Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The White House has known about the whistleblower for a LONG TIME.

“The officer first shared information about potential abuse of power and a White House cover-up with the C.I.A.’s top lawyer through an anonymous process. She shared the officer’s concerns with White House and Justice Department officials, following policy.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/us/politics/who-is-whistleblower.html#click=https://t.co/r7jd0saQlq

Wow, the NYT really put a Target on the WB back. “She” narrows the field.
And of course the WB is a woman. All the men are too scared.
Just like we need a woman president. Men have shown us they just don’t have the courage or temperament.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The White House has known about the whistleblower for a LONG TIME.

“The officer first shared information about potential abuse of power and a White House cover-up with the C.I.A.’s top lawyer through an anonymous process. She shared the officer’s concerns with White House and Justice Department officials, following policy.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/us/politics/who-is-whistleblower.html#click=https://t.co/r7jd0saQlq

Wow, the NYT really put a Target on the WB back. “She” narrows the field.
And of course the WB is a woman. All the men are too scared.
Just like we need a woman president. Men have shown us they just don’t have the courage or temperament.

Fascinating. It's been reported that the whistleblower is a man...

Whoever it is, it won’t take that long to figure out. Likely someone who was in detail to the WH from the agency. There can’t be that many at any one given time.

Yes, we knew that last week. The identity won't remain secret forever.

You knew what last week? I know many in the intelligence community suspected this right off the bat, but until the NYT revealed it was a CIA analyst non-insiders didn’t have confirmation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The thing I don't like about the whistleblower complaint is that it's all hearsay.

But it sounds like the people that the whistleblower heard from were interviewed so hopefully there is a LOT of corroboration.

I would think that the actual transcript can and will be retrieved from the secret server.

The thing is, Giuliani and Trump have already admitted to the contours of the issue, even of the whistleblower complaint is ALL heresay and has details wrong.

Facts: Trump used Congressionally authorized funds as leverage to conduct personal campaign gains. That is illegal on two fronts. Giulianii has been serving as an unpaid government envoy to conduct said policy. That is 2 or 3 counts of illegality. Giuliani is implicating the Pompeo State Department. Mulvaney illegally withheld the funds; Pence met with the Ukrainian president to reaffirm the con and Barr has been systemic in the cover-up.

All of this is either admitted to or prima facia.

That is not a fact at all. That is what the left is pushing. There is no evidence of that whatsoever. And, even the Ukrainian president denied it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The White House has known about the whistleblower for a LONG TIME.

“The officer first shared information about potential abuse of power and a White House cover-up with the C.I.A.’s top lawyer through an anonymous process. She shared the officer’s concerns with White House and Justice Department officials, following policy.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/us/politics/who-is-whistleblower.html#click=https://t.co/r7jd0saQlq

Wow, the NYT really put a Target on the WB back. “She” narrows the field.
And of course the WB is a woman. All the men are too scared.
Just like we need a woman president. Men have shown us they just don’t have the courage or temperament.

Lots of people already know who it is. Sue Gordon.

I don’t think so.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The White House has known about the whistleblower for a LONG TIME.

“The officer first shared information about potential abuse of power and a White House cover-up with the C.I.A.’s top lawyer through an anonymous process. She shared the officer’s concerns with White House and Justice Department officials, following policy.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/us/politics/who-is-whistleblower.html#click=https://t.co/r7jd0saQlq

Wow, the NYT really put a Target on the WB back. “She” narrows the field.
And of course the WB is a woman. All the men are too scared.
Just like we need a woman president. Men have shown us they just don’t have the courage or temperament.

Lots of people already know who it is. Sue Gordon.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The White House has known about the whistleblower for a LONG TIME.

“The officer first shared information about potential abuse of power and a White House cover-up with the C.I.A.’s top lawyer through an anonymous process. She shared the officer’s concerns with White House and Justice Department officials, following policy.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/us/politics/who-is-whistleblower.html#click=https://t.co/r7jd0saQlq

Wow, the NYT really put a Target on the WB back. “She” narrows the field.
And of course the WB is a woman. All the men are too scared.
Just like we need a woman president. Men have shown us they just don’t have the courage or temperament.

Fascinating. It's been reported that the whistleblower is a man...

Whoever it is, it won’t take that long to figure out. Likely someone who was in detail to the WH from the agency. There can’t be that many at any one given time.

Yes, we knew that last week. The identity won't remain secret forever.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If Nancy Pelosi or Adam Schiff had taken the time to look at the criteria for complaints, they would understand why this was not passed on.
This complaint should not have ever made it to Congress based on these criteria.

