Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the ranking system is generally pretty accurate within some tolerance. Even at young ages. Loudoun 1st VA 51st in usa SYC 3rd VS 78 in usa.Anonymous wrote:Not sure how I’m letting myself get baited into this dumb convo but they tied last time they played.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a 2014 thread. Why are you talking about 2013s. Go to that thread.Anonymous wrote:yet NVA is still ahead of them in GA and rankings. SYC plays kickball to the one elite player on the team. Majority of NVA players would displace SYC players.Anonymous wrote:Yea. Not knocking the roster size but rather explaining why the 2014s had a smaller team. NVA isn’t the gold standard so I’m not even sure why you would use them as any type of exampleAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:17-18 like every other club that does 11 V 11. The roster was smaller because the girls left last year and they didn’t have the talent to backfill. I wouldn’t get too excited.Anonymous wrote:How many players will be on the SYC U13 roster this year? Look like last year they had 14 players and the playing time was good. Will it be similar this year?
No talent to fill? Yet they still beat NVA, who had a 20 player roster. If anything, having 14 girls means more touches, more minutes, and more actual development for each player. Kudos to SYC for not just filling spots for numbers’ sake and instead prioritizing the girls growth and development.
Ok, How about SYC 2014 VS LS 2014? Let’s go!
This is cute. There’s no contest. Loudoun.
Coach B has been purposely playing against lower skill leveled u13 teams all year. When they play appropriate leveled teams they do not out pro-form 6-0 anymore. I can't help but wonder why. SYC doesn't do this. Loudoun also plays down 2014 NVA girls to pad certain games/tournaments while SYC does not. They are not the same and you're obsessive tracking of stats that don't actually matter won't change that.
What a bunch of lies and BS. Nice try
These NVA players are posted in pictures on the team's insta at tournaments and games as well as the player's personal instas, some even wearing NVA jerseys. Cope harder. Elite players are a small community here and we all know of, if not are friends, with each other. Sorry that you're kid isn't one of them.
Nice condescending, self-congratulating tone here. "We" know all the "elite" 11 y.o. players bc we decided our friend group was the "elite." Sorry you're not one of them.
How do we know? Is there a USYNT U12 roster?
Most coaches know the best player at 12 y.o. is rarely the best player at 18 y.o. Enjoy it while it lasts.
Some reading for you:
https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2026/01/14/why-child-prodigies-rarely-become-elite-performers
Coach B was forced to take two players because of 20 kid roster on NVA. And taking a keeper and a bench player from 2013s is hardly game changing.
Well, maybe if NVA and Loudoun forced kids to play the new age groups, you’d have less issues. They created their own problems.
And Coach B isn’t forced to do anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the ranking system is generally pretty accurate within some tolerance. Even at young ages. Loudoun 1st VA 51st in usa SYC 3rd VS 78 in usa.Anonymous wrote:Not sure how I’m letting myself get baited into this dumb convo but they tied last time they played.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a 2014 thread. Why are you talking about 2013s. Go to that thread.Anonymous wrote:yet NVA is still ahead of them in GA and rankings. SYC plays kickball to the one elite player on the team. Majority of NVA players would displace SYC players.Anonymous wrote:Yea. Not knocking the roster size but rather explaining why the 2014s had a smaller team. NVA isn’t the gold standard so I’m not even sure why you would use them as any type of exampleAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:17-18 like every other club that does 11 V 11. The roster was smaller because the girls left last year and they didn’t have the talent to backfill. I wouldn’t get too excited.Anonymous wrote:How many players will be on the SYC U13 roster this year? Look like last year they had 14 players and the playing time was good. Will it be similar this year?
No talent to fill? Yet they still beat NVA, who had a 20 player roster. If anything, having 14 girls means more touches, more minutes, and more actual development for each player. Kudos to SYC for not just filling spots for numbers’ sake and instead prioritizing the girls growth and development.
Ok, How about SYC 2014 VS LS 2014? Let’s go!
This is cute. There’s no contest. Loudoun.
Coach B has been purposely playing against lower skill leveled u13 teams all year. When they play appropriate leveled teams they do not out pro-form 6-0 anymore. I can't help but wonder why. SYC doesn't do this. Loudoun also plays down 2014 NVA girls to pad certain games/tournaments while SYC does not. They are not the same and you're obsessive tracking of stats that don't actually matter won't change that.
