Anonymous
Post 01/27/2019 17:50     Subject: Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel
Anonymous wrote:The Mueller Report, in plain sight

https://twitter.com/jentaub/status/1089193853230505984


So it was leaked?
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2019 16:48     Subject: Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel
Meanwhile Parscale is being paid how many millions "to manage Trump-Pence2020"?
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2019 16:20     Subject: Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here’s the best line in the whole indictment...

“senior Trump Campaign official was directed to contact STONE about any additional releases and what other damaging information [WIKILEAKS] had regarding the Clinton Campaign.”

Just who would be directing a senior campaign official?

Hmmmm. One guess.




Yes, I noticed that line. It jumped right out at me. I didn't see much mention of it on Twitter though.

So, Trump directed his kid or SIL to contact Stone to find out what else Wikileaks had on Clinton. No Collusion!
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2019 14:56     Subject: Re:Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel
Anonymous wrote:Stone is a fame whore. No doubt in my mind he's going to flip, but he's going to drag it all out for the most publicity he can get.


The courts will put a gag order on him on Tuesday, most likely.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2019 14:39     Subject: Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/766871663887527936

August 19th 2016 tweet referring to the August 8, 2016 Julian Assange speech via video link at the Green Party Convention at Jill Stein's invitation. Look at what the Mueller indictment on Stone says was happening on the communications front with "Organization 1" at the same time.


Anyone else having trouble accessing this tweet?


Worked fine for me, but here’s the link in the tweet for you: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/green-partys-jill-stein-praises-julian-assange-as-a-hero.amp?__twitter_impression=true
God, could Jill Stein have made it any more obvious that she’s a Russian stooge?
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2019 14:21     Subject: Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel
Anonymous wrote:

https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/766871663887527936

August 19th 2016 tweet referring to the August 8, 2016 Julian Assange speech via video link at the Green Party Convention at Jill Stein's invitation. Look at what the Mueller indictment on Stone says was happening on the communications front with "Organization 1" at the same time.


Anyone else having trouble accessing this tweet?
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2019 13:46     Subject: Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:CNN has video of the pre-dawn raid of Roger Stone’s house. It’s like they are taking down El Chapo!


https://twitter.com/cnnpolitics/status/1088769400994480128?s=21


Why all the agents, long guns, etc?
Is Stone a flight risk? Did they expect him to resist?

This was a show. The SC overdid this one.


(1) risk of destroying evidence if given heads up on arrest, (2) risk of Stone being armed and shooting agents


You are reaching, Seriously.

Destroying evidence? He has been saying for months that he expected to be indicted. The FBI has been looking at his text messages, phone calls, and emails for 2 years. If he was going to destroy evidence - he would have done it long ago. The only risk of being alerted is if CNN said something.
And, Stone shooting someone? He doesn't own a gun. Somehow, I think the FBI knows this.

It was a show. Even reasonable liberals admit it was over the top. Intimidation? Probably. But, it isn't a good look for the FBI.


I think people who commit treason should be arrested. I am a reasonable person. Over the top? HA! Good one.

Why don't you worry about why he was arrested and not how he was arrested? I mean, is that really your priority???

Lying to congress: nbd.
Treason: nbd.
They brought armed agents to arrest him: THE WORLD IS COMING TO AN END!!!

+1
The “law and order” party is really showing themselves for the hypocrites they are. Oh my god! The FBI arrested him? Oh my god, a traitor to his country fully capable of lying and deception and they thought he’d stoop to destroying evidence? Excuse me as I clutch my pearls!


This is how the GOP, their media-machine, and their supporters roll. When they get caught in their wrongdoing, they will try to switch the narrative to anything and everything else.

So sick of their made-up deflections. The guy is a traitor to our country. Period. If no one was hurt during the arrest, don't care about their pearl-clutching.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2019 13:31     Subject: Re:Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel
Stone is a fame whore. No doubt in my mind he's going to flip, but he's going to drag it all out for the most publicity he can get.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2019 12:30     Subject: Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel
It's about time someone got arrested for Hillary's emails.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2019 11:48     Subject: Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel


https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/766871663887527936

August 19th 2016 tweet referring to the August 8, 2016 Julian Assange speech via video link at the Green Party Convention at Jill Stein's invitation. Look at what the Mueller indictment on Stone says was happening on the communications front with "Organization 1" at the same time.

Anonymous
Post 01/27/2019 11:33     Subject: Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel
Anonymous wrote:Rubio is certainly suggesting that knowingly working with Wikileaks is a crime.


They asked Wikieaks to provide them with stolen information. Specifically, they asked Wikileaks to find Clinton emails. So yeah, in this particular case it would be a crime.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2019 10:56     Subject: Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel
Rubio is certainly suggesting that knowingly working with Wikileaks is a crime.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2019 10:05     Subject: Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:OK. If there is evidence he should be charged. Fair enough. But please tell me -- Why get him at 6 am, why put a chain around his waist in addition to handcuffs, why take him out in his pajamas without giving him a chance to change clothes? I feel like calling the FBI to complain.


And CNN's camera is rolling ...

This is how Soviet Union or North Korea deal with their political dissidents. Shameful.


I agree. He is such a dangerous criminal that he was released with a $250,000 signature bond - meaning he had to pay no money.
I thought liberals did not like the militarization of police. I guess it's ok when it is a 66 YO white man who is no flight risk and doesn't own a handgun.

We don't like, but why do you only complain if it's a white man? And what's with the specious comparisons to the Soviet Union or North Korea? When people are arrested in those places, you never see them again. I heard Stone is going on TV tonight. Can you name a time that happened in the history of the Soviet Union or North Korea?


Not to mention, but Trump supporters now love Russia and have no problem with letting Putin run our country. While all the phony concern about one of their tactics?


There is help available for seriously delusional people like you.


DP, what was posted that was false?

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/397672-trump-effect-republican-support-for-russia-has-doubled

Pretty universal polling among the GOP has a favorability rating for Putin higher than other Americans.


“RealClearPolitics Washington editor Carl Cannon called increased support for Russia among Republicans "disturbing" on Monday.

He also said the reason for the increased GOP support is related to President Trump's criticisms of the investigation of the 2016 presidential election.

"There's one other variable, and this is a little bit disturbing. In 2014, 22 percent of Republicans said that Russia was an ally, this was from a Gallup poll. That number's now 40 percent," Cannon told Hill.TV's Joe Concha on "What America's Thinking," referring to two Gallup polls on American attitudes toward Moscow.”
https://thehill.com/hilltv/what-americas-thinking/397239-polling-editor-increased-support-for-russia-among-republicans

“A quarter of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents (25%) said they had a favorable view of Putin, compared with just 9% of Democrats and Democratic leaners. These views have changed little since last year.”
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/07/13/key-public-opinion-findings-on-trump-putin-and-the-countries-they-lead/



This is disturbing. It also explains a lot
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2019 09:41     Subject: Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why are the networks giving this guy airtime? He is a known fraudster and yet...

Did you just describe the current POTUS? This is a pretty broad description of the current administration.


Yes, they shouldn’t give trump airtime either.
Anonymous
Post 01/27/2019 09:39     Subject: Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel
Anonymous wrote:Why are the networks giving this guy airtime? He is a known fraudster and yet...

Did you just describe the current POTUS? This is a pretty broad description of the current administration.