Anonymous wrote:Lol to the Jonathan Turkey puff pieces. I don’t believe right wingers about anything.

What is it, exactly, that you "don't believe"? That the lunatic arrested for attempted murder of Kavanaugh was actually plotting to kill THREE justices? Oh. Your gaslighting is so very typical.

The California man accused of plotting to assassinate Brett M. Kavanaugh spoke of killing two more conservative justices in a bid to alter Supreme Court votes for years, according to an FBI affidavit filed this week in court.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/man-accused-in-plot-to-kill-kavanaugh-eyed-other-justices-fbi-says/ar-AA105rzk

https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/news/brett-kavanaugh-home-nicholas-roske-fbi-warrant-maryland/

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/kavanaugh-suspect-said-he-wanted-to-kill-more-supreme-court-justices-officials-say/ar-AA104B8s

https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/27/politics/kavanaugh-roske-arrest-warrant/index.html

https://www.thedailybeast.com/feds-uncover-creepy-online-posts-by-nicholas-roske-man-accused-of-plotting-to-kill-justice-brett-kavanaugh

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/feds-kavanaugh-plotter-sought-to-alter-court-for-decades/ar-AA104GNB

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess when Republicans lie, cheat, and steal to form an illegitimate SCOTUS and then overthrow decades of settled law, some people might get upset.

I still maintain that the primary threat against the regressive justices will be right wingers who want to give the appearance of violent liberals as they did throughout summer 2020. This is the way the GOP operates and violence and intimidation is specifically the way the forced birther movement has worked throughout the last fifty years.

Agreed. You can’t fight violence with peace, though. Eventually you have to start treating the thugs seriously and making examples out of them. Felony convictions, brutal prison sentences, bankrupting judgments, executions where appropriate. If you don’t meet the threat appropriately, you will quickly devolve into violent fascism.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess when Republicans lie, cheat, and steal to form an illegitimate SCOTUS and then overthrow decades of settled law, some people might get upset.

You can repeat it all you want....
There is NOTHING illegitimate about the members of SCOTUS.
Returning a decision to the states that was wrongfully decided is not "overthrowing" anything.

Sorry. Suck it up.

That’s your opinion. We’ll see how you feel when the blue states start coming after the rights you hold dear, like the right to homeschool, the right to procreate, the right to go into the ground with your organs intact, or the right to force your children into church. None of those things are spelled out in the Constitution but every GOP thug I know prizes those “rights” highly.

LOL. Good luck with all that. A post that reeks of desperation.

I wouldn’t underestimate the hate and anger your fellow Americans have for you right now. After the bloodied pregnant corpses start showing up on Facebook feeds, you won’t have many allies left for your fringe causes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess when Republicans lie, cheat, and steal to form an illegitimate SCOTUS and then overthrow decades of settled law, some people might get upset.

You can repeat it all you want....
There is NOTHING illegitimate about the members of SCOTUS.
Returning a decision to the states that was wrongfully decided is not "overthrowing" anything.

Sorry. Suck it up.

That’s your opinion. We’ll see how you feel when the blue states start coming after the rights you hold dear, like the right to homeschool, the right to procreate, the right to go into the ground with your organs intact, or the right to force your children into church. None of those things are spelled out in the Constitution but every GOP thug I know prizes those “rights” highly.

LOL. Good luck with all that. A post that reeks of desperation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess when Republicans lie, cheat, and steal to form an illegitimate SCOTUS and then overthrow decades of settled law, some people might get upset.

You can repeat it all you want....
There is NOTHING illegitimate about the members of SCOTUS.
Returning a decision to the states that was wrongfully decided is not "overthrowing" anything.

Sorry. Suck it up.

That’s your opinion. We’ll see how you feel when the blue states start coming after the rights you hold dear, like the right to homeschool, the right to procreate, the right to go into the ground with your organs intact, or the right to force your children into church. None of those things are spelled out in the Constitution but every GOP thug I know prizes those “rights” highly.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess when Republicans lie, cheat, and steal to form an illegitimate SCOTUS and then overthrow decades of settled law, some people might get upset.