What a bunch of lies and BS. Nice try
These NVA players are posted in pictures on the team's insta at tournaments and games as well as the player's personal instas, some even wearing NVA jerseys. Cope harder. Elite players are a small community here and we all know of, if not are friends, with each other. Sorry that you're kid isn't one of them.
Nice condescending, self-congratulating tone here. "We" know all the "elite" 11 y.o. players bc we decided our friend group was the "elite." Sorry you're not one of them.
How do we know? Is there a USYNT U12 roster?
Most coaches know the best player at 12 y.o. is rarely the best player at 18 y.o. Enjoy it while it lasts.
Some reading for you:
https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2026/01/14/why-child-prodigies-rarely-become-elite-performers
Coach B was forced to take two players because of 20 kid roster on NVA. And taking a keeper and a bench player from 2013s is hardly game changing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Their futsal name was Elite Ballers. You don’t get a name like that without being elite.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the ranking system is generally pretty accurate within some tolerance. Even at young ages. Loudoun 1st VA 51st in usa SYC 3rd VS 78 in usa.Anonymous wrote:Not sure how I’m letting myself get baited into this dumb convo but they tied last time they played.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a 2014 thread. Why are you talking about 2013s. Go to that thread.Anonymous wrote:yet NVA is still ahead of them in GA and rankings. SYC plays kickball to the one elite player on the team. Majority of NVA players would displace SYC players.Anonymous wrote:Yea. Not knocking the roster size but rather explaining why the 2014s had a smaller team. NVA isn’t the gold standard so I’m not even sure why you would use them as any type of exampleAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:17-18 like every other club that does 11 V 11. The roster was smaller because the girls left last year and they didn’t have the talent to backfill. I wouldn’t get too excited.Anonymous wrote:How many players will be on the SYC U13 roster this year? Look like last year they had 14 players and the playing time was good. Will it be similar this year?
No talent to fill? Yet they still beat NVA, who had a 20 player roster. If anything, having 14 girls means more touches, more minutes, and more actual development for each player. Kudos to SYC for not just filling spots for numbers’ sake and instead prioritizing the girls growth and development.
Ok, How about SYC 2014 VS LS 2014? Let’s go!
This is cute. There’s no contest. Loudoun.
Coach B has been purposely playing against lower skill leveled u13 teams all year. When they play appropriate leveled teams they do not out pro-form 6-0 anymore. I can't help but wonder why. SYC doesn't do this. Loudoun also plays down 2014 NVA girls to pad certain games/tournaments while SYC does not. They are not the same and you're obsessive tracking of stats that don't actually matter won't change that.
What a bunch of lies and BS. Nice try
These NVA players are posted in pictures on the team's insta at tournaments and games as well as the player's personal instas, some even wearing NVA jerseys. Cope harder. Elite players are a small community here and we all know of, if not are friends, with each other. Sorry that you're kid isn't one of them.
Nice condescending, self-congratulating tone here. "We" know all the "elite" 11 y.o. players bc we decided our friend group was the "elite." Sorry you're not one of them.
How do we know? Is there a USYNT U12 roster?
Most coaches know the best player at 12 y.o. is rarely the best player at 18 y.o. Enjoy it while it lasts.
Some reading for you:
https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2026/01/14/why-child-prodigies-rarely-become-elite-performers
I hope this is sarcasm
Anonymous wrote:Their futsal name was Elite Ballers. You don’t get a name like that without being elite.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the ranking system is generally pretty accurate within some tolerance. Even at young ages. Loudoun 1st VA 51st in usa SYC 3rd VS 78 in usa.Anonymous wrote:Not sure how I’m letting myself get baited into this dumb convo but they tied last time they played.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a 2014 thread. Why are you talking about 2013s. Go to that thread.Anonymous wrote:yet NVA is still ahead of them in GA and rankings. SYC plays kickball to the one elite player on the team. Majority of NVA players would displace SYC players.Anonymous wrote:Yea. Not knocking the roster size but rather explaining why the 2014s had a smaller team. NVA isn’t the gold standard so I’m not even sure why you would use them as any type of exampleAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:17-18 like every other club that does 11 V 11. The roster was smaller because the girls left last year and they didn’t have the talent to backfill. I wouldn’t get too excited.Anonymous wrote:How many players will be on the SYC U13 roster this year? Look like last year they had 14 players and the playing time was good. Will it be similar this year?
