Do studies need to be done? Are these schools that have large classes NOT getting high test scores across the board? Because last I checked, they are doing great in that arena.
Is GreatSchools.org or whatever other nonsense site suddenly giving them ratings below a 9 or 10? No.
Not that I think that this makes having sardine-packed classes the best thing for the kids, but the proof is in the pudding that large class sizes do not affect student achievement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ok, but to get class sizes down, we need more teachers, which means more money.
Do you have a money tree somewhere?
We need more revenue streams.
Recently, a School Board member asked how much would it cost to lower the average FCPS class size by .5 students (don't even get me started on that) - FCPS came back w/ $7M estimate. I am an advocate funding ESOL, FARMS and special needs students who desperately need resources - let's not steal from Peter to pay Paul.
It's interesting how regular, English-speaking families get treated like a fringe special-interest group when they ask for class sizes below 30 students for their kids, but the ESOL/FARMS/special-needs kids get much smaller classes.
That wasn't my point - I was adding some facts to the discussion. Let's call it $70M annually to reduce each class size by 5 students.
Do studies need to be done? Are these schools that have large classes NOT getting high test scores across the board? Because last I checked, they are doing great in that arena.
Is GreatSchools.org or whatever other nonsense site suddenly giving them ratings below a 9 or 10? No.
Not that I think that this makes having sardine-packed classes the best thing for the kids, but the proof is in the pudding that large class sizes do not affect student achievement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ok, but to get class sizes down, we need more teachers, which means more money.
Do you have a money tree somewhere?
We need more revenue streams.
Recently, a School Board member asked how much would it cost to lower the average FCPS class size by .5 students (don't even get me started on that) - FCPS came back w/ $7M estimate. I am an advocate funding ESOL, FARMS and special needs students who desperately need resources - let's not steal from Peter to pay Paul.
It's interesting how regular, English-speaking families get treated like a fringe special-interest group when they ask for class sizes below 30 students for their kids, but the ESOL/FARMS/special-needs kids get much smaller classes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ok, but to get class sizes down, we need more teachers, which means more money.
Do you have a money tree somewhere?
We need more revenue streams.
Recently, a School Board member asked how much would it cost to lower the average FCPS class size by .5 students (don't even get me started on that) - FCPS came back w/ $7M estimate. I am an advocate funding ESOL, FARMS and special needs students who desperately need resources - let's not steal from Peter to pay Paul.
Anonymous wrote:ok, but to get class sizes down, we need more teachers, which means more money.
Do you have a money tree somewhere?
We need more revenue streams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:yeah, good luck. Their line is that class size has no effect on student achievement. There are studies that say this.
Yes. My principal told me this as he gave me my 35th first grader. Not in FCPS.
Next time, tell your Principal that those studies define "large" as 25-27 students. As far as I know, there has not been a study for classrooms of over 30 students.
Do studies need to be done? Are these schools that have large classes NOT getting high test scores across the board? Because last I checked, they are doing great in that arena.
Is GreatSchools.org or whatever other nonsense site suddenly giving them ratings below a 9 or 10? No.
Not that I think that this makes having sardine-packed classes the best thing for the kids, but the proof is in the pudding that large class sizes do not affect student achievement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:yeah, good luck. Their line is that class size has no effect on student achievement. There are studies that say this.
Yes. My principal told me this as he gave me my 35th first grader. Not in FCPS.
Next time, tell your Principal that those studies define "large" as 25-27 students. As far as I know, there has not been a study for classrooms of over 30 students.
Anonymous wrote:yeah, good luck. Their line is that class size has no effect on student achievement. There are studies that say this.
Yes. My principal told me this as he gave me my 35th first grader. Not in FCPS.
yeah, good luck. Their line is that class size has no effect on student achievement. There are studies that say this.
Anonymous wrote:yeah, good luck. Their line is that class size has no effect on student achievement. There are studies that say this.
However, I think that using those studies is a huge cop out so they don't have to make the hard choices and can continue to shove our kids into classrooms like sardines in perpetuity.
And when they "fix" our ridiculously overcrowded school, they are leaving us over capacity by ~150 with the current amendment.[/quote
That is hysterical, there are studies that show class size matters. This is a main reason people go private. Will be watching this with interest, would love to see same in MCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where do the poor people in McLean live?
Those are the kids from Timber Lane that the McLean folks want so desperately to get rid of.
Not really, the students at Timber Lane that make it a Title I school do not generally go to Longfellow/McLean. They are zoned for Falls Church. Some of the McLean students line in apartments near the Safeway on Anderson Road. Some live in the Rotunda. Some are scattered in the district.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where do the poor people in McLean live?
Those are the kids from Timber Lane that the McLean folks want so desperately to get rid of.
Sorry, but that area has been at McLean HS for over 30 years and is not going away.
If people in McLean wanted the area moved out of the school, do you really think they could not have convinced Janie Strauss, who lives in the McLean HS district, to make it happen at some point over the gazillion years Janie has been on the School Board? The part of Timber Lane that feeds into McLean is closer to both Marshall HS and Falls Church HS, two schools that at various times have had the lowest enrollments in the county, than it is to McLean. It would have been easy to justify moving the area to either school to shore up its enrollment. That never happened because there was never any concerted effort by "McLean folks" or anyone else to make it happen.
It's part of the school community, and kids at Longfellow and McLean spend more time volunteering at Timber Lane every year than at any other school in the pyramid. Without Timber Lane, McLean just becomes Langley Lite. With it, it has its own identity that most people there really like.
It doesn't matter how long neighborhoods have been zoned for a particular HS. It looks like they are planning to move McLean neighborhoods that have gone to McLean for 50+ years to other HS. Your logic is flawed. Tyson's growth will change everything. It is a potential disrupter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where do the poor people in McLean live?
Those are the kids from Timber Lane that the McLean folks want so desperately to get rid of.
Sorry, but that area has been at McLean HS for over 30 years and is not going away.
If people in McLean wanted the area moved out of the school, do you really think they could not have convinced Janie Strauss, who lives in the McLean HS district, to make it happen at some point over the gazillion years Janie has been on the School Board? The part of Timber Lane that feeds into McLean is closer to both Marshall HS and Falls Church HS, two schools that at various times have had the lowest enrollments in the county, than it is to McLean. It would have been easy to justify moving the area to either school to shore up its enrollment. That never happened because there was never any concerted effort by "McLean folks" or anyone else to make it happen.
It's part of the school community, and kids at Longfellow and McLean spend more time volunteering at Timber Lane every year than at any other school in the pyramid. Without Timber Lane, McLean just becomes Langley Lite. With it, it has its own identity that most people there really like.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where do the poor people in McLean live?
Those are the kids from Timber Lane that the McLean folks want so desperately to get rid of.