Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, that shoe was a very very rare and exclusive celebrity brand or something like that. It was not a household name and it isn’t something any cop would conclude. Only someone who rummaged OJ’s closet would know what Bruno Magli was and his property was searched the same night Nicole’s was . Let’s say his daughter who was at the guest house called him and let him know Nicole’s dead and the detectives are at his house searching everything without warrant or telling him, he would absolutely be panicked enough to cut a finger from breaking a glass in the hotel room (as he claimed) and in the mental state to be suicidal and be on the run . He knows he is the suspect .

You do realize that Oj told two different stories as to how he cut his finger, don’t you?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Oj defender is actually using talking points from oj’s own mouth kind of the way trump supporters only say what he says. Oj is guilty and I’m a guy and was once an Oj fan but the case was won at jury selection.
The jurors have said after case that it was payback, it didn’t matter what evidence was shown

What makes him guilty if the blood is questionable? Any jury would’ve let him walk. The evidence wasn’t overwhelming . The only thing we have is a 911 call and DV arrest from 1989 where OJ is on the recorded call blasting Nicole for blowing a guy in the living room while the kids were home. Something that most guys would have a fit about

Anonymous wrote:Also, that shoe was a very very rare and exclusive celebrity brand or something like that. It was not a household name and it isn’t something any cop would conclude. Only someone who rummaged OJ’s closet would know what Bruno Magli was and his property was searched the same night Nicole’s was . Let’s say his daughter who was at the guest house called him and let him know Nicole’s dead and the detectives are at his house searching everything without warrant or telling him, he would absolutely be panicked enough to cut a finger from breaking a glass in the hotel room (as he claimed) and in the mental state to be suicidal and be on the run . He knows he is the suspect .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Furman didn’t plant one thing in this case. He just didn’t. It would of been impossible. I’ve heard other detectives say that even if he wanted too, he wouldn’t have the time to do it. It was impossible. They found blood when Oj was in Chicago. They just didn’t have his blood to plant.
They saw a trail of blood. Why? This may shock you. Ready? OJ killed them.

Furhman did plant evidence. He was caught lying on the stand.

There’s a reason those tapes came out. His other cop colleagues were disturbed by him and ratted him out . On those tapes, he admitted to regularly planting drugs /evidence on suspects, especially black men and said if he thinks someone did it, that’s enough to go ahead and get to staging a scene.

He told coworkers getting OJ would be his launch to the big time. Instead, he left the force in disgrace.

It didn’t stop him from writing a book. A guy like that will die with the lie. He wont ever admit to wrongdoing. He believed cops should lie. All is fair in shady detective work until it happens to someone’s son.

Most cops are shady.

This force just happened to be starstruck OJ fans.

Not saying Furman was not the shadiest, but let's not absolve everyone else here.

Starstruck or not, when a woman dies, it always leads back to the man she is with or the ex . I don’t fault the cops for that . What I do fault them for is how sloppily they handled the evidence and the scene. It was not appropriate for Furhman to even “jump the gate” at OJ’s house without a warrant at 5am. Kato and Oj’s daughter were there but still.. There are procedures for due process and investigation handling and detectives picking up blood vials from the labs then placing them in their pockets en route to the scene make no sense. I get DNA technology was very primitive back then but they very well could’ve gotten hairs from OJ and seen if any were found on Ron and Nicole’s fingernails . I don’t see why blood draws were necessary. OJ wasn’t the one horribly stabbed to death. I still believe whatever’s under Ron and Nicole’s fingernails and throats would’ve been a stronger tell. It’s too late now unfortunately. The evidence they found was stuff nobody with a brain would do (wear a glove then leave it bloodied on the scene, What was the purpose?)

The other interesting thing is the Bruno Magli shoe. How would cops know what shoe made those prints or what he was wearing that night unless someone saw his closet?

Are you kidding? They didn’t know what shoe print they were looking for that night.
Also, Furman jumped the gate because they had just seen the owner of the house, Oj - his ex was just butchered, so he followed the blood in his driveway (the reason he jumped the fence). Furman, by your theory was jumping the fence to sprinkle blood.
Oj, had flown to Chicago that night, so he hadn’t given up his blood yet.
Furman couldn’t of set him up even if he wanted too

Furhman was not supposed to jump the gate. Warrants are needed for a reason. Also, the LAPD’s crime scene photos from that week didn’t show the glove or sock or any of the OJ bloody evidence the prosecution used. That means these items were planted later on after OJ was arrested and got blood drawn.