No talent to fill? Yet they still beat NVA, who had a 20 player roster. If anything, having 14 girls means more touches, more minutes, and more actual development for each player. Kudos to SYC for not just filling spots for numbers’ sake and instead prioritizing the girls growth and development.
Ok, How about SYC 2014 VS LS 2014? Let’s go!
This is cute. There’s no contest. Loudoun.
Coach B has been purposely playing against lower skill leveled u13 teams all year. When they play appropriate leveled teams they do not out pro-form 6-0 anymore. I can't help but wonder why. SYC doesn't do this. Loudoun also plays down 2014 NVA girls to pad certain games/tournaments while SYC does not. They are not the same and you're obsessive tracking of stats that don't actually matter won't change that.
What a bunch of lies and BS. Nice try
These NVA players are posted in pictures on the team's insta at tournaments and games as well as the player's personal instas, some even wearing NVA jerseys. Cope harder. Elite players are a small community here and we all know of, if not are friends, with each other. Sorry that you're kid isn't one of them.
Nice condescending, self-congratulating tone here. "We" know all the "elite" 11 y.o. players bc we decided our friend group was the "elite." Sorry you're not one of them.
How do we know? Is there a USYNT U12 roster?
Most coaches know the best player at 12 y.o. is rarely the best player at 18 y.o. Enjoy it while it lasts.
Some reading for you:
https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2026/01/14/why-child-prodigies-rarely-become-elite-performers
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the ranking system is generally pretty accurate within some tolerance. Even at young ages. Loudoun 1st VA 51st in usa SYC 3rd VS 78 in usa.Anonymous wrote:Not sure how I’m letting myself get baited into this dumb convo but they tied last time they played.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a 2014 thread. Why are you talking about 2013s. Go to that thread.Anonymous wrote:yet NVA is still ahead of them in GA and rankings. SYC plays kickball to the one elite player on the team. Majority of NVA players would displace SYC players.Anonymous wrote:Yea. Not knocking the roster size but rather explaining why the 2014s had a smaller team. NVA isn’t the gold standard so I’m not even sure why you would use them as any type of exampleAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:17-18 like every other club that does 11 V 11. The roster was smaller because the girls left last year and they didn’t have the talent to backfill. I wouldn’t get too excited.Anonymous wrote:How many players will be on the SYC U13 roster this year? Look like last year they had 14 players and the playing time was good. Will it be similar this year?
No talent to fill? Yet they still beat NVA, who had a 20 player roster. If anything, having 14 girls means more touches, more minutes, and more actual development for each player. Kudos to SYC for not just filling spots for numbers’ sake and instead prioritizing the girls growth and development.
Ok, How about SYC 2014 VS LS 2014? Let’s go!
This is cute. There’s no contest. Loudoun.
Coach B has been purposely playing against lower skill leveled u13 teams all year. When they play appropriate leveled teams they do not out pro-form 6-0 anymore. I can't help but wonder why. SYC doesn't do this. Loudoun also plays down 2014 NVA girls to pad certain games/tournaments while SYC does not. They are not the same and you're obsessive tracking of stats that don't actually matter won't change that.
What a bunch of lies and BS. Nice try
These NVA players are posted in pictures on the team's insta at tournaments and games as well as the player's personal instas, some even wearing NVA jerseys. Cope harder. Elite players are a small community here and we all know of, if not are friends, with each other. Sorry that you're kid isn't one of them.
Nice condescending, self-congratulating tone here. "We" know all the "elite" 11 y.o. players bc we decided our friend group was the "elite." Sorry you're not one of them.
How do we know? Is there a USYNT U12 roster?
Most coaches know the best player at 12 y.o. is rarely the best player at 18 y.o. Enjoy it while it lasts.
