Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have the daily delight of mansplaining. I am the lone token female in a sea of men.
We need more females. Many days it's a stampede of testosterone. Yes, I can handle simple division, but let's waste 10 minutes while you explain division.
It gets really lonely as you climb the ladder. Fewer women. I'm angry because there are so many capable women who gave up careers.
If you haven't been here, trust me, we are fighting a gender battle.
I agree with this 100%. All the SAHMs who claim we're all so jealous that they run the PTA and work out - actually, our frustration with your choices runs much deeper than that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have the daily delight of mansplaining. I am the lone token female in a sea of men.
We need more females. Many days it's a stampede of testosterone. Yes, I can handle simple division, but let's waste 10 minutes while you explain division.
It gets really lonely as you climb the ladder. Fewer women. I'm angry because there are so many capable women who gave up careers.
If you haven't been here, trust me, we are fighting a gender battle.
I agree with this 100%. All the SAHMs who claim we're all so jealous that they run the PTA and work out - actually, our frustration with your choices runs much deeper than that.
Anonymous wrote:I have the daily delight of mansplaining. I am the lone token female in a sea of men.
We need more females. Many days it's a stampede of testosterone. Yes, I can handle simple division, but let's waste 10 minutes while you explain division.
It gets really lonely as you climb the ladder. Fewer women. I'm angry because there are so many capable women who gave up careers.
If you haven't been here, trust me, we are fighting a gender battle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not sure where the assumption comes from that once a SAHM, always a SAHM. I worked full time, was on committees etc.
I also don't understand the disdain for what women did a generation or two ago. Was their role not important? Thinking back to my mom's stories growing up, are some of you implying that my Grandma's time was useless? Who else was going to do all of that? She had a massive garden she loved spending time in, etc. She sewed for her own family and others. That brought in a little extra money and provided what others needed.
You don't have to go sit in an office or a court room, or go to meetings all day to be doing something worthwhile.
Your grandma was captive labor and none of the shit she did provided a net benefit for society . That you failed to realize it shows the irreparable damage patriarchy has done to the psyche of women in this country
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I haven't read this whole thread, so likely someone has already pointed this out, but being a sahm does not mean that is the only thing you ever did. I'm a former scientist turned sahm. My kids love hearing about the research that I used to do, and I am instilling a love of science in both my son and my daughter. I doubt my daughter would list becoming an astronaut as one of her aspirations if she was hanging out with a nanny after school instead of watching NASA videos of the ISS with me. I actually worked part time until my second child was born, and frankly, because I made it a point to always work around my first child's schedule, he didn't even notice that I was working. So, if you think that the only example of women having choices is by taking time away from your kids, you're wrong. Kudos to those who have flexible jobs that allow them to be there for their kids when needed, without a whole lot of stress on the entire family. For many of us, that is not realistic. My staying home benefits my entire family by allowing us to always make whatever choice is best for the kids (such as keeping them at home when they are even slightly sick and not worrying about summer plans) without the stress of dealing with an employer's expectations. With my particular career, that flexibility would not have been possible if I continued to woh. My former professsional interests have a greater influence on my kids' interests than my husband's current career because I get to spend more time with our kids than he does. So, if anything, by staying home, I am actually guiding my daughter toward interests in stem to a greater extent than if I was still woh.
so your daughter is more likely to become a scientist because you used to be a scientist but now SAH, as opposed to if you were still a working scientist? Riiiiiight.
NP The cognitive dissonance of these presumably educated women is unbelievable , but then again we have a man with the vocabulary of a four year old as president , thanks in no small part to some of these women
I tutored a man in reading once who owned his own company, and was very successful. Trump seems to be someone who understand practical application unlike many past presidents. I'm afraid ignorance runs in all circles, definitely in yours.
Anonymous wrote:To clarify, my comment was in response to the poster who stated that a SAHM cannot be a role model. She never would say this about a SAHD.
Anonymous wrote:This is reverse sexism. Would you say this about a Stay at Home Dad? It is funny that you claim to be a feminist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think there is some jealous there. In the DC area, one partner has to be making a lot of money to enable the other to stay home and still maintain a nice lifestyle (nice house in a close in nabe, vacations, nice cars, pricey extracurricular activities for the kiddos, maybe private school, etc.)
To have an UMC lifestyle with a SAHP, the breadwinner has to be making 300-400k +.
On my end its less jealous and more...disbelief. I was raised to be independent and to own my own financials. When I went into my marriage I was comfortably set in a career and had two properties free-and-clear. That only helped when we made future decisions together to buy our 'dream' home. It boggles my mind that some women will rely solely on another person's generosity to live their life.
