Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some people who love me missed my wedding.
I was gracious and said, only nice things to them about it. Life went on and it just didn't matter.
Thanks! This is how mature people feel about it.
What if your sister missed your wedding because she had a work Xmas party or your mom missed because she volunteers every weekend at her church. Give me a break. Not what pages OP's responses are on (they all start "OP here") but she never said she didn't say only nice things about it to the sister or nephew. This is an anonymous online vent. Or actually she said she was checking her thinking with us.
Anonymous wrote:Can't the sister ask the coach what the ramifications would be for missing the game up front/essentially ask for son to be excused? I think the son can deal with the fallout. Challenges and frustrating situations are part of life. So are family and celebrations!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree it obscures things a bit. But if it was dance or cheerleading or something else, I'm sure it'd be the same, just with less people chiming in because they are less participated in activities. But I have to believe they have lots of the same pressure and costs and issues that are being raised here.
Hey it could be the Dungeons and Dragons team for all I care. Same stuff. Same opinion. Go to the family event.
Different PP. I don't think so. I think the anti-sport people have really twisted this here. I would have the child miss the tournament, but what I find eye-opening on this thread is this viciousness people apparently harbor towards children (children!) who like sports. Have you read some of what people have wrote here? Apparently playing a team sport means you're setting yourself for a life in a cubicle, never participate in civic life, don't think of anybody other than yourselves, are all deluded into a blind belief you (or your child) will get a scholarship, and don't love family. It's unbelievable.
I'm no team sports fanatic either. I didn't play sports in school. But I find the vitriol here really awful and I think the anti-sports people are probably teaching their own kids some lessons that are a lot worse than what OP's sister is teaching her child.
There are many former dorks that have no idea the type of commitment that goes into playing and succeeding at a high level sport. They also view something like a 'violin concert' or 'debate' or 'chess tournament' as superior to a sporting event. I have kids that do both so I KNOW that one is not better than the other--they are just different. They require commitment, practice and sacrifice to succeed.
I have played Division 1 soccer. I also played Varsity soccer as a Freshmen at a local school that won VA State Championship. In the upper years--you were expected to be at games/tournaments. Death in family was just about the only acceptable excuse. BUT--you need to know your family's priorities and sometimes be wiling to take it on the cuff if it is vitally important to your family.
I understood when my sister and her son missed an important event in my life---but came post-game. It's hard to know what it's like to be in somebody else's shoes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Having read OP's sanctimonious passive aggressive update, I'm now on Team Sister, though I wasn't before. Holy cow.
+100
Ok, though I've been on team "nephew", I also thought the earlier posts by the OP were sensible. Given this when I read the "smack me upside the head" comment I assumed she meant that the smack was deserved because her older, more experienced self would realize how unaware her 40 year old self had been about the complications and grey areas that come with child-rearing. I hope I'm correct?
I am the post who wrote the 'holy cow' post above and no, I don't think that's at all what she meant, which is why I'm on Team Sister now. I thought that her update started over-the-top dramatic and bridezilla in tone to begin with, which surprised me because I hadn't gotten that vibe earlier (but now I'm wondering if I was wrong and my new fellow Team Sister folks are just better at spotting bridezillas in the wild than me). Then the whole "smack me upside the head" business with her mother, wtf? She's going around talking shit about how awful her sister is to her mom and then brags and jokes about that? What? Team Sister all the way now.
And generally speaking, I'd make my kid go to a family wedding except if it was like the World Cup tryouts or playing Carnegie Hall or something and I was on Team OP, but now I wonder if there's a lot more going on than what OP said, because, like I said, that update? Was a piece. of. work.
I'll retract and go back to Team OP if it turns out OP meant what you said. But I don't think she did.
np here. I think you reeeeeally misunderstood the update.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree it obscures things a bit. But if it was dance or cheerleading or something else, I'm sure it'd be the same, just with less people chiming in because they are less participated in activities. But I have to believe they have lots of the same pressure and costs and issues that are being raised here.
Hey it could be the Dungeons and Dragons team for all I care. Same stuff. Same opinion. Go to the family event.
Different PP. I don't think so. I think the anti-sport people have really twisted this here. I would have the child miss the tournament, but what I find eye-opening on this thread is this viciousness people apparently harbor towards children (children!) who like sports. Have you read some of what people have wrote here? Apparently playing a team sport means you're setting yourself for a life in a cubicle, never participate in civic life, don't think of anybody other than yourselves, are all deluded into a blind belief you (or your child) will get a scholarship, and don't love family. It's unbelievable.
I'm no team sports fanatic either. I didn't play sports in school. But I find the vitriol here really awful and I think the anti-sports people are probably teaching their own kids some lessons that are a lot worse than what OP's sister is teaching her child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can't the sister ask the coach what the ramifications would be for missing the game up front/essentially ask for son to be excused? I think the son can deal with the fallout. Challenges and frustrating situations are part of life. So are family and celebrations!
HS coaches don't talk to parents in general. The kids are suppose to do all the negotiating for themselves. They are in HS not Kindergarten.
And THAT is the issue. Kids don't have the balls to go in and say they have a family obligation out of town. So they cry to their parents that they will be benched all year and parents think of all the money and effort they have put in themselves, get fearful that could be the reality and give in. Let the kid NOT talk to the coach and go to the tournament instead. The parent takes the fall-out.