Some reading for you:
https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2026/01/14/why-child-prodigies-rarely-become-elite-performers
Their futsal name was Elite Ballers. You don’t get a name like that without being elite.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the ranking system is generally pretty accurate within some tolerance. Even at young ages. Loudoun 1st VA 51st in usa SYC 3rd VS 78 in usa.Anonymous wrote:Not sure how I’m letting myself get baited into this dumb convo but they tied last time they played.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a 2014 thread. Why are you talking about 2013s. Go to that thread.Anonymous wrote:yet NVA is still ahead of them in GA and rankings. SYC plays kickball to the one elite player on the team. Majority of NVA players would displace SYC players.Anonymous wrote:Yea. Not knocking the roster size but rather explaining why the 2014s had a smaller team. NVA isn’t the gold standard so I’m not even sure why you would use them as any type of exampleAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:17-18 like every other club that does 11 V 11. The roster was smaller because the girls left last year and they didn’t have the talent to backfill. I wouldn’t get too excited.Anonymous wrote:How many players will be on the SYC U13 roster this year? Look like last year they had 14 players and the playing time was good. Will it be similar this year?
No talent to fill? Yet they still beat NVA, who had a 20 player roster. If anything, having 14 girls means more touches, more minutes, and more actual development for each player. Kudos to SYC for not just filling spots for numbers’ sake and instead prioritizing the girls growth and development.
Ok, How about SYC 2014 VS LS 2014? Let’s go!
This is cute. There’s no contest. Loudoun.
Coach B has been purposely playing against lower skill leveled u13 teams all year. When they play appropriate leveled teams they do not out pro-form 6-0 anymore. I can't help but wonder why. SYC doesn't do this. Loudoun also plays down 2014 NVA girls to pad certain games/tournaments while SYC does not. They are not the same and you're obsessive tracking of stats that don't actually matter won't change that.
What a bunch of lies and BS. Nice try
These NVA players are posted in pictures on the team's insta at tournaments and games as well as the player's personal instas, some even wearing NVA jerseys. Cope harder. Elite players are a small community here and we all know of, if not are friends, with each other. Sorry that you're kid isn't one of them.
Nice condescending, self-congratulating tone here. "We" know all the "elite" 11 y.o. players bc we decided our friend group was the "elite." Sorry you're not one of them.
How do we know? Is there a USYNT U12 roster?
Most coaches know the best player at 12 y.o. is rarely the best player at 18 y.o. Enjoy it while it lasts.
Some reading for you:
https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2026/01/14/why-child-prodigies-rarely-become-elite-performers
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the ranking system is generally pretty accurate within some tolerance. Even at young ages. Loudoun 1st VA 51st in usa SYC 3rd VS 78 in usa.Anonymous wrote:Not sure how I’m letting myself get baited into this dumb convo but they tied last time they played.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a 2014 thread. Why are you talking about 2013s. Go to that thread.Anonymous wrote:yet NVA is still ahead of them in GA and rankings. SYC plays kickball to the one elite player on the team. Majority of NVA players would displace SYC players.Anonymous wrote:Yea. Not knocking the roster size but rather explaining why the 2014s had a smaller team. NVA isn’t the gold standard so I’m not even sure why you would use them as any type of exampleAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:17-18 like every other club that does 11 V 11. The roster was smaller because the girls left last year and they didn’t have the talent to backfill. I wouldn’t get too excited.Anonymous wrote:How many players will be on the SYC U13 roster this year? Look like last year they had 14 players and the playing time was good. Will it be similar this year?
No talent to fill? Yet they still beat NVA, who had a 20 player roster. If anything, having 14 girls means more touches, more minutes, and more actual development for each player. Kudos to SYC for not just filling spots for numbers’ sake and instead prioritizing the girls growth and development.
Ok, How about SYC 2014 VS LS 2014? Let’s go!
This is cute. There’s no contest. Loudoun.
Coach B has been purposely playing against lower skill leveled u13 teams all year. When they play appropriate leveled teams they do not out pro-form 6-0 anymore. I can't help but wonder why. SYC doesn't do this. Loudoun also plays down 2014 NVA girls to pad certain games/tournaments while SYC does not. They are not the same and you're obsessive tracking of stats that don't actually matter won't change that.
