Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That’s why I think Scenario 2 is best. It doesn’t have kids moving high schools. Only middle schools.

What are you talking about? Hundreds of kids-maybe 1000-- switch high schools downstream from Skyview in 2.

Can you give some examples of the moves please?

You can see on the map for scenario 2, click on High School. Anything in stripes is moving to a different school. 1800 kids to Skyview from other high schools and multiple secondary moves to backfill Westfield and I guess for other reasons at other schools. (How are you having this conversation if you don't understand how to read the maps?)

I was typing in street names and seeing the 3 scenarios in words. I do not pay attention to stripes.

I want a specific example of what street is moving to what school so we can talk commute times.

You said option 2 didn't have kids moving high schools. 2 does -in fact- have hundreds of kids moving to different high schools.

We can explain to you how to read the map, but we can't understand it for you.

Why can’t you give me a specific example? Kids would be moving from what high school and to which new one? And which community? Please share an example alone with commute times. I’d like to understand.

If you can't read the maps, you should just see yourself out of this conversation. We aren't going to explain every little nuance to you.

You don’t have a specific example. So you don’t have a case to prevent a move due to proximity.

No one needs to "prove" their "case" to someone who is too dumb to read a map.

It will definitely help with the consultants if you can be specific. That’s why I was chosen twice to be a spokesperson for the small group at the meetings - because I can articulate points with details.

Why did you go to a meeting twice? Maybe let someone else get a word in edgewise?

Because I had the time and wanted to make sure my voice was heard and didn’t want to get moved to a shcool further away. You were welcome to do the same.

Someone (I assume a Centreville parent) posted a long explanation in the closed thread showing in detail how much farther their areas were to Westfield as compared to Lees Corner and nearby Chantilly elementary schools which we can all see on a map are much closer, so, duh. Lees Corner Angry Mama got super pissed off when confronted with facts, and kept making crap up. It was entertaining but sad.

Is the person who bullied her way into spokesperson at TWO meetings the same person who lives in Lees Corner who lied about time and distance to places and cried about "contiguous" boundaries? I think that's the same person.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What school gets a worse commute time to their high school in scenario 2? Anyone?

All of the Centreville kids switched from Centreville HS to Westfield get a much worse commute. The Chantilly HS areas they are moving to Westfield looks about equidistant but those areas will insist that Westfield is much farther and that they are Rooted in Chantilly.

How much further would it be? Mileage and commute time?

Again, this is something you can figure out for yourself. Pick a few addresses and map it out, if you won't take pp's assertion as fact. I'm not sure why you are asking people to do projects to you. How bizarre.

I wouldn't trust someone to speak for my group who is too dumb to read a map!

Why are you asking people to explain the maps to you?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What school gets a worse commute time to their high school in scenario 2? Anyone?

All of the Centreville kids switched from Centreville HS to Westfield get a much worse commute. The Chantilly HS areas they are moving to Westfield looks about equidistant but those areas will insist that Westfield is much farther and that they are Rooted in Chantilly.

How much further would it be? Mileage and commute time?

Anonymous wrote:The Oakton boundary is ridiculous in all three scenarios. That's a school zone that makes no sense.

And it looks like Scenario 2 sends some kids all the way to Oakton from close by the CHS, so that's a bunch of kids being sent much farther away.

That is actually Scenario 1 I believe. Are you referring to Highland Oaks?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That’s why I think Scenario 2 is best. It doesn’t have kids moving high schools. Only middle schools.

What are you talking about? Hundreds of kids-maybe 1000-- switch high schools downstream from Skyview in 2.

Can you give some examples of the moves please?

You can see on the map for scenario 2, click on High School. Anything in stripes is moving to a different school. 1800 kids to Skyview from other high schools and multiple secondary moves to backfill Westfield and I guess for other reasons at other schools. (How are you having this conversation if you don't understand how to read the maps?)

I was typing in street names and seeing the 3 scenarios in words. I do not pay attention to stripes.

I want a specific example of what street is moving to what school so we can talk commute times.

You said option 2 didn't have kids moving high schools. 2 does -in fact- have hundreds of kids moving to different high schools.

We can explain to you how to read the map, but we can't understand it for you.

Why can’t you give me a specific example? Kids would be moving from what high school and to which new one? And which community? Please share an example alone with commute times. I’d like to understand.

If you can't read the maps, you should just see yourself out of this conversation. We aren't going to explain every little nuance to you.

You don’t have a specific example. So you don’t have a case to prevent a move due to proximity.

No one needs to "prove" their "case" to someone who is too dumb to read a map.

It will definitely help with the consultants if you can be specific. That’s why I was chosen twice to be a spokesperson for the small group at the meetings - because I can articulate points with details.

