Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:....and we are still waiting for the tape in which a conservative talk show host said that Heather Heyer deserved to die.

DP. It wasn't Sean Hannity who said it, but one of the guests on his show who criticized her for marching that day. He seems to imply that it was her own fault and she got what was coming to her for counter protesting alongside Antifa.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hannity-host-hether-heyer-antifa_us_59a8d292e4b0b5e530fd7fbf

Well, that's sure different than the poster who claimed Hannity (or some other conservative talk show host) said she deserved to die. And you thought that the guest "implied.....she got what was coming to her" is also a matter for interpretation. I hear it as the guest pointing out that she did participate in the violent Antifa march, and was not an innocent bystander. That's also different from saying she deserved it. But I agree it was pretty cold of the guest to say even that.

So, as I thought, the story was embellished. Nobody said she deserved to die, and certainly not a conservative newsperson. That said, I am very sorry this young woman lost her life.

Well, actually the guest is a conservative Youtue talk show host. Jonathan Gilliam at http://www.jonathantgilliam.com/the-experts.html. To me, and others, it sounds like he's saying she deserved to die, much like saying 'play with fire and you'll get burned.' And just because Antifa was marching at the same time she was, does not mean she was part of Antifa. Anyways, that's the one I know of, there are probably others. Lots of conservative 'leaders', like the rally organizer, the operator of Daily Stormer, and Richard Spencer were pretty disrespectful towards her death, and even happy about it. If that's how conservative leaders felt, then conservative talk show hosts probably felt the same way.

Um, conservative =/= KKK. The "leaders" you mention? They're KKK and /or Alt-Right.

I know who the 'leaders' are, and they sure aren't liberals or moderates. Nor do they don't lead liberals or moderates.

Conservatives may not be comfortable being associated with the KKK and Alt-Right, but they sure are happy gaining their votes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is a joke. All of you who voted for trump are less intelligent than us. There is no contesting that. There is literally nothing you can say to counter the actual facts that are complicit with a racist, anti-intellectual organization. Enjoy your little support group session, idiots.

The enraged liberal responses are so entertaining. Especially when they insist - yes, insist! - that they and they alone are right. Period. End of discussion. So, so funny.

You voted for a guy who can't even differentiate between heal and heel. Multiple times. He is a moron.

Like his IQ doesn't hit 3 digits. Had he not been given daddy's money, he would be one of those blowhards yelling about not having a job because some hardworking immigrant was smarter and harder working.

Are you 12? I don't know any adult who starts sentences with "like."

Are you anxious about growing older? Lots of posts about age....

Also, those are different meanings of the word "like." PP - the one who was asking if you're 12 - seems to think you meant it as the kind of Valley Girl verbal tic: "Like, his IQ doesn't hit 3 digits?" Whereas clearly you meant it in the more literal sense of, where the word "like" was a stand in for a word like "clearly" or "obviously." "Obviously his IQ doesn't hit 3 digits."

So bad insult PP. You failed on a number of levels, including among them your English comprehension.

That you actually think it's correct to start a sentence with "like" only proves the point. You are either 12 years old or simply very, very stupid. Either way, you really aren't in any position to be lecturing others on their "English comprehension."

No, I am actually a professional writer with one of those blue check marks next to my name on Facebook thanks to my professional accomplishments. (Whaevs; I know that's a dumb detail to include - but it is what it is.) I know how to use the word "like" at the beginning of a sentence in various ways, and I also know you were being in idiot when you said that this version of it is somehow juvenile. It's not.

And just of course Trump supporters would also be both pedantic and ignorant about language. OF COURSE they would.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is a joke. All of you who voted for trump are less intelligent than us. There is no contesting that. There is literally nothing you can say to counter the actual facts that are complicit with a racist, anti-intellectual organization. Enjoy your little support group session, idiots.

The enraged liberal responses are so entertaining. Especially when they insist - yes, insist! - that they and they alone are right. Period. End of discussion. So, so funny.

