Anonymous wrote:So Carlson complains about the "attack" (eye witnesses dispute this characterization) while his Daily Caller website doxxes anyone he considered an enemy.

Pot, meet kettle.

That's the thing with righties; in addition, to a lack of empathy, they're hypocrites.

So Carlson complains about the "attack" (eye witnesses dispute this characterization) while his Daily Caller website doxxes anyone he considered an enemy.

Pot, meet kettle.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tucker was the one talking about Hillary and the pizza party.

He’ll get his just deserts.

Citation of your claim?

Truth is - Tucker Carlson is one of the few shows that will have people with totally opposite views on to debate. This scares the liberals.

Exactly. He's not afraid to tangle with liberals, and it's entertaining to see him do so. Especially when he dismantles their idiotic arguments, piece by piece.

Agreed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:18:55, please stop deflecting. Thanks.

THANK YOU. So much whataboutism - they can start a new thread if they want to discuss gun control.

It's not about gun control, it's about hitting a low point in civilized society. The vandalism to Tucker's house, though bad, doesn't even compare to recent events. Especially in light of Tucker's own criticism of and conspiracy theories about the Parkland students, delivered to an enraptured audience of millions of people.

Wasn’t he a dick to the Pulse nightclub survivors too?

Yes, he was. One of the survivors received a bunch of death threats after Tucker criticized him on his show. Another new low for America.

https://www.thewrap.com/tucker-carlson-slammed-for-attacking-survivor-of-pulse-nightclub-massacre/

Just watched the clip. Nothing they said was wrong. It was not a homophobic Christian who shot up the Pulse nightclub. Blaming it on Mike Pence is absurd. It was, in fact, a radicalized Muslim, many of whom are vehemently anti-gay. Saying so is not dickish. Saying so to someone who was a survivor of the attack should not be off limits.

Does that justify the death threats?

Of course not. The claim though was that Tucker Carlson was a dick to the Pulse survivor.

He was a dick to the Pulse survivor.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:18:55, please stop deflecting. Thanks.

THANK YOU. So much whataboutism - they can start a new thread if they want to discuss gun control.

It's not about gun control, it's about hitting a low point in civilized society. The vandalism to Tucker's house, though bad, doesn't even compare to recent events. Especially in light of Tucker's own criticism of and conspiracy theories about the Parkland students, delivered to an enraptured audience of millions of people.

Wasn’t he a dick to the Pulse nightclub survivors too?

Yes, he was. One of the survivors received a bunch of death threats after Tucker criticized him on his show. Another new low for America.

https://www.thewrap.com/tucker-carlson-slammed-for-attacking-survivor-of-pulse-nightclub-massacre/

Just watched the clip. Nothing they said was wrong. It was not a homophobic Christian who shot up the Pulse nightclub. Blaming it on Mike Pence is absurd. It was, in fact, a radicalized Muslim, many of whom are vehemently anti-gay. Saying so is not dickish. Saying so to someone who was a survivor of the attack should not be off limits.

THANK YOU. Honestly, these people are trying to twist this into Carlson criticizing the survivor for, what - being gay? Having survived an attack? NO. He criticized Brandon Wolf because Wolf claimed that if Mike Pence became president, he would put homosexuals in concentration camps. Who says things like that?? Wolf deserved to be called out on that atrocious remark. That he received death threats only reflects incredibly poorly on liberals who refuse to allow criticism of POC, women, and LGBT people.

To quote some of the really lovely, caring liberals here on DCUM - "play stupid games, win stupid prizes."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tucker was the one talking about Hillary and the pizza party.

He’ll get his just deserts.

Citation of your claim?

Truth is - Tucker Carlson is one of the few shows that will have people with totally opposite views on to debate. This scares the liberals.

Exactly. He's not afraid to tangle with liberals, and it's entertaining to see him do so. Especially when he dismantles their idiotic arguments, piece by piece.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:18:55, please stop deflecting. Thanks.

THANK YOU. So much whataboutism - they can start a new thread if they want to discuss gun control.

It's not about gun control, it's about hitting a low point in civilized society. The vandalism to Tucker's house, though bad, doesn't even compare to recent events. Especially in light of Tucker's own criticism of and conspiracy theories about the Parkland students, delivered to an enraptured audience of millions of people.

Wasn’t he a dick to the Pulse nightclub survivors too?

Yes, he was. One of the survivors received a bunch of death threats after Tucker criticized him on his show. Another new low for America.

https://www.thewrap.com/tucker-carlson-slammed-for-attacking-survivor-of-pulse-nightclub-massacre/

Do you even understand why he was criticizing him? Did you even read the article? Stop spreading complete lies.

“Brandon Wolf told MSNBC viewers that if Mike Pence became president, he would put gay people in concentration camps. That is false, and I said so,” he said. “TheWrap’s headline is dishonest. I didn’t ‘attack a survivor of the Pulse nightclub massacre.’ I fact-checked a talking head on Joy Reid’s show who was lying. That’s still allowed, I think.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:18:55, please stop deflecting. Thanks.

THANK YOU. So much whataboutism - they can start a new thread if they want to discuss gun control.

It's not about gun control, it's about hitting a low point in civilized society. The vandalism to Tucker's house, though bad, doesn't even compare to recent events. Especially in light of Tucker's own criticism of and conspiracy theories about the Parkland students, delivered to an enraptured audience of millions of people.

Wasn’t he a dick to the Pulse nightclub survivors too?

Um, nope. He was not. He rebutted a talking head making idiotic claims about Pence on the - wait for it - Joy Reid show. Good for him for doing so. And nice of you to spread lies.
https://www.thewrap.com/tucker-carlson-slammed-for-attacking-survivor-of-pulse-nightclub-massacre/

Anonymous wrote:Another right circle snuggle thread. I love how you guys always find your safe spaces.

Hey, if people protesting Tucker bugs you, the fact that Christine Blasey Ford is still getting death threats ought to make you apoplectic with rage. https://mobile.twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1060660737176068097

Oh, what’s that? You don’t care. Oh. I wonder why.

There have been no threats to Christine Blasey Ford.

Anonymous wrote:Another right circle snuggle thread. I love how you guys always find your safe spaces.

Hey, if people protesting Tucker bugs you, the fact that Christine Blasey Ford is still getting death threats ought to make you apoplectic with rage. https://mobile.twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1060660737176068097

Oh, what’s that? You don’t care. Oh. I wonder why.

It's kinda funny to watch.

Another right circle snuggle thread. I love how you guys always find your safe spaces.

Hey, if people protesting Tucker bugs you, the fact that Christine Blasey Ford is still getting death threats ought to make you apoplectic with rage. https://mobile.twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1060660737176068097

Oh, what’s that? You don’t care. Oh. I wonder why.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:18:55, please stop deflecting. Thanks.

THANK YOU. So much whataboutism - they can start a new thread if they want to discuss gun control.

It's not about gun control, it's about hitting a low point in civilized society. The vandalism to Tucker's house, though bad, doesn't even compare to recent events. Especially in light of Tucker's own criticism of and conspiracy theories about the Parkland students, delivered to an enraptured audience of millions of people.

Wasn’t he a dick to the Pulse nightclub survivors too?

Yes, he was. One of the survivors received a bunch of death threats after Tucker criticized him on his show. Another new low for America.

https://www.thewrap.com/tucker-carlson-slammed-for-attacking-survivor-of-pulse-nightclub-massacre/

Just watched the clip. Nothing they said was wrong. It was not a homophobic Christian who shot up the Pulse nightclub. Blaming it on Mike Pence is absurd. It was, in fact, a radicalized Muslim, many of whom are vehemently anti-gay. Saying so is not dickish. Saying so to someone who was a survivor of the attack should not be off limits.

Does that justify the death threats?

Of course not. The claim though was that Tucker Carlson was a dick to the Pulse survivor.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:18:55, please stop deflecting. Thanks.

THANK YOU. So much whataboutism - they can start a new thread if they want to discuss gun control.

It's not about gun control, it's about hitting a low point in civilized society. The vandalism to Tucker's house, though bad, doesn't even compare to recent events. Especially in light of Tucker's own criticism of and conspiracy theories about the Parkland students, delivered to an enraptured audience of millions of people.

Wasn’t he a dick to the Pulse nightclub survivors too?

Yes, he was. One of the survivors received a bunch of death threats after Tucker criticized him on his show. Another new low for America.

https://www.thewrap.com/tucker-carlson-slammed-for-attacking-survivor-of-pulse-nightclub-massacre/

Just watched the clip. Nothing they said was wrong. It was not a homophobic Christian who shot up the Pulse nightclub. Blaming it on Mike Pence is absurd. It was, in fact, a radicalized Muslim, many of whom are vehemently anti-gay. Saying so is not dickish. Saying so to someone who was a survivor of the attack should not be off limits.

Does that justify the death threats?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:18:55, please stop deflecting. Thanks.

THANK YOU. So much whataboutism - they can start a new thread if they want to discuss gun control.

It's not about gun control, it's about hitting a low point in civilized society. The vandalism to Tucker's house, though bad, doesn't even compare to recent events. Especially in light of Tucker's own criticism of and conspiracy theories about the Parkland students, delivered to an enraptured audience of millions of people.

Wasn’t he a dick to the Pulse nightclub survivors too?

Yes, he was. One of the survivors received a bunch of death threats after Tucker criticized him on his show. Another new low for America.

https://www.thewrap.com/tucker-carlson-slammed-for-attacking-survivor-of-pulse-nightclub-massacre/

Just watched the clip. Nothing they said was wrong. It was not a homophobic Christian who shot up the Pulse nightclub. Blaming it on Mike Pence is absurd. It was, in fact, a radicalized Muslim, many of whom are vehemently anti-gay. Saying so is not dickish. Saying so to someone who was a survivor of the attack should not be off limits.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tucker was the one talking about Hillary and the pizza party.

He’ll get his just deserts.

Citation of your claim?

Truth is - Tucker Carlson is one of the few shows that will have people with totally opposite views on to debate. This scares the liberals.

Exactly. And no citation, of course.

Because, there is none. Liberals love to throw out claims with no evidence because other liberals will believe the crap.
That is how Obama operated - if he said it enough - it became “fact.” “If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.” Sure.