Anonymous wrote:The bigger the stone, the smaller the peen.
Anonymous wrote:Yes. Tiny stones on older women look sad. I think bigger stones on younger women look gauche too.Once you've hit your 40s, you can wear 4cts plus and not look ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Yes. Tiny stones on older women look sad. I think bigger stones on younger women look gauche too.Once you've hit your 40s, you can wear 4cts plus and not look ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do.
Sometimes when I see a woman with a tiny diamond I wonder how cheap her husband must be to not bother to get her something nicer.
The larger the diamond the more I think her husband wanted to impress her/ show his love. Also that he’s rich.
No, but I've noticed them more as I approach my late 30s. I often notice white women with huge diamonds. Is it a cultural thing? I know many affluent, non-white women, and it's much less common to see one with a conspicuous diamond. Yet everywhere I go where you see middle class/somewhat affluent white woman, I notice the big ring. Sometimes I'll admire an interesting cut or setting, but most of the time they look a little garish to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I admit that I am judgmental of women who still think an e-ring is a status symbol of some sort. It's not.
Yes it is. Whether you like it or not, it is.
Anonymous wrote:I do.
Sometimes when I see a woman with a tiny diamond I wonder how cheap her husband must be to not bother to get her something nicer.
The larger the diamond the more I think her husband wanted to impress her/ show his love. Also that he’s rich.
Anonymous wrote:I admit that I am judgmental of women who still think an e-ring is a status symbol of some sort. It's not.
Anonymous wrote:I have a non-traditional ring with colored stones, and I notice other rings with colored stones. Tradtional diamond rings I don't usually notice unless there's something unusual about them, and I definitely don't notice difference the difference in the size of the diamond in traditional rings. To each her own.
As a middle easterner who was raised to believe that jewelry is something that should hold value I think it’s great when women don’t wear diamond rings because their value doesn’t hold. That being said I have a diamond pave wedding ring lol. Don’t have a diamond engagement ring because the tradition is to receive a whole jewelry set (necklace, ring, bracelet and earring).Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, When I see a ring, particularly a big ring, I see a woman who needed an expensive gift in order to see her spouse as worth marrying. I see a woman who needs a husband who is still very traditional and needs a husband who earns her love through gifts she can show off to prove to her friends he will be able to keep her and provide for her.
You all are kind of depressing me. I have a huge ring that’s a family heirloom- it’s the only thing i have that belonged to my dead grandmother. It’s ridiculously large, but it was free which was only s little less than we could have afforded at the time. A couple shallow friends told me i should “make” my husband buy me something else because the ring was free. We preferred to spend money saving for a house down payment instead.
Sometimes when i feel like I’m going to be judged i rotate my ring so the diamond is in my palm and it looks like a plain band
I wish the judgement was in my imagination, but you’re definitely confirming my worst fears
Anonymous wrote:I actually notice the smaller diamonds in a positive light and assume they have been married a long time/married young which I find very sweet. My sister's husband now makes close to 7 figures but 27 years ago when they were sophomores in college and dying to get engaged a .35 diamond was a huge splurge. She was give a huge upgrade right for their 10th. She wore it maybe 3 months and then went back to her tiny yellow gold ring. She said when she looked at her new ring she thought nothing and when she looked at her "real" ring she remembered that summer of college where they were obsessed with eachother and madly madly in love.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have never thought about it or noticed other people's rings unless it's large enough to stand out (3+ carat stone). And I don't judge either way, nor do I count other people's money. Some of the wealthiest, most pedigreed people I know (the family-stepped-off-the-Mayflower kind) leave their giant heirloom solitaires at home unless it's a special occasion and wear simple wedding bands - the person I have in mind lives in comfortably worn no-name jeans and drives an 11 year old Range Rover. She has a fantastic designer wardrobe and handbag collection, but you would never see it on her in daily life. Only idiots make snap assumptions based on outward appearances.
My family stepped off the Mayflower and I don't have a "giant heirloom solitaire at home."
Wondering why your friend has "a fantastic designer wardrobe and handbag collection, but you would never see it on her in daily life." In what life -- if not the daily kind -- is she wearing this stuff?