Why did you go to a meeting twice? Maybe let someone else get a word in edgewise?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That’s why I think Scenario 2 is best. It doesn’t have kids moving high schools. Only middle schools.

What are you talking about? Hundreds of kids-maybe 1000-- switch high schools downstream from Skyview in 2.

Can you give some examples of the moves please?

You can see on the map for scenario 2, click on High School. Anything in stripes is moving to a different school. 1800 kids to Skyview from other high schools and multiple secondary moves to backfill Westfield and I guess for other reasons at other schools. (How are you having this conversation if you don't understand how to read the maps?)

I was typing in street names and seeing the 3 scenarios in words. I do not pay attention to stripes.

I want a specific example of what street is moving to what school so we can talk commute times.

You said option 2 didn't have kids moving high schools. 2 does -in fact- have hundreds of kids moving to different high schools.

We can explain to you how to read the map, but we can't understand it for you.

Why can’t you give me a specific example? Kids would be moving from what high school and to which new one? And which community? Please share an example alone with commute times. I’d like to understand.

If you can't read the maps, you should just see yourself out of this conversation. We aren't going to explain every little nuance to you.

You don’t have a specific example. So you don’t have a case to prevent a move due to proximity.

No one needs to "prove" their "case" to someone who is too dumb to read a map.

It will definitely help with the consultants if you can be specific. That’s why I was chosen twice to be a spokesperson for the small group at the meetings - because I can articulate points with details.

I really don't understand why some people need all the information spoon fed to them. Its right there, on the website. Use your brain.

The Oakton boundary is ridiculous in all three scenarios. That's a school zone that makes no sense.

And it looks like Scenario 2 sends some kids all the way to Oakton from close by the CHS, so that's a bunch of kids being sent much farther away.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That’s why I think Scenario 2 is best. It doesn’t have kids moving high schools. Only middle schools.

What are you talking about? Hundreds of kids-maybe 1000-- switch high schools downstream from Skyview in 2.

Can you give some examples of the moves please?

You can see on the map for scenario 2, click on High School. Anything in stripes is moving to a different school. 1800 kids to Skyview from other high schools and multiple secondary moves to backfill Westfield and I guess for other reasons at other schools. (How are you having this conversation if you don't understand how to read the maps?)

I was typing in street names and seeing the 3 scenarios in words. I do not pay attention to stripes.

I want a specific example of what street is moving to what school so we can talk commute times.

You said option 2 didn't have kids moving high schools. 2 does -in fact- have hundreds of kids moving to different high schools.

We can explain to you how to read the map, but we can't understand it for you.

Why can’t you give me a specific example? Kids would be moving from what high school and to which new one? And which community? Please share an example alone with commute times. I’d like to understand.

If you can't read the maps, you should just see yourself out of this conversation. We aren't going to explain every little nuance to you.

You don’t have a specific example. So you don’t have a case to prevent a move due to proximity.

No one needs to "prove" their "case" to someone who is too dumb to read a map.

Anonymous wrote:What school gets a worse commute time to their high school in scenario 2? Anyone?

All of the Centreville kids switched from Centreville HS to Westfield get a much worse commute. The Chantilly HS areas they are moving to Westfield looks about equidistant but those areas will insist that Westfield is much farther and that they are Rooted in Chantilly.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That’s why I think Scenario 2 is best. It doesn’t have kids moving high schools. Only middle schools.

What are you talking about? Hundreds of kids-maybe 1000-- switch high schools downstream from Skyview in 2.

Can you give some examples of the moves please?

You can see on the map for scenario 2, click on High School. Anything in stripes is moving to a different school. 1800 kids to Skyview from other high schools and multiple secondary moves to backfill Westfield and I guess for other reasons at other schools. (How are you having this conversation if you don't understand how to read the maps?)

I was typing in street names and seeing the 3 scenarios in words. I do not pay attention to stripes.

I want a specific example of what street is moving to what school so we can talk commute times.

You said option 2 didn't have kids moving high schools. 2 does -in fact- have hundreds of kids moving to different high schools.

We can explain to you how to read the map, but we can't understand it for you.

Why can’t you give me a specific example? Kids would be moving from what high school and to which new one? And which community? Please share an example alone with commute times. I’d like to understand.

If you can't read the maps, you should just see yourself out of this conversation. We aren't going to explain every little nuance to you.

You don’t have a specific example. So you don’t have a case to prevent a move due to proximity.

Specific cases help make the case of why one shouldn’t be moved. Just saying look at the maps isn’t an argument to stay. Sorry.

What school gets a worse commute time to their high school in scenario 2? Anyone?