You can repeat it all you want....
There is NOTHING illegitimate about the members of SCOTUS.
Returning a decision to the states that was wrongfully decided is not "overthrowing" anything.

Sorry. Suck it up.

“I’m looking forward to women dying. They should! Having babies is all they’re good for, and if this country was on the path of God as it should be as the founders intended before the commie libs got to ‘em, we could go ahead and shoot women who think they’re too good to have babies!”

Anonymous wrote:I guess when Republicans lie, cheat, and steal to form an illegitimate SCOTUS and then overthrow decades of settled law, some people might get upset.

I still maintain that the primary threat against the regressive justices will be right wingers who want to give the appearance of violent liberals as they did throughout summer 2020. This is the way the GOP operates and violence and intimidation is specifically the way the forced birther movement has worked throughout the last fifty years.

Anonymous wrote:I guess when Republicans lie, cheat, and steal to form an illegitimate SCOTUS and then overthrow decades of settled law, some people might get upset.

You can repeat it all you want....
There is NOTHING illegitimate about the members of SCOTUS.
Returning a decision to the states that was wrongfully decided is not "overthrowing" anything.

Sorry. Suck it up.

I guess when Republicans lie, cheat, and steal to form an illegitimate SCOTUS and then overthrow decades of settled law, some people might get upset.

Lol to the Jonathan Turkey puff pieces. I don’t believe right wingers about anything.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now that it’s clear that the leaker was working at the behest of a regressive justice, Republicans are just going to drop the whole matter?

This is not clear at all. Because CNN says something, we are supposed to believe it? Ha ha ha ha ha ha.
I hope they find the leaker, that leaker is publicly identified and hopefully loses his/her opportunity to practice law.
I am certain it was a liberal justices' staffer.

There’s a non-zero chance it was Ginni Thomas.

A newly unveiled FBI search warrant shows that the man accused of attempting to assassinate Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh meticulously planned the alleged plot and even reached out for advice on an internet forum.

According to the FBI search warrant obtained by Fox News Digital, 26-year-old Nicholas John Roske Googled various search terms related to the attack, including "how to be stealthy," "assassin skills" and "most effective place to stab someone" in the weeks leading up to the planned attack.

"im gonna stop roe v wade from being overturned," Roske told another internet user in an online conversation, according to the documents.

The other user responded with, "what u tryna do."

Roske said back, "remove some people from the Supreme Court."

The person Roske was speaking with said that "two dead judges ain't gonna do nothing. The whole government is f***** There's no fixing that You would die before you killed them all."

Roske responded, "yeah but I could get at least one, which would change the votes for decades to come, and I am shooting for 3 all of the major decisions for the past 10 years have been along party lines so if there are more liberal than conservative judges, they will have the power."

The newly released document also says that Roske was planning on targeting at least two other members of the Court but did not identify them.

Anonymous wrote:So now that it’s clear that the leaker was working at the behest of a regressive justice, Republicans are just going to drop the whole matter?

This is not clear at all. Because CNN says something, we are supposed to believe it? Ha ha ha ha ha ha.
I hope they find the leaker, that leaker is publicly identified and hopefully loses his/her opportunity to practice law.
I am certain it was a liberal justices' staffer.

So now that it’s clear that the leaker was working at the behest of a regressive justice, Republicans are just going to drop the whole matter?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is some kind of feeble attempt of rehabbing his image. It makes absolutely no sense. He went ahead and decided against Rowe, as he intended all along. It was said at the beginning of the thread that the decision was leaked by a Republican to force them to all fall in line with the corrupt decision. Acting like he was helpless. History is going to be brutal on this "Chief Justice."

He actually did not vote against Roe. That decision was 5-4. He voted to reduce the fetal age limit to 15 weeks.