You voted for a guy who can't even differentiate between heal and heel. Multiple times. He is a moron.

Like his IQ doesn't hit 3 digits. Had he not been given daddy's money, he would be one of those blowhards yelling about not having a job because some hardworking immigrant was smarter and harder working.

Are you 12? I don't know any adult who starts sentences with "like."

Are you anxious about growing older? Lots of posts about age....

Also, those are different meanings of the word "like." PP - the one who was asking if you're 12 - seems to think you meant it as the kind of Valley Girl verbal tic: "Like, his IQ doesn't hit 3 digits?" Whereas clearly you meant it in the more literal sense of, where the word "like" was a stand in for a word like "clearly" or "obviously." "Obviously his IQ doesn't hit 3 digits."

So bad insult PP. You failed on a number of levels, including among them your English comprehension.

Excellent. Trump idiot trying to explain "English comprehension" to me. Tell me more. Clearly you have it all figured out.

Like, I know, right? Like, you libs are just so, what's the word? Like, erudite, yeah, that's it! You totally know how to write! Like, I never see *any* spelling or gramatical errors in your posts, dude.

Fail! Bigly.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is a joke. All of you who voted for trump are less intelligent than us. There is no contesting that. There is literally nothing you can say to counter the actual facts that are complicit with a racist, anti-intellectual organization. Enjoy your little support group session, idiots.

The enraged liberal responses are so entertaining. Especially when they insist - yes, insist! - that they and they alone are right. Period. End of discussion. So, so funny.

You voted for a guy who can't even differentiate between heal and heel. Multiple times. He is a moron.

Like his IQ doesn't hit 3 digits. Had he not been given daddy's money, he would be one of those blowhards yelling about not having a job because some hardworking immigrant was smarter and harder working.

Are you 12? I don't know any adult who starts sentences with "like."

Are you anxious about growing older? Lots of posts about age....

Are you the one calling everyone "Granny" because you can't come up with anything relevant to add to the discussion? Maybe if you didn't have the emotional intelligence of a middle schooler, your posts would be more interesting.

OK? I mean, I posted some photos of your team's march, which showed them carrying swastikas and wearing t-shirts calling for the killing of journalists. Your response was to post some photos from left-leaning marches - but I honestly don't see what in those photos you are trying to call attention to; what you think proves we're actually the monsters, from those photos. Is it the boobs? You hate the boobs? You think they are roughly equivalent to swastikas?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Yes, you're right. I love those KKK boys. Just as much as you love your Antifa wackos.

DP... well, one side is fighting against fascism usually related to racists, and the other is fighting non white people. I think I'll side with antifa even though I don't agree with their tactics.

I find it ironic... I've heard gun lovers say that if Jews had guns during Hitler's reign then they would've been able to save themselves, ie, they should've violently fought against fascism. But here, it's wrong to violently fight against fascism even though antifa doesn't really use guns in their protests, unlike the KKK/white nationalists have.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is a joke. All of you who voted for trump are less intelligent than us. There is no contesting that. There is literally nothing you can say to counter the actual facts that are complicit with a racist, anti-intellectual organization. Enjoy your little support group session, idiots.

The enraged liberal responses are so entertaining. Especially when they insist - yes, insist! - that they and they alone are right. Period. End of discussion. So, so funny.

You voted for a guy who can't even differentiate between heal and heel. Multiple times. He is a moron.

If we're using spelling as a litmus test, there are too many liberal morons to count on DCUM alone.

So how are we doing on our compilation of bad-grammar/spelling posts? Still waiting on that...

I got burned out. Too much time sitting at the computer, copying poorly written posts started to depress me. There are just too many of them. Sorry to disappoint!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am referring to those sources, amongst many others over a couple of decades. You can't stop because this is the way your brain is wired. I am focusing on the outcomes. We could go down the sorted personal transgressions of revered presidents but, look at the time...

