Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anita Hill told us. It was a mistake to put Thomas on the Court. And I think it’s been a mistake for conservative not to impeach under Trump when they had the White House and the Senate and could put a different member of the Federalist society who holds the same conservative views. Putting the name of a Justice who is bought and paid for on 5-4 decisions in cases like Dobbs damages and delegimizes the Court in ways that it will take decades to undo, if they can. Not seriously pursing the Dobbs leaker was another huge error.

A decade ago, SCOTUS had a higher approval rating than Congress of POTUS. Now it’s something like 19%. Dobbs is bad. The failure to even pretend they follow any ethical guidelines is so much worse.

Have yuo watched the Anita Hill hearings? I don't believe her. Why did she follow Thomas to other jobs if he was so awful? Why did she volunteer to escort him after she left that job and was living in the midwest when he came to speak? Would you volunteer to escort someone who had harassed you?

Conservatives never believe women.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anita Hill told us. It was a mistake to put Thomas on the Court. And I think it’s been a mistake for conservative not to impeach under Trump when they had the White House and the Senate and could put a different member of the Federalist society who holds the same conservative views. Putting the name of a Justice who is bought and paid for on 5-4 decisions in cases like Dobbs damages and delegimizes the Court in ways that it will take decades to undo, if they can. Not seriously pursing the Dobbs leaker was another huge error.

A decade ago, SCOTUS had a higher approval rating than Congress of POTUS. Now it’s something like 19%. Dobbs is bad. The failure to even pretend they follow any ethical guidelines is so much worse.

Have yuo watched the Anita Hill hearings? I don't believe her. Why did she follow Thomas to other jobs if he was so awful? Why did she volunteer to escort him after she left that job and was living in the midwest when he came to speak? Would you volunteer to escort someone who had harassed you?

I watched them in college. And given where women were at that point in entering the workforce as professionals and not just teachers, nurses and secretaries, and how badly I was treated at my first job as a lawyer, I 100% believed her. 25 years ago, I held my nose and quietly put up with a lot as the first woman at my law firm and as a member of the first generation of women to enter the workforce on allegedly equal footing. And I didn’t have the added “bonus” of being Black. A lot has changed for women in the workplace in the last 30 years. And some things haven’t. When your job was on the line and you have powerful people who will get your fired because they think the rules don’t apply to them, sometimes you your options are bad and worse. Be grateful you’ve apparently never been in that situation.

Anonymous wrote:Anita Hill told us. It was a mistake to put Thomas on the Court. And I think it’s been a mistake for conservative not to impeach under Trump when they had the White House and the Senate and could put a different member of the Federalist society who holds the same conservative views. Putting the name of a Justice who is bought and paid for on 5-4 decisions in cases like Dobbs damages and delegimizes the Court in ways that it will take decades to undo, if they can. Not seriously pursing the Dobbs leaker was another huge error.

A decade ago, SCOTUS had a higher approval rating than Congress of POTUS. Now it’s something like 19%. Dobbs is bad. The failure to even pretend they follow any ethical guidelines is so much worse.

Have yuo watched the Anita Hill hearings? I don't believe her. Why did she follow Thomas to other jobs if he was so awful? Why did she volunteer to escort him after she left that job and was living in the midwest when he came to speak? Would you volunteer to escort someone who had harassed you?

Anita Hill told us. It was a mistake to put Thomas on the Court. And I think it’s been a mistake for conservative not to impeach under Trump when they had the White House and the Senate and could put a different member of the Federalist society who holds the same conservative views. Putting the name of a Justice who is bought and paid for on 5-4 decisions in cases like Dobbs damages and delegimizes the Court in ways that it will take decades to undo, if they can. Not seriously pursing the Dobbs leaker was another huge error.

A decade ago, SCOTUS had a higher approval rating than Congress of POTUS. Now it’s something like 19%. Dobbs is bad. The failure to even pretend they follow any ethical guidelines is so much worse.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I dont think this is new. If i remember scalia died at a posh hunting retreat where he had flown by private airplane. We found out only because he died therr

It doesn’t make it right that the conservatives on the court are allowed to flout the rules with impunity.

Gosh, no, and I’m sure the other justices all are pure as the driven snow.

Please show evidence of a comparison that is remotely similar.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I dont think this is new. If i remember scalia died at a posh hunting retreat where he had flown by private airplane. We found out only because he died therr

It doesn’t make it right that the conservatives on the court are allowed to flout the rules with impunity.

Gosh, no, and I’m sure the other justices all are pure as the driven snow.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is accepting gift from friends corruption ?
His judicial philosophy has nothing to do with gifts.

