Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More on the letter....and role of parents vs students
https://www.today.com/parents/college-counselor-warns-parents-stop-sabotaging-other-kids-t151612
This letter makes me think of the classic salesman who overpromises and the poor operations person who has to tell the customer the salesman overpromised.
All these schools market on ivy league dreams, and then guidance is the one that gets arrows for delivery the truth.
Caveat emptor.
Not a Sidwell parent, but Sidwell and other schools absolutely DO NOT market on ivy league dreams. It is supposed to be about the secondary school experience and skills developed for the future. If families are viewing these schools as a way into certain colleges, that is their assumption and their problem if it doesn't pan out. Sidwell doesn't even publish college placement results and other schools give broad brush strokes. They do this for a reason - some accuse them of lack of transparency but it has more to do with not setting up false expectations or "marketing on ivy league dreams."
Hmm. While waiting in the admissions office during DC's interview, the only thing on the coffee table was a Sidwell magazine with an article on .... Sidwell's college placement announcements.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More on the letter....and role of parents vs students
https://www.today.com/parents/college-counselor-warns-parents-stop-sabotaging-other-kids-t151612
This letter makes me think of the classic salesman who overpromises and the poor operations person who has to tell the customer the salesman overpromised.
All these schools market on ivy league dreams, and then guidance is the one that gets arrows for delivery the truth.
Caveat emptor.
Not a Sidwell parent, but Sidwell and other schools absolutely DO NOT market on ivy league dreams. It is supposed to be about the secondary school experience and skills developed for the future. If families are viewing these schools as a way into certain colleges, that is their assumption and their problem if it doesn't pan out. Sidwell doesn't even publish college placement results and other schools give broad brush strokes. They do this for a reason - some accuse them of lack of transparency but it has more to do with not setting up false expectations or "marketing on ivy league dreams."
Hmm. While waiting in the admissions office during DC's interview, the only thing on the coffee table was a Sidwell magazine with an article on .... Sidwell's college placement announcements.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More on the letter....and role of parents vs students
https://www.today.com/parents/college-counselor-warns-parents-stop-sabotaging-other-kids-t151612
This letter makes me think of the classic salesman who overpromises and the poor operations person who has to tell the customer the salesman overpromised.
All these schools market on ivy league dreams, and then guidance is the one that gets arrows for delivery the truth.
Caveat emptor.
Not a Sidwell parent, but Sidwell and other schools absolutely DO NOT market on ivy league dreams. It is supposed to be about the secondary school experience and skills developed for the future. If families are viewing these schools as a way into certain colleges, that is their assumption and their problem if it doesn't pan out. Sidwell doesn't even publish college placement results and other schools give broad brush strokes. They do this for a reason - some accuse them of lack of transparency but it has more to do with not setting up false expectations or "marketing on ivy league dreams."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More on the letter....and role of parents vs students
https://www.today.com/parents/college-counselor-warns-parents-stop-sabotaging-other-kids-t151612
This letter makes me think of the classic salesman who overpromises and the poor operations person who has to tell the customer the salesman overpromised.
All these schools market on ivy league dreams, and then guidance is the one that gets arrows for delivery the truth.
Caveat emptor.
Not a Sidwell parent, but Sidwell and other schools absolutely DO NOT market on ivy league dreams. It is supposed to be about the secondary school experience and skills developed for the future. If families are viewing these schools as a way into certain colleges, that is their assumption and their problem if it doesn't pan out. Sidwell doesn't even publish college placement results and other schools give broad brush strokes. They do this for a reason - some accuse them of lack of transparency but it has more to do with not setting up false expectations or "marketing on ivy league dreams."
Anonymous wrote:
Not all schools answer that demand with state-of-the-art gyms and green middle schools that get covered in architectural magazines. Yes, there are other schools in the area with great facilities. But these schools aren’t claiming Quaker values.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A school charging the tuition SFS charges is not one that espouses Quaker values. It’s really more of a gimmick now.
It's not a gimmick at the lower and middle schools.
Parents what resources for their kids. It costs money. That is why the schools charge money. The parochial schools are subsidized by the Church. Independent schools don't have that luxury.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:More on the letter....and role of parents vs students
https://www.today.com/parents/college-counselor-warns-parents-stop-sabotaging-other-kids-t151612
This letter makes me think of the classic salesman who overpromises and the poor operations person who has to tell the customer the salesman overpromised.
All these schools market on ivy league dreams, and then guidance is the one that gets arrows for delivery the truth.
Caveat emptor.
Anonymous wrote:More on the letter....and role of parents vs students
https://www.today.com/parents/college-counselor-warns-parents-stop-sabotaging-other-kids-t151612
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A school charging the tuition SFS charges is not one that espouses Quaker values. It’s really more of a gimmick now.
It's not a gimmick at the lower and middle schools.
Anonymous wrote:A school charging the tuition SFS charges is not one that espouses Quaker values. It’s really more of a gimmick now.
Anonymous wrote:This is all ridiculous. This has been brewing for years. I have had a child at this school for years and this graduating class is famous for being a large outlier.
Please don't forget - this is Sasha Obama's class and a grandchild of Joe Biden. Do you think for a moment that the parents applying their children into this class didn't know that? They had delusions of grandeur of hobnobbing with the Obamas/Bidens. These parents had little care for a Quaker education/values. Rather, it is full of climbers and movers and shakers. There are lots of hyper aggressive Finance and Journalist types who stop at nothing to get what they want.
Sorry to tell you, with little exception, Sidwell parents are normal and boring. They love Quaker values and wouldnt think of doing this.
The allure of being close to a popular (now ex) President, attracted a certain type. Once this class and its parents graduate, youll see a lot of normal boring move along scenes.