Well, one of the outcomes is that this country is even more divided than ever, and our "dear" leader can't/won't/doesn't seem capable of repairing that rift; that even with the Rs controlling all three branches of our government, they can't get anything major done, like repealing and replacing ACA. One of the few bipartisan things R congress has done is to write up a non binding resolution for Trump to denounce white supremacists. I agree with this outcome.

Clap it out with me: Neo-Nazis and KKK are not embraced by Republicans.

This is your strategy for 2018? Will I need to smear blood across my door in order for Antifa to passover my house? Am I being punked right now?

DP. If Republicans truly reject Neo-Nazis and the KKK, then they should nullify any votes they receive from anybody in those organizations.

First, how would they know, and second, it's unconstitutional. Should we also nullify the votes of BLM supporters calling to "fry 'em like bacon"? No matter how distasteful these people are, it's free speech.

Extreme vetting. It's not unconstitutional to protect constitutional rights. BLM's purpose is not to "fry 'em like bacon", although that is a distasteful and misguided thing for someone to say. Can't say the same for the purposes of the neo-Nazis and the KKK.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am referring to those sources, amongst many others over a couple of decades. You can't stop because this is the way your brain is wired. I am focusing on the outcomes. We could go down the sorted personal transgressions of revered presidents but, look at the time...

Well, one of the outcomes is that this country is even more divided than ever, and our "dear" leader can't/won't/doesn't seem capable of repairing that rift; that even with the Rs controlling all three branches of our government, they can't get anything major done, like repealing and replacing ACA. One of the few bipartisan things R congress has done is to write up a non binding resolution for Trump to denounce white supremacists. I agree with this outcome.

Clap it out with me: Neo-Nazis and KKK are not embraced by Republicans.

This is your strategy for 2018? Will I need to smear blood across my door in order for Antifa to passover my house? Am I being punked right now?

Why the theatrics? Why do dramatic? It is so weird.

+1

Drama student?

I thought it was hilarious. (DP) It really is true what they say - liberals have zero sense of humor!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why can't liberals realize that they could win moderates who voted Trump over to their side by exhibiting tolerance and respect, and that they drive them further away with their inflammatory rhetoric?

Why can't you Trumpsters realize that you are called names because of your continued support of Trump after all this sh1te, your continued turning the blind eye.

From what I have read, there are people who voted for Trump who seem to regret it now.

I think if someone regrets their Trump vote, they should be given a pat on the back for finally opening their eyes.

Trump's got the lowest approval rating ever for a POTUS in his first year. This is reported by Fox News. You know it's bad when Fox News is reporting low poll numbers. I know, I know... polls, they are wrong.. except if they *ever* showed how great he is, then you'd be saying, "look at these polls!". This is why we keep calling you names.

1. Pardon me. There was a seismic movement within the U.S. that was intended to yield a candidate to achieve seismic results. Is he perfect? NO but, he is who we have in office and we are reaping benefits of a Supreme Court Justice, stronger national defense, lower immigration flow, regulation relief, strong economy, focus on the middle class, etc.

2. I regretted my vote for a few days but, guess what? Because who gave North Korea nukes in the first place, people. Who supported NAFTA and we could hear the "giant sucking sound." Who voted *against* the interests of affinity groups some of you all have a Saviour Complex for? Whose party is making deals against the U.S. own interests but, in their own political and families' financial interests. You all make me feel more like a Democrat on social issues until we reach the budget. I see parallels between the media's obsession with harpooning this President and Herman Melville's Moby Dick. I'll be right here when the story breaks that the indictment is in but, 8 months of "Gotcha Now" is gonna turn him into a folk hero. Now, let's wait to hear what Susan Rice and Donald Trump Jr. have to say in their testimony.

3. You assume because I enjoy infotainment from Fox that we use Fox as our source documents? Super adorable.

I am one poster though and others, of course, have different experiences and opinions.