Why would the glove not be in the LAPD’s crime scene photo from the week of June 12th?

Not if it is reasonable to assume a crime is or has taken place. All that blood and two dead bodies do not require a warrant.

This is why some cops are notoriously bad detectives. They don’t like to follow protocols. We shouldn’t have detectives from the police force do any crime scene investigations or raids without attorneys present imo.

If someone is being beaten in their home by a spouse, the police have every right to go in and stop it w/out a warrant. They are not going to wait for lawyers to arrive at the scene.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Furman didn’t plant one thing in this case. He just didn’t. It would of been impossible. I’ve heard other detectives say that even if he wanted too, he wouldn’t have the time to do it. It was impossible. They found blood when Oj was in Chicago. They just didn’t have his blood to plant.
They saw a trail of blood. Why? This may shock you. Ready? OJ killed them.

Furhman did plant evidence. He was caught lying on the stand.

There’s a reason those tapes came out. His other cop colleagues were disturbed by him and ratted him out . On those tapes, he admitted to regularly planting drugs /evidence on suspects, especially black men and said if he thinks someone did it, that’s enough to go ahead and get to staging a scene.

He told coworkers getting OJ would be his launch to the big time. Instead, he left the force in disgrace.

It didn’t stop him from writing a book. A guy like that will die with the lie. He wont ever admit to wrongdoing. He believed cops should lie. All is fair in shady detective work until it happens to someone’s son.

Most cops are shady.

This force just happened to be starstruck OJ fans.

Not saying Furman was not the shadiest, but let's not absolve everyone else here.

Starstruck or not, when a woman dies, it always leads back to the man she is with or the ex . I don’t fault the cops for that . What I do fault them for is how sloppily they handled the evidence and the scene. It was not appropriate for Furhman to even “jump the gate” at OJ’s house without a warrant at 5am. Kato and Oj’s daughter were there but still.. There are procedures for due process and investigation handling and detectives picking up blood vials from the labs then placing them in their pockets en route to the scene make no sense. I get DNA technology was very primitive back then but they very well could’ve gotten hairs from OJ and seen if any were found on Ron and Nicole’s fingernails . I don’t see why blood draws were necessary. OJ wasn’t the one horribly stabbed to death. I still believe whatever’s under Ron and Nicole’s fingernails and throats would’ve been a stronger tell. It’s too late now unfortunately. The evidence they found was stuff nobody with a brain would do (wear a glove then leave it bloodied on the scene, What was the purpose?)

The other interesting thing is the Bruno Magli shoe. How would cops know what shoe made those prints or what he was wearing that night unless someone saw his closet?

Are you kidding? They didn’t know what shoe print they were looking for that night.
Also, Furman jumped the gate because they had just seen the owner of the house, Oj - his ex was just butchered, so he followed the blood in his driveway (the reason he jumped the fence). Furman, by your theory was jumping the fence to sprinkle blood.
Oj, had flown to Chicago that night, so he hadn’t given up his blood yet.
Furman couldn’t of set him up even if he wanted too

Furhman was not supposed to jump the gate. Warrants are needed for a reason. Also, the LAPD’s crime scene photos from that week didn’t show the glove or sock or any of the OJ bloody evidence the prosecution used. That means these items were planted later on after OJ was arrested and got blood drawn.

Why would the glove not be in the LAPD’s crime scene photo from the week of June 12th?

Not if it is reasonable to assume a crime is or has taken place. All that blood and two dead bodies do not require a warrant.

This is why some cops are notoriously bad detectives. They don’t like to follow protocols. We shouldn’t have detectives from the police force do any crime scene investigations or raids without attorneys present imo.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Oj defender is actually using talking points from oj’s own mouth kind of the way trump supporters only say what he says. Oj is guilty and I’m a guy and was once an Oj fan but the case was won at jury selection.
The jurors have said after case that it was payback, it didn’t matter what evidence was shown

I’m the Oj is innocent poster. I think OJ was idiotic and followed very bad advice about writing the book. If Cochran hadn’t died, I guarantee he wouldn’t have ever wrote that.