What a bunch of lies and BS. Nice try
These NVA players are posted in pictures on the team's insta at tournaments and games as well as the player's personal instas, some even wearing NVA jerseys. Cope harder. Elite players are a small community here and we all know of, if not are friends, with each other. Sorry that you're kid isn't one of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the ranking system is generally pretty accurate within some tolerance. Even at young ages. Loudoun 1st VA 51st in usa SYC 3rd VS 78 in usa.Anonymous wrote:Not sure how I’m letting myself get baited into this dumb convo but they tied last time they played.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a 2014 thread. Why are you talking about 2013s. Go to that thread.Anonymous wrote:yet NVA is still ahead of them in GA and rankings. SYC plays kickball to the one elite player on the team. Majority of NVA players would displace SYC players.Anonymous wrote:Yea. Not knocking the roster size but rather explaining why the 2014s had a smaller team. NVA isn’t the gold standard so I’m not even sure why you would use them as any type of exampleAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:17-18 like every other club that does 11 V 11. The roster was smaller because the girls left last year and they didn’t have the talent to backfill. I wouldn’t get too excited.Anonymous wrote:How many players will be on the SYC U13 roster this year? Look like last year they had 14 players and the playing time was good. Will it be similar this year?
No talent to fill? Yet they still beat NVA, who had a 20 player roster. If anything, having 14 girls means more touches, more minutes, and more actual development for each player. Kudos to SYC for not just filling spots for numbers’ sake and instead prioritizing the girls growth and development.
Ok, How about SYC 2014 VS LS 2014? Let’s go!
This is cute. There’s no contest. Loudoun.
Coach B has been purposely playing against lower skill leveled u13 teams all year. When they play appropriate leveled teams they do not out pro-form 6-0 anymore. I can't help but wonder why. SYC doesn't do this. Loudoun also plays down 2014 NVA girls to pad certain games/tournaments while SYC does not. They are not the same and you're obsessive tracking of stats that don't actually matter won't change that.
What a bunch of lies and BS. Nice try
These NVA players are posted in pictures on the team's insta at tournaments and games as well as the player's personal instas, some even wearing NVA jerseys. Cope harder. Elite players are a small community here and we all know of, if not are friends, with each other. Sorry that you're kid isn't one of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the ranking system is generally pretty accurate within some tolerance. Even at young ages. Loudoun 1st VA 51st in usa SYC 3rd VS 78 in usa.Anonymous wrote:Not sure how I’m letting myself get baited into this dumb convo but they tied last time they played.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a 2014 thread. Why are you talking about 2013s. Go to that thread.Anonymous wrote:yet NVA is still ahead of them in GA and rankings. SYC plays kickball to the one elite player on the team. Majority of NVA players would displace SYC players.Anonymous wrote:Yea. Not knocking the roster size but rather explaining why the 2014s had a smaller team. NVA isn’t the gold standard so I’m not even sure why you would use them as any type of exampleAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:17-18 like every other club that does 11 V 11. The roster was smaller because the girls left last year and they didn’t have the talent to backfill. I wouldn’t get too excited.Anonymous wrote:How many players will be on the SYC U13 roster this year? Look like last year they had 14 players and the playing time was good. Will it be similar this year?
No talent to fill? Yet they still beat NVA, who had a 20 player roster. If anything, having 14 girls means more touches, more minutes, and more actual development for each player. Kudos to SYC for not just filling spots for numbers’ sake and instead prioritizing the girls growth and development.
Ok, How about SYC 2014 VS LS 2014? Let’s go!
This is cute. There’s no contest. Loudoun.
Coach B has been purposely playing against lower skill leveled u13 teams all year. When they play appropriate leveled teams they do not out pro-form 6-0 anymore. I can't help but wonder why. SYC doesn't do this. Loudoun also plays down 2014 NVA girls to pad certain games/tournaments while SYC does not. They are not the same and you're obsessive tracking of stats that don't actually matter won't change that.
What a bunch of lies and BS. Nice try
Yes to girls on the U13 NVA team coming down to help in tournaments - 3 for sure - because those girls are 2014s.
SYC does this when they are playing "up", so that they can use 2013s to help their 2014 squad.
You can tell all this from pictures. Everyone knows each other.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the ranking system is generally pretty accurate within some tolerance. Even at young ages. Loudoun 1st VA 51st in usa SYC 3rd VS 78 in usa.Anonymous wrote:Not sure how I’m letting myself get baited into this dumb convo but they tied last time they played.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a 2014 thread. Why are you talking about 2013s. Go to that thread.Anonymous wrote:yet NVA is still ahead of them in GA and rankings. SYC plays kickball to the one elite player on the team. Majority of NVA players would displace SYC players.Anonymous wrote:Yea. Not knocking the roster size but rather explaining why the 2014s had a smaller team. NVA isn’t the gold standard so I’m not even sure why you would use them as any type of exampleAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:17-18 like every other club that does 11 V 11. The roster was smaller because the girls left last year and they didn’t have the talent to backfill. I wouldn’t get too excited.Anonymous wrote:How many players will be on the SYC U13 roster this year? Look like last year they had 14 players and the playing time was good. Will it be similar this year?
