Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No he didn’t do his due diligence because he didn’t get the facts, and now he’s being smarmy about it.
No, it is true that no one was able to confirm this story - that's just a fact. You can call people names and sling your insults all you want, but the FACT is that until the rapist was arrested and his name made public, there were NO verifiable facts to go on. Deal with it.
Anonymous wrote:The fact that people demanded to breach this 10 year old's medical privacy and when that was denied, declared the entire story to be false is incredibly disturbing.
These are the SAME people who think it would be the most horrible, intrusive breach of privacy imaginable for the government were to know they owned an AR-15, yet they demand to be privy to the details of a victim protected by medical privacy laws around a young girl's rape. Such mind numbing hypocrisy.
And now that we know the 10 year old's story is in fact true. But not a single one of them is offering admissions of being wrong, let alone apologies.
Anonymous wrote:This is literally the Alex Jones playbook of “Sandy Hook was a hoax.”
Anonymous wrote:Not a single person apologizing. Unreal.
If there are any voters who gave the forced birthers the benefit of the doubt, I hope you don’t make that mistake again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Is he? Do you have a link to support your claim?
The dna evidence of rape would be the aborted baby. We all know this story is a lie now, but everyone seems ok for this unknown pregnant 10 year old to be raped and impregnated by an adult, the adult never face any charges or legal consequences, apparently.
No, Nancy Drew, the story unfortunately is true. The rapist has been arrested. The Ohio AG, the right-wing media jackals, the forced birth crowd -- YOU WERE ALL WRONG. You wrongly accused a respected physician of lying. And, yes, a little girl was forced to travel to another state so she didn't have to go through a pregnancy and bear her rapist's child.
YOUR CRAZY IDEAS HAVE CAUSED A LITTLE CHILD EVEN MORE PAIN. F YOU.
https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/2022/07/13/columbus-man-charged-rape-10-year-old-led-abortion-in-indiana/10046625002/
A Columbus man has been charged with impregnating a 10-year-old Ohio girl, whose travel to Indiana to seek an abortion led to international attention following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v Wade and activation of Ohio's abortion law.
Gershon Fuentes, 27, whose last known address was an apartment on Columbus' Northwest Side, was arrested Tuesday after police say he confessed to raping the child on at least two occasions. He's since been charged with rape, a felony of the first degree in Ohio.
Columbus police were made aware of the girl's pregnancy through a referral by Franklin County Children Services that was made by her mother on June 22, Det. Jeffrey Huhn testified Wednesday morning at Fuentes' arraignment. On June 30, the girl underwent a medical abortion in Indianapolis, Huhn said.
Oh God. I believed the story when it first came out. Why wouldn’t I? And when the right wingers said it was a lie, I was so hoping in this case to be owned. I was absolutely happy to think that this particular case wasn’t true. And to find out that the AG was just lying through his teeth in defense of an indefensible political position? So so upsetting. Magas - I wanted you to be right and suspended my disbelief to figure you might have known what you were talking about. But it’s all part of the grift. That poor poor child. Victimized once by the rapist, a second time by the State of Ohio, and a third time by the ugly right wing mob.
And her doctor is going to be put through the wringer.
Yep. Sounds like a pretty convincing way to discourage doctors talking about those inconvenient cases that illustrate how sh!tty the forced birther arguments are.
If nobody talks about the inconvenient horrible cases, they don't exist.
If they do talk about them, then obviously they shouldn't and must be effectively punished.
Damn. It's almost like they want to pretend those cases don't actually happen.
It’s more like they don’t care about the child’s suffering. In their view, a young minor is less likely to be drug addicted and therefore more likely to produce a healthy, adoptable infant. Therefore, they view pregnant children as a net positive for society.
Never forget: "a domestic supply of infants."
You know, when I read the phrase from the opinion, I didn’t think the forced birthers wanted ten-year-olds raped. I knew they had no morals but I did not think they were that low. How wrong I was.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No he didn’t do his due diligence because he didn’t get the facts, and now he’s being smarmy about it.
No, it is true that no one was able to confirm this story - that's just a fact. You can call people names and sling your insults all you want, but the FACT is that until the rapist was arrested and his name made public, there were NO verifiable facts to go on. Deal with it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Is he? Do you have a link to support your claim?
The dna evidence of rape would be the aborted baby. We all know this story is a lie now, but everyone seems ok for this unknown pregnant 10 year old to be raped and impregnated by an adult, the adult never face any charges or legal consequences, apparently.
No, Nancy Drew, the story unfortunately is true. The rapist has been arrested. The Ohio AG, the right-wing media jackals, the forced birth crowd -- YOU WERE ALL WRONG. You wrongly accused a respected physician of lying. And, yes, a little girl was forced to travel to another state so she didn't have to go through a pregnancy and bear her rapist's child.
YOUR CRAZY IDEAS HAVE CAUSED A LITTLE CHILD EVEN MORE PAIN. F YOU.
https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/2022/07/13/columbus-man-charged-rape-10-year-old-led-abortion-in-indiana/10046625002/
A Columbus man has been charged with impregnating a 10-year-old Ohio girl, whose travel to Indiana to seek an abortion led to international attention following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v Wade and activation of Ohio's abortion law.
Gershon Fuentes, 27, whose last known address was an apartment on Columbus' Northwest Side, was arrested Tuesday after police say he confessed to raping the child on at least two occasions. He's since been charged with rape, a felony of the first degree in Ohio.
Columbus police were made aware of the girl's pregnancy through a referral by Franklin County Children Services that was made by her mother on June 22, Det. Jeffrey Huhn testified Wednesday morning at Fuentes' arraignment. On June 30, the girl underwent a medical abortion in Indianapolis, Huhn said.
Oh God. I believed the story when it first came out. Why wouldn’t I? And when the right wingers said it was a lie, I was so hoping in this case to be owned. I was absolutely happy to think that this particular case wasn’t true. And to find out that the AG was just lying through his teeth in defense of an indefensible political position? So so upsetting. Magas - I wanted you to be right and suspended my disbelief to figure you might have known what you were talking about. But it’s all part of the grift. That poor poor child. Victimized once by the rapist, a second time by the State of Ohio, and a third time by the ugly right wing mob.
And her doctor is going to be put through the wringer.
Yep. Sounds like a pretty convincing way to discourage doctors talking about those inconvenient cases that illustrate how sh!tty the forced birther arguments are.
If nobody talks about the inconvenient horrible cases, they don't exist.
If they do talk about them, then obviously they shouldn't and must be effectively punished.
Damn. It's almost like they want to pretend those cases don't actually happen.
It’s more like they don’t care about the child’s suffering. In their view, a young minor is less likely to be drug addicted and therefore more likely to produce a healthy, adoptable infant. Therefore, they view pregnant children as a net positive for society.
Never forget: "a domestic supply of infants."