The only thing Oj was smart about is protecting his children and being a good parent and he was better at it before Nicole died. Nicole was very young, married young, and wanted to party. Bringing Ron to the house when she only knew him for a few weeks was why OJ was mad not because he was jealous of her per say but just that she had lots of shady characters in the home . Ever watch OJ talk about Kris Jenner? He has nothing nice to say about her or Faye Resnick .

A good parent? Wtf. He beat the mother of his kids over 60 times. He didn’t care about anyone but himself. Oj kiiled them and I’m sorry to burst your bubble. Furman framed nobody in this case. The case was lost at jury selection. No evidence points to anyone but Oj

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Two of Ron’s friends /coworkers from that same restaurant died in unsolved murders in 1993 and 1995 months before and after Ron and Nicole died. That entire restaraunt and its drug den accusations were never explored by corrupt LAPD.

There are phone recordings of OJ screaming at Nicole for her drug habit and allowing dangerous people in close orbit with the kids. Faye Resnick was one of Heidi Fleiss’ girls and a huge cocaine addict . Why was she living with Nicole till days prior to the murders when she owed a huge tab and was in financial ruin? Nicole married young, finally experienced freedom , but made very bad friends who used her and her connection to OJ .

If Sydney Simpson thinks her mom was killed because of drug deals and bad friends, she probably is right. She knew all these people and I’m sure like all eight year old girls do, she eavesdropped on Faye and her moms conversations

No, an 8 year old whose mom was brutally murdered and whose dad is the prime suspect is incapable of assessing the situation accurately. She’d probably burst if she accepted the truth that her dad killed her mom. Of course, she thinks he’s innocent.

It’s us third parties who don’t have a horse in this race who can clearly see OJ’s guilt. I knew he was guilty from the police chase. Innocent people are terrified when their loved ones/people close to their orbit are murdered. They seek protection and to help the police in any way they can. If my ex husband who I was accused of hitting got murdered, the last thing I would do was seek a getaway. I’d be there with our kids, comforting them and trying to help the investigators.

He’s as guilty as sin.

Of course you don’t have fear and would want to help the cops and investigators. OJ probably feared he would get shot. He knew his life was over so he was suicidal. I’m sure he thought he would’ve went to jail for life . It didn’t look good: being the ex with a contentious divorce and DV arrest with a an ex wife that was brutally murdered along with her drug dealer pal.

His 24 year old son and himself were who he hired attorneys before, not his ex wife or his daughter or anyone else. There’s a reason for that. Why would he care that he and his son are cleared?

Take a guess

Gross. You can delude yourself as much as you want about OJ (but do read what his first wife has to say about his character). Fine, but it’s disgusting of you to slander Ron Goldman. He wasn’t a drug dealer. There is no evidence of that, except your delusions. He was an innocent 25 year old wanna be actor who worked as a waiter, who was in the wrong place at the wrong time. Only by the grace of god something that horrific hasn’t happened to you. Don’t push HIM.

That place was a drug den. A woman like Nicole wouldn’t look twice at a waiter.

How religious of you to wish death . Right on brand

Troll

I’m not a troll. I used to think OJ did it too when I was younger. I think he’s innocent and was framed now

np Do you deny all the 911 calls and the fact that he beat Nicole regularly? He should have been in jail for that. But, because the cops were fans and the 911 operator actually asked "what did you do?" As if she is to blame for being beaten. Sick.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Oj defender is actually using talking points from oj’s own mouth kind of the way trump supporters only say what he says. Oj is guilty and I’m a guy and was once an Oj fan but the case was won at jury selection.
The jurors have said after case that it was payback, it didn’t matter what evidence was shown

I’m the Oj is innocent poster. I think OJ was idiotic and followed very bad advice about writing the book. If Cochran hadn’t died, I guarantee he wouldn’t have ever wrote that.