No talent to fill? Yet they still beat NVA, who had a 20 player roster. If anything, having 14 girls means more touches, more minutes, and more actual development for each player. Kudos to SYC for not just filling spots for numbers’ sake and instead prioritizing the girls growth and development.
Ok, How about SYC 2014 VS LS 2014? Let’s go!
This is cute. There’s no contest. Loudoun.
Coach B has been purposely playing against lower skill leveled u13 teams all year. When they play appropriate leveled teams they do not out pro-form 6-0 anymore. I can't help but wonder why. SYC doesn't do this. Loudoun also plays down 2014 NVA girls to pad certain games/tournaments while SYC does not. They are not the same and you're obsessive tracking of stats that don't actually matter won't change that.
What a bunch of lies and BS. Nice try
These NVA players are posted in pictures on the team's insta at tournaments and games as well as the player's personal instas, some even wearing NVA jerseys. Cope harder. Elite players are a small community here and we all know of, if not are friends, with each other. Sorry that you're kid isn't one of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the ranking system is generally pretty accurate within some tolerance. Even at young ages. Loudoun 1st VA 51st in usa SYC 3rd VS 78 in usa.Anonymous wrote:Not sure how I’m letting myself get baited into this dumb convo but they tied last time they played.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a 2014 thread. Why are you talking about 2013s. Go to that thread.Anonymous wrote:yet NVA is still ahead of them in GA and rankings. SYC plays kickball to the one elite player on the team. Majority of NVA players would displace SYC players.Anonymous wrote:Yea. Not knocking the roster size but rather explaining why the 2014s had a smaller team. NVA isn’t the gold standard so I’m not even sure why you would use them as any type of exampleAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:17-18 like every other club that does 11 V 11. The roster was smaller because the girls left last year and they didn’t have the talent to backfill. I wouldn’t get too excited.Anonymous wrote:How many players will be on the SYC U13 roster this year? Look like last year they had 14 players and the playing time was good. Will it be similar this year?
No talent to fill? Yet they still beat NVA, who had a 20 player roster. If anything, having 14 girls means more touches, more minutes, and more actual development for each player. Kudos to SYC for not just filling spots for numbers’ sake and instead prioritizing the girls growth and development.
Ok, How about SYC 2014 VS LS 2014? Let’s go!
This is cute. There’s no contest. Loudoun.
Coach B has been purposely playing against lower skill leveled u13 teams all year. When they play appropriate leveled teams they do not out pro-form 6-0 anymore. I can't help but wonder why. SYC doesn't do this. Loudoun also plays down 2014 NVA girls to pad certain games/tournaments while SYC does not. They are not the same and you're obsessive tracking of stats that don't actually matter won't change that.
What a bunch of lies and BS. Nice try
Yes to girls on the U13 NVA team coming down to help in tournaments - 3 for sure - because those girls are 2014s.
SYC does this when they are playing "up", so that they can use 2013s to help their 2014 squad.
You can tell all this from pictures. Everyone knows each other.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the ranking system is generally pretty accurate within some tolerance. Even at young ages. Loudoun 1st VA 51st in usa SYC 3rd VS 78 in usa.Anonymous wrote:Not sure how I’m letting myself get baited into this dumb convo but they tied last time they played.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a 2014 thread. Why are you talking about 2013s. Go to that thread.Anonymous wrote:yet NVA is still ahead of them in GA and rankings. SYC plays kickball to the one elite player on the team. Majority of NVA players would displace SYC players.Anonymous wrote:Yea. Not knocking the roster size but rather explaining why the 2014s had a smaller team. NVA isn’t the gold standard so I’m not even sure why you would use them as any type of exampleAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:17-18 like every other club that does 11 V 11. The roster was smaller because the girls left last year and they didn’t have the talent to backfill. I wouldn’t get too excited.Anonymous wrote:How many players will be on the SYC U13 roster this year? Look like last year they had 14 players and the playing time was good. Will it be similar this year?
No talent to fill? Yet they still beat NVA, who had a 20 player roster. If anything, having 14 girls means more touches, more minutes, and more actual development for each player. Kudos to SYC for not just filling spots for numbers’ sake and instead prioritizing the girls growth and development.
