Anonymous wrote:
I'm LOL, and I never do that.![]()
![]()
"Photoshop was involved to make nonathletic kids appear athletic
Some cases involved Photoshopping pictures of kids playing sports that they did not play. For example, one parent “e-mailed CW-1 a photograph of his son purporting to play water polo, with his right arm and upper torso exposed above the water line. In the e-mail, Sloane asked, ‘Does this work??’ CW-1 responded: ‘Yes but a little high out of the water-no one gets that high.’”"
Anonymous wrote:Wondering if this is the tip of the iceberg
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone explain this to me:
Once these students were admitted, how were they supposed to keep up with their coursework? Were the parents planning to bribe the professors or administrators? Did Singer continue to facilitate bribes after enrollment? What would the endgame be?
This is what I'm wondering. It's one thing to bribe your kid's way in to college, but how did they actually expect them to graduate?
It doesn't matter if they graduate, but even attending for a year or so is a decent credential while they try to figure out what to do with their lives.
It's also harder to get into some of these schools than graduate. They can also easily afford a 5-year plan, so there is time to re-take classes etc.
I went to Stanford. Believe me, there were complete idiots who managed to graduate just by picking an easy major.
And by paying people like me to do their work for them. I attended two whole classes in my time at my university as another student. They were both from wealthy families and terrible at math. My university didn't make you show ID for any tests (and still doesn't, from what I hear), you just had to write your student number on your test. The key was to stick to the larger lecture courses with 100+ students where you could just blend in. I know someone who pretended to be another student in the lab portion of a biology course with only 35 other students. Just thinking about doing that would make me anxious.
Trust me, cheating is still rampant in college.
Anonymous wrote:I'm sure the kids will get to stay.
They didn't do anything illegal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone explain this to me:
Once these students were admitted, how were they supposed to keep up with their coursework? Were the parents planning to bribe the professors or administrators? Did Singer continue to facilitate bribes after enrollment? What would the endgame be?
This is what I'm wondering. It's one thing to bribe your kid's way in to college, but how did they actually expect them to graduate?
It doesn't matter if they graduate, but even attending for a year or so is a decent credential while they try to figure out what to do with their lives.
It's also harder to get into some of these schools than graduate. They can also easily afford a 5-year plan, so there is time to re-take classes etc.
I went to Stanford. Believe me, there were complete idiots who managed to graduate just by picking an easy major.
Anonymous wrote:I'm sure the kids will get to stay.
They didn't do anything illegal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What will happen to the kids of the cheaters?
They'll be mercifully adopted by Teri Hatcher.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you think these parents knew the indictment was coming down today?
Probably. I worked with someone who was indicted for embezzlement. She knew the morning the indictment was going to be unsealed, skipped work, and let a few select coworkers know. Her lawyer made arrangements for her to turn herself in so there was no need for an arrest or handcuffs.
Anonymous wrote:It seems the Asians are the only ones who are actually relying on merit to get into elite colleges.![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:What will happen to the kids of the cheaters?
Anonymous wrote:So does anyone think any of these parents will actually serve jail time? I doubt it. The mastermind will, and I assume some of the coaches will as well.