Anonymous
06/09/2026 21:49
Subject: Top 10 public "ranking"?
Anonymous wrote:UCs are in a league of their own. There are other universities that can fill in the remaining spots on a t10 public list.
Not any more.
Anonymous
06/08/2026 10:26
Subject: Top 10 public "ranking"?
Anonymous wrote:UCs are in a league of their own. There are other universities that can fill in the remaining spots on a t10 public list.
They've done a pretty good job of filling in their own moat.
Anonymous
06/08/2026 08:09
Subject: Top 10 public "ranking"?
UCs are in a league of their own. There are other universities that can fill in the remaining spots on a t10 public list.
Anonymous
06/07/2026 13:50
Subject: Top 10 public "ranking"?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, the 5 year experiment should have gathered enough data to start talking about whether it needs to go back to test optional, and then possibly to test required a few years after going back to test optional.
Or will the "we are not going back" actually win?
280+ UC profs are saying something. Follow: https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1327108.page
More have signed since
Over 1,000
Does UC think things will change with a new Gov? S in go back to test optional or required?
Anonymous
06/07/2026 00:28
Subject: Top 10 public "ranking"?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, the 5 year experiment should have gathered enough data to start talking about whether it needs to go back to test optional, and then possibly to test required a few years after going back to test optional.
Or will the "we are not going back" actually win?
280+ UC profs are saying something. Follow: https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1327108.page
More have signed since
Over 1,000
Anonymous
06/06/2026 19:36
Subject: Top 10 public "ranking"?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, the 5 year experiment should have gathered enough data to start talking about whether it needs to go back to test optional, and then possibly to test required a few years after going back to test optional.
Or will the "we are not going back" actually win?
280+ UC profs are saying something. Follow: https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1327108.page
More have signed since
Anonymous
06/06/2026 15:19
Subject: Top 10 public "ranking"?
Anonymous wrote:Well, the 5 year experiment should have gathered enough data to start talking about whether it needs to go back to test optional, and then possibly to test required a few years after going back to test optional.
Or will the "we are not going back" actually win?
280+ UC profs are saying something. Follow: https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1327108.page
Anonymous
06/06/2026 15:14
Subject: Top 10 public "ranking"?
Anonymous wrote:Well, the 5 year experiment should have gathered enough data to start talking about whether it needs to go back to test optional, and then possibly to test required a few years after going back to test optional.
Or will the "we are not going back" actually win?
I don't think they can avoid going back eventually.