He did not declare all the gifts from his friend (or right wing groups such as heritage foundation) or nay added up to multimillion dollars. Obviously, it gives the appearance that the SC has been bought off by vested interests ..,

Not to mention the real possibility there is tax fraud and money laundering happening here that he sought to hide. I mean. This is really bad.

I would love it if he got nailed by the IRS for undeclared gift taxes. LOL.

How do you know he didn't claim them on his taxes?

You think he claimed his illegal profits. On his IRS forms.

I doubt he even fills out a tax form. Thomas is one of those Sovereign citizens. Those types are always going on about the admiralty court just like the federalist society.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is accepting gift from friends corruption ?
His judicial philosophy has nothing to do with gifts.

He did not declare all the gifts from his friend (or right wing groups such as heritage foundation) or nay added up to multimillion dollars. Obviously, it gives the appearance that the SC has been bought off by vested interests ..,

Not to mention the real possibility there is tax fraud and money laundering happening here that he sought to hide. I mean. This is really bad.

I would love it if he got nailed by the IRS for undeclared gift taxes. LOL.

Gift taxes are paid by the giver, not the recipient.

NP. Capital gains taxes then.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is accepting gift from friends corruption ?
His judicial philosophy has nothing to do with gifts.

He did not declare all the gifts from his friend (or right wing groups such as heritage foundation) or nay added up to multimillion dollars. Obviously, it gives the appearance that the SC has been bought off by vested interests ..,

Not to mention the real possibility there is tax fraud and money laundering happening here that he sought to hide. I mean. This is really bad.

I would love it if he got nailed by the IRS for undeclared gift taxes. LOL.

How do you know he didn't claim them on his taxes?

You think he claimed his illegal profits. On his IRS forms.

That's tends to be how republicans think, lol.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is accepting gift from friends corruption ?
His judicial philosophy has nothing to do with gifts.

He did not declare all the gifts from his friend (or right wing groups such as heritage foundation) or nay added up to multimillion dollars. Obviously, it gives the appearance that the SC has been bought off by vested interests ..,

Not to mention the real possibility there is tax fraud and money laundering happening here that he sought to hide. I mean. This is really bad.

I would love it if he got nailed by the IRS for undeclared gift taxes. LOL.

Gift taxes are paid by the giver, not the recipient.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is accepting gift from friends corruption ?
His judicial philosophy has nothing to do with gifts.

He did not declare all the gifts from his friend (or right wing groups such as heritage foundation) or nay added up to multimillion dollars. Obviously, it gives the appearance that the SC has been bought off by vested interests ..,

Not to mention the real possibility there is tax fraud and money laundering happening here that he sought to hide. I mean. This is really bad.

I would love it if he got nailed by the IRS for undeclared gift taxes. LOL.

How do you know he didn't claim them on his taxes?

You think he claimed his illegal profits. On his IRS forms.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is accepting gift from friends corruption ?
His judicial philosophy has nothing to do with gifts.

He did not declare all the gifts from his friend (or right wing groups such as heritage foundation) or nay added up to multimillion dollars. Obviously, it gives the appearance that the SC has been bought off by vested interests ..,

Not to mention the real possibility there is tax fraud and money laundering happening here that he sought to hide. I mean. This is really bad.

I would love it if he got nailed by the IRS for undeclared gift taxes. LOL.

How do you know he didn't claim them on his taxes?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is accepting gift from friends corruption ?
His judicial philosophy has nothing to do with gifts.

He did not declare all the gifts from his friend (or right wing groups such as heritage foundation) or nay added up to multimillion dollars. Obviously, it gives the appearance that the SC has been bought off by vested interests ..,

Not to mention the real possibility there is tax fraud and money laundering happening here that he sought to hide. I mean. This is really bad.

That news would just make the rubes double down on their support. There were a lot of Trump supporters on here who thought he was really smart for not paying his taxes. Republicans have terrible judgment.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How is accepting gift from friends corruption ?
His judicial philosophy has nothing to do with gifts.

He did not declare all the gifts from his friend (or right wing groups such as heritage foundation) or nay added up to multimillion dollars. Obviously, it gives the appearance that the SC has been bought off by vested interests ..,

Not to mention the real possibility there is tax fraud and money laundering happening here that he sought to hide. I mean. This is really bad.

I would love it if he got nailed by the IRS for undeclared gift taxes. LOL.

Anonymous wrote:How is accepting gift from friends corruption ?
His judicial philosophy has nothing to do with gifts.

I presume you are not a lawyer. No ethical lawyer would have Thomas to not disclose these "gifts." Blatantly unethical.