Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obviously timed for the return of the House:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/us/politics/trump-epstein-emails.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20251112&instance_id=166274&nl=breaking-news®i_id=130978122&segment_id=210450&user_id=fcb1b8a728d5f78d42df74f0dbc09f85
EPSTEIN ALLEGED IN E-MAILS THAT TRUMP KNEW OF HIS CONDUCT
In a message obtained by Congress, the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein's victims.
It's pretty clear this leak was timed for the House reconvening after being off 59 days. Johnson is swearing in Adelita Grijalva, who will become the 218th signature on the discharge petition to release the Epstein files.
The fact that more information hasn't be released or leaked sooner and faster the past few years makes it obvious there is an effort by very powerful people to keep as much info sealed for as long as possible. As far as Trump's involvement is concerned; it's very likely he at least knew of Epstein's disgusting and criminal wrongdoings at the time they were happening and it's certainly plausible he participated in the wrongdoings. Best case for Trump, which really isn't a best anything, is that he is one of many powerful politicians seeking to provide cover for ultra-wealthy political donors who have ties to those implicated in the files.
Trump joked that Epstein liked them young.
Joked about it.
Even though he had a daughter.
Trump has two daughters though he only lusts after Ivanka.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The NY Times ran hundreds of "but her emails" articles in 2016 and sat on Epstein's emails the entire time.
Why?
This, this, this.
Why do you think the New York Times had these emails?
A lot of this was taking place in NYC over many years. That’s what real reporting is: tracking down sources and piecing together stories. For sure the NYT should have been on top of this and “asking questions” as they did about Hilary’s emails and Biden’s age.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tried to bring the discharge petition to the House floor today. Mike Johnson approved it. Hakeem Jeffries did not.
This is utter fiction.
Johnson is scheduling the vote for next week. I you are referring to Burchett;s efforts, that measure was improperly presented and was designed to give Republicans cover since their vote on a unanimous consent would be secret. Every vote on this needs to be public. Every legislator who votes against disclosure needs to be named and shamed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can't help but wonder if there's some connection between Epstein, trump, John Casablancas and the teen pageants
I believe that’s already been documented.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/14/teen-models-powerful-men-when-donald-trump-hosted-look-of-the-year
Three decades on, a very different picture of the competition is beginning to emerge. Over the last six months, the Guardian has spoken to several dozen former Look of the Year contestants, as well as industry insiders, and obtained 12 hours of previously unseen, behind-the-scenes footage. The stories we have heard suggest that Casablancas, and some of the men in his orbit, used the contest to engage in sexual relationships with vulnerable young models. Some of these allegations amount to sexual harassment, abuse or exploitation of teenage girls; others are more accurately described as rape.
No such allegations have been levelled against Trump, who at the time was dating Marla Maples, the woman who in 1993 became his second wife. But his close involvement in the contest raises questions for the president. Did he know that Casablancas and others were sleeping with contestants? Why would a man in his 40s, whose main business was real-estate development, want to host a beauty contest for teenage girls?
Trump also had a model agency
https://web.archive.org/web/20040728165039/http://trumpmodels.com/
be sure to note the "special arrangements" section
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obviously timed for the return of the House:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/us/politics/trump-epstein-emails.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20251112&instance_id=166274&nl=breaking-news®i_id=130978122&segment_id=210450&user_id=fcb1b8a728d5f78d42df74f0dbc09f85
EPSTEIN ALLEGED IN E-MAILS THAT TRUMP KNEW OF HIS CONDUCT
In a message obtained by Congress, the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein's victims.
It's pretty clear this leak was timed for the House reconvening after being off 59 days. Johnson is swearing in Adelita Grijalva, who will become the 218th signature on the discharge petition to release the Epstein files.
Do you remember the "birthday book?"
Of COURSE he knew.
He knew and was Epstein’s best client. Trump actively took part.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does "Police Chief etc. I'm 75% there" mean?
Exectly. Where is "there" -- what goal were they working toward?
Sarah Longwell figured this out on her show today. It means Epstein and Maxwell had been wondering who sold them out. Epstein finally figured out it was Trump so he emailed Maxwell to tell her. Trump was the dog that didn’t bark bc when the police chief was dragging everyone, Trump seemed immune annd was not mentioned/questioned even though he was at Epstein’s house for hours with underage girls. “I’m 75% there” means he’s 75% sure or 75% to figuring out the whole thing.
Could be, and that’s just further proof that he raped children. He’s sell anyone out to save himself.
Though, these made up narratives to try to sell Trump as a non child rapists are getting pretty entertaining.
Was he also secretly saving them from the basement of a pizza shop lmao
You drop phrases like "raped children" so easily. I wish you had the courage not to be anonymous when you say such things.
So he can send his army of violent criminals out to kidnap us too?
It is quite interesting to note though that you don’t see too many people defending him in public anymore, isn’t it perhaps it’s because they all know what he really is and don’t want to be associated with him? It works two ways you know.
Wait, what? You're calling him a child rapist because of immigration enforcement?
There is going to come a day where all these comments will be unmasked and communities will splinter.
I can’t wait to find out who is behind the posts supporting Trump at this point.
OMG!! This this this!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can't help but wonder if there's some connection between Epstein, trump, John Casablancas and the teen pageants
I believe that’s already been documented.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/14/teen-models-powerful-men-when-donald-trump-hosted-look-of-the-year
Three decades on, a very different picture of the competition is beginning to emerge. Over the last six months, the Guardian has spoken to several dozen former Look of the Year contestants, as well as industry insiders, and obtained 12 hours of previously unseen, behind-the-scenes footage. The stories we have heard suggest that Casablancas, and some of the men in his orbit, used the contest to engage in sexual relationships with vulnerable young models. Some of these allegations amount to sexual harassment, abuse or exploitation of teenage girls; others are more accurately described as rape.
No such allegations have been levelled against Trump, who at the time was dating Marla Maples, the woman who in 1993 became his second wife. But his close involvement in the contest raises questions for the president. Did he know that Casablancas and others were sleeping with contestants? Why would a man in his 40s, whose main business was real-estate development, want to host a beauty contest for teenage girls?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can't help but wonder if there's some connection between Epstein, trump, John Casablancas and the teen pageants
I believe that’s already been documented.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obviously timed for the return of the House:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/us/politics/trump-epstein-emails.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20251112&instance_id=166274&nl=breaking-news®i_id=130978122&segment_id=210450&user_id=fcb1b8a728d5f78d42df74f0dbc09f85
EPSTEIN ALLEGED IN E-MAILS THAT TRUMP KNEW OF HIS CONDUCT
In a message obtained by Congress, the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein's victims.
It's pretty clear this leak was timed for the House reconvening after being off 59 days. Johnson is swearing in Adelita Grijalva, who will become the 218th signature on the discharge petition to release the Epstein files.
The fact that more information hasn't be released or leaked sooner and faster the past few years makes it obvious there is an effort by very powerful people to keep as much info sealed for as long as possible. As far as Trump's involvement is concerned; it's very likely he at least knew of Epstein's disgusting and criminal wrongdoings at the time they were happening and it's certainly plausible he participated in the wrongdoings. Best case for Trump, which really isn't a best anything, is that he is one of many powerful politicians seeking to provide cover for ultra-wealthy political donors who have ties to those implicated in the files.
Trump joked that Epstein liked them young.
Joked about it.
Even though he had a daughter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The NY Times ran hundreds of "but her emails" articles in 2016 and sat on Epstein's emails the entire time.
Why?
This, this, this.
Why do you think the New York Times had these emails?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does "Police Chief etc. I'm 75% there" mean?
Exectly. Where is "there" -- what goal were they working toward?
Sarah Longwell figured this out on her show today. It means Epstein and Maxwell had been wondering who sold them out. Epstein finally figured out it was Trump so he emailed Maxwell to tell her. Trump was the dog that didn’t bark bc when the police chief was dragging everyone, Trump seemed immune annd was not mentioned/questioned even though he was at Epstein’s house for hours with underage girls. “I’m 75% there” means he’s 75% sure or 75% to figuring out the whole thing.
Could be, and that’s just further proof that he raped children. He’s sell anyone out to save himself.
Though, these made up narratives to try to sell Trump as a non child rapists are getting pretty entertaining.
Was he also secretly saving them from the basement of a pizza shop lmao
You drop phrases like "raped children" so easily. I wish you had the courage not to be anonymous when you say such things.
So he can send his army of violent criminals out to kidnap us too?
It is quite interesting to note though that you don’t see too many people defending him in public anymore, isn’t it perhaps it’s because they all know what he really is and don’t want to be associated with him? It works two ways you know.
Wait, what? You're calling him a child rapist because of immigration enforcement?
There is going to come a day where all these comments will be unmasked and communities will splinter.
I can’t wait to find out who is behind the posts supporting Trump at this point.
Anonymous wrote:Tried to bring the discharge petition to the House floor today. Mike Johnson approved it. Hakeem Jeffries did not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The NY Times ran hundreds of "but her emails" articles in 2016 and sat on Epstein's emails the entire time.
Why?
This, this, this.