Ok, How about SYC 2014 VS LS 2014? Let’s go!
This is cute. There’s no contest. Loudoun.
Coach B has been purposely playing against lower skill leveled u13 teams all year. When they play appropriate leveled teams they do not out pro-form 6-0 anymore. I can't help but wonder why. SYC doesn't do this. Loudoun also plays down 2014 NVA girls to pad certain games/tournaments while SYC does not. They are not the same and you're obsessive tracking of stats that don't actually matter won't change that.
What a bunch of lies and BS. Nice try
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the ranking system is generally pretty accurate within some tolerance. Even at young ages. Loudoun 1st VA 51st in usa SYC 3rd VS 78 in usa.Anonymous wrote:Not sure how I’m letting myself get baited into this dumb convo but they tied last time they played.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a 2014 thread. Why are you talking about 2013s. Go to that thread.Anonymous wrote:yet NVA is still ahead of them in GA and rankings. SYC plays kickball to the one elite player on the team. Majority of NVA players would displace SYC players.Anonymous wrote:Yea. Not knocking the roster size but rather explaining why the 2014s had a smaller team. NVA isn’t the gold standard so I’m not even sure why you would use them as any type of exampleAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:17-18 like every other club that does 11 V 11. The roster was smaller because the girls left last year and they didn’t have the talent to backfill. I wouldn’t get too excited.Anonymous wrote:How many players will be on the SYC U13 roster this year? Look like last year they had 14 players and the playing time was good. Will it be similar this year?
No talent to fill? Yet they still beat NVA, who had a 20 player roster. If anything, having 14 girls means more touches, more minutes, and more actual development for each player. Kudos to SYC for not just filling spots for numbers’ sake and instead prioritizing the girls growth and development.
Ok, How about SYC 2014 VS LS 2014? Let’s go!
This is cute. There’s no contest. Loudoun.
Coach B has been purposely playing against lower skill leveled u13 teams all year. When they play appropriate leveled teams they do not out pro-form 6-0 anymore. I can't help but wonder why. SYC doesn't do this. Loudoun also plays down 2014 NVA girls to pad certain games/tournaments while SYC does not. They are not the same and you're obsessive tracking of stats that don't actually matter won't change that.
What a bunch of lies and BS. Nice try
Yes to girls on the U13 NVA team coming down to help in tournaments - 3 for sure - because those girls are 2014s.
SYC does this when they are playing "up", so that they can use 2013s to help their 2014 squad.
You can tell all this from pictures. Everyone knows each other.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the ranking system is generally pretty accurate within some tolerance. Even at young ages. Loudoun 1st VA 51st in usa SYC 3rd VS 78 in usa.Anonymous wrote:Not sure how I’m letting myself get baited into this dumb convo but they tied last time they played.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a 2014 thread. Why are you talking about 2013s. Go to that thread.Anonymous wrote:yet NVA is still ahead of them in GA and rankings. SYC plays kickball to the one elite player on the team. Majority of NVA players would displace SYC players.Anonymous wrote:Yea. Not knocking the roster size but rather explaining why the 2014s had a smaller team. NVA isn’t the gold standard so I’m not even sure why you would use them as any type of exampleAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:17-18 like every other club that does 11 V 11. The roster was smaller because the girls left last year and they didn’t have the talent to backfill. I wouldn’t get too excited.Anonymous wrote:How many players will be on the SYC U13 roster this year? Look like last year they had 14 players and the playing time was good. Will it be similar this year?
No talent to fill? Yet they still beat NVA, who had a 20 player roster. If anything, having 14 girls means more touches, more minutes, and more actual development for each player. Kudos to SYC for not just filling spots for numbers’ sake and instead prioritizing the girls growth and development.
Ok, How about SYC 2014 VS LS 2014? Let’s go!
This is cute. There’s no contest. Loudoun.
Coach B has been purposely playing against lower skill leveled u13 teams all year. When they play appropriate leveled teams they do not out pro-form 6-0 anymore. I can't help but wonder why. SYC doesn't do this. Loudoun also plays down 2014 NVA girls to pad certain games/tournaments while SYC does not. They are not the same and you're obsessive tracking of stats that don't actually matter won't change that.
What a bunch of lies and BS. Nice try