Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+1 LoL the show goes on. Losing big time sounds hilarious. A few players change. A few players come down from the comforts of a good team to a meh team. Will meshing even more players work out the second time around? Who knows. Charlotte and Richmond will test this theory. Cant speak for Arlington but from what I hear from the families they will be fine.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No no … only a few. And they know who they are. Your DD would be at VDA if given the opportunity and the roster space to play existed. Its only far away for those in MD and even with that girls from MD make the trek.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not trying to throw shade at VDA, but a lot of those kids committed while playing at other teams. With that being said, VDA still does a great job getting kids in school.
Very odd that girls who are committed would leave Arlington, NVA and similar clubs to drive all the way to VDA for no reason. Like it or not VDA is attracting the most talent right now. And if your daughter is good enough she will tryout there and leave her club if she gets an offer.
Plenty of “good enough” players don’t go to VDA for any number of reasons. One reason maybe is that it is really far away.
ARL and Union are losing to VDA big time. They will feel it big time next year they dont do any development internally and with added leagues no where to pull from
ARL will be just fine. Union will have 1 age group that competes - thats about it for them.
Which of the Arlington teams got better for next year?
Anonymous wrote:No no … only a few. And they know who they are. Your DD would be at VDA if given the opportunity and the roster space to play existed. Its only far away for those in MD and even with that girls from MD make the trek.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not trying to throw shade at VDA, but a lot of those kids committed while playing at other teams. With that being said, VDA still does a great job getting kids in school.
Very odd that girls who are committed would leave Arlington, NVA and similar clubs to drive all the way to VDA for no reason. Like it or not VDA is attracting the most talent right now. And if your daughter is good enough she will tryout there and leave her club if she gets an offer.
Plenty of “good enough” players don’t go to VDA for any number of reasons. One reason maybe is that it is really far away.
Who said better or worse? Someone doesn’t read. Next season Arl will find out which teams flourish or flounder. Be patient chap.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+1 LoL the show goes on. Losing big time sounds hilarious. A few players change. A few players come down from the comforts of a good team to a meh team. Will meshing even more players work out the second time around? Who knows. Charlotte and Richmond will test this theory. Cant speak for Arlington but from what I hear from the families they will be fine.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No no … only a few. And they know who they are. Your DD would be at VDA if given the opportunity and the roster space to play existed. Its only far away for those in MD and even with that girls from MD make the trek.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not trying to throw shade at VDA, but a lot of those kids committed while playing at other teams. With that being said, VDA still does a great job getting kids in school.
Very odd that girls who are committed would leave Arlington, NVA and similar clubs to drive all the way to VDA for no reason. Like it or not VDA is attracting the most talent right now. And if your daughter is good enough she will tryout there and leave her club if she gets an offer.
Plenty of “good enough” players don’t go to VDA for any number of reasons. One reason maybe is that it is really far away.
ARL and Union are losing to VDA big time. They will feel it big time next year they dont do any development internally and with added leagues no where to pull from
ARL will be just fine. Union will have 1 age group that competes - thats about it for them.
Which of the Arlington teams got better for next year?
Will find out next season. As will the other clubs oh defensive one. Lots of changes in the beltway. Next season will be a season that will make or break coaching reputations. And while you guys stay hyper focused on your local shuffling the Carolinas have gotten better and added a team in the mix that is also pretty decent. Hope your ready.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+1 LoL the show goes on. Losing big time sounds hilarious. A few players change. A few players come down from the comforts of a good team to a meh team. Will meshing even more players work out the second time around? Who knows. Charlotte and Richmond will test this theory. Cant speak for Arlington but from what I hear from the families they will be fine.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No no … only a few. And they know who they are. Your DD would be at VDA if given the opportunity and the roster space to play existed. Its only far away for those in MD and even with that girls from MD make the trek.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not trying to throw shade at VDA, but a lot of those kids committed while playing at other teams. With that being said, VDA still does a great job getting kids in school.