The only thing Oj was smart about is protecting his children and being a good parent and he was better at it before Nicole died. Nicole was very young, married young, and wanted to party. Bringing Ron to the house when she only knew him for a few weeks was why OJ was mad not because he was jealous of her per say but just that she had lots of shady characters in the home . Ever watch OJ talk about Kris Jenner? He has nothing nice to say about her or Faye Resnick .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Oj defender is actually using talking points from oj’s own mouth kind of the way trump supporters only say what he says. Oj is guilty and I’m a guy and was once an Oj fan but the case was won at jury selection.
The jurors have said after case that it was payback, it didn’t matter what evidence was shown

I’m the Oj is innocent poster. I think OJ was idiotic and followed very bad advice about writing the book. If Cochran hadn’t died, I guarantee he wouldn’t have ever wrote that.

The only thing Oj was smart about is protecting his children and being a good parent and he was better at it before Nicole died. Nicole was very young, married young, and wanted to party. Bringing Ron to the house when she only knew him for a few weeks was why OJ was mad not because he was jealous of her per say but just that she had lots of shady characters in the home . Ever watch OJ talk about Kris Jenner? He has nothing nice to say about her or Faye Resnick .

Anonymous wrote:Also, that shoe was a very very rare and exclusive celebrity brand or something like that. It was not a household name and it isn’t something any cop would conclude. Only someone who rummaged OJ’s closet would know what Bruno Magli was and his property was searched the same night Nicole’s was . Let’s say his daughter who was at the guest house called him and let him know Nicole’s dead and the detectives are at his house searching everything without warrant or telling him, he would absolutely be panicked enough to cut a finger from breaking a glass in the hotel room (as he claimed) and in the mental state to be suicidal and be on the run . He knows he is the suspect .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Two of Ron’s friends /coworkers from that same restaurant died in unsolved murders in 1993 and 1995 months before and after Ron and Nicole died. That entire restaraunt and its drug den accusations were never explored by corrupt LAPD.

There are phone recordings of OJ screaming at Nicole for her drug habit and allowing dangerous people in close orbit with the kids. Faye Resnick was one of Heidi Fleiss’ girls and a huge cocaine addict . Why was she living with Nicole till days prior to the murders when she owed a huge tab and was in financial ruin? Nicole married young, finally experienced freedom , but made very bad friends who used her and her connection to OJ .

If Sydney Simpson thinks her mom was killed because of drug deals and bad friends, she probably is right. She knew all these people and I’m sure like all eight year old girls do, she eavesdropped on Faye and her moms conversations

No, an 8 year old whose mom was brutally murdered and whose dad is the prime suspect is incapable of assessing the situation accurately. She’d probably burst if she accepted the truth that her dad killed her mom. Of course, she thinks he’s innocent.

It’s us third parties who don’t have a horse in this race who can clearly see OJ’s guilt. I knew he was guilty from the police chase. Innocent people are terrified when their loved ones/people close to their orbit are murdered. They seek protection and to help the police in any way they can. If my ex husband who I was accused of hitting got murdered, the last thing I would do was seek a getaway. I’d be there with our kids, comforting them and trying to help the investigators.

He’s as guilty as sin.

Of course you don’t have fear and would want to help the cops and investigators. OJ probably feared he would get shot. He knew his life was over so he was suicidal. I’m sure he thought he would’ve went to jail for life . It didn’t look good: being the ex with a contentious divorce and DV arrest with a an ex wife that was brutally murdered along with her drug dealer pal.

His 24 year old son and himself were who he hired attorneys before, not his ex wife or his daughter or anyone else. There’s a reason for that. Why would he care that he and his son are cleared?

Take a guess

Gross. You can delude yourself as much as you want about OJ (but do read what his first wife has to say about his character). Fine, but it’s disgusting of you to slander Ron Goldman. He wasn’t a drug dealer. There is no evidence of that, except your delusions. He was an innocent 25 year old wanna be actor who worked as a waiter, who was in the wrong place at the wrong time. Only by the grace of god something that horrific hasn’t happened to you. Don’t push HIM.

That place was a drug den. A woman like Nicole wouldn’t look twice at a waiter.

How religious of you to wish death . Right on brand

Troll

I’m not a troll. I used to think OJ did it too when I was younger. I think he’s innocent and was framed now

Anonymous wrote:The Oj defender is actually using talking points from oj’s own mouth kind of the way trump supporters only say what he says. Oj is guilty and I’m a guy and was once an Oj fan but the case was won at jury selection.
The jurors have said after case that it was payback, it didn’t matter what evidence was shown