How many 20 somethings earn $174,000 per year? Of those that do, how many live in run-down walk-up flats?
In other words, she's using politics for personal financial gain.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow. The Trumpsters on here reallllly have AOC on their minds.
What a joke you all are.
Maybe you should start worrying about your band of buffoons - specifically "Gym" Jordan and Mark Meadows. Talk about clowns.
As the saying goes "you don't pull the pigtails of a girl you dislike." You all are afraid of her and wish you had someone like her on your side.
Well, Cummings came to Meadows' defense, no?
And not every D or I loves AOC. Making generalizations places you in the ignorant category.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AOC constantly cites the simultaneous existence of extreme luxury and poverty as a moral failing and as justification for her proposed redistributive policies.
Once you realize, however, that, within a moral context, there is no meaningful distinction between “extreme luxury” and “excess” in relation to eliminating poverty it’s clear she is undermining her own position.
No different than Bernie or Al Gore insiting on private jet travel while asserting climate change is an extinction level challenge.
+1.
You idiots couldn’t find the navy yard on google maps, eh?
What’s funny is that can’t see where this is heading even though AOC is telegraphing it. To cite AOC, if private owniership of a helipad in New York while poverty exists in Alabama is immoral, why aren’t $1000 Hamilton tickets and upscale restaurants immoral? Why is it moral to spend $15 on a movie ticket when that $15 could be allocated to alleviate poverty? Travel to Europe while poverty exists?
When her staff tells you they want to end air travel and consumption of meat you should believe them.
The Harris Teeter is not immoral is it? Please tell me the Harris Teeter is not immoral.
The Harris Teeter in Arlington was picketed for not putting the [b]morning after bill [/]on open shelves but making people ask a pharmacist for the pill. That is immoral.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AOC constantly cites the simultaneous existence of extreme luxury and poverty as a moral failing and as justification for her proposed redistributive policies.
Once you realize, however, that, within a moral context, there is no meaningful distinction between “extreme luxury” and “excess” in relation to eliminating poverty it’s clear she is undermining her own position.
No different than Bernie or Al Gore insiting on private jet travel while asserting climate change is an extinction level challenge.
+1.
You idiots couldn’t find the navy yard on google maps, eh?
What’s funny is that can’t see where this is heading even though AOC is telegraphing it. To cite AOC, if private owniership of a helipad in New York while poverty exists in Alabama is immoral, why aren’t $1000 Hamilton tickets and upscale restaurants immoral? Why is it moral to spend $15 on a movie ticket when that $15 could be allocated to alleviate poverty? Travel to Europe while poverty exists?
When her staff tells you they want to end air travel and consumption of meat you should believe them.
The Harris Teeter is not immoral is it? Please tell me the Harris Teeter is not immoral.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And her hypocrisy just keeps on going....
https://nypost.com/2019/03/02/gas-guzzling-car-rides-expose-aocs-hypocrisy-amid-green-new-deal-pledge/
Do as I say, not as I do.
She listed 1,049 transactions for Uber, Lyft, Juno and other car services, federal filings show. The campaign had 505 Uber expenses alone.
In all, Ocasio-Cortez spent $29,365.70 on those emissions-spewing vehicles, along with car and van rentals — even though her Queens HQ was a one-minute walk to the 7 train.
Anonymous wrote:Wow. The Trumpsters on here reallllly have AOC on their minds.
What a joke you all are.
Maybe you should start worrying about your band of buffoons - specifically "Gym" Jordan and Mark Meadows. Talk about clowns.
As the saying goes "you don't pull the pigtails of a girl you dislike." You all are afraid of her and wish you had someone like her on your side.
Anonymous wrote:Wow. The Trumpsters on here reallllly have AOC on their minds.
What a joke you all are.
Maybe you should start worrying about your band of buffoons - specifically "Gym" Jordan and Mark Meadows. Talk about clowns.
As the saying goes "you don't pull the pigtails of a girl you dislike." You all are afraid of her and wish you had someone like her on your side.
Anonymous wrote:And her hypocrisy just keeps on going....
https://nypost.com/2019/03/02/gas-guzzling-car-rides-expose-aocs-hypocrisy-amid-green-new-deal-pledge/