Very odd that girls who are committed would leave Arlington, NVA and similar clubs to drive all the way to VDA for no reason. Like it or not VDA is attracting the most talent right now. And if your daughter is good enough she will tryout there and leave her club if she gets an offer.
Plenty of “good enough” players don’t go to VDA for any number of reasons. One reason maybe is that it is really far away.
ARL and Union are losing to VDA big time. They will feel it big time next year they dont do any development internally and with added leagues no where to pull from
ARL will be just fine. Union will have 1 age group that competes - thats about it for them.
Which of the Arlington teams got better for next year?
Anonymous wrote:+1 LoL the show goes on. Losing big time sounds hilarious. A few players change. A few players come down from the comforts of a good team to a meh team. Will meshing even more players work out the second time around? Who knows. Charlotte and Richmond will test this theory. Cant speak for Arlington but from what I hear from the families they will be fine.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No no … only a few. And they know who they are. Your DD would be at VDA if given the opportunity and the roster space to play existed. Its only far away for those in MD and even with that girls from MD make the trek.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not trying to throw shade at VDA, but a lot of those kids committed while playing at other teams. With that being said, VDA still does a great job getting kids in school.
Very odd that girls who are committed would leave Arlington, NVA and similar clubs to drive all the way to VDA for no reason. Like it or not VDA is attracting the most talent right now. And if your daughter is good enough she will tryout there and leave her club if she gets an offer.
Plenty of “good enough” players don’t go to VDA for any number of reasons. One reason maybe is that it is really far away.
ARL and Union are losing to VDA big time. They will feel it big time next year they dont do any development internally and with added leagues no where to pull from
ARL will be just fine. Union will have 1 age group that competes - thats about it for them.
+1 LoL the show goes on. Losing big time sounds hilarious. A few players change. A few players come down from the comforts of a good team to a meh team. Will meshing even more players work out the second time around? Who knows. Charlotte and Richmond will test this theory. Cant speak for Arlington but from what I hear from the families they will be fine.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No no … only a few. And they know who they are. Your DD would be at VDA if given the opportunity and the roster space to play existed. Its only far away for those in MD and even with that girls from MD make the trek.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not trying to throw shade at VDA, but a lot of those kids committed while playing at other teams. With that being said, VDA still does a great job getting kids in school.
Very odd that girls who are committed would leave Arlington, NVA and similar clubs to drive all the way to VDA for no reason. Like it or not VDA is attracting the most talent right now. And if your daughter is good enough she will tryout there and leave her club if she gets an offer.
Plenty of “good enough” players don’t go to VDA for any number of reasons. One reason maybe is that it is really far away.
ARL and Union are losing to VDA big time. They will feel it big time next year they dont do any development internally and with added leagues no where to pull from
ARL will be just fine. Union will have 1 age group that competes - thats about it for them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No no … only a few. And they know who they are. Your DD would be at VDA if given the opportunity and the roster space to play existed. Its only far away for those in MD and even with that girls from MD make the trek.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not trying to throw shade at VDA, but a lot of those kids committed while playing at other teams. With that being said, VDA still does a great job getting kids in school.
Very odd that girls who are committed would leave Arlington, NVA and similar clubs to drive all the way to VDA for no reason. Like it or not VDA is attracting the most talent right now. And if your daughter is good enough she will tryout there and leave her club if she gets an offer.
Plenty of “good enough” players don’t go to VDA for any number of reasons. One reason maybe is that it is really far away.
ARL and Union are losing to VDA big time. They will feel it big time next year they dont do any development internally and with added leagues no where to pull from
Anonymous wrote:No no … only a few. And they know who they are. Your DD would be at VDA if given the opportunity and the roster space to play existed. Its only far away for those in MD and even with that girls from MD make the trek.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not trying to throw shade at VDA, but a lot of those kids committed while playing at other teams. With that being said, VDA still does a great job getting kids in school.