1. How is our national defense stronger when Trump is alienating our allies? How is it stronger when our military largely ignores him?
2. I hate to break it to you, but the majority of Rs in Congress voted in favor of TPP. There are also many R in Congress who support H1Bs. There are also many Rs in congress who don't want strong labor controls and higher minimum wage to help American workers. Trump could help bring back jobs by starting with his own, but again, you ignore that bit.

You realize that Trump is making an a$$ all by himself, without the media's help? You think it's only the US media that lampoons him? Oh, dear, go read some international news source, and you'll see our's our pretty tame in comparison.

3. Then what reputable, non biases news source do you use? I'm honestly curious.

Again, you refuse to open your eyes.

1. General Mattis makes our national defense stronger. General Kelly at DHS made our national defense stronger. LEA's are stronger when they have support to follow the laws on the books.
2. R&D can vote as they wish and eventually they will need to answer to their constituents who will decide. I support legal immigration 100%. The Clinton Admin couldn't even deal efficiently with guest worker program the states' agriculture geowers were begging for. This issue is older than all of us and I cut my political teeth supporting immigrant farm workers until I was denied an earned opportunity due to the color of my skin because, "this wasn't my fight."
3. Congressional Record, federal register, census bureau, agency press releases, WSJ, WP, Barron's, Economist to name a few. I also enjoy authorized autobiographies.

Hi. I'm your +1 poster from above, and we are really in sync. Of the sources you list, I agree with all of them, except for the WP. It used to be only slightly biased to the left, but ever since Trump won the nomination, they have done a full-throttle NYT on us. Every single headline looks like it was written by a member of the oppo research team, and I can't tell the difference between the front page and the editorial section.

DP, but I agree with this. We get the WP daily, and you're exactly right - it's pretty much turned into a sole-issue rag. Take down Trump, at all costs. We recently started getting the Wash. Times and it's much more balanced. Thinking it's time to give up the Post altogether. We just can't take it seriously anymore.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am referring to those sources, amongst many others over a couple of decades. You can't stop because this is the way your brain is wired. I am focusing on the outcomes. We could go down the sorted personal transgressions of revered presidents but, look at the time...

Well, one of the outcomes is that this country is even more divided than ever, and our "dear" leader can't/won't/doesn't seem capable of repairing that rift; that even with the Rs controlling all three branches of our government, they can't get anything major done, like repealing and replacing ACA. One of the few bipartisan things R congress has done is to write up a non binding resolution for Trump to denounce white supremacists. I agree with this outcome.

Clap it out with me: Neo-Nazis and KKK are not embraced by Republicans.

This is your strategy for 2018? Will I need to smear blood across my door in order for Antifa to passover my house? Am I being punked right now?

Why the theatrics? Why do dramatic? It is so weird.

+1

Drama student?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why can't liberals realize that they could win moderates who voted Trump over to their side by exhibiting tolerance and respect, and that they drive them further away with their inflammatory rhetoric?

Why can't you Trumpsters realize that you are called names because of your continued support of Trump after all this sh1te, your continued turning the blind eye.

From what I have read, there are people who voted for Trump who seem to regret it now.

I think if someone regrets their Trump vote, they should be given a pat on the back for finally opening their eyes.

Trump's got the lowest approval rating ever for a POTUS in his first year. This is reported by Fox News. You know it's bad when Fox News is reporting low poll numbers. I know, I know... polls, they are wrong.. except if they *ever* showed how great he is, then you'd be saying, "look at these polls!". This is why we keep calling you names.

1. Pardon me. There was a seismic movement within the U.S. that was intended to yield a candidate to achieve seismic results. Is he perfect? NO but, he is who we have in office and we are reaping benefits of a Supreme Court Justice, stronger national defense, lower immigration flow, regulation relief, strong economy, focus on the middle class, etc.

