Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Or, it's maybe (just maybe) possible that different parents have different perspectives?
For some, this is a deal breaker (that it happened and the administration seemed afraid to deal with it head on).
For others, the schools' great track record with happy students and academic success makes it not a deal breaker.
Both perspectives actually seem quite sane to me without having to name call or eye roll others.
But it still would give me pause knowing the admin turned their backs on kids. While it may not happen again, the thoughts still linger.
It’s not the same admin.
Pretty much the entire top leadership has turned over including most of the board now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My understanding is that there were up to 13 victims from different years during the 4-5 years he taught at LAMB.
Dead horse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Or, it's maybe (just maybe) possible that different parents have different perspectives?
For some, this is a deal breaker (that it happened and the administration seemed afraid to deal with it head on).
For others, the schools' great track record with happy students and academic success makes it not a deal breaker.
Both perspectives actually seem quite sane to me without having to name call or eye roll others.
But it still would give me pause knowing the admin turned their backs on kids. While it may not happen again, the thoughts still linger.
It’s not the same admin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Or, it's maybe (just maybe) possible that different parents have different perspectives?
For some, this is a deal breaker (that it happened and the administration seemed afraid to deal with it head on).
For others, the schools' great track record with happy students and academic success makes it not a deal breaker.
Both perspectives actually seem quite sane to me without having to name call or eye roll others.
But it still would give me pause knowing the admin turned their backs on kids. While it may not happen again, the thoughts still linger.
Anonymous wrote:Or, it's maybe (just maybe) possible that different parents have different perspectives?
For some, this is a deal breaker (that it happened and the administration seemed afraid to deal with it head on).
For others, the schools' great track record with happy students and academic success makes it not a deal breaker.
Both perspectives actually seem quite sane to me without having to name call or eye roll others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How on earth is sexual abuse a dead horse
Paewnts are nuts to have children go to LAMB
said the person hoping readers will pull their kids out of LAMB in order to free up an extremely coveted spot for their own DC
Anonymous wrote:How on earth is sexual abuse a dead horse
Paewnts are nuts to have children go to LAMB
Anonymous wrote:My understanding is that there were up to 13 victims from different years during the 4-5 years he taught at LAMB.
Anonymous wrote:was it just two the two victims? I find that part really hard to believe. There are certainly more. There are always more. I just read that report and its so infuriating. several people need to be in jail. I can't believe other parents didnt sign the petition for more transparency. Yall are drinking that LAMB koolaid for sure.
Anonymous wrote:was it just two the two victims? I find that part really hard to believe. There are certainly more. There are always more. I just read that report and its so infuriating. several people need to be in jail. I can't believe other parents didnt sign the petition for more transparency. Yall are drinking that LAMB koolaid for sure.
Anonymous wrote:also, I am assuming the school has an insurance policy that would cover this lawsuit? or does this bankrupt the school? where is the charter board in weighing on them staying open.