Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The existing limits on pay deductions for housing and food strike many families as unreasonable. The maximum deduction for housing is $35/week and the maximum deduction for food is $6.00/day. For more detail see the minimum wage regulations.
I agree that in the context of the homes where au pairs are most likely to be retained, these numbers look low. Yet, I do not think that adjusting these numbers is a promising idea. First, from a practical legislative standpoint, raising these numbers basically means cutting the minimum wage; we cannot carve out au pairs for different allowances. Cutting the minimum wage is not what we are trying to do right now. Second, the truth is that from a marginal cost standpoint, the numbers are not so far off. It does not actually cost a family anything to let an au pair use empty space in the house. Similarly, one more plate at a family table does not necessarily generate the same cost as it would to prepare a single meal from scratch.
Addendum: This note has generated push back. I fully appreciate that the marginal costs of having an au pair in a house are not zero. I fully appreciate that families are likely to spend much more than the housing and meals allowances. I’m just responding to some who seemed to suggest that the allowances should be compared to market rents.
I don’t disagree that the marginal cost is not the same as market rent - but that’s why you don’t compare the market wage to the au pair stipend. Please explain how it makes sense to compare market wage rate to au pair wage rate if you refuse to use market living costs (rent, food, etc) and instead use marginal living costs?
It is not the market rate; it’s the minimum wage, with live in costs deducted at allowed levels; in no way is it market competitive for a live in nanny (unless you’re exploiting Prior to March 2020, the average rates we saw were $20-25/hr for nannies and $25-30 for Family Assistants. Since COVID, we’ve seen the market shift to $25-30/hr across the board due to the highly competitive nature of the market. Live in nanny’s earn more with the same DoL deduction rules plus healthcare insurance travel education and many other competitive rules. I applaud the PP as well for summarizing the solution space: good intentions by most, welcoming the reform nonetheless because it is needed. The rates above for DMV
A live in nanny is treated entirely differently than an au pair. An au pair is expected to be treated like a member of the family. If the family goes out to dinner on a Saturday night, the au pair is invited. If the family goes to Kings Dominion for the day, the au pair is invited and the family pays. If the family goes to the beach for a week, the au pair is invited. If she works for even a minute of her time at the beach, she gets her own bedroom/hotel room with a door (at the family's cost). The au pair is invited to all family gatherings and included in all family activities, from trips to the movies, to apple picking excursions, to ice skating, to Zoo lights, to skiing, etc.