So yes, HS kids still need to be treated like K students sometimes. I would follow up with coach via email to make sure my child actually talked to the coach correctly about the situation and everyone was on the same page.
Easier said than done. HS students need to deal with the coach and deal with the fall out. Sometimes teens make bad decisions and there are consequences but you can't soften the blow every single time. No, HS students never need to be treated like K students. Maybe the parents can coach the HS student on how to talk to a coach but in 4, 3, 2, 1 short year(s) they will be in college. Are you going to call their professor too?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can't the sister ask the coach what the ramifications would be for missing the game up front/essentially ask for son to be excused? I think the son can deal with the fallout. Challenges and frustrating situations are part of life. So are family and celebrations!
HS coaches don't talk to parents in general. The kids are suppose to do all the negotiating for themselves. They are in HS not Kindergarten.
And THAT is the issue. Kids don't have the balls to go in and say they have a family obligation out of town. So they cry to their parents that they will be benched all year and parents think of all the money and effort they have put in themselves, get fearful that could be the reality and give in. Let the kid NOT talk to the coach and go to the tournament instead. The parent takes the fall-out.
So yes, HS kids still need to be treated like K students sometimes. I would follow up with coach via email to make sure my child actually talked to the coach correctly about the situation and everyone was on the same page.
Easier said than done. HS students need to deal with the coach and deal with the fall out. Sometimes teens make bad decisions and there are consequences but you can't soften the blow every single time. No, HS students never need to be treated like K students. Maybe the parents can coach the HS student on how to talk to a coach but in 4, 3, 2, 1 short year(s) they will be in college. Are you going to call their professor too?
I don't know. Is the professor going to fail the student because the student missed the pretest for a wedding? If so I might.
Well if you are going to call a college professor for your child ... you and I will not see eye to eye on much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can't the sister ask the coach what the ramifications would be for missing the game up front/essentially ask for son to be excused? I think the son can deal with the fallout. Challenges and frustrating situations are part of life. So are family and celebrations!
HS coaches don't talk to parents in general. The kids are suppose to do all the negotiating for themselves. They are in HS not Kindergarten.
And THAT is the issue. Kids don't have the balls to go in and say they have a family obligation out of town. So they cry to their parents that they will be benched all year and parents think of all the money and effort they have put in themselves, get fearful that could be the reality and give in. Let the kid NOT talk to the coach and go to the tournament instead. The parent takes the fall-out.
So yes, HS kids still need to be treated like K students sometimes. I would follow up with coach via email to make sure my child actually talked to the coach correctly about the situation and everyone was on the same page.
Easier said than done. HS students need to deal with the coach and deal with the fall out. Sometimes teens make bad decisions and there are consequences but you can't soften the blow every single time. No, HS students never need to be treated like K students. Maybe the parents can coach the HS student on how to talk to a coach but in 4, 3, 2, 1 short year(s) they will be in college. Are you going to call their professor too?
I don't know. Is the professor going to fail the student because the student missed the pretest for a wedding? If so I might.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can't the sister ask the coach what the ramifications would be for missing the game up front/essentially ask for son to be excused? I think the son can deal with the fallout. Challenges and frustrating situations are part of life. So are family and celebrations!
HS coaches don't talk to parents in general. The kids are suppose to do all the negotiating for themselves. They are in HS not Kindergarten.
And THAT is the issue. Kids don't have the balls to go in and say they have a family obligation out of town. So they cry to their parents that they will be benched all year and parents think of all the money and effort they have put in themselves, get fearful that could be the reality and give in. Let the kid NOT talk to the coach and go to the tournament instead. The parent takes the fall-out.
So yes, HS kids still need to be treated like K students sometimes. I would follow up with coach via email to make sure my child actually talked to the coach correctly about the situation and everyone was on the same page.
Easier said than done. HS students need to deal with the coach and deal with the fall out. Sometimes teens make bad decisions and there are consequences but you can't soften the blow every single time. No, HS students never need to be treated like K students. Maybe the parents can coach the HS student on how to talk to a coach but in 4, 3, 2, 1 short year(s) they will be in college. Are you going to call their professor too?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can't the sister ask the coach what the ramifications would be for missing the game up front/essentially ask for son to be excused? I think the son can deal with the fallout. Challenges and frustrating situations are part of life. So are family and celebrations!
HS coaches don't talk to parents in general. The kids are suppose to do all the negotiating for themselves. They are in HS not Kindergarten.
And THAT is the issue. Kids don't have the balls to go in and say they have a family obligation out of town. So they cry to their parents that they will be benched all year and parents think of all the money and effort they have put in themselves, get fearful that could be the reality and give in. Let the kid NOT talk to the coach and go to the tournament instead. The parent takes the fall-out.
So yes, HS kids still need to be treated like K students sometimes. I would follow up with coach via email to make sure my child actually talked to the coach correctly about the situation and everyone was on the same page.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can't the sister ask the coach what the ramifications would be for missing the game up front/essentially ask for son to be excused? I think the son can deal with the fallout. Challenges and frustrating situations are part of life. So are family and celebrations!
HS coaches don't talk to parents in general. The kids are suppose to do all the negotiating for themselves. They are in HS not Kindergarten.