Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s i treating that Gaza thread is almost 1000 pages, while the biggest political scandal? since the Watergate has less than 300.

What scandal? Some people walked into a building. That’s it.

The real scandal is democrats hiding the full video for more that 2 years, and deceptively editing portions they then released to the press. The video reveals J6 was (to use the democrats own words), “mostly peaceful.”

Sorry, liar. We all watched that day. We've seen the video. We saw the Cap Hill police being dragged out and beaten. We saw them in secured areas they had no right to be.

FACTS.

Anonymous wrote:
One source:

https://nypost.com/2022/11/22/jan-6-defendant-christopher-worrell-reportedly-denied-cancer-treatment-in-prison/

A decade for Worrell. I hope he has time to think about his supplication to Trump and doing better in a decade.

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, and Antifa and BLM are the "violent" ones.

Geeze. This was coming. We all knew it.

This aged well...

Could this guy be any more MAGA?

Anonymous wrote:Here’s the first report, re Scott Perry of PA.

A federal judge granted the Justice Dept. access to nearly 1,700 records recovered from the cellphone of Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) in a long-running legal battle in the criminal investigation of Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. wapo.st/3Ry21mM

Supreme Court to hear whether obstruction of an official proceeding – 18 USC 1512c – can be used to prosecute January 6 riot defendants who impeded Congress — one of the charges against Trump in the federal 2020 election case.

U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, a Trump appointee, granted defendant Joseph Fischer's pretrial motion to dismiss his obstruction charges, ruling that the statute applied only in cases in which a defendant had taken "some action with respect to a document, record or other object."

Federal prosecutors appealed that ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. A divided three-judge panel on the D.C. Circuit in April reversed Nichols' ruling, saying the statute was not limited to documents and records, but instead "applies to all forms of corrupt obstruction of an official proceeding."
https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-weigh-challenge-jan-6-obstruction-charge-2023-12-13/

Anonymous wrote:It’s i treating that Gaza thread is almost 1000 pages, while the biggest political scandal? since the Watergate has less than 300.

The war in Gaza has two opposing viewpoints that both have at least some validity. January 6 does not - if you don't understand it was a criminal insurrection there's something wrong with your brain.

It’s i treating that Gaza thread is almost 1000 pages, while the biggest political scandal? since the Watergate has less than 300.

Anonymous wrote:brainwashed lunatic

Yeah, how well did that argument work for Alex Jones?

brainwashed lunatic

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His Deputy Chief of Communications has "clarified" what he meant (e.g. is trying to cover up the Speaker's gaffe):
[url]
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4343141-gop-bluring-faces-in-jan-6-security-tapes-says-speaker-johnson/[/url][url]

After Johnson’s remarks, his deputy chief for communications clarified that the blurring would be done to prevent all forms of retaliation, and that Justice already had access to raw footage.

“Faces are to be blurred from public viewing room footage to prevent all forms of retaliation against private citizens from any non-governmental actors. The Department of Justice already has access to raw footage from January 6, 2021,” Deputy Chief for Communications Raj Shah wrote in a tweet.

Must protect the traitors at all cost.

That’s what he wants alright.

Anonymous wrote:His Deputy Chief of Communications has "clarified" what he meant (e.g. is trying to cover up the Speaker's gaffe):
[url]
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4343141-gop-bluring-faces-in-jan-6-security-tapes-says-speaker-johnson/[/url][url]

After Johnson’s remarks, his deputy chief for communications clarified that the blurring would be done to prevent all forms of retaliation, and that Justice already had access to raw footage.

“Faces are to be blurred from public viewing room footage to prevent all forms of retaliation against private citizens from any non-governmental actors. The Department of Justice already has access to raw footage from January 6, 2021,” Deputy Chief for Communications Raj Shah wrote in a tweet.

Must protect the traitors at all cost.

His Deputy Chief of Communications has "clarified" what he meant (e.g. is trying to cover up the Speaker's gaffe):
[url]
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4343141-gop-bluring-faces-in-jan-6-security-tapes-says-speaker-johnson/[/url][url]

After Johnson’s remarks, his deputy chief for communications clarified that the blurring would be done to prevent all forms of retaliation, and that Justice already had access to raw footage.

“Faces are to be blurred from public viewing room footage to prevent all forms of retaliation against private citizens from any non-governmental actors. The Department of Justice already has access to raw footage from January 6, 2021,” Deputy Chief for Communications Raj Shah wrote in a tweet.

If the publicly released videos are blurred, then public trackers cannot help identify people.

I thought it was Antifa and BLM....why wouldn't the GOP want that help?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nice to see Speaker Johnson commit obstruction of justice

This is so dumb on so many levels. Does he seriously not realize DOJ had had these tapes for years? And why does he want to protect criminals from law enforcement?

He knows. This is just red meat for the base. Johnson “making liberals cry”😭