Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So that's Trusty's excuse for why none of the vendors wanted to scan the documents for Trump? It's not that they were worried about payment; it's that they didn't have the ability to scan 200,000 pages that quickly?
"In short, seasoned IT professionals who routinely work
on large-scale document productions with the Government cannot meet the Government’s
proposed schedule, and it was never realistic for the Government to suggest such a narrow
timeframe. Consequently, the Plaintiff respectfully suggests that Your Honor and the
parties will be best served by having the retained vendor convey a supportable timeframe
for scanning roughly 200,000 pages into a platform, and also provide a breakdown of rollout quantities and proposed deadlines. It would be better to base deadlines on actual data
and not wistful claims by the Government."
He makes it sound like the government will need much much longer to have the task accomplished, but the DOJ is just asking for another day or two to hire a vendor.
I dunno....It seems like if you hire enough people you could get
any scanning, indexing job done in two weeks.
Something doesn’t make sense. 200,000 pages is something between 80 and 100 bankers boxes. DOJ didn’t sieze anything close to that according to the inventory. Are there electronic documents on a drive?
That's a good point. After the raid Trump's attorneys said the FBI took about 12 boxes of material.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So that's Trusty's excuse for why none of the vendors wanted to scan the documents for Trump? It's not that they were worried about payment; it's that they didn't have the ability to scan 200,000 pages that quickly?
"In short, seasoned IT professionals who routinely work
on large-scale document productions with the Government cannot meet the Government’s
proposed schedule, and it was never realistic for the Government to suggest such a narrow
timeframe. Consequently, the Plaintiff respectfully suggests that Your Honor and the
parties will be best served by having the retained vendor convey a supportable timeframe
for scanning roughly 200,000 pages into a platform, and also provide a breakdown of rollout quantities and proposed deadlines. It would be better to base deadlines on actual data
and not wistful claims by the Government."
He makes it sound like the government will need much much longer to have the task accomplished, but the DOJ is just asking for another day or two to hire a vendor.
I dunno....It seems like if you hire enough people you could get
any scanning, indexing job done in two weeks.
Something doesn’t make sense. 200,000 pages is something between 80 and 100 bankers boxes. DOJ didn’t sieze anything close to that according to the inventory. Are there electronic documents on a drive?
That's a good point. After the raid Trump's attorneys said the FBI took about 12 boxes of material.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So that's Trusty's excuse for why none of the vendors wanted to scan the documents for Trump? It's not that they were worried about payment; it's that they didn't have the ability to scan 200,000 pages that quickly?
"In short, seasoned IT professionals who routinely work
on large-scale document productions with the Government cannot meet the Government’s
proposed schedule, and it was never realistic for the Government to suggest such a narrow
timeframe. Consequently, the Plaintiff respectfully suggests that Your Honor and the
parties will be best served by having the retained vendor convey a supportable timeframe
for scanning roughly 200,000 pages into a platform, and also provide a breakdown of rollout quantities and proposed deadlines. It would be better to base deadlines on actual data
and not wistful claims by the Government."
He makes it sound like the government will need much much longer to have the task accomplished, but the DOJ is just asking for another day or two to hire a vendor.
I dunno....It seems like if you hire enough people you could get
any scanning, indexing job done in two weeks.
Something doesn’t make sense. 200,000 pages is something between 80 and 100 bankers boxes. DOJ didn’t sieze anything close to that according to the inventory. Are there electronic documents on a drive?
Anonymous wrote:So that's Trusty's excuse for why none of the vendors wanted to scan the documents for Trump? It's not that they were worried about payment; it's that they didn't have the ability to scan 200,000 pages that quickly?
"In short, seasoned IT professionals who routinely work
on large-scale document productions with the Government cannot meet the Government’s
proposed schedule, and it was never realistic for the Government to suggest such a narrow
timeframe. Consequently, the Plaintiff respectfully suggests that Your Honor and the
parties will be best served by having the retained vendor convey a supportable timeframe
for scanning roughly 200,000 pages into a platform, and also provide a breakdown of rollout quantities and proposed deadlines. It would be better to base deadlines on actual data
and not wistful claims by the Government."
He makes it sound like the government will need much much longer to have the task accomplished, but the DOJ is just asking for another day or two to hire a vendor.
I dunno....It seems like if you hire enough people you could get
any scanning, indexing job done in two weeks.
Anonymous wrote:So that's Trusty's excuse for why none of the vendors wanted to scan the documents for Trump? It's not that they were worried about payment; it's that they didn't have the ability to scan 200,000 pages that quickly?
"In short, seasoned IT professionals who routinely work
on large-scale document productions with the Government cannot meet the Government’s
proposed schedule, and it was never realistic for the Government to suggest such a narrow
timeframe. Consequently, the Plaintiff respectfully suggests that Your Honor and the
parties will be best served by having the retained vendor convey a supportable timeframe
for scanning roughly 200,000 pages into a platform, and also provide a breakdown of rollout quantities and proposed deadlines. It would be better to base deadlines on actual data
and not wistful claims by the Government."
He makes it sound like the government will need much much longer to have the task accomplished, but the DOJ is just asking for another day or two to hire a vendor.
I dunno....It seems like if you hire enough people you could get any scanning, indexing job done in two weeks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any updates?
This seems like a big deal.
Anonymous wrote:Any updates?