It disturbs me even further when these same women, some of them friends, were die-hard Hillary fans and very much into telling their daughters that 'this will be the first woman president, someone to look up to, someone to emulate' and yet the closest rolemodel to those daughters completely opted out of a career. How can you tell your children to aspire to be the head of NASA or a president or a multi-millionaire CEO, but you didn't bother to do anything yourself?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have the daily delight of mansplaining. I am the lone token female in a sea of men.
We need more females. Many days it's a stampede of testosterone. Yes, I can handle simple division, but let's waste 10 minutes while you explain division.
It gets really lonely as you climb the ladder. Fewer women. I'm angry because there are so many capable women who gave up careers.
If you haven't been here, trust me, we are fighting a gender battle.
What about the millions of women who went into industries like nursing, teaching, health professions i.e. speech therapy, occupational therapy, etc.? Are you that my career isn't as worthy, or that I can't consider myself a feminist, because I'm in an industry that's dominated by females? (I'm an OT.)
Anonymous wrote:I have the daily delight of mansplaining. I am the lone token female in a sea of men.
We need more females. Many days it's a stampede of testosterone. Yes, I can handle simple division, but let's waste 10 minutes while you explain division.
It gets really lonely as you climb the ladder. Fewer women. I'm angry because there are so many capable women who gave up careers.
If you haven't been here, trust me, we are fighting a gender battle.
Anonymous wrote:This is reverse sexism. Would you say this about a Stay at Home Dad? It is funny that you claim to be a feminist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think there is some jealous there. In the DC area, one partner has to be making a lot of money to enable the other to stay home and still maintain a nice lifestyle (nice house in a close in nabe, vacations, nice cars, pricey extracurricular activities for the kiddos, maybe private school, etc.)
To have an UMC lifestyle with a SAHP, the breadwinner has to be making 300-400k +.
On my end its less jealous and more...disbelief. I was raised to be independent and to own my own financials. When I went into my marriage I was comfortably set in a career and had two properties free-and-clear. That only helped when we made future decisions together to buy our 'dream' home. It boggles my mind that some women will rely solely on another person's generosity to live their life.
It disturbs me even further when these same women, some of them friends, were die-hard Hillary fans and very much into telling their daughters that 'this will be the first woman president, someone to look up to, someone to emulate' and yet the closest rolemodel to those daughters completely opted out of a career. How can you tell your children to aspire to be the head of NASA or a president or a multi-millionaire CEO, but you didn't bother to do anything yourself?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think there is some jealous there. In the DC area, one partner has to be making a lot of money to enable the other to stay home and still maintain a nice lifestyle (nice house in a close in nabe, vacations, nice cars, pricey extracurricular activities for the kiddos, maybe private school, etc.)
To have an UMC lifestyle with a SAHP, the breadwinner has to be making 300-400k +.
On my end its less jealous and more...disbelief. I was raised to be independent and to own my own financials. When I went into my marriage I was comfortably set in a career and had two properties free-and-clear. That only helped when we made future decisions together to buy our 'dream' home. It boggles my mind that some women will rely solely on another person's generosity to live their life.
It disturbs me even further when these same women, some of them friends, were die-hard Hillary fans and very much into telling their daughters that 'this will be the first woman president, someone to look up to, someone to emulate' and yet the closest rolemodel to those daughters completely opted out of a career. How can you tell your children to aspire to be the head of NASA or a president or a multi-millionaire CEO, but you didn't bother to do anything yourself?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Working mom here. Look, you ladies are getting pretty ridiculous if you REALLY can't think of ANYTHING interesting or productive to do with your time if you suddenly had the means to quit your jobs, like you won the lotto or inherited a bunch of money from some long lost relative. Come on. I understand why you might be annoyed by some of these posts but doubling down on this particular track is the height of absurdity.
It is no doubt fun to have plenty of money. Believe or not, many people are wealthy and work.
Well they usually work for themselves which is quite a bit different from having a boss or even working for the government. If you can't see that I don't know what to tell you. [/quote
Having six or seven unoccupied hours a day between school pick up and dropoff isn't the same as working for yourself either, to state the obvious.
I can tell you have never been a sah, your idealizing it.
Anonymous wrote:So you actually believe that when we are all retired people are going to care about your career? Will you pass out your resume to the other retirees at the beach? I can't imagine being so limited and unengaging that I could declare a huge group of people " boring".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Working mom here. Look, you ladies are getting pretty ridiculous if you REALLY can't think of ANYTHING interesting or productive to do with your time if you suddenly had the means to quit your jobs, like you won the lotto or inherited a bunch of money from some long lost relative. Come on. I understand why you might be annoyed by some of these posts but doubling down on this particular track is the height of absurdity.
It is no doubt fun to have plenty of money. Believe or not, many people are wealthy and work.