Very odd that girls who are committed would leave Arlington, NVA and similar clubs to drive all the way to VDA for no reason. Like it or not VDA is attracting the most talent right now. And if your daughter is good enough she will tryout there and leave her club if she gets an offer.
Plenty of “good enough” players don’t go to VDA for any number of reasons. One reason maybe is that it is really far away.
No no … only a few. And they know who they are. Your DD would be at VDA if given the opportunity and the roster space to play existed. Its only far away for those in MD and even with that girls from MD make the trek.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not trying to throw shade at VDA, but a lot of those kids committed while playing at other teams. With that being said, VDA still does a great job getting kids in school.
Very odd that girls who are committed would leave Arlington, NVA and similar clubs to drive all the way to VDA for no reason. Like it or not VDA is attracting the most talent right now. And if your daughter is good enough she will tryout there and leave her club if she gets an offer.
Plenty of “good enough” players don’t go to VDA for any number of reasons. One reason maybe is that it is really far away.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not trying to throw shade at VDA, but a lot of those kids committed while playing at other teams. With that being said, VDA still does a great job getting kids in school.
Very odd that girls who are committed would leave Arlington, NVA and similar clubs to drive all the way to VDA for no reason. Like it or not VDA is attracting the most talent right now. And if your daughter is good enough she will tryout there and leave her club if she gets an offer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s MV’s college placement record?
Kids in Vienna are too smart to play college soccer.
And untalented.
All you need a the brain talent. The soccer talent is useless if you are not in men’s soccer signing a fat pro contract in a 1st team in Europe.
All you need a the brain talent? I guess Vienna people aren't smart either.
Right. That's why no one from Madison or Oakton goes to a good college, soccer player or not. That's why Madison and Oakton always have losing records.
People on this board make the strangest, most easily refuted claims. Little wonder this forum died when people were required to stand behind a user name.
Dude it was a joke someone was making about your dumb grammar. Had nothing to do with the students and athletes of those schools.
Anonymous wrote:Can you two take this somewhere else. Mmmkaythx!!Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s MV’s college placement record?
Kids in Vienna are too smart to play college soccer.
And untalented.
All you need a the brain talent. The soccer talent is useless if you are not in men’s soccer signing a fat pro contract in a 1st team in Europe.
All you need a the brain talent? I guess Vienna people aren't smart either.
Right. That's why no one from Madison or Oakton goes to a good college, soccer player or not. That's why Madison and Oakton always have losing records.
People on this board make the strangest, most easily refuted claims. Little wonder this forum died when people were required to stand behind a user name.
Dude it was a joke someone was making about your dumb grammar. Had nothing to do with the students and athletes of those schools.
Can you two take this somewhere else. Mmmkaythx!!Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s MV’s college placement record?
Kids in Vienna are too smart to play college soccer.
And untalented.
All you need a the brain talent. The soccer talent is useless if you are not in men’s soccer signing a fat pro contract in a 1st team in Europe.
All you need a the brain talent? I guess Vienna people aren't smart either.
Right. That's why no one from Madison or Oakton goes to a good college, soccer player or not. That's why Madison and Oakton always have losing records.
People on this board make the strangest, most easily refuted claims. Little wonder this forum died when people were required to stand behind a user name.
Dude it was a joke someone was making about your dumb grammar. Had nothing to do with the students and athletes of those schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s MV’s college placement record?
Kids in Vienna are too smart to play college soccer.
And untalented.
All you need a the brain talent. The soccer talent is useless if you are not in men’s soccer signing a fat pro contract in a 1st team in Europe.
All you need a the brain talent? I guess Vienna people aren't smart either.
Right. That's why no one from Madison or Oakton goes to a good college, soccer player or not. That's why Madison and Oakton always have losing records.
People on this board make the strangest, most easily refuted claims. Little wonder this forum died when people were required to stand behind a user name.