2. I regretted my vote for a few days but, guess what? Because who gave North Korea nukes in the first place, people. Who supported NAFTA and we could hear the "giant sucking sound." Who voted *against* the interests of affinity groups some of you all have a Saviour Complex for? Whose party is making deals against the U.S. own interests but, in their own political and families' financial interests. You all make me feel more like a Democrat on social issues until we reach the budget. I see parallels between the media's obsession with harpooning this President and Herman Melville's Moby Dick. I'll be right here when the story breaks that the indictment is in but, 8 months of "Gotcha Now" is gonna turn him into a folk hero. Now, let's wait to hear what Susan Rice and Donald Trump Jr. have to say in their testimony.

3. You assume because I enjoy infotainment from Fox that we use Fox as our source documents? Super adorable.

I am one poster though and others, of course, have different experiences and opinions.

1. How is our national defense stronger when Trump is alienating our allies? How is it stronger when our military largely ignores him?
2. I hate to break it to you, but the majority of Rs in Congress voted in favor of TPP. There are also many R in Congress who support H1Bs. There are also many Rs in congress who don't want strong labor controls and higher minimum wage to help American workers. Trump could help bring back jobs by starting with his own, but again, you ignore that bit.

You realize that Trump is making an a$$ all by himself, without the media's help? You think it's only the US media that lampoons him? Oh, dear, go read some international news source, and you'll see our's our pretty tame in comparison.

3. Then what reputable, non biases news source do you use? I'm honestly curious.

Again, you refuse to open your eyes.

1. General Mattis makes our national defense stronger. General Kelly at DHS made our national defense stronger. LEA's are stronger when they have support to follow the laws on the books.
2. R&D can vote as they wish and eventually they will need to answer to their constituents who will decide. I support legal immigration 100%. The Clinton Admin couldn't even deal efficiently with guest worker program the states' agriculture geowers were begging for. This issue is older than all of us and I cut my political teeth supporting immigrant farm workers until I was denied an earned opportunity due to the color of my skin because, "this wasn't my fight."
3. Congressional Record, federal register, census bureau, agency press releases, WSJ, WP, Barron's, Economist to name a few. I also enjoy authorized autobiographies.

Hi. I'm your +1 poster from above, and we are really in sync. Of the sources you list, I agree with all of them, except for the WP. It used to be only slightly biased to the left, but ever since Trump won the nomination, they have done a full-throttle NYT on us. Every single headline looks like it was written by a member of the oppo research team, and I can't tell the difference between the front page and the editorial section.

lol... so what you are saying is that if a news source is critical of Trump then they are no longer unbiased. Sigh, this is why we keep calling you names. I try not to call you names, but fail every day because of posts like your's.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am referring to those sources, amongst many others over a couple of decades. You can't stop because this is the way your brain is wired. I am focusing on the outcomes. We could go down the sorted personal transgressions of revered presidents but, look at the time...

Well, one of the outcomes is that this country is even more divided than ever, and our "dear" leader can't/won't/doesn't seem capable of repairing that rift; that even with the Rs controlling all three branches of our government, they can't get anything major done, like repealing and replacing ACA. One of the few bipartisan things R congress has done is to write up a non binding resolution for Trump to denounce white supremacists. I agree with this outcome.

Clap it out with me: Neo-Nazis and KKK are not embraced by Republicans.

This is your strategy for 2018? Will I need to smear blood across my door in order for Antifa to passover my house? Am I being punked right now?

Why the theatrics? Why do dramatic? It is so weird.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why can't liberals realize that they could win moderates who voted Trump over to their side by exhibiting tolerance and respect, and that they drive them further away with their inflammatory rhetoric?

Why can't you Trumpsters realize that you are called names because of your continued support of Trump after all this sh1te, your continued turning the blind eye.

From what I have read, there are people who voted for Trump who seem to regret it now.

I think if someone regrets their Trump vote, they should be given a pat on the back for finally opening their eyes.

Trump's got the lowest approval rating ever for a POTUS in his first year. This is reported by Fox News. You know it's bad when Fox News is reporting low poll numbers. I know, I know... polls, they are wrong.. except if they *ever* showed how great he is, then you'd be saying, "look at these polls!". This is why we keep calling you names.

1. Pardon me. There was a seismic movement within the U.S. that was intended to yield a candidate to achieve seismic results. Is he perfect? NO but, he is who we have in office and we are reaping benefits of a Supreme Court Justice, stronger national defense, lower immigration flow, regulation relief, strong economy, focus on the middle class, etc.

2. I regretted my vote for a few days but, guess what? Because who gave North Korea nukes in the first place, people. Who supported NAFTA and we could hear the "giant sucking sound." Who voted *against* the interests of affinity groups some of you all have a Saviour Complex for? Whose party is making deals against the U.S. own interests but, in their own political and families' financial interests. You all make me feel more like a Democrat on social issues until we reach the budget. I see parallels between the media's obsession with harpooning this President and Herman Melville's Moby Dick. I'll be right here when the story breaks that the indictment is in but, 8 months of "Gotcha Now" is gonna turn him into a folk hero. Now, let's wait to hear what Susan Rice and Donald Trump Jr. have to say in their testimony.

3. You assume because I enjoy infotainment from Fox that we use Fox as our source documents? Super adorable.

I am one poster though and others, of course, have different experiences and opinions.

1. How is our national defense stronger when Trump is alienating our allies? How is it stronger when our military largely ignores him?
2. I hate to break it to you, but the majority of Rs in Congress voted in favor of TPP. There are also many R in Congress who support H1Bs. There are also many Rs in congress who don't want strong labor controls and higher minimum wage to help American workers. Trump could help bring back jobs by starting with his own, but again, you ignore that bit.

You realize that Trump is making an a$$ all by himself, without the media's help? You think it's only the US media that lampoons him? Oh, dear, go read some international news source, and you'll see our's our pretty tame in comparison.

3. Then what reputable, non biases news source do you use? I'm honestly curious.

Again, you refuse to open your eyes.

1. General Mattis makes our national defense stronger. General Kelly at DHS made our national defense stronger. LEA's are stronger when they have support to follow the laws on the books.
2. R&D can vote as they wish and eventually they will need to answer to their constituents who will decide. I support legal immigration 100%. The Clinton Admin couldn't even deal efficiently with guest worker program the states' agriculture geowers were begging for. This issue is older than all of us and I cut my political teeth supporting immigrant farm workers until I was denied an earned opportunity due to the color of my skin because, "this wasn't my fight."
3. Congressional Record, federal register, census bureau, agency press releases, WSJ, WP, Barron's, Economist to name a few. I also enjoy authorized autobiographies.

Hi. I'm your +1 poster from above, and we are really in sync. Of the sources you list, I agree with all of them, except for the WP. It used to be only slightly biased to the left, but ever since Trump won the nomination, they have done a full-throttle NYT on us. Every single headline looks like it was written by a member of the oppo research team, and I can't tell the difference between the front page and the editorial section.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am referring to those sources, amongst many others over a couple of decades. You can't stop because this is the way your brain is wired. I am focusing on the outcomes. We could go down the sorted personal transgressions of revered presidents but, look at the time...

Well, one of the outcomes is that this country is even more divided than ever, and our "dear" leader can't/won't/doesn't seem capable of repairing that rift; that even with the Rs controlling all three branches of our government, they can't get anything major done, like repealing and replacing ACA. One of the few bipartisan things R congress has done is to write up a non binding resolution for Trump to denounce white supremacists. I agree with this outcome.

Clap it out with me: Neo-Nazis and KKK are not embraced by Republicans.

This is your strategy for 2018? Will I need to smear blood across my door in order for Antifa to passover my house? Am I being punked right now?