2 - How much money is really being saved by keeping the "W-L" abbreviation?
3 - If the answer to #1 is NO, is the savings from #2 really worth picking a name that will likely last for many decades?
I find it hard to believe that we are not being penny wise and pound foolish trying to pick a name that will retain the "W-L" abbreviation.![]()