Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At this point in time you have to be brain dead to vote fir one republican

This is bigger than their so called polices

Republicans have one goal to install a dictatorship and take away your freedoms at every level . This is basic American core values

Either you stand with the US or you are a traitor

Please list the freedoms you think are being eliminated.

Go take a look at Project 2025, the GOP’s playbook.

That was the Heritage Foundation. It is not law. Get real. Give an example of a freedom that has been eliminated.

SCOTUS giving the thumbs up to throw people in jail just because they’re Hispanic and have low-paying jobs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At this point in time you have to be brain dead to vote fir one republican

This is bigger than their so called polices

Republicans have one goal to install a dictatorship and take away your freedoms at every level . This is basic American core values

Either you stand with the US or you are a traitor

Please list the freedoms you think are being eliminated.

Go take a look at Project 2025, the GOP’s playbook.

That was the Heritage Foundation. It is not law. Get real. Give an example of a freedom that has been eliminated.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At this point in time you have to be brain dead to vote fir one republican

This is bigger than their so called polices

Republicans have one goal to install a dictatorship and take away your freedoms at every level . This is basic American core values

Either you stand with the US or you are a traitor

Please list the freedoms you think are being eliminated.

Go take a look at Project 2025, the GOP’s playbook.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At this point in time you have to be brain dead to vote fir one republican

This is bigger than their so called polices

Republicans have one goal to install a dictatorship and take away your freedoms at every level . This is basic American core values

Either you stand with the US or you are a traitor

Please list the freedoms you think are being eliminated.

Anonymous wrote:At this point in time you have to be brain dead to vote fir one republican

This is bigger than their so called polices

Republicans have one goal to install a dictatorship and take away your freedoms at every level . This is basic American core values

Either you stand with the US or you are a traitor

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no need to slander someone when all you need to do is listen to her interviews or read her actual opinions on issues.

Her views are completely opposite of mine. That’s not slander - that’s fact.

My opposition to her views has nothing to do with her race or sex.

So then, why were those of us who had no interest in voting for Kamala Harris (or Hillary Clinton) called "racists" and "misogynists"? It's ok for Democrats to have those opinions, but not Republicans? How typical.

People I called misogynists: people complaining about HRC’s “shrill” voice or focusing on Harris’s private relationships.

People I called racists: people calling Harris a “DEI hire”.

After HRC lost, there were pages and pages of unhinged liberals claiming her loss was due to "misogyny". After Harris lost, there were pages and pages of unhinged liberals claiming her loss was due to "racism" (oh, and "misogyny" too, of course).

I've bolded above the exact words that so many of us used in response to the slander from the left, but none of you would hear it and instead, just kept shouting us down. Funny how you've conveniently forgotten all of that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no need to slander someone when all you need to do is listen to her interviews or read her actual opinions on issues.

Her views are completely opposite of mine. That’s not slander - that’s fact.

My opposition to her views has nothing to do with her race or sex.

So then, why were those of us who had no interest in voting for Kamala Harris (or Hillary Clinton) called "racists" and "misogynists"? It's ok for Democrats to have those opinions, but not Republicans? How typical.

People I called misogynists: people complaining about HRC’s “shrill” voice or focusing on Harris’s private relationships.

People I called racists: people calling Harris a “DEI hire”.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no need to slander someone when all you need to do is listen to her interviews or read her actual opinions on issues.

Her views are completely opposite of mine. That’s not slander - that’s fact.

My opposition to her views has nothing to do with her race or sex.

So then, why were those of us who had no interest in voting for Kamala Harris (or Hillary Clinton) called "racists" and "misogynists"? It's ok for Democrats to have those opinions, but not Republicans? How typical.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sears is not a bad candidate. But she is just blow away by her opponent. This just happens in elections sometimes -- wish it would happen more -- but you have two fine candidates -- one is just superior.

You seriously said one candidate, in this race, is “superior” ?? omg.

Go on . . .

The racist dixie-crats keep trying to hide their racism, but it’s so pervasive with many Virginia democrats, they just cannot hide it.

Their racial hatred toward an accomplished Black woman might just be enough to tip the scales toward Spanberger, sadly.

This is some pretty desperate stuff. I love it.

Anonymous wrote:There is no need to slander someone when all you need to do is listen to her interviews or read her actual opinions on issues.

Her views are completely opposite of mine. That’s not slander - that’s fact.

My opposition to her views has nothing to do with her race or sex.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sears would not be my first choice, but Spanberger is my no choice.

Why?

Anonymous wrote:Sears would not be my first choice, but Spanberger is my no choice.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In case you were wondering about her position on gay people...

GOP Candidate Said Gay People Were ‘Immoral’
Virginia gubernatorial nominee Winsome Earle-Sears (R) expressed strong opposition to a series of LGBTQ+ rights in a candidate questionnaire completed when she unsuccessfully ran for Congress in 2004, the Virginia Mercury reports.

She responded “yes” to questions about whether she would vote to block same-sex couples from adopting children and oppose workplace protections for gay people, and she indicated that she believed homosexuality is an “immoral lifestyle choice.”

Interesting. I wonder if our resident TERFs are going to vote for her.