To me, that is evidence the criteria need to be a loosened a bit. One cannot have a corrupt President protected by his immediate witnesses who because of a stupid these rules escapes from all consequences of his corruption.

Nah, PP has it wrong. The report is a credible urgent concern. We can all read it and see why.

A third hand account containing information that is incorrect that doesn't meet the criteria outlined in the guidelines. Nope. Not credible. Not urgent.

Either you didn't read the report or you're just lying. It's very clear. It's based on work documents, not watercooler gossip.

Blah blah blah blah. You’ve sealed your fate Dems, 4 more years of Trump are coming. Go ahead, keep pressing!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The White House has known about the whistleblower for a LONG TIME.

“The officer first shared information about potential abuse of power and a White House cover-up with the C.I.A.’s top lawyer through an anonymous process. She shared the officer’s concerns with White House and Justice Department officials, following policy.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/us/politics/who-is-whistleblower.html#click=https://t.co/r7jd0saQlq

Wow, the NYT really put a Target on the WB back. “She” narrows the field.
And of course the WB is a woman. All the men are too scared.
Just like we need a woman president. Men have shown us they just don’t have the courage or temperament.

Fascinating. It's been reported that the whistleblower is a man...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The White House has known about the whistleblower for a LONG TIME.

“The officer first shared information about potential abuse of power and a White House cover-up with the C.I.A.’s top lawyer through an anonymous process. She shared the officer’s concerns with White House and Justice Department officials, following policy.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/us/politics/who-is-whistleblower.html#click=https://t.co/r7jd0saQlq

Wow, the NYT really put a Target on the WB back. “She” narrows the field.
And of course the WB is a woman. All the men are too scared.
Just like we need a woman president. Men have shown us they just don’t have the courage or temperament.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If Nancy Pelosi or Adam Schiff had taken the time to look at the criteria for complaints, they would understand why this was not passed on.
This complaint should not have ever made it to Congress based on these criteria.

To me, that is evidence the criteria need to be a loosened a bit. One cannot have a corrupt President protected by his immediate witnesses who because of a stupid these rules escapes from all consequences of his corruption.

Nah, PP has it wrong. The report is a credible urgent concern. We can all read it and see why.

A third hand account containing information that is incorrect that doesn't meet the criteria outlined in the guidelines. Nope. Not credible. Not urgent.

Either you didn't read the report or you're just lying. It's very clear. It's based on work documents, not watercooler gossip.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The White House has known about the whistleblower for a LONG TIME.

“The officer first shared information about potential abuse of power and a White House cover-up with the C.I.A.’s top lawyer through an anonymous process. She shared the officer’s concerns with White House and Justice Department officials, following policy.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/us/politics/who-is-whistleblower.html#click=https://t.co/r7jd0saQlq

Wow, the NYT really put a Target on the WB back. “She” narrows the field.
And of course the WB is a woman. All the men are too scared.
Just like we need a woman president. Men have shown us they just don’t have the courage or temperament.

Fascinating. It's been reported that the whistleblower is a man...

Whoever it is, it won’t take that long to figure out. Likely someone who was in detail to the WH from the agency. There can’t be that many at any one given time.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The White House has known about the whistleblower for a LONG TIME.

“The officer first shared information about potential abuse of power and a White House cover-up with the C.I.A.’s top lawyer through an anonymous process. She shared the officer’s concerns with White House and Justice Department officials, following policy.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/us/politics/who-is-whistleblower.html#click=https://t.co/r7jd0saQlq

Wow, the NYT really put a Target on the WB back. “She” narrows the field.
And of course the WB is a woman. All the men are too scared.
Just like we need a woman president. Men have shown us they just don’t have the courage or temperament.

Fascinating. It's been reported that the whistleblower is a man...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The White House has known about the whistleblower for a LONG TIME.

“The officer first shared information about potential abuse of power and a White House cover-up with the C.I.A.’s top lawyer through an anonymous process. She shared the officer’s concerns with White House and Justice Department officials, following policy.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/us/politics/who-is-whistleblower.html#click=https://t.co/r7jd0saQlq

Wow, the NYT really put a Target on the WB back. “She” narrows the field.
And of course the WB is a woman. All the men are too scared.
Just like we need a woman president. Men have shown us they just don’t have the courage or temperament.

Anonymous wrote:The White House has known about the whistleblower for a LONG TIME.

“The officer first shared information about potential abuse of power and a White House cover-up with the C.I.A.’s top lawyer through an anonymous process. She shared the officer’s concerns with White House and Justice Department officials, following policy.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/us/politics/who-is-whistleblower.html#click=https://